Re: ilisp debian package
On Saturday 06 Apr 2002 4:16 pm, Will Newton wrote: I have still not had any response to this. Can anyone tell me the correct procedure for getting these bugs closed? The changelog looks like this: ilisp (5.11.1-7) unstable; urgency=low * well 125744 was fixed, but I put the files in the old place on accident. * Fixed 140049 - bad symlinks * Fixed 138669 - typo in ilisp-cmu * Fixed 137011 - ilisp-pkg issues -- Craig Brozefsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 25 Feb 2002 12:26:21 -0500 ilisp is being removed from woody because of a bug that is fixed but not closed. According to your changelog the following bugs are fixed, but are not closed: 125744 140049 138669 137011 98132 128856 129980 87652 123631 121266 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ilisp debian package
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 02:26:30PM +0100, Will Newton wrote: On Saturday 06 Apr 2002 4:16 pm, Will Newton wrote: I have still not had any response to this. Can anyone tell me the correct procedure for getting these bugs closed? The changelog looks like this: ilisp (5.11.1-7) unstable; urgency=low * well 125744 was fixed, but I put the files in the old place on accident. * Fixed 140049 - bad symlinks * Fixed 138669 - typo in ilisp-cmu * Fixed 137011 - ilisp-pkg issues Read up on the BTS docs, but the common ways are: The phrase Closes: #140049 in the changelog Email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with body: close 140049 IIRC check the documentation for full details. HTH, -- Craig Brozefsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 25 Feb 2002 12:26:21 -0500 ilisp is being removed from woody because of a bug that is fixed but not closed. According to your changelog the following bugs are fixed, but are not closed: 125744 140049 138669 137011 98132 128856 129980 87652 123631 121266 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/ Ignorance continues to thrive when intelligent people choose to do nothing. Speaking out against censorship and ignorance is the imperative of all intelligent people. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ilisp debian package
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 02:26:30PM +0100, Will Newton wrote: I have still not had any response to this. Can anyone tell me the correct procedure for getting these bugs closed? Since you're not a maintainer, you shouldn't close them. However, you can tag them fixed, by sending 'tag fixed' commands to [EMAIL PROTECTED] The changelog looks like this: ilisp (5.11.1-7) unstable; urgency=low * well 125744 was fixed, but I put the files in the old place on accident. * Fixed 140049 - bad symlinks * Fixed 138669 - typo in ilisp-cmu * Fixed 137011 - ilisp-pkg issues -- Craig Brozefsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 25 Feb 2002 12:26:21 -0500 Craig's syntax is incorrect, it should be 'Closes: #140049' etc. -- 2. That which causes joy or happiness. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ilisp debian package
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 11:34:13PM +1000, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: Read up on the BTS docs, but the common ways are: Email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with body: close 140049 No! Don't fucking do that! Geez, how many times does one have to repeat that. -- 2. That which causes joy or happiness. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ilisp debian package
On Sunday 07 Apr 2002 2:44 pm, Josip Rodin wrote: Since you're not a maintainer, you shouldn't close them. However, you can tag them fixed, by sending 'tag fixed' commands to [EMAIL PROTECTED] OK, if Craig hasn't done it by the end of today I will do that. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ilisp debian package
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 03:04:43PM +0100, Will Newton wrote: On Sunday 07 Apr 2002 2:44 pm, Josip Rodin wrote: Since you're not a maintainer, you shouldn't close them. However, you can tag them fixed, by sending 'tag fixed' commands to [EMAIL PROTECTED] OK, if Craig hasn't done it by the end of today I will do that. Why? Considering how close to the release we are, and how easy it is, why not do it now? It certainly won't interfer with the maintainer closing them. -- David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED] It's not a habit; it's cool; I feel alive. If you don't have it you're on the other side. - K's Choice (probably referring to the Internet) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ilisp debian package
On Sunday 07 Apr 2002 3:20 pm, David Starner wrote: Why? Considering how close to the release we are, and how easy it is, why not do it now? It certainly won't interfer with the maintainer closing them. OK, done. I just don't want to step on anyone's toes. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ilisp debian package
Will Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sunday 07 Apr 2002 3:20 pm, David Starner wrote: Why? Considering how close to the release we are, and how easy it is, why not do it now? It certainly won't interfer with the maintainer closing them. OK, done. I just don't want to step on anyone's toes. My sincerest apologies for the delay. I have had hard time keeping up with devel and devel-announce for reasons of my own stupidty in configuring gnus and since I had done the [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body containing closes BUGID in it, which apparently is not supported anymore (I was going from docs) I assumed the bugs were all closed out properly. -- Craig Brozefsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] Free Software Sociopath(tm) http://www.red-bean.com/~craig Ask me about Common Lisp Enterprise Eggplants at Red Bean! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
