Re: Freeze in 7 days??? (was Re: perl version depends)

1998-10-09 Thread Gergely Madarasz
On Thu, 8 Oct 1998, Santiago Vila wrote:

 2) Are we really going to freeze slink in 7 days?

I dont think we should freeze until we have a broken libc in slink...

--
Madarasz Gergely   [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  It's practically impossible to look at a penguin and feel angry.
  Egy pingvinre gyakorlatilag lehetetlen haragosan nezni.
HuLUG: http://mlf.linux.rulez.org/



Re: Freeze in 7 days??? (was Re: perl version depends)

1998-10-09 Thread Gergely Madarasz
On Fri, 9 Oct 1998, Gergely Madarasz wrote:

 On Thu, 8 Oct 1998, Santiago Vila wrote:
 
  2) Are we really going to freeze slink in 7 days?
 
 I dont think we should freeze until we have a broken libc in slink...
^
Hmpf... I meant while :)

--
Madarasz Gergely   [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  It's practically impossible to look at a penguin and feel angry.
  Egy pingvinre gyakorlatilag lehetetlen haragosan nezni.
HuLUG: http://mlf.linux.rulez.org/



Re: Freeze in 7 days??? (was Re: perl version depends)

1998-10-08 Thread J.H.M.Dassen
On Thu, Oct 08, 1998 at 05:53:19PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
 1) Don't we have to recompile all our ncurses-based apps against 4.2?

If we want all the ncurses-based apps to use the same version of ncurses,
yes. I'm not sure if we have to, though if I were the release manager, I
wouldn't release 2.1 before all ncurses-based apps used the same version.

 2) Are we really going to freeze slink in 7 days?

Yes.

 I see that 1) and 2) don't mix very well.

That depends on what type of changes the release manager will accept into
frozen. Brian, could you please state what your plans in this regard are?

Ray
-- 
POPULATION EXPLOSION  Unique in human experience, an event which happened 
yesterday but which everyone swears won't happen until tomorrow.  
- The Hipcrime Vocab by Chad C. Mulligan 



Re: Freeze in 7 days??? (was Re: perl version depends)

1998-10-08 Thread Santiago Vila
On Thu, 8 Oct 1998, Brian White wrote:

 The general guideline for frozen is:
 
   no new code
 
 A recompile with a new package is fine.  Fixes to make something work with
 a change in another package is also fine.

Does this mean also no new documentation?

For slink, I plan to provide the texi2html-converted HTML for all my GNU
packages, which means a new package foo-doc for every GNU foo package.
Do I absolutely have to do this before the freeze? Will all my foo-doc
packages be rejected because no new packages?

-- 
 35068fe90da2260a88a96e33ee9316af (a truly random sig)



Re: Freeze in 7 days??? (was Re: perl version depends)

1998-10-08 Thread Brian White
 Does this mean also no new documentation?

No.


 For slink, I plan to provide the texi2html-converted HTML for all my GNU
 packages, which means a new package foo-doc for every GNU foo package.
 Do I absolutely have to do this before the freeze? Will all my foo-doc
 packages be rejected because no new packages?

There should be no problem with that.

  Brian
 ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )

---
 Generated by Signify v1.04.  For this and more, visit http://www.verisim.com/



Re: Freeze in 7 days??? (was Re: perl version depends)

1998-10-08 Thread Michael Meskes
On Thu, Oct 08, 1998 at 05:53:39PM +0200, J.H.M.Dassen wrote:
  2) Are we really going to freeze slink in 7 days?
 
 Yes.

Oops, I better hurry with my pending iceconf upload. :-)

Michael
-- 
Dr. Michael Meskes  | Th.-Heuss-Str. 61, D-41812 Erkelenz | Go SF49ers!
Senior-Consultant   | business: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Go Rhein Fire!
Mummert+Partner |  private: [EMAIL PROTECTED]| Use Debian
Unternehmensberatung AG |   [EMAIL PROTECTED]| GNU/Linux!