Re: Bug#787739: ITP: plip -- fully automated protein-ligand interaction profiler
On 06/05/2015 03:04 PM, Geert Stappers wrote: On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 02:08:37PM +0200, Simon Richter wrote: On 05.06.2015 11:25, Alex Mestiashvili wrote: This might be confusing to old people. PLIP is a protocol for transporting IP packets over the parallel port. I agree that the name is a bit ambiguous, but I see a couple of reasons why it is still might be ok: Yes, I also think it is probably okay -- I just wanted to mention that it might be confusing at first. In other words: 'plip' is a good name for the protein-ligand interaction profiler Groeten Geert Stappers Thank you for the answers, I'll go with the name plip mostly due to the potential problems with the repository renaming. Best regards, Alex -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/55754adb.6000...@biotec.tu-dresden.de
Re: Bug#787739: ITP: plip -- fully automated protein-ligand interaction profiler
On 06/04/2015 11:35 PM, Simon Richter wrote: Hi, On 04.06.2015 17:21, Alexandre Mestiashvili wrote: * Package name: plip This might be confusing to old people. PLIP is a protocol for transporting IP packets over the parallel port. Simon Hi Simon, I agree that the name is a bit ambiguous, but I see a couple of reasons why it is still might be ok: - aptitude search plip shows only hplip, which has nothing to do with parallel port as well. - plipconfig is provided by net-tools package, and I think it is not likely that somebody will create a package for parallel port ip protocol software only. - it is not a python library to call it python-plip. - any 4 letter name is ambiguous and currently there are ~ 790 such packages. And honestly, being old doesn't mean using old technologies :) After the discussion with the upstream, I think I can rename it to pliprofiler The problem is that I've already created the repository: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-med/plip.git Which should be renamed in this case. What is the correct way to do it ? Thank you, Alex -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/55716b27.3060...@biotec.tu-dresden.de
Re: Bug#787739: ITP: plip -- fully automated protein-ligand interaction profiler
Hi Alex, On 05.06.2015 11:25, Alex Mestiashvili wrote: This might be confusing to old people. PLIP is a protocol for transporting IP packets over the parallel port. I agree that the name is a bit ambiguous, but I see a couple of reasons why it is still might be ok: Yes, I also think it is probably okay -- I just wanted to mention that it might be confusing at first. Simon signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Bug#787739: ITP: plip -- fully automated protein-ligand interaction profiler
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 02:08:37PM +0200, Simon Richter wrote: On 05.06.2015 11:25, Alex Mestiashvili wrote: This might be confusing to old people. PLIP is a protocol for transporting IP packets over the parallel port. I agree that the name is a bit ambiguous, but I see a couple of reasons why it is still might be ok: Yes, I also think it is probably okay -- I just wanted to mention that it might be confusing at first. In other words: 'plip' is a good name for the protein-ligand interaction profiler Groeten Geert Stappers -- Leven en laten leven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150605130439.gs23...@gpm.stappers.nl
Re: Bug#787739: ITP: plip -- fully automated protein-ligand interaction profiler
Hi, On 04.06.2015 17:21, Alexandre Mestiashvili wrote: * Package name: plip This might be confusing to old people. PLIP is a protocol for transporting IP packets over the parallel port. Simon signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
