Re: Use of the -devel-announce list

1999-05-12 Thread Edward Betts
On Wed, 12 May, 1999, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> Please can I encourage anyone posting to -devel-announce to ensure
> that they have set the Reply-To: field to something sensible, and to
> encourage anyone replying to a -devel-announce posting to check where
> they are sending their reply.  (Hint: -devel-announce is usually not
> appropriate!)
> 
> This is meant to be a very low volume announcement list, and it would
> be good to keep it that way.
> 
> Question: would it be worth making -devel-announce a moderated list?

No, that is not the hacker way, that is the suit way.

The solution must be that every time you see a follow-up in debian-announce
that should not be there you send a message in private mail, to the author
explaining their mistake. 

They will get a couple of mails telling them not to do it and they won't do it
agian.

I wonder if you know how ITS stops hackers crashing the system. They had a
KILL SYSTEM command that would crash the system. A newbie would find it, run
it and the system would crash, everybody would shout at them and they would
never do it agian. Nobody got a kick out of crashing the system so nobody did
it, except newbies, and they were newbies, so could be forgive, once.

-- 
I consume, therefore I am


pgpOgU3YrEgiE.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Use of the -devel-announce list

1999-05-12 Thread Ben Pfaff
Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

   Question: would it be worth making -devel-announce a moderated list?

Could we just add some sort of mail filter rule that forces a
Reply-To: to be set, and either adds Reply-To: debian-devel or returns
the mail to the sender with an explanation if none is set (depending
on how BOFHish we want to be).



Re: Use of the -devel-announce list

1999-05-12 Thread Vincent Murphy
On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 03:24:06PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> Question: would it be worth making -devel-announce a moderated list?

 absolutely.  the logo thread on debian-devel-announce seriously pissed me
off, because i don't filter the -announce lists with procmail.

-vinny



Re: Use of the -devel-announce list

1999-05-12 Thread Andrew Isaacson
On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 03:24:06PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> Question: would it be worth making -devel-announce a moderated list?

Yes!

But I wouldn't want to be the moderator... so maybe your suggestion is
enough.  Perhaps an auto-moderator, which rejects messages lacking a
Reply-To: header (with an informative error message)?

-andy
-- 
Andy Isaacson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]Fight Spam, join CAUCE:
http://www.csl.mtu.edu/~adisaacs/  http://www.cauce.org/