Re: Request for testers for new gphoto package

2001-09-12 Thread Robert van der Meulen

Hi,

Quoting Paul Slootman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
snip dependency problems (gphoto2 depends on libusb1, which isn't there)
 There's some problem there... Apparently libusb1 was removed a couple of
 weeks ago.
  PS: Please send copies to me and not to the list, in order to not clobber
  it (I'm not subscribed so keep that in mind)
 To the list anyway to prevent others from running into the same problem
 and wasting their time.
I've been using gphoto2 for a while now.
'libusb1' is not present, 'libusb0' is, and works fine with gphoto2.
If someone does want to try the package, try it with libusb0 installed, and
maybe a pseudopackage providing libusb1 to fix the depends.
Maybe the gphoto2 maintainder should depend on libusb0 instead ?

Greets,
Robert
-- 
  Linux Generation
   encrypted mail preferred. finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for my GnuPG/PGP key.
You must have an IQ of at least half a million.  -- Popeye




Re: Request for testers for new gphoto package

2001-09-10 Thread Paul Slootman
On Sun 09 Sep 2001, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
 
 I would appreciate it if people (with digital cameras) tested this new
 version and sent me some feedback regarding its failure/success. Please
 take heed that gphoto is a popular package and Anthony asked for no major
 changes in packages so I *really* want good reasons to upgrade this
 package.

Well, I've been using a version I compiled myself from CVS because the
debian package doesn't work with my Canon G1:
# gphoto2 --help | grep '^g' 
gPhoto (v2.0beta1) - Cross-platform digital camera library.

However, I can't install your package:

dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of gphoto:
 gphoto depends on libusb1; however:
   Package libusb1 is not installed.

# apt-get install libusb1
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Package libusb1 has no available version, but exists in the database.
This typically means that the package was mentioned in a dependency and
never uploaded, has been obsoleted or is not available with the contents
of sources.list
E: Package libusb1 has no installation candidate


There's some problem there... Apparently libusb1 was removed a couple of
weeks ago.


 PS: Please send copies to me and not to the list, in order to not clobber
 it (I'm not subscribed so keep that in mind)

To the list anyway to prevent others from running into the same problem
and wasting their time.


Paul Slootman




Re: Request for testers for new gphoto package

2001-09-10 Thread Paul Slootman
On Mon 10 Sep 2001, Paul Slootman wrote:
 
 However, I can't install your package:

Removing the partly installed package also doesn't work well:

# dpkg --purge gphoto
(Reading database ... 44388 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing gphoto ...
Purging configuration files for gphoto ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/gphoto.postrm: e: command not found

Try using vim with colour syntax highlighting, you will see that line 13
has a line break at column 80 where you won't normally notice it. Looks
like cut  paste...

Tip: always test whether you can also actually remove the package before
releasing it on an unsuspecting public.


Paul Slootman