Re: Re: Realtek RTL8723DE, RTL8821CE, RTL8822BE and RTL8822CE chipsets
Enviado desde mi iPhone
Re: Realtek RTL8723DE, RTL8821CE, RTL8822BE and RTL8822CE chipsets
On 01.04.21 08:52, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > Can you please list some unsupported chips in addition to these specific > Realtek ones? I was looking for a WIFI USB dongle recently, and I found this site quite useful for determining support status (I'm linking directly to the chipset page, but the site in general has interesting stuff): http://en.techinfodepot.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Wireless_Adapters/Chipset_table The page seems to be somewhat up-to-date, too. Best, Christian
Re: Re: Realtek RTL8723DE, RTL8821CE, RTL8822BE and RTL8822CE chipsets
On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 11:46:34AM +0500, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: > Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > > > Can you please list some unsupported chips in addition to these specific > > Realtek ones? > > Bad question. > > Recently I had to choose and buy a USB WiFi adapter suitable for > making a software access point. And this is in a semi-rural area, so > almost no interference from neighbors. So I thought, let's make sure > that the USB bus is not a limiting factor. I.e., the requirements are: > USB3, 802.11ac or ax, can act as an access point in Linux, can > actually be bought here in Russia. Result: all (and yes I mean "all", > 100%) of USB3 WiFi adapters available in Russia (according to > market.yandex.ru, which aggregates almost all major shops) are based > on various unsupported-in-mainline Realtek chipsets (RTL8812AU, > RTL8814AU, RTL8812BU). So there is no exception. You can check this > yourself by going through this product list, it's not that long: > > https://market.yandex.ru/catalog--wi-fi-oborudovanie-v-ekaterinburge/55410/list?cpa=0&hid=723087&glfilter=4863258%3A12107055&glfilter=18057628%3A18057633%2C18057635&glfilter=4863263%3A12107090&glfilter=4863264%3A12107093&onstock=1&local-offers-first=1 I see now, this is a problem specific to USB adapters. The same page for PCIe ones lists a lot of Intel and BCM ones (I wouln't buy BCM of course but I know there is some BCM stuff in Debian). All my WiFi adapters I ever used with Linux (included with a laptop, included with a motherboard, bought separatele for PCIe) were either Intel or Ralink and all of them worked fine without extra drivers, even though iwlwifi sometimes breaks with some kernel versions. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Re: Realtek RTL8723DE, RTL8821CE, RTL8822BE and RTL8822CE chipsets
Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > Can you please list some unsupported chips in addition to these specific > Realtek ones? Bad question. Recently I had to choose and buy a USB WiFi adapter suitable for making a software access point. And this is in a semi-rural area, so almost no interference from neighbors. So I thought, let's make sure that the USB bus is not a limiting factor. I.e., the requirements are: USB3, 802.11ac or ax, can act as an access point in Linux, can actually be bought here in Russia. Result: all (and yes I mean "all", 100%) of USB3 WiFi adapters available in Russia (according to market.yandex.ru, which aggregates almost all major shops) are based on various unsupported-in-mainline Realtek chipsets (RTL8812AU, RTL8814AU, RTL8812BU). So there is no exception. You can check this yourself by going through this product list, it's not that long: https://market.yandex.ru/catalog--wi-fi-oborudovanie-v-ekaterinburge/55410/list?cpa=0&hid=723087&glfilter=4863258%3A12107055&glfilter=18057628%3A18057633%2C18057635&glfilter=4863263%3A12107090&glfilter=4863264%3A12107093&onstock=1&local-offers-first=1 The two adapters (TP-LINK Archer T4U Plus and D-link DWA-182/E1) that are not known to wikidevi.wi-cat.ru can still be identified as something Realtek-based by downloading Windows drivers. I ordered a (Mediatek-based) Alfa Networks AWUS036ACM adapter from Amazon, but it took way too long to arrive (it did, eventually, long after I have given up, that's why the local shopping attempt). So I ended up buying a TP-Link Archer T3U v3.2 in a local shop and using it with a driver from https://github.com/cilynx/rtl88x2bu, and it does yield throughput higher than the theoretical limit of USB 2.0. -- Alexander E. Patrakov CV: http://u.pc.cd/wT8otalK
Re: Realtek RTL8723DE, RTL8821CE, RTL8822BE and RTL8822CE chipsets
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 08:03:23PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 10:37:37AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote: > > > Not sure what hardware you are talking about but the majority of WiFI > > > hardware is supported by the mainline kernels, at least after you load > > > their firmware. > > > > I assume you haven't tried very much wifi hardware. Realistically, the state > > of wifi support is still terrible. The best thing to do is try to buy > > something known to be supported, but that's relatively difficult for most > > people because the name on the box generally has nothing to do with the > > chips inside the box. > Can you please list some unsupported chips in addition to these specific > Realtek ones? It would be easier for you to list ones that you've actually tested and know work. OK, whatever. It's a serious request. In 20 years of trying different wireless devices I've had just one that's completely reliable under linux (atheros qca6174 chipset) even if it's a little slow (only 2x2 mimo, and possibly hampered by the laptop's antenna configuration). It's older 802.11ac; I haven't ever seen a working 802.11ax. (Not saying it doesn't exist, just that I haven't seen it--hence the question!) I've seen lots of