Re: Debian is not a main distro?

1998-10-03 Thread James Troup
Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 On Thu, Oct 01, 1998 at 05:36:37PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
  Assuming, of course, that Debian will accept them as a developer.
 
 Are people with legitimate packaging interests being rejected?

That's a ridiculously simplistic question that I won't answer (hint:
there's a bit more to being a suitable person for Debian than having
``legitimate packaging interests''), but I will say, Steve Lamb's
implication is grossly unfair, as the number of rejections we've had
to do so far can be counted on the fingers of a very mutilated hand.

-- 
James



Re: Debian is not a main distro?

1998-10-03 Thread Steve Lamb
On 03 Oct 1998 00:41:50 +0100, James Troup wrote:

Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 On Thu, Oct 01, 1998 at 05:36:37PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
  Assuming, of course, that Debian will accept them as a developer.

 Are people with legitimate packaging interests being rejected?

That's a ridiculously simplistic question that I won't answer (hint:
there's a bit more to being a suitable person for Debian than having
``legitimate packaging interests''), but I will say, Steve Lamb's
implication is grossly unfair, as the number of rejections we've had
to do so far can be counted on the fingers of a very mutilated hand.

No, it is not grossly unfair.  I did not cite numbers any more than I did
not.  It was left up to the individual who read it to decide for themselves
what those numbers were.  I can, however, prove that one person has been told
that they would not be accepted if they applied.  That person is me.

So my statement is accurate and not a gross misrepresentation because,
as stated, no numbers were given...  Malformed hand or not.  :P

-- 
 Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
 ICQ: 5107343  | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
---+-