On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 06:33:51PM -0700, Mike Markley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 11:46:18PM +0200, Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Both dkim-milter and libdkim builds libdkim-dev, and libdkim0 and libdkim2 > > conflict too, even though the names aren't completely identical. As I > > explained when dkim-milter was first packaged, I'm not completely foreign > > to > > dropping Alt-N's libdkim altogether, but the issue should be properly > > discussed first. > > Somehow I'd had a brainlapse and forgotten about this issue before > uploading the new packages; entirely my fault. > > If you still see value in the AltN library, I'm happy to rename my > packages (probably to something like libdkim-sendmail or libsmdkim or > the like). We'll still need to decide about library names, but I don't > see that you need to drop your packages unless they're completely > unnecessary.
I haven't heard anything back, so I'll assume that you continue to plan to maintain the existing libdkim. My current plan is to do the rename as described above; input from debian-devel is welcomed (but I'm not subscribed, so please Cc: me). -- Mike Markley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> There can be no twisted thought without a twisted molecule. - R. W. Gerard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]