Re: Bug#172419: (no subject)

2002-12-10 Thread Stefan Schimanski 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday 10 December 2002 06:09, Colin Walters wrote:
 On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 16:08, Stefan Schimanski wrote:
  Package: wnpp
  Version: unavailable; reported 2002-12-09
  Severity: wishlist
 
  * Package name: geramik
Description : A GTK theme which imitates the KDE 3.1 look

 This package should follow the naming scheme for GTK+ 2 theme
 engines; specifically, it should be called gtk2-engines-geramik.

Sure, but geramik is the source package name. There will be a 
gtk-engines-geramik, gtk2-engines-geramik and geramik-data.

Greetings
  Schimmi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE99YzaHUDhE+YrLEURAtsAAJ4p5bzBc2QXHpSp+GHwLekKkxYgugCfT8Jd
hOVVtnzpzZugaWNMbJFp5YI=
=N1t0
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: Bug#172419: (no subject)

2002-12-10 Thread Colin Walters 
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 01:42, Stefan Schimanski wrote:

 Sure, but geramik is the source package name. There will be a 
 gtk-engines-geramik, gtk2-engines-geramik and geramik-data.

Ok, good.  Hm, I wonder if we should extend the format of the ITP to
have something like:

Source: geramik
Binaries: gtk-engines-geramik, gtk2-engines-geramik, geramik-data

Right now there is some ambiguity...I guess it doesn't usually matter a
whole lot though.

Re: Bug#172419: (no subject)

2002-12-09 Thread Colin Walters 
On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 16:08, Stefan Schimanski wrote:
 Package: wnpp
 Version: unavailable; reported 2002-12-09
 Severity: wishlist
 
 * Package name: geramik
   Description : A GTK theme which imitates the KDE 3.1 look

This package should follow the naming scheme for GTK+ 2 theme engines;
specifically, it should be called gtk2-engines-geramik.  

Thanks.