Re: Release-critical Bugreport for March 10, 2000
On Sat, Mar 11, 2000 at 07:17:47PM -0800, Chip Salzenberg wrote: According to Christian Hammers: According to the automated report: Package: nfs-kernel-server (debian/main) Maintainer: Chip Salzenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] 59641 nfs-kernel-server: conflicts with Standard package nfs-server Package: nfs-server (debian/main) Maintainer: Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED] 59642 nfs-server: conflicts with Standard package nfs-kernel-server Huh? Isn't this what it is expected to? Yes, that's expected. I thought those bugs had been downgraded. If they're really both standard packages, they shouldn't conflict; one needs to be recategorized. -- Mike Stone
Re: Release-critical Bugreport for March 10, 2000
On Sat, Mar 11, 2000 at 12:07:11PM +0100, Christian Hammers wrote: Hello Package: fetchmailconf (debian/main) Maintainer: Paul Haggart [EMAIL PROTECTED] [REMOVE] This package can be removed if it is not fixed. 57287 generates wrong config files Hello! I fixed that one a couple of days ago! Do not remove it! Then why is it still open and marked 'important'?
Re: Release-critical Bugreport for March 10, 2000
Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Mar 11, 2000 at 12:07:11PM +0100, Christian Hammers wrote:
Package: nfs-kernel-server (debian/main)
Maintainer: Chip Salzenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
59641 nfs-kernel-server: conflicts with Standard package nfs-server
Package: nfs-server (debian/main)
Maintainer: Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
59642 nfs-server: conflicts with Standard package nfs-kernel-server
Huh? Isn't this what it is expected to?
They can't both be standard if they conflict with each other, see Policy.
I will be uploading a new release with a symlink bug fix and a downgraded
priority.
--
Debian GNU/Linux 2.1 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmVHI~} [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Re: Release-critical Bugreport for March 10, 2000
According to Christian Hammers: According to the automated report: Package: nfs-kernel-server (debian/main) Maintainer: Chip Salzenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] 59641 nfs-kernel-server: conflicts with Standard package nfs-server Package: nfs-server (debian/main) Maintainer: Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED] 59642 nfs-server: conflicts with Standard package nfs-kernel-server Huh? Isn't this what it is expected to? Yes, that's expected. I thought those bugs had been downgraded. -- Chip Salzenberg - a.k.a. - [EMAIL PROTECTED] I wanted to play hopscotch with the impenetrable mystery of existence, but he stepped in a wormhole and had to go in early. // MST3K
Re: Release-critical Bugreport for March 10, 2000
According to Josip Rodin: They can't both be standard if they conflict with each other, see Policy. Well, then, don't remove one, just change its priority! -- Chip Salzenberg - a.k.a. - [EMAIL PROTECTED] I wanted to play hopscotch with the impenetrable mystery of existence, but he stepped in a wormhole and had to go in early. // MST3K
Re: Release-critical Bugreport for March 10, 2000
On Sat, Mar 11, 2000 at 07:18:35PM -0800, Chip Salzenberg wrote: They can't both be standard if they conflict with each other, see Policy. Well, then, don't remove one, just change its priority! Who said I want to remove one? :) -- enJoy -*/\*- don't even try to pronounce my first name
Re: Release-critical Bugreport for March 10, 2000
Hello Package: fetchmailconf (debian/main) Maintainer: Paul Haggart [EMAIL PROTECTED] [REMOVE] This package can be removed if it is not fixed. 57287 generates wrong config files Hello! I fixed that one a couple of days ago! Do not remove it! bye, -christian- Package: nfs-kernel-server (debian/main) Maintainer: Chip Salzenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] 59641 nfs-kernel-server: conflicts with Standard package nfs-server Package: nfs-server (debian/main) Maintainer: Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED] 59642 nfs-server: conflicts with Standard package nfs-kernel-server Huh? Isn't this what it is expected to? -- Linux - the choice of the GNU generation. Join the Debian Project http://www.debian.org Christian Hammers * Oberer Heidweg 35 * D-52477 Alsdorf * Tel: 02404-25624 50 3C 52 26 3E 52 E7 20 D2 A1 F5 16 C4 C9 D4 D3 1024/925BCB55 1997/11/01
Re: Release-critical Bugreport for March 10, 2000
On Sat, Mar 11, 2000 at 12:07:11PM +0100, Christian Hammers wrote: Mail-Followup-To: ch, debian-devel@lists.debian.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED], ^^ I think you must fix your header... ;-) bye Christian -- | Christian Surchi | www.firenze.linux.it/~csurchi| www. | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | gnu. | | FLUG: www.firenze.linux.it | Debian GNU/Linux: www.debian.org | org | Odie mihi cras tibi. (Letto sulla porta di un cimitero.)
