Re: Release-critical Bugreport for October 29, 2004

2004-10-29 Thread Jochen Voss 
Hello,

On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 06:30:02AM -0700, BugScan reporter wrote:
 Package: screen (debian/main)
 Maintainer: Adam Lazur [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   269366 [] [U] screen: ftbfs [sparc] no tgetent - no screen
Where does the [U] come from?  I do not see the upstream bug tag
set on

http://bugs.debian.org/269366

The problem is in fact Debian specific: the Debian package patches
configure.in but uses the old (non-regenerated) configure.  This
makes detection of libncursesw fail.

I hope this helps,
Jochen
-- 
http://seehuhn.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: Release-critical Bugreport for October 29, 2004

2004-10-29 Thread Frank Lichtenheld 
On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 04:13:48PM +0100, Jochen Voss wrote:
 Hello,
 
 On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 06:30:02AM -0700, BugScan reporter wrote:
  Package: screen (debian/main)
  Maintainer: Adam Lazur [EMAIL PROTECTED]
269366 [] [U] screen: ftbfs [sparc] no tgetent - no screen
 Where does the [U] come from?  I do not see the upstream bug tag
 set on

U has two meanings there. If it appears in the left [], it means the
upstream tag, if it appears in the right [], it means the sid tag.

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/

Re: Release-critical Bugreport for October 29, 2004

2004-10-29 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson 
On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 04:13:48PM +0100, Jochen Voss wrote:
   269366 [] [U] screen: ftbfs [sparc] no tgetent - no screen
 Where does the [U] come from?  I do not see the upstream bug tag
 set on

It is for sid in this case.

/* Steinar */
-- 
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/