Re: LibreOffice architecture support (was: Fwd: Plan to remove dead C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*))
Hi, Am 11.01.23 um 15:20 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz: Hi Helge! On 1/11/23 15:03, Helge Deller wrote: Yes, sadly we don't have a working java right now on hppa, and it will probably take some more time to get one. At least I won't have time for it during the next few months. But it would be sad to loose those bindings... There are some efforts to bring back gcj if that helps: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-January/609530.html https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=7fe8c0b852fa421fe52de99a7f59e45027139eed That would need to be reinstated if that ever becomes a thing. Regards, Rene
Re: LibreOffice architecture support (was: Fwd: Plan to remove dead C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*))
Hi Helge! On 1/11/23 15:03, Helge Deller wrote: Yes, sadly we don't have a working java right now on hppa, and it will probably take some more time to get one. At least I won't have time for it during the next few months. But it would be sad to loose those bindings... There are some efforts to bring back gcj if that helps: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-January/609530.html The reason for being BD-Uninstallable is the lack of cruft in Debian Ports: https://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2017/12/msg00060.html as a result of some packages FTBFS. That is for sparc and m68k? (Where both the needed KDE packages are uninstallable) Adrian, as there seems to be various arches (and reasons) will you speak upstream? Yes, I have already replied upstream. I will follow up there tonight. One of the biggest problems for Debian Ports remains the lack of cruft as explained in my post to the debian-sparc mailing list above. This causes these long BD-Uninstallable queues. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer `. `' Physicist `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Re: LibreOffice architecture support (was: Fwd: Plan to remove dead C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*))
On 1/10/23 19:54, Rene Engelhard wrote: Hi, Am 10.01.23 um 19:44 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz: On 1/10/23 19:25, Rene Engelhard wrote: (which are for many BD-Uninstallable since ages because it does not have Java (anymore), didn't do a long-ago transition, ...) They all have Java support except for hppa, see: I was indeed aiming at hppa here. Misses libnumbertext and that one has a Java component and thus we get libnumbertext build-depends on: - default-jdk:hppa default-jdk depends on: - default-jre:hppa (= 2:1.5-72) default-jre depends on: - default-jre-headless:hppa (= 2:1.5-72) default-jre-headless depends on missing: - openjdk-5-jre-headless:hppa Yes, sadly we don't have a working java right now on hppa, and it will probably take some more time to get one. At least I won't have time for it during the next few months. But it would be sad to loose those bindings... The reason for being BD-Uninstallable is the lack of cruft in Debian Ports: https://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2017/12/msg00060.html as a result of some packages FTBFS. That is for sparc and m68k? (Where both the needed KDE packages are uninstallable) Adrian, as there seems to be various arches (and reasons) will you speak upstream? Helge
Re: LibreOffice architecture support (was: Fwd: Plan to remove dead C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*))
Hi, Am 10.01.23 um 19:44 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz: On 1/10/23 19:25, Rene Engelhard wrote: (which are for many BD-Uninstallable since ages because it does not have Java (anymore), didn't do a long-ago transition, ...) They all have Java support except for hppa, see: I was indeed aiming at hppa here. Misses libnumbertext and that one has a Java component and thus we get libnumbertext build-depends on: - default-jdk:hppa default-jdk depends on: - default-jre:hppa (= 2:1.5-72) default-jre depends on: - default-jre-headless:hppa (= 2:1.5-72) default-jre-headless depends on missing: - openjdk-5-jre-headless:hppa The reason for being BD-Uninstallable is the lack of cruft in Debian Ports: https://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2017/12/msg00060.html as a result of some packages FTBFS. That is for sparc and m68k? (Where both the needed KDE packages are uninstallable) Regards, Rene
Re: LibreOffice architecture support (was: Fwd: Plan to remove dead C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*))
(posting this to debian-devel@ since debian-ports@ cross-posts to too many lists) Hello Rene! On 1/10/23 19:25, Rene Engelhard wrote: (which are for many BD-Uninstallable since ages because it does not have Java (anymore), didn't do a long-ago transition, ...) They all have Java support except for hppa, see: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=openjdk-11=sid https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=openjdk-18=sid The reason for being BD-Uninstallable is the lack of cruft in Debian Ports: https://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2017/12/msg00060.html as a result of some packages FTBFS. So, it's more a Debian Ports problem than an architecture problem. Also, both alpha and ia64 are BD-Uninstallable because you don't want to drop clang from Build-Depends from these architectures for whatever reason despite these not having had a LLVM/clang port for several years: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=963109 If clang could be dropped from Build-Depends for alpha and ia64, that would already help us move a little further. speak up at upstream or they will be gone. And without those bridges no architecture support for it. I will see what I can do. Thanks, Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer `. `' Physicist `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
