Re: Debian 2.1r3

1999-09-28 Thread Martin Schulze 
Chris Rutter wrote:
 The current `sub-release' (whatever) of Debian 2.1 is r3, right?
 I was just wondering, as all references on the web site are to r2,
 but I thought I received a message from the security team about
 r3 last week somtime.  Just wanted to check before I filed a
 boring bug report, or something. /pedant

Debian GNU/Linux 2.1r3 is the current official release that should
be present on all ftp mirrors of Debian.  There are CD images as
well.  Last I checked an announcement to debian-announce was missing,
though.

It was released by the Security Team, FTP Maintainers and Stable
Release Officer.

Thus if there are problems with references on the web pages, please
talk to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Regards,

Joey

-- 
The only stupid question is the unasked one.

Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.

Re: Debian 2.1r3

1999-09-17 Thread Josip Rodin 
On Fri, Sep 17, 1999 at 03:44:36PM +0100, Chris Rutter wrote:
 The current `sub-release' (whatever) of Debian 2.1 is r3, right?
 I was just wondering, as all references on the web site are to r2,
 but I thought I received a message from the security team about
 r3 last week somtime.  Just wanted to check before I filed a
 boring bug report, or something. /pedant

Nope, r2 is still official, apparently there have been some problems with
syncing packages on some architectures.

-- 
enJoy -*/\*- don't even try to pronounce my first name

Re: Debian 2.1r3

1999-09-17 Thread David Bristel 
That's strange, since r3 can be found on a number of mirrors.

Dave Bristel


On Fri, 17 Sep 1999, Josip Rodin wrote:

 Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 16:51:03 +0200
 From: Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Chris Rutter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: Debian developers list debian-devel@lists.debian.org
 Subject: Re: Debian 2.1r3
 Resent-Date: 17 Sep 1999 14:55:08 -
 Resent-From: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
 Resent-cc: recipient list not shown: ;
 
 On Fri, Sep 17, 1999 at 03:44:36PM +0100, Chris Rutter wrote:
  The current `sub-release' (whatever) of Debian 2.1 is r3, right?
  I was just wondering, as all references on the web site are to r2,
  but I thought I received a message from the security team about
  r3 last week somtime.  Just wanted to check before I filed a
  boring bug report, or something. /pedant
 
 Nope, r2 is still official, apparently there have been some problems with
 syncing packages on some architectures.
 
 -- 
 enJoy -*/\*- don't even try to pronounce my first name
 
 
 -- 
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Debian 2.1r3

1999-09-17 Thread Josip Rodin 
On Fri, Sep 17, 1999 at 07:53:06AM -0700, David Bristel wrote:
   The current `sub-release' (whatever) of Debian 2.1 is r3, right?
   I was just wondering, as all references on the web site are to r2,
   but I thought I received a message from the security team about
   r3 last week somtime.  Just wanted to check before I filed a
   boring bug report, or something. /pedant
  
  Nope, r2 is still official, apparently there have been some problems with
  syncing packages on some architectures.
 
 That's strange, since r3 can be found on a number of mirrors.

Depends on what you think 2.1r3 really is. When an announcement on
debian-announce gets sent, then it should be official.

-- 
enJoy -*/\*- don't even try to pronounce my first name