Re: Uploaded ssh 1.2.26-4 (source i386) to non-US
On 12 May 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ssh (1.2.26-4) unstable; urgency=low . * make sure that ssh1 gets user suid bit set (closes: #37127) Files: 264c7c1726f8d333a7de8c356bd7a73e 619 non-us/net optional ssh_1.2.26-4.dsc 8346f02e1de9f0771a56612e044b2b91 46926 non-us/net optional ssh_1.2.26-4.diff.gz d24a8fe61a54ecace08cf6349bfd5e93 430966 non-us/net optional ssh_1.2.26-4_i386.deb 33d2642924205944373e7335933874bd 40768 non-us/net optional ssh-askpass_1.2.26-4_i386.deb I guess this will be rejected... where should it go (no, I will not subscribe to debian-policy now...) non-US/main because we all need it? non-US/contrib because it needs rsaref to compile? non-US/non-free because rsaref is also in non-US? Ciao, Christian.
Re: Uploaded ssh 1.2.26-4 (source i386) to non-US
On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 03:44:15PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote: 264c7c1726f8d333a7de8c356bd7a73e 619 non-us/net optional ssh_1.2.26-4.dsc 8346f02e1de9f0771a56612e044b2b91 46926 non-us/net optional ssh_1.2.26-4.diff.gz d24a8fe61a54ecace08cf6349bfd5e93 430966 non-us/net optional ssh_1.2.26-4_i386.deb 33d2642924205944373e7335933874bd 40768 non-us/net optional ssh-askpass_1.2.26-4_i386.deb I guess this will be rejected... I doubt it, since the old ssh package is already in place, so this'll probably get overriden. where should it go (no, I will not subscribe to debian-policy now...): non-US/main because we all need it? Definitely not that. non-US/non-free because rsaref is also in non-US? In there, because the licence is clearly not DFSG free. See /usr/doc/ssh/copyright, the very title says: SSH (Secure Shell) NON-COMMERCIAL LICENSE (Version 1, May 27th, 1996) ~~ -- enJoy -*/\*- http://jagor.srce.hr/~jrodin/
Re: Uploaded ssh 1.2.26-4 (source i386) to non-US
On 12 May 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ssh (1.2.26-4) unstable; urgency=low . * make sure that ssh1 gets user suid bit set (closes: #37127) Files: 264c7c1726f8d333a7de8c356bd7a73e 619 non-us/net optional ssh_1.2.26-4.dsc 8346f02e1de9f0771a56612e044b2b91 46926 non-us/net optional ssh_1.2.26-4.diff.gz d24a8fe61a54ecace08cf6349bfd5e93 430966 non-us/net optional ssh_1.2.26-4_i386.deb 33d2642924205944373e7335933874bd 40768 non-us/net optional ssh-askpass_1.2.26-4_i386.deb I guess this will be rejected... where should it go (no, I will not subscribe to debian-policy now...) non-US/main because we all need it? non-US/contrib because it needs rsaref to compile? non-US/non-free because rsaref is also in non-US? non-US/non-free because ssh is non-free Does this mean I need to re-upload it, or will someone else sort it out ? Cheers, Phil.
Re: Uploaded ssh 1.2.26-4 (source i386) to non-US
On Wed, 12 May 1999, Josip Rodin wrote: I doubt it, since the old ssh package is already in place, so this'll probably get overriden. You have a point there... I had this: Installing: apache-ssl_1.3.6.4+1.32-1_m68k.deb to dists/potato/non-US/main/binary-m68k/apache-ssl_1.3.6.4+1.32-1.deb And I got this mail: (new) pgp-us_2.6.3a-5_m68k.deb optional non-us/utils WARNING: Already present in non-free distribution. because pgp is allready in non-US/non-free on pandora? In there, because the licence is clearly not DFSG free. See /usr/doc/ssh/copyright, the very title says: Thanx for the explanation (my question was more theoretical though, I do not maintain any non-US packages). So I will build ssh for m68k and dinstall will move it by itself were it belongs, hopefully. Ciao, Christian.