reports of reliable devices, but they tend to be things that are either ancient, or hard to find, or simply don't work as well for me as for others (apparently). I've personally used a lot of devices that mostly worked, until they hung or started going really slow or in some other way behaved much worse than the phone sitting next to the laptop (ironically running linux). I've heard good things about the intel adapters, but AFAIK they aren't available in USB so if someone didn't happen to get a laptop with that solution integrated it's not a simple end-user addition. IMO, wifi is the last major pain point to a fully functional linux sytem. Most other things these days you can just buy a something off the shelf at the local electronics store and odds are all the pieces will work out of the box. But wifi still requires a good bit of research, and isn't something a novice will find simple unless they get lucky on their components or bought something from a specialty retailer that focuses on linux systems.
Re: Realtek RTL8723DE, RTL8821CE, RTL8822BE and RTL8822CE chipsets
El dom, 4 abr 2021 a las 12:28, Devops PK Carlisle LLC () escribió: > > This is interesting. > > First, I must ask... Are either Ralink or Atheros more quickly adopted > into Linux support before Realtek? Are they more stable, etc.? (In my > original post, I noted that I pulled a Realtek based 5ghz dongle from an > extreme end user system, in no small part due to stability/reliability)? I do not think so, I guess this mostly depends on how many people are involved with each driver and how well tested is the code. In the particular case of rtw88 driver (the one supporting chipsets in the subject), it is maintained by Realtek folks with additional contributions from the community. Some chipsets are supported, some not yet. For the case I know (rtl8821ce), original chipset is supported, but support for other variants (e.g., rfe 2) was late for 5.11 (Realtek tests took longer than expected), but will be present in 5.12 kernel, requiring new firmware (https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/2/2/76). I think the best option is to wait for that kernel and firmware to reach debian-backports. For other variants of other chipsets things may be fifferent. Regards, -- Agustin
Re: Realtek RTL8723DE, RTL8821CE, RTL8822BE and RTL8822CE chipsets
This is interesting. First, I must ask... Are either Ralink or Atheros more quickly adopted into Linux support before Realtek? Are they more stable, etc.? (In my original post, I noted that I pulled a Realtek based 5ghz dongle from an extreme end user system, in no small part due to stability/reliability)? Second, I must note that perhaps you *were* lucky or whatever, as I have never found anything other than a Realtek chipset on offer. Even if Atheros or Ralink are more stable, I don't know if I could actually *find* one. I am well aware that the Chinese company's dongle made in People's Dongle Factory Thirteen will have folded before the container ship hits the States, but the Realtek chipset is the key...it is finally why I know that can work with it. On 4/4/21 5:27 AM, Andrej Shadura wrote: > > On Sun, 4 Apr 2021, at 11:25, Andrej Shadura wrote: >> On Thu, 1 Apr 2021, at 21:22, Devops PK Carlisle LLC wrote: >>> Something I did not mention before, to answer your question the chip >>> reads as rtl8821cu (so yes, a Realtek). >>> >>> In fairness I do not recall ever having run across a wifi dongle that >>> did not have a Realtek chip (although they may be out there). It was >>> because I could at least confirm a Realtek chip in an otherwise cheap >>> Chinese dongle, that I was willing to even try it. >> >> I may be lucky or picky or whatever, but all except just one of my >> external USB dongles have Atheros chips. > > Oh, and another one has a Ralink chip. >
Re: Realtek RTL8723DE, RTL8821CE, RTL8822BE and RTL8822CE chipsets
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 10:37:37AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote: > > > > Not sure what hardware you are talking about but the majority of WiFI > > > > hardware is supported by the mainline kernels, at least after you load > > > > their firmware. > > > > > > I assume you haven't tried very much wifi hardware. Realistically, the > > > state > > > of wifi support is still terrible. The best thing to do is try to buy > > > something known to be supported, but that's relatively difficult for most > > > people because the name on the box generally has nothing to do with the > > > chips inside the box. > > Can you please list some unsupported chips in addition to these specific > > Realtek ones? > > It would be easier for you to list ones that you've actually tested and know > work. OK, whatever. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Realtek RTL8723DE, RTL8821CE, RTL8822BE and RTL8822CE chipsets
On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 11:52:46AM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 10:38:11PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote: On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 10:20:03PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > Not sure what hardware you are talking about but the majority of WiFI > hardware is supported by the mainline kernels, at least after you load > their firmware. I assume you haven't tried very much wifi hardware. Realistically, the state of wifi support is still terrible. The best thing to do is try to buy something known to be supported, but that's relatively difficult for most people because the name on the box generally has nothing to do with the chips inside the box. Can you please list some unsupported chips in addition to these specific Realtek ones? It would be easier for you to list ones that you've actually tested and know work.
