Re: packages.d.o mail (Re: Greylisting for @debian.org email, please)
Le jeudi 23 juin 2005 à 19:33 +0200, Andreas Barth a écrit : * Marco d'Itri ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050623 19:31]: On Jun 23, Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There are plans to merge @packages.d.o and @packages.QA.d.o, so that both reach the maintainer and the PTS subscribers. The QA address requires the presence of an X-PTS-Approved header to let a message reach package@p.q.d.o, but I never asked Frank what his plans about this wrt the merge were. This is evil, I just verified that packages.qa.debian.org generates backscatter. You mean, this mails should rather be checked during SMTP time? Agreed. Patches accepted. The PTS source is in CVS (cvs.debian.org:/cvs/qa/pts) and you can see the installation at master.debian.org:/org/packages.qa.debian.org/ In the mean time, the only spam that PTS users receives is the spam sent to the BTS ... so it's better than nothing. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog -+- http://www.ouaza.com Formation Linux et logiciel libre : http://www.logidee.com Earn money with free software: http://www.geniustrader.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: packages.d.o mail (Re: Greylisting for @debian.org email, please)
On Jun 24, Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Patches accepted. The PTS source is in CVS (cvs.debian.org:/cvs/qa/pts) and you can see the installation at master.debian.org:/org/packages.qa.debian.org/ I am not the one who is polluting the rest of the network, if you can't get it right then don't do it. In the mean time, the only spam that PTS users receives is the spam sent to the BTS ... so it's better than nothing. The issue are the bounces sent to *other* people! -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: packages.d.o mail (Re: Greylisting for @debian.org email, please)
* Adeodato Simó ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050623 16:50]: * Andreas Barth [Thu, 23 Jun 2005 13:54:29 +0200]: The packages.d.o-addresses are a really useful tool for contacting multiple maintainers e.g. for transitions. They were quite helpful during e.g. the release of sarge. There are plans to merge @packages.d.o and @packages.QA.d.o, so that both reach the maintainer and the PTS subscribers. The QA address requires the presence of an X-PTS-Approved header to let a message reach package@p.q.d.o, but I never asked Frank what his plans about this wrt the merge were. If @packages.d.o addresses are really such a big source of spam, we could require the header for both domains, which isn't _that_ disruptive if we assume most users of @p.d.o addresses are developers, and not end users. Well, that would work for me, yes. Cheers, Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: packages.d.o mail (Re: Greylisting for @debian.org email, please)
On Jun 23, Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There are plans to merge @packages.d.o and @packages.QA.d.o, so that both reach the maintainer and the PTS subscribers. The QA address requires the presence of an X-PTS-Approved header to let a message reach package@p.q.d.o, but I never asked Frank what his plans about this wrt the merge were. This is evil, I just verified that packages.qa.debian.org generates backscatter. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: packages.d.o mail (Re: Greylisting for @debian.org email, please)
* Marco d'Itri ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050623 19:31]: On Jun 23, Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There are plans to merge @packages.d.o and @packages.QA.d.o, so that both reach the maintainer and the PTS subscribers. The QA address requires the presence of an X-PTS-Approved header to let a message reach package@p.q.d.o, but I never asked Frank what his plans about this wrt the merge were. This is evil, I just verified that packages.qa.debian.org generates backscatter. You mean, this mails should rather be checked during SMTP time? Agreed. Cheers, Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
