Re: dpkg-dev: dpkg-shlibdeps doesn't work within fakeroot
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adam P. Harris) writes: > Roberto Lumbreras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Friday, October 9 1998, at 21:19:38, James Troup wrote: > > : Look at fakeroot's shlibs file. This is not a bug (or certainly not > > : the one you're claiming it is). > > > Ok. Of course, you are right ;) I've added (>= 2.0.7u) to > > /var/lib/dpkg/info/fakeroot.shlibs and now it works, but I think > > dpkg-shlibdeps should know that "libc6, libc6 (>= 2.0.7u)" should > > be "libc6 (>= 2.0.7u)". Anyway, I don't know much about how shlibs > > stuff works... > > Um, what is the right way to *really* fix this issue? I don't know about the Right way, but the method that appeals to me is (assuming it's possible) to make dpkg-shlibdeps not obey LD_PRELOAD (and thus not use fakeroot), because apart from this issue (when libc6 has a versioned shlibs file) there is also the problem of fakeroot being used to build libc5-compat packages. > I suspect that fakeroot.shlib was just a hack put in place to > workaround some bug in libc6 which is now fixed. No, it's not, run ldd with and without fakeroot on a libc5-compat library... | 11:45:[EMAIL PROTECTED]| ~ $ldd /usr/lib/libc5-compat/libgpm.so.1.14 | libc.so.5 => /lib/libc.so.5 (0x4000f000) | libncurses.so.3.0 => /lib/libncurses.so.3.0 (0x400cd000) | 11:45:[EMAIL PROTECTED]| ~ $fakeroot ldd /usr/lib/libc5-compat/libgpm.so.1.14 | /usr/lib/libfakeroot/libfakeroot.so.0 => /usr/lib/libfakeroot/libfakeroot.so.0 (0x4000a000) | libc.so.5 => /lib/libc.so.5 (0x40014000) | libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x400d2000) | libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x400d6000) | libncurses.so.3.0 => /lib/libncurses.so.3.0 (0x40177000) | ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x401b3000) | 11:45:[EMAIL PROTECTED]| ~ $ [Of course, IMHO, the *real* solution to all of these problems is not to use fakeroot or libtricks at all but sudo or something similar] -- James
Re: dpkg-dev: dpkg-shlibdeps doesn't work within fakeroot
Adam P. Harris wrote: > > Ok. Of course, you are right ;) I've added (>= 2.0.7u) to > > /var/lib/dpkg/info/fakeroot.shlibs and now it works, but I think > > dpkg-shlibdeps should know that "libc6, libc6 (>= 2.0.7u)" should > > be "libc6 (>= 2.0.7u)". Anyway, I don't know much about how shlibs > > stuff works... > > Um, what is the right way to *really* fix this issue? I checked the > fakeroot bugs and didn't see any bugs open that looked relevant. > Someone on IRC advised me to use 'LD_PRELOAD= dpkg-shlibdeps..' to > work around for now. > > I suspect that fakeroot.shlib was just a hack put in place to > workaround some bug in libc6 which is now fixed. If so, I'd like to > file an important bug against fakeroot to remove this file. I suspect > an awfully large number of packages will be uploaded with this problem > (which lintian doesn't detect, AFAIK). Hm, it'd probably be easy to make lintian detect it. Richard? -- see shy jo
Re: dpkg-dev: dpkg-shlibdeps doesn't work within fakeroot
Roberto Lumbreras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Friday, October 9 1998, at 21:19:38, James Troup wrote: > : Look at fakeroot's shlibs file. This is not a bug (or certainly not > : the one you're claiming it is). > Ok. Of course, you are right ;) I've added (>= 2.0.7u) to > /var/lib/dpkg/info/fakeroot.shlibs and now it works, but I think > dpkg-shlibdeps should know that "libc6, libc6 (>= 2.0.7u)" should > be "libc6 (>= 2.0.7u)". Anyway, I don't know much about how shlibs > stuff works... Um, what is the right way to *really* fix this issue? I checked the fakeroot bugs and didn't see any bugs open that looked relevant. Someone on IRC advised me to use 'LD_PRELOAD= dpkg-shlibdeps..' to work around for now. I suspect that fakeroot.shlib was just a hack put in place to workaround some bug in libc6 which is now fixed. If so, I'd like to file an important bug against fakeroot to remove this file. I suspect an awfully large number of packages will be uploaded with this problem (which lintian doesn't detect, AFAIK). So if someone could advise me on how this ought to be fixed. And I hear it's not libtricks, which is purported to be broken. .A. P. [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onShore.com/>
Re: dpkg-dev: dpkg-shlibdeps doesn't work within fakeroot
On Friday, October 9 1998, at 21:19:38, James Troup wrote: : Roberto Lumbreras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : : > Package: dpkg-dev : > Version: 1.4.0.30 : > : > $ dpkg-shlibdeps src/fortify; cat debian/substvars : > shlibs:Depends=libc6 (>= 2.0.7u) : > : > $ fakeroot dpkg-shlibdeps src/fortify; cat debian/substvars : > shlibs:Depends=libc6, libc6 (>= 2.0.7u) : >^ ^ : : Look at fakeroot's shlibs file. This is not a bug (or certainly not : the one you're claiming it is). Ok. Of course, you are right ;) I've added (>= 2.0.7u) to /var/lib/dpkg/info/fakeroot.shlibs and now it works, but I think dpkg-shlibdeps should know that "libc6, libc6 (>= 2.0.7u)" should be "libc6 (>= 2.0.7u)". Anyway, I don't know much about how shlibs stuff works... Regards, -- Roberto Lumbreras [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] & pgp 143BE391 Lander Internet, Madrid-Spain-UE; http://www.lander.es
Re: dpkg-dev: dpkg-shlibdeps doesn't work within fakeroot
Roberto Lumbreras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Package: dpkg-dev > Version: 1.4.0.30 > > $ dpkg-shlibdeps src/fortify; cat debian/substvars > shlibs:Depends=libc6 (>= 2.0.7u) > > $ fakeroot dpkg-shlibdeps src/fortify; cat debian/substvars > shlibs:Depends=libc6, libc6 (>= 2.0.7u) >^ ^ Look at fakeroot's shlibs file. This is not a bug (or certainly not the one you're claiming it is). -- James