Re: Realtek RTL8723DE, RTL8821CE, RTL8822BE and RTL8822CE chipsets
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 02:40:39PM +0200, Dominique Dumont wrote: > > Can you please list some unsupported chips in addition to these specific > > Realtek ones? > > My daughter's laptop (an HP pavilion) has a RTL8821CE wifi chip which is not > supported. That one is in the subject. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Realtek RTL8723DE, RTL8821CE, RTL8822BE and RTL8822CE chipsets
On Thursday, 1 April 2021 08:52:46 CEST Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > Can you please list some unsupported chips in addition to these specific > Realtek ones? My daughter's laptop (an HP pavilion) has a RTL8821CE wifi chip which is not supported. All the best
Re: Realtek RTL8723DE, RTL8821CE, RTL8822BE and RTL8822CE chipsets
Something I did not mention before, to answer your question the chip reads as rtl8821cu (so yes, a Realtek). In fairness I do not recall ever having run across a wifi dongle that did not have a Realtek chip (although they may be out there). It was because I could at least confirm a Realtek chip in an otherwise cheap Chinese dongle, that I was willing to even try it. On 4/1/21 2:52 AM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 10:38:11PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 10:20:03PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: >>> Not sure what hardware you are talking about but the majority of WiFI >>> hardware is supported by the mainline kernels, at least after you load >>> their firmware. >> >> I assume you haven't tried very much wifi hardware. Realistically, the state >> of wifi support is still terrible. The best thing to do is try to buy >> something known to be supported, but that's relatively difficult for most >> people because the name on the box generally has nothing to do with the >> chips inside the box. > Can you please list some unsupported chips in addition to these specific > Realtek ones? >
Re: Realtek RTL8723DE, RTL8821CE, RTL8822BE and RTL8822CE chipsets
On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 08:51:08AM +0100, Paul Sutton wrote: > > > > Not sure what hardware you are talking about but the majority of WiFI > > > > hardware is supported by the mainline kernels, at least after you load > > > > their firmware. > > > > > > I assume you haven't tried very much wifi hardware. Realistically, > > > the > state > > > of wifi support is still terrible. The best thing to do is try to buy > > > something known to be supported, but that's relatively difficult for most > > > people because the name on the box generally has nothing to do with the > > > chips inside the box. > > Can you please list some unsupported chips in addition to these specific > > Realtek ones? > > > > It has been suggested to me to buy the external USB wifi dongles This doesn't sound related to my question. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Realtek RTL8723DE, RTL8821CE, RTL8822BE and RTL8822CE chipsets
On 01/04/2021 07:52, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 10:38:11PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote: On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 10:20:03PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: Not sure what hardware you are talking about but the majority of WiFI hardware is supported by the mainline kernels, at least after you load their firmware. I assume you haven't tried very much wifi hardware. Realistically, the state of wifi support is still terrible. The best thing to do is try to buy something known to be supported, but that's relatively difficult for most people because the name on the box generally has nothing to do with the chips inside the box. Can you please list some unsupported chips in addition to these specific Realtek ones? It has been suggested to me to buy the external USB wifi dongles, while this is fine if the device is pretty much flush or perhaps only 5mm out from the side, anything bigger risks it being caught or knocked, which will not only cause damage to the dongle but also the laptop it's self, In that light our choices are perhaps more limite Paul -- -- Paul Sutton, Cert Cont Sci (Open) https://personaljournal.ca/paulsutton/ OpenPGP : 4350 91C4 C8FB 681B 23A6 7944 8EA9 1B51 E27E 3D99 Pronoun : him/his/he OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Realtek RTL8723DE, RTL8821CE, RTL8822BE and RTL8822CE chipsets
