Re: Update excuses - please explain

2002-08-22 Thread Andreas Tille 
On Thu, 22 Aug 2002, Anthony Towns wrote:

> No, nothing stange about it at all. paul got rebuilt before the new
> libgtkdatabox-* was available. It either needs to be binNMUed on those
> architectures, or a new source needs to be uploaded to get it rebuilt.
Well, now I understand the trouble.  New upload just went to incoming.
On the other hand I insist on my statement that this is not obviously
to see using the update_excuses and madison and needs some guessing
on developers side.

Next question:  Is there any trace of packages which are uploaded to
stable and should go to woody-proposed-updates?  How can I check if
the moove to there is progressing or whether I need to do something?

Kind regards

 Andreas.

Re: Update excuses - please explain

2002-08-22 Thread Anthony Towns 
On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 09:21:39AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Aug 2002, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > that's what the m68k and sparc buildds used to build paul. The sparc and
> > m68k debs need to be updated to reflect the new library.
> But what to do that these debs will be updated?  The autobuilder
> leaves no trace that there went something wrong and I can see the
> debs in the archive.  Isn't it strange?

No, nothing stange about it at all. paul got rebuilt before the new
libgtkdatabox-* was available. It either needs to be binNMUed on those
architectures, or a new source needs to be uploaded to get it rebuilt.

Cheers,
aj

-- 
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

 ``If you don't do it now, you'll be one year older when you do.''

Re: Update excuses - please explain

2002-08-22 Thread Andreas Tille 
On Thu, 22 Aug 2002, Anthony Towns wrote:

> Which is to say "libgtkdatabox" no longer exists, but it used to, and
Oh well, yes - I remember ;)

> that's what the m68k and sparc buildds used to build paul. The sparc and
> m68k debs need to be updated to reflect the new library.
But what to do that these debs will be updated?  The autobuilder
leaves no trace that there went something wrong and I can see the
debs in the archive.  Isn't it strange?

Kind regards

 Andreas.

Re: Update excuses - please explain

2002-08-22 Thread Anthony Towns 
On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 08:26:20AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> # paul (- to 0.1.0.2-5)
> * paul/m68k unsatisfiable Depends: libgtkdatabox (>= 0.1.3)
> * paul/sparc unsatisfiable Depends: libgtkdatabox (>= 0.1.3)
> Moreover:
> auric:~> madison libgtkdatabox
> libgtkdatabox | 0.1.12.3-1 | oldstable | source, alpha, arm, i386, m68k, 
> powerpc, sparc
> libgtkdatabox | 1:0.1.13.0-6 |   testing | source
> libgtkdatabox | 1:0.1.13.0-6 |  unstable | source

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ madison libgtkdatabox-0.1.13-0
libgtkdatabox-0.1.13-0 | 1:0.1.13.0-6 |   testing | alpha, arm, hppa, i386, 
ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
libgtkdatabox-0.1.13-0 | 1:0.1.13.0-6 |  unstable | alpha, arm, hppa, 
hurd-i386, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc

> Sorry I can't verify the problem why paul has unsatisfiable Depends on
> m68k and sparc.  Could anybody please enlighten me?

Which is to say "libgtkdatabox" no longer exists, but it used to, and
that's what the m68k and sparc buildds used to build paul. The sparc and
m68k debs need to be updated to reflect the new library.

Cheers,
aj

-- 
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

 ``If you don't do it now, you'll be one year older when you do.''

Update excuses - please explain

2002-08-22 Thread Andreas Tille 
Hello

   http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_excuses.html#paul

says:

# paul (- to 0.1.0.2-5)

* Maintainer: Andreas Tille
* 76 days old (needed 2 days)
* paul/m68k unsatisfiable Depends: libgtkdatabox (>= 0.1.3)
* paul/sparc unsatisfiable Depends: libgtkdatabox (>= 0.1.3)
* Valid candidate

Moreover:

auric:~> madison paul
  paul |  0.1-1 | oldstable | source, alpha, arm, i386, m68k, 
powerpc, sparc
  paul |  0.1.0.2-5 |  unstable | source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, 
m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
auric:~> madison libgtkdatabox
libgtkdatabox | 0.1.12.3-1 | oldstable | source, alpha, arm, i386, m68k, 
powerpc, sparc
libgtkdatabox | 1:0.1.13.0-6 |   testing | source
libgtkdatabox | 1:0.1.13.0-6 |  unstable | source


Sorry I can't verify the problem why paul has unsatisfiable Depends on
m68k and sparc.  Could anybody please enlighten me?

Kind regards

Andreas.