Re: Spamassassin config files in /usr/share
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 11:45:08PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote: The spamassasin maintainer doesn't think that there are settings in /usr/share that can't be overridden by the settings in /etc should be considered serious. See bug #141125 and spamassassin bug #188. It's not a configuration file, therefore it needn't be in /etc. Obviously it'd be better if it were a configuration file, but that's a wishlist bug. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/ I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``BAM! Science triumphs again!'' -- http://www.angryflower.com/vegeta.gif -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Spamassassin config files in /usr/share
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 11:45:08PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote: The spamassasin maintainer doesn't think that there are settings in /usr/share that can't be overridden by the settings in /etc should be considered serious. See bug #141125 and spamassassin bug #188. Currently, I edit the file in /usr/share to implement my site-wide policies, but this will be overridden every time spamassassin is upgraded. Why shouldn't this be considered a violation of policy 11.7.1? Lots of things aren't configurable that should be. For example, you have to recompile a lot of packages to change some of their build-time options, which is even more work than changing a file in /usr/share. Not every one of these is a release-critical bug. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Spamassassin config files in /usr/share
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 11:45:08PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote: Currently, I edit the file in /usr/share to implement my site-wide policies, but this will be overridden every time spamassassin is upgraded. Why not use dpkg-divert? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Spamassassin config files in /usr/share
On 06-Apr-2002 Malcolm Parsons wrote: On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 11:45:08PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote: Currently, I edit the file in /usr/share to implement my site-wide policies, but this will be overridden every time spamassassin is upgraded. Why not use dpkg-divert? that is obviously a good short term solution. But should a user need to do this for the long term? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Spamassassin config files in /usr/share
Blars Blarson wrote: The spamassasin maintainer doesn't think that there are settings in /usr/share that can't be overridden by the settings in /etc should be considered serious. See bug #141125 and spamassassin bug #188. If you really must exactly offset amazon's whitelisted score, you can probably do it by writing a separate rule like this: header AMAZON_OFFSET_WHITELIST From =~ /amazon/ score AMAZON_OFFSET_WHITELIST 100 -- see shy jo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
