Re: [Election Results] Official and Final
On Sat, Apr 01, 2000 at 10:14:47AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 02:43:19PM -0800, Seth R Arnold wrote: The ballots came from: 216 people, if I counted right (wc(1) :). So much for the `300 active developers' vaporware, even if you include dissidents et al... Wouldn't this be more properly FUD? :) What? it doesn't matter. the secret debian cabal forced everyone at gunpoint to vote the right way, and then (through skilled use of drugs, hypnosis and alien mind-control devices) made us all forget the torture session. craig ps: there is no cabal. -- craig sanders
Re: [Election Results] Official and Final
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 02:43:19PM -0800, Seth R Arnold wrote: The ballots came from: 216 people, if I counted right (wc(1) :). So much for the `300 active developers' vaporware, even if you include dissidents et al... Wouldn't this be more properly FUD? :) What? -- Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification
Re: [Election Results] Official and Final
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 11:40:43PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: Okay, 62.43% isn't so bad, but it doesn't really take that much effort to vote in Debian, IMHO. You've just got to decide how to vote first. -- Mark Brown mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Trying to avoid grumpiness) http://www.tardis.ed.ac.uk/~broonie/ EUFShttp://www.eusa.ed.ac.uk/societies/filmsoc/ pgpMMgvpN27h5.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Election Results] Official and Final
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 07:08:07PM -, Darren Benham wrote: The ballots came from: 216 people, if I counted right (wc(1) :). So much for the `300 active developers' vaporware, even if you include dissidents et al... N: Marco D N: Rapha N: Stig Mathis These names are incorrect (perhaps others, maybe I haven't noticed), it seems your program doesn't like `'' or 8-bit characters, please fix it for the next vote. -- Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification
Re: [Election Results] Official and Final
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 07:08:07PM -, Darren Benham wrote: The ballots came from: 216 people, if I counted right (wc(1) :). So much for the `300 active developers' vaporware, even if you include dissidents et al... If that was a valid argument, the Netherlands would have a population of ~3 million instead of 16. Mike. -- Windows never had any potential for soundness or beauty. If you decide to build a motorcycle, and you start with a bathtub, no good will ever come of it. -- Anonymous Coward
Re: [Election Results] Official and Final
On Fri, 31 Mar 2000, Josip Rodin wrote: 216 people, if I counted right (wc(1) :). So much for the `300 active developers' vaporware, even if you include dissidents et al... It think it just clearly shows typical lack of election interest. FYI, Echelon has confirmed a total of 346 developers by PGP verification. Jason
Re: [Election Results] Official and Final
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 02:06:19PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: 216 people, if I counted right (wc(1) :). So much for the `300 active developers' vaporware, even if you include dissidents et al... It think it just clearly shows typical lack of election interest. FYI, Echelon has confirmed a total of 346 developers by PGP verification. Okay, 62.43% isn't so bad, but it doesn't really take that much effort to vote in Debian, IMHO. -- Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification
Re: [Election Results] Official and Final
* Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000331 12:23]: On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 07:08:07PM -, Darren Benham wrote: The ballots came from: 216 people, if I counted right (wc(1) :). So much for the `300 active developers' vaporware, even if you include dissidents et al... Wouldn't this be more properly FUD? :) -- Seth Arnold | http://www.willamette.edu/~sarnold/ Hate spam? See http://maps.vix.com/rbl/ for help
