[FIXED] Re: Why was Bug#40360 not closed automatically?

1999-09-27 Thread Thomas Schoepf
On Sun, Sep 26, 1999 at 09:07:22PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:

  I just noticed that the BTS lists 2 outstanding important bugs
  (#40360,#40459) against mutt, although they have been closed by 
 mutt_0.95.7-1:
 They have been reopened, the bug is not fixed.

Argl, my mistake. And because I hate making mistakes I took some time and I
found a fix!

Please try this patch:

--- dh_configure.orig   Mon Sep 27 02:24:16 1999
+++ dh_configureMon Sep 27 02:18:18 1999
@@ -15,5 +15,5 @@
 export SENDMAIL=/usr/sbin/sendmail
 export PERL=/usr/bin/perl

-exec ./configure ${1+$@}
+./configure ${1+$@}


I have absolutely no idea why, but this little exec in front causes all this
pain. With it, I can't compile mutt on my machine (with autoconf and automake
installed), without it it's no problem at all.

What I saw is that with this exec, the Makefiles somehow contain a VPATH
variable set to the current build directory and both srcdir and top_srcdir
get set to different values that without this exec.

The Makefiles seem to be designed as if they presume srcdir and top_srcdir set
to relative rather than absolute paths. With absolute paths, ./po/Makefile
fails to recreate ./keymap_defs.h


Thomas
-- 
GnuPG: ID=B0FA4F49, PGP2: ID=2EA7BBBD
http://www.debian.org/debian/doc/debian-keyring.tar.gz


pgpdfAAjcR7Rt.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Why was Bug#40360 not closed automatically?

1999-09-26 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Sep 26, Thomas Schoepf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I just noticed that the BTS lists 2 outstanding important bugs
 (#40360,#40459) against mutt, although they have been closed by mutt_0.95.7-1:
They have been reopened, the bug is not fixed.

If someone understands automake please help.

-- 
ciao,
Marco