Re: Two imlib maintainers on package maintainer list
On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 07:41:45PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > I'm very happy that you took the package, because I'm heavyly dependend > from it. In my humble opinion maintaining is not so hard, because > the program compiled well in all version I compiled myself (sometimes > there where reasons despite the Debian packaging...). No, the maintaining of it is not hard. Compiles cleanly and no major hacks are required to the source. I just didn't necessarily agree with the author on all things...;) That and it's hard for me to test / debug gnome stuff because I refuse to use it. (Let's not go there, please =) Brian
Re: Two imlib maintainers on package maintainer list
On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 01:53:44PM -0500, Shaleh wrote: > Raster and I had philosophical differences, which made the maintainer/author > relationship hard. Give it a shot, if you can't do it someone else will step > in. Same reason here. Just took me a few months to really realize it =)
RE: Two imlib maintainers on package maintainer list
On 27-Jan-99 Ossama Othman wrote: > Hi, > >> The right answer is "hell no" (= > > I get the feeling nobody wants these packages. Did I just make a > boneheaded move by accepting the Imlib packages? :) > > -Ossama Raster and I had philosophical differences, which made the maintainer/author relationship hard. Give it a shot, if you can't do it someone else will step in.
RE: Two imlib maintainers on package maintainer list
On Wed, 27 Jan 1999, Ossama Othman wrote: > I get the feeling nobody wants these packages. Did I just make a > boneheaded move by accepting the Imlib packages? :) I'm very happy that you took the package, because I'm heavyly dependend from it. In my humble opinion maintaining is not so hard, because the program compiled well in all version I compiled myself (sometimes there where reasons despite the Debian packaging...). Thanks for maintaining this package Andreas.
RE: Two imlib maintainers on package maintainer list
Hi, > The right answer is "hell no" (= I get the feeling nobody wants these packages. Did I just make a boneheaded move by accepting the Imlib packages? :) -Ossama __ Ossama Othman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 58 60 1A E8 7A 66 F4 44 74 9F 3C D4 EF BF 35 88 1024/8A04D15D 1998/08/26
RE: Two imlib maintainers on package maintainer list
On 27-Jan-99 Ossama Othman wrote: > Hi, > > There are two imlib maintainers listed on the "People Behind Debian" web > page, Brian and Shaleh. Is that right? :) > > Thanks, > -Ossama > The right answer is "hell no" (= The detailed answer is I used to maintain it and hamm still contains the packages I uploaded.
Re: Two imlib maintainers on package maintainer list
On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 12:14:57PM -0600, Ossama Othman wrote: > There are two imlib maintainers listed on the "People Behind Debian" web > page, Brian and Shaleh. Is that right? :) No. Shaleh was the maintainer before me.