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 10:38:11PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote: > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 10:20:03PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > > Not sure what hardware you are talking about but the majority of WiFI > > hardware is supported by the mainline kernels, at least after you load > > their firmware. > > I assume you haven't tried very much wifi hardware. Realistically, the state > of wifi support is still terrible. The best thing to do is try to buy > something known to be supported, but that's relatively difficult for most > people because the name on the box generally has nothing to do with the > chips inside the box. Can you please list some unsupported chips in addition to these specific Realtek ones? -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Realtek RTL8723DE, RTL8821CE, RTL8822BE and RTL8822CE chipsets
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 10:20:03PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: Not sure what hardware you are talking about but the majority of WiFI hardware is supported by the mainline kernels, at least after you load their firmware. I assume you haven't tried very much wifi hardware. Realistically, the state of wifi support is still terrible. The best thing to do is try to buy something known to be supported, but that's relatively difficult for most people because the name on the box generally has nothing to do with the chips inside the box.
Re: Realtek RTL8723DE, RTL8821CE, RTL8822BE and RTL8822CE chipsets
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 12:35:22PM -0400, Devops PK Carlisle LLC wrote: > No big deal, not a complaint, I am PERFECTLY comfortable with compiling > and inserting a driver (compare and contrast that to Windows, where you > are SOL if there is not a driver available, I *do* get it)...more a > point in the right direction. This is where we were 10 years ago with > 2.4ghz. Not sure what hardware you are talking about but the majority of WiFI hardware is supported by the mainline kernels, at least after you load their firmware. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Realtek RTL8723DE, RTL8821CE, RTL8822BE and RTL8822CE chipsets
I will note something similar, except that I went into it with my eyes open... Originally (10 years ago), 2.4ghz wifi was not natively supported. Okay, said we geeks, can it be compiled and inserted manually? Yes, it could. I wrote a script to compile and insert said driver, and thereafter, every time there was a kernel update or patch, that's what I did. And it worked fine for the couple of years it took for 2.4ghz to be natively supported in Linux. Fast forward to 2 months ago. Looking at 5ghz wifi, I *knew* what I was volunteering for when I saw a 5ghz wifi dongle on Amazon (one of the questions was: Is it supported for Linux? *I* snickered, as I has a very good idea what the implications were). I bought one, and, back to old school, I can and do run it, manually compiling and inserting the driver as needed. It's a very familiar process. Here's a real world application: in fact I bought *two* 5ghz dongles, one for myself, one for an *extreme* end user whose system I administer. On my system, as needed, compile and reinsert driver. On her system, I pulled the 5ghz, went back to the 2.4ghz dongle, trusting that she won't see the difference. No big deal, not a complaint, I am PERFECTLY comfortable with compiling and inserting a driver (compare and contrast that to Windows, where you are SOL if there is not a driver available, I *do* get it)...more a point in the right direction. This is where we were 10 years ago with 2.4ghz. On 3/29/21 8:59 PM, Timothy M Butterworth wrote: > All, > > Currently in Bullseye the Realtek 8822CE WiFi adapter is not being > recognized. There is a patched driver available at: git clone > https://github.com/lwfinger/rtw88.git is it too late to get this > driver into Bullseye. I ask because I have a laptop with a 8822CE > adapter that is not functional. > > More info on getting Realtek adapters working: > https://easylinuxtipsproject.blogspot.com/p/realtek.html#ID7 > > Tim >
Realtek RTL8723DE, RTL8821CE, RTL8822BE and RTL8822CE chipsets
All, Currently in Bullseye the Realtek 8822CE WiFi adapter is not being recognized. There is a patched driver available at: git clone https://github.com/lwfinger/rtw88.git is it too late to get this driver into Bullseye. I ask because I have a laptop with a 8822CE adapter that is not functional. More info on getting Realtek adapters working: https://easylinuxtipsproject.blogspot.com/p/realtek.html#ID7 Tim