Re: bts behaviour - versioning issue?
also sprach Adrian von Bidder [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.09.23.1101 +0200]: When I look at http://bugs.debian.org/postgrey, I'm confused at the information for #309511, which is listed as outstanding (wishlist), but Done and Archived. Can anybody tell me why? It was only fixed in a branch (the volatile branch), not in the unstable one. Versioning support isn't quite perfect yet. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' :proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck http://debiansystem.info `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems courage is not the absence of fear, but the decision that something else is more important than fear. -- ambrose redmoon signature.asc Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)
Re: bts behaviour - versioning issue?
Adrian von Bidder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] When I look at http://bugs.debian.org/postgrey, I'm confused at the information for #309511, which is listed as outstanding (wishlist), but Done and Archived. Can anybody tell me why? The version tracking code uses branches. The bts seems to think that the bug applies to sid and etch but is fixed in the volatile branch http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=postgrey;dist=volatile and it does not apply to stable http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=postgrey;dist=stable cu andreas -- The 'Galactic Cleaning' policy undertaken by Emperor Zhark is a personal vision of the emperor's, and its inclusion in this work does not constitute tacit approval by the author or the publisher for any such projects, howsoever undertaken.(c) Jasper Ffforde -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: bts behaviour - versioning issue?
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 11:01:58AM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote: When I look at http://bugs.debian.org/postgrey, I'm confused at the information for #309511, which is listed as outstanding (wishlist), but Done and Archived. outstanding means not fixed in the current version (for this suite). Done means fixed in some version, and Archived means would have been archived by now under the previous implementation of bug archival, but isn't really archived yet because how to archive bugs with v-t is not yet decided/implemented. To get rid of the bug, I would suggest: reopen 309511 close 309511 This was never a sourceful bug in the package, so version tracking is of no benefit here -- an unversioned close is really best. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: bts behaviour - versioning issue?
On Saturday 23 September 2006 11:17, Steve Langasek wrote: [...] Ok, thanks everybody. (Steve, I hope you do something today besides explaining things to me ;-) cheers -- vbi -- Protect your privacy - encrypt your email: http://fortytwo.ch/gpg/intro pgpBWHkmganv2.pgp Description: PGP signature
