Re: Anthony Towns: What I did today
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 08:34:20PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: Hi Anthony, On Saturday, 14 Jan 2006, you wrote: On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 04:22:50PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: On Friday, 13 Jan 2006, you wrote: Things I did today: 2. Removed the empty SuperH architecture from the archive (binary-sh). Coincidence? You decide. URL: http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/blog/2006/01/13#2006-01-13-sh-irts Nice you have done this, but Planet is definitely not the correct place to document changes like this. I would find it more appropriate to inform fellow DDs either via debian-devel@ or [EMAIL PROTECTED] Not all developers read planet.debian.org. I think you'll find the correct place is the -sh list, which was notified: http://lists.debian.org/debian-superh/2002/04/msg00010.html The sh arch in unstable has consisted of Architecture: all packages only since then. Even so you informed the porters it would have been nice to just drop a mail on -devel? Where is the problem in writing a mail to -devel? Going this way everybody would be informed and noone can complain afterwards. I don't see what your problems is, really. the SuperH Packages.gz inside Debian has been useless since many years. The real-life impact of the change Anthony did is zero. Well, not zero -- it removes some megs from every mirror that don't do any good anyway. If you remove cruft from one of your packages, do you start notifying developers on d-d-a? This is exactly the same thing. -- .../ -/ ---/ .--./ / .--/ .-/ .../ -/ ../ -./ --./ / -.--/ ---/ ..-/ .-./ / -/ ../ --/ ./ / .--/ ../ -/ / / -../ ./ -.-./ ---/ -../ ../ -./ --./ / --/ -.--/ / .../ ../ --./ -./ .-/ -/ ..-/ .-./ ./ .-.-.-/ / --/ ---/ .-./ .../ ./ / ../ .../ / ---/ ..-/ -/ -../ .-/ -/ ./ -../ / -/ ./ -.-./ / -./ ---/ .-../ ---/ --./ -.--/ / .-/ -./ -.--/ .--/ .-/ -.--/ .-.-.-/ / ...-.-/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Anthony Towns: What I did today
* Wouter Verhelst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060115 10:00]: If you remove cruft from one of your packages, do you start notifying developers on d-d-a? In case of the developers reference, I did. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Anthony Towns: What I did today
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 10:20:33AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: * Wouter Verhelst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060115 10:00]: If you remove cruft from one of your packages, do you start notifying developers on d-d-a? In case of the developers reference, I did. That's a bit of a special case, no? -- .../ -/ ---/ .--./ / .--/ .-/ .../ -/ ../ -./ --./ / -.--/ ---/ ..-/ .-./ / -/ ../ --/ ./ / .--/ ../ -/ / / -../ ./ -.-./ ---/ -../ ../ -./ --./ / --/ -.--/ / .../ ../ --./ -./ .-/ -/ ..-/ .-./ ./ .-.-.-/ / --/ ---/ .-./ .../ ./ / ../ .../ / ---/ ..-/ -/ -../ .-/ -/ ./ -../ / -/ ./ -.-./ / -./ ---/ .-../ ---/ --./ -.--/ / .-/ -./ -.--/ .--/ .-/ -.--/ .-.-.-/ / ...-.-/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Anthony Towns: What I did today
Hi, I think you'll find the correct place is the -sh list, which was notified: http://lists.debian.org/debian-superh/2002/04/msg00010.html The sh arch in unstable has consisted of Architecture: all packages only since then. Even so you informed the porters it would have been nice to just drop a mail on -devel? Where is the problem in writing a mail to -devel? Going this way everybody would be informed and noone can complain afterwards. binary-sh found on ftp-master was just a cruft; superh is really waiting to be merged from outside of Debian. We have several out-of-debian trees for Debian superH. regards, junichi -- [EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.gr.jp} Debian Project -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Anthony Towns: What I did today
Hi AJ, On Friday, 13 Jan 2006, you wrote: Things I did today: 2. Removed the empty SuperH architecture from the archive (binary-sh). Coincidence? You decide. URL: http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/blog/2006/01/13#2006-01-13-sh-irts Nice you have done this, but Planet is definitely not the correct place to document changes like this. I would find it more appropriate to inform fellow DDs either via debian-devel@ or [EMAIL PROTECTED] Not all developers read planet.debian.org. To get that clear, i don't want to criticize you removed unneeded SuperH architecture from the archive, but where you document changes like this. Greetings Martin PS: CC'ed -devel to get fellow developers informed about your changes. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Anthony Towns: What I did today
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 04:22:50PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: On Friday, 13 Jan 2006, you wrote: Things I did today: 2. Removed the empty SuperH architecture from the archive (binary-sh). Coincidence? You decide. URL: http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/blog/2006/01/13#2006-01-13-sh-irts Nice you have done this, but Planet is definitely not the correct place to document changes like this. I would find it more appropriate to inform fellow DDs either via debian-devel@ or [EMAIL PROTECTED] Not all developers read planet.debian.org. I think you'll find the correct place is the -sh list, which was notified: http://lists.debian.org/debian-superh/2002/04/msg00010.html The sh arch in unstable has consisted of Architecture: all packages only since then. HTH, HAND. Cheers, aj signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Anthony Towns: What I did today
Hi Anthony, On Saturday, 14 Jan 2006, you wrote: On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 04:22:50PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: On Friday, 13 Jan 2006, you wrote: Things I did today: 2. Removed the empty SuperH architecture from the archive (binary-sh). Coincidence? You decide. URL: http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/blog/2006/01/13#2006-01-13-sh-irts Nice you have done this, but Planet is definitely not the correct place to document changes like this. I would find it more appropriate to inform fellow DDs either via debian-devel@ or [EMAIL PROTECTED] Not all developers read planet.debian.org. I think you'll find the correct place is the -sh list, which was notified: http://lists.debian.org/debian-superh/2002/04/msg00010.html The sh arch in unstable has consisted of Architecture: all packages only since then. Even so you informed the porters it would have been nice to just drop a mail on -devel? Where is the problem in writing a mail to -devel? Going this way everybody would be informed and noone can complain afterwards. Greetings Martin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Anthony Towns: What I did today
* Martin Zobel-Helas [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-01-13 20:34:20]: ...and no one can complain afterwards. you underestimate your fellow nagg^Wdevelopers. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Anthony Towns: What I did today
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, Andreas Schuldei wrote: * Martin Zobel-Helas [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-01-13 20:34:20]: ...and no one can complain afterwards. you underestimate your fellow nagg^Wdevelopers. Well, there are always people who complain. But posting development related mails to debian-devel is the intended purpose of this list and there is less reason to complain then it is if people do not at least mark their postings [OT] when they are chatting about other distributions on debian-devel. So, if you ask me it would be better if messages like the one Anthony blogged would be here in the first place and the blog would say: I just posted this or that to debian-devel ... :) Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
