Re: Gtk1.2/Imlib/gnome-lib packages (Long)
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 3:20 AM, Barry deFreese wrote: > OK, I have created a new page at: > http://wiki.debian.org/Gtk1.2ImlibGnome1Removals and linked it to the > OngoingTransitions page. Would it be a good idea to file bugs against all packages depending on the gnome1/gtk1/imlib1 stack? With user debian...@l.d.o (or debian-rele...@l.d.o) and usertag gtk1-removal. This would be a good way to get an overview of the current status of the removal I think. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Gtk1.2/Imlib/gnome-lib packages (Long)
Daniel Leidert wrote: It does *not* build-depend on gnome-bin and I already told you this (you simply did not answer). Where do you see this build-dependency? Regards, Daniel Daniel, Sorry about that, I keep going through so many of these, I keep mixing up build-deps/deps in my syntax. But I did have "Just a suggests, can probably be removed." in there. Thanks, Barry deFreese -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Gtk1.2/Imlib/gnome-lib packages (Long)
On Friday 19 December 2008 21:07:09 Daniel Leidert wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 17.12.2008, 12:03 -0500 schrieb Barry deFreese: > > Hi folks, > > > > Just in case anyone cares/is interested, here is some work I have been > > doing on packages using Gtk1.2, Imlib, gnome-libs, or any combination > > thereof. > > > > > > Obviously some packages fall within more than one rdepend/rbdepend. > > gnome-libs: > > > > bluefish > > Actually built with gtk2 but still build-deps on gnome-bin?? (pinged > > maintainer). Just a suggests, can probably be removed. > > It does *not* build-depend on gnome-bin and I already told you this (you > simply did not answer). Where do you see this build-dependency? Ok, genuine mistakes happen, gnome-bin is found in Suggests, hence could be easily removed from there => no harm done ;-) I think he did a pretty good job compiling such a list, and I wonder if Alternatives: field would also be helpful for hopeless packages or it would just clutter the data ? -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Gtk1.2/Imlib/gnome-lib packages (Long)
Daniel Leidert (19/12/2008): > > bluefish > > Actually built with gtk2 but still build-deps on gnome-bin?? (pinged > > maintainer). Just a suggests, can probably be removed. > > It does *not* build-depend on gnome-bin and I already told you this > (you simply did not answer). Where do you see this build-dependency? He probably meant “depends”. Which would be consistent with the “just a suggests:” bits. And for those following at home: | cy...@talisker:~$ apt-cache show bluefish|grep bin | Suggests: galeon | iceape | iceweasel | www-browser, gnome-bin, weblint-perl | weblint, libxml2-utils, php5-cli, tidy Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Gtk1.2/Imlib/gnome-lib packages (Long)
Am Mittwoch, den 17.12.2008, 12:03 -0500 schrieb Barry deFreese: > Hi folks, > > Just in case anyone cares/is interested, here is some work I have been > doing on packages using Gtk1.2, Imlib, gnome-libs, or any combination > thereof. > > > Obviously some packages fall within more than one rdepend/rbdepend. > gnome-libs: > > bluefish > Actually built with gtk2 but still build-deps on gnome-bin?? (pinged > maintainer). Just a suggests, can probably be removed. It does *not* build-depend on gnome-bin and I already told you this (you simply did not answer). Where do you see this build-dependency? Regards, Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Gtk1.2/Imlib/gnome-lib packages (Long)
Paul Wise wrote: On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Barry deFreese wrote: Shoot, I didn't add that, Moritz did. Ah, woops. Which one should we actually use? OngoingTransitions IMO (perhaps it could be renamed too). BTW, found this page too: http://wiki.debian.org/GTK%2B_1.2_leftovers OK, I have created a new page at: http://wiki.debian.org/Gtk1.2ImlibGnome1Removals and linked it to the OngoingTransitions page. Please feel free to update/fix, etc (especially the layout, I'm not happy with). Thanks! Barry deFreese -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Gtk1.2/Imlib/gnome-lib packages (Long)
Paul Wise wrote: On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Barry deFreese wrote: Shoot, I didn't add that, Moritz did. Ah, woops. Which one should we actually use? OngoingTransitions IMO (perhaps it could be renamed too). BTW, found this page too: http://wiki.debian.org/GTK%2B_1.2_leftover Yeah, I just found that too thanks. It's a bit cluttered though. Barry -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Gtk1.2/Imlib/gnome-lib packages (Long)
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Barry deFreese wrote: > Shoot, I didn't add that, Moritz did. Ah, woops. > Which one should we actually use? OngoingTransitions IMO (perhaps it could be renamed too). BTW, found this page too: http://wiki.debian.org/GTK%2B_1.2_leftovers -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Gtk1.2/Imlib/gnome-lib packages (Long)
Paul Wise wrote: On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 5:40 AM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Actually, it would be nice if we had a decicated cleanups/transitions overview page on wiki.debian.org as a central starting point for people who want to help out. This is the old one: http://wiki.debian.org/OngoingTransitions This is the one that Barry added: http://wiki.debian.org/Transitions Shoot, I didn't add that, Moritz did. I didn't see the other one when I was poking around wiki.d.o today though. Which one should we actually use? Sorry, Barry -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Gtk1.2/Imlib/gnome-lib packages (Long)
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 5:40 AM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Actually, it would be nice if we had a decicated cleanups/transitions > overview page on wiki.debian.org as a central starting point for > people who want to help out. This is the old one: http://wiki.debian.org/OngoingTransitions This is the one that Barry added: http://wiki.debian.org/Transitions -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Gtk1.2/Imlib/gnome-lib packages (Long)
Barry deFreese wrote: > Just in case anyone cares/is interested, here is some work I have been > doing on packages using Gtk1.2, Imlib, gnome-libs, or any combination > thereof. Thanks. Could you fold this into a page on wiki.debian.org, so that people can add their specific solution attempts or actions? Such a useful list will likely be lost in the noise in some weeks and through a wiki it can be updated more easily. Actually, it would be nice if we had a decicated cleanups/transitions overview page on wiki.debian.org as a central starting point for people who want to help out. Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Gtk1.2/Imlib/gnome-lib packages (Long)
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 2:03 AM, Barry deFreese wrote: > Just in case anyone cares/is interested, here is some work I have been doing > on packages using Gtk1.2, Imlib, gnome-libs, or any combination thereof. The playdv binary from libdv-bin can be dropped until it is ported to GTK+ 2, bug filed upstream: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1925173&group_id=4393&atid=354393 PS: cult?? -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Gtk1.2/Imlib/gnome-lib packages (Long)
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Barry deFreese wrote: sqlrelay Some of the binaries have decent popcons. We could probably either port sqlrelay-config-gtk or just remove that binary for now. I'd also strongly vote for only droping this specific binary in case this would be a Gtk 1.2 removal blocker but keeping sqlrelay in any case. It works perfectly without the config-gtk thingy . Thanks for your investigation and patches Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org