Re: can the bug reporter close a bug? [was:Re: Bug#81396: root shell fscked after upgrade to woody]

2001-01-07 Thread Gordon Sadler
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 01:14:40AM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> I apologize for prolonging this thread - it's quite annoying.
> However, after reading this enlightened response I wonder if it's
> possible for a user to close the (silly) bug he or she reported after
> he or she solves the problem.  bugs.debian.org doesn't seem to
> indicate a way for a bug to be closed other than action by the
> maintainer.

Actually under /usr/doc/debian the doc-debian package provides a number
of files, including bug-main-mailcontrol.txt.

A message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] of this format:

close $(bugnumber)
thanks

will close a bug. Only submitters or maintainers should close a bug as
noted in the docs.




Re: can the bug reporter close a bug? [was:Re: Bug#81396: root shell fscked after upgrade to woody]

2001-01-07 Thread Gordon Sadler
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 01:57:11AM -0600, Gordon Sadler wrote:
> Actually under /usr/doc/debian the doc-debian package provides a number
> of files, including bug-main-mailcontrol.txt.
> 
> A message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] of this format:
> 
> close $(bugnumber)
> thanks
> 
> will close a bug. Only submitters or maintainers should close a bug as
> noted in the docs.
Ugh late night.

s;/usr/doc;/usr/share/doc
s/bug-main-mailcontrol.txt/bug-maint-mailcontrol.txt




Re: can the bug reporter close a bug? [was:Re: Bug#81396: root shell fscked after upgrade to woody]

2001-01-07 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 01:57:11AM -0600, Gordon Sadler wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 01:14:40AM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> > I apologize for prolonging this thread - it's quite annoying.
> > However, after reading this enlightened response I wonder if it's
> > possible for a user to close the (silly) bug he or she reported after
> > he or she solves the problem.  bugs.debian.org doesn't seem to
> > indicate a way for a bug to be closed other than action by the
> > maintainer.
> 
> Actually under /usr/doc/debian the doc-debian package provides a number
> of files, including bug-main-mailcontrol.txt.

Yes, but also anyone, including the submitter, spammers, joe public
etc can email [EMAIL PROTECTED] to close a bug as well. The BTS doesn't care.


Hamish
-- 
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>




Re: can the bug reporter close a bug? [was:Re: Bug#81396: root shell fscked after upgrade to woody]

2001-01-07 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 11:42:57PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 01:57:11AM -0600, Gordon Sadler wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 01:14:40AM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> > > I apologize for prolonging this thread - it's quite annoying.
> > > However, after reading this enlightened response I wonder if it's
> > > possible for a user to close the (silly) bug he or she reported after
> > > he or she solves the problem.  bugs.debian.org doesn't seem to
> > > indicate a way for a bug to be closed other than action by the
> > > maintainer.
> > 
> > Actually under /usr/doc/debian the doc-debian package provides a number
> > of files, including bug-main-mailcontrol.txt.
> 
> Yes, but also anyone, including the submitter, spammers, joe public
> etc can email [EMAIL PROTECTED] to close a bug as well. The BTS doesn't care.

So does this mean the submitter can close their own bug or not?  I'm
not sure what you mean by "the BTS doesn't care"

-- 
Nathan Norman - Staff Engineer | A good plan today is better
Micromuse Inc. | than a perfect plan tomorrow.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   |   -- Patton


pgp62E0fSYvxi.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: can the bug reporter close a bug? [was:Re: Bug#81396: root shell fscked after upgrade to woody]

2001-01-07 Thread Samuel Hocevar
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001, Nathan E Norman wrote:

> > Yes, but also anyone, including the submitter, spammers, joe public
> > etc can email [EMAIL PROTECTED] to close a bug as well. The BTS doesn't 
> > care.
> 
> So does this mean the submitter can close their own bug or not?  I'm
> not sure what you mean by "the BTS doesn't care"

   It means that anyone may close any bug. I think the maintainer would
easily notice abusers, so it's better to have it this way rather than
having complex authentication methods.

-- 
Sam.




Re: can the bug reporter close a bug? [was:Re: Bug#81396: root shell fscked after upgrade to woody]

2001-01-07 Thread Mark Brown
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 01:09:12PM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote:

> So does this mean the submitter can close their own bug or not?  I'm
> not sure what you mean by "the BTS doesn't care"

Anyone can close a bug - the BTS doesn't actually check where the close
command comes from.  The unenforced standard is that only the submitter
and the maintainer responsible for the package should close a bug.

-- 
Mark Brown  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   (Trying to avoid grumpiness)
http://www.tardis.ed.ac.uk/~broonie/
EUFShttp://www.eusa.ed.ac.uk/societies/filmsoc/


pgpFdO3db8Wqq.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: can the bug reporter close a bug? [was:Re: Bug#81396: root shell fscked after upgrade to woody]

2001-01-07 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 01:09:12PM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> So does this mean the submitter can close their own bug or not?  I'm
> not sure what you mean by "the BTS doesn't care"

Yes, the BTS will allow the submitter to close their own bug that way.
So can anyone else. (AFAIK.)


Hamish
-- 
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>




Processed: Re: can the bug reporter close a bug? [was:Re: Bug#81396: root shell fscked after upgrade to woody]

2001-01-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> close 81396
Bug#81396: root shell fscked after upgrade to woody
Bug closed, send any further explanations to "Eray 'exa' Ozkural" <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>

> thanks,
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)