Re: Release-critical Bugreport for March 10, 2000
On Sat, Mar 11, 2000 at 12:07:11PM +0100, Christian Hammers wrote: Package: nfs-kernel-server (debian/main) Maintainer: Chip Salzenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] 59641 nfs-kernel-server: conflicts with Standard package nfs-server Package: nfs-server (debian/main) Maintainer: Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED] 59642 nfs-server: conflicts with Standard package nfs-kernel-server Huh? Isn't this what it is expected to? They can't both be standard if they conflict with each other, see Policy. -- enJoy -*/\*- don't even try to pronounce my first name
Re: Release-critical Bugreport for March 10, 2000
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: Bug stamp-out list for Mar 10 03:04 (CST) Package: dump (debian/main) Maintainer: Bdale Garbee [EMAIL PROTECTED] 59935 dump: dump segfaults A number of bugs have been fixed since the 0.4b12 snapshot that's in potato now. I agree with the submitter of this bug that a fresher snapshot should be released with potato. I am building 0.4b16, and if it tests cleanly, I'll upload it for potato before the end of the weekend... should close 8-10 open bugs total. Package: makedev (debian/main) Maintainer: Bdale Garbee [EMAIL PROTECTED] 59502 raw ftape devices wrong I have reviewed Documentation/devices.txt from kernel version 2.3.51, and it still agrees with makedev on the naming of these devices. Further, the naming there seems completely self-consistent. Since I consider the kernel devices.txt file authoritative, and see no evidence that this is a typo, I am going to reassign this bug to ftape, and assume that the ftape maintainer will fix the device references there as needed. Package: ntp (debian/main) Maintainer: Bdale Garbee [EMAIL PROTECTED] 59090 slink-potato upgrade (probably) delete config file This is the problem with the xntp3 meta-package being created from the ntp sources which have a lower version number than the xntp3 package had in slink. I have had several excellant suggestions about how to fix this, and expect to upload a fresh set of ntp/xntp3 packages sometime this weekend which will close this and a few other misc bugs. Bdale
Re: Release-critical Bugreport for March 10, 2000
On Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 03:15:04AM -0600, BugScan reporter was heard to say: Package: gnomeicu (debian/main) Maintainer: Edward C. Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED] 58919 gnomeicu causes XServer to grab all the memory. I think there was a discussion on -devel that concluded that there's some evidence that this bug is caused by Imlib.. Also, from the reporter: I think the bug is Important because it causes the system to became [sic] unusable. But i stil use gnomeicu so, it may not be so RC. Bug severity inflation, perhaps? Package: mozilla (debian/main) Maintainer: Debian Mozilla maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED] 59990 mozilla: Segmentation fault on first start 60012 M14 segfaults immediately I haven't looked at these (the BTS doesn't even seem to list them), but they're probably just the result of an old ~/.mozilla hanging around.. Package: rep-gtk (debian/main) Maintainer: Mikolaj J. Habryn [EMAIL PROTECTED] 58684 rep-gtk_0.8-2(unstable): build error (prototype mismatch) Package: sawmill (debian/main) Maintainer: Mikolaj J. Habryn [EMAIL PROTECTED] [REMOVE] This package can be removed if it is not fixed. 59760 sawmill: Sawmill fails to load -- missing file /usr/lib/rep/0.11/i686-pc-linux-gnu/timers.so It would be really unfortunate if we lost these -- but the version of Sawmill this bug is reported against isn't the one in potato!! This is 0.25-1, the latest bleeding-edge release of sawmill, which AFAIK is only in unstable. John appears to have sent a patch for 58684 as well; I don't know if that's fixed or not. Package: ssh (non-US/main) Maintainer: Philip Hands [EMAIL PROTECTED] [HELP] Please NMU, with extreme care. Contact Tommi Virtanen for info. 59464 X11 forwarding appears to be /completely/ broken in 1.2.2-14 This is my bug, and it's fixed now. (although X forwarding is still broken, I can get it to work with some trouble) 59862 ssh: X forwarding problems even after xauth upgrade Not sure what's wrong there.. Daniel -- Do you know why the prisoner in the tower watches the flight of birds? -- Terry Pratchett, _Reaper_Man_
Re: Release-critical Bugreport for March 10, 2000
On Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 03:15:04AM -0600, BugScan reporter wrote: Bug stamp-out list for Mar 10 03:04 (CST) Total number of release-critical bugs: 181 Number that will disappear after removing packages marked [REMOVE]: 9 -- Package: mp3blaster (debian/main) Maintainer: Joseph Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] [REMOVE] This package can be removed if it is not fixed. 59564 mp3blaster: fails to build, C++ error This error is trivial. $ zcat mp3blaster_2-0b16-1.diff.gz | head -2 --- mp3blaster-2-0b16.orig/mpegsound/mpeglayer3.cc +++ mp3blaster-2-0b16/mpegsound/mpeglayer3.cc $ tar tzf mp3blaster_2-0b16.orig.tar.gz | head -1 mp3blaster-2.0b16/Makefile.in If you doesn't see the difference : mp3blaster-2-0b16/ mp3blaster-2.0b16/ ^ Fixing takes 5 minutes.
