Re: Choice of gcc versions for kernel modules
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 06:44:47PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: I'm not sure what to do with bug #374367 against OpenAFS, so I'm asking for advice. The short version (slightly longer version in the bug log) is that the archive has switched from gcc 4.0 to gcc 4.1, but the AMD64 kernel (at least -- I haven't checked other architectures) was built with gcc 4.0. However, CC in the linux-headers packages is set to just gcc and therefore uses the system default. Any reason why you don't ask the maintainer of the kernels? The problem will be fixed with the next upload. Bastian -- Death, when unnecessary, is a tragic thing. -- Flint, Requiem for Methuselah, stardate 5843.7 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Choice of gcc versions for kernel modules
Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 06:44:47PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: I'm not sure what to do with bug #374367 against OpenAFS, so I'm asking for advice. The short version (slightly longer version in the bug log) is that the archive has switched from gcc 4.0 to gcc 4.1, but the AMD64 kernel (at least -- I haven't checked other architectures) was built with gcc 4.0. However, CC in the linux-headers packages is set to just gcc and therefore uses the system default. Any reason why you don't ask the maintainer of the kernels? Mostly because I didn't know if it was a stupid question. :) Next time I should just mail debian-kernel? The problem will be fixed with the next upload. Excellent, thank you. Is there an existing bug with which I should merge the OpenAFS bug? -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
