Re: arch-dir of ruby1.8/1.9 was changed to i486-linux from i386-linux

2005-07-01 Thread Andres Salomon
On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 00:52:32 +0900, akira yamada wrote:
[...]
 And if you are maintaining packages which have extension libraries,
 please rebuild and upload it to Debian.
 
 

Please file bugs against extensions; lots of people don't read d-d.




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



arch-dir of ruby1.8/1.9 was changed to i486-linux from i386-linux

2005-06-29 Thread akira yamada
Dear Ruby users


I uploaded ruby1.8_1.8.2-9 and ruby1.9_1.9.0+20050623-2 to Debian.
In this release for ix86, arch-name of ruby1.8/1.9 was changed to 
/usr/lib/ruby/1.[89]/i486-linux from /usr/lib/ruby/1.[89]/i386-linux.

ref: 
  - URL:http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/06/msg00010.html
  - URL:http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=315566

New $LOAD_PATH is:

  /usr/local/lib/site_ruby/1.[89]
  /usr/local/lib/site_ruby/1.[89]/i486-linux
  /usr/local/lib/site_ruby/1.[89]/i386-linux
  /usr/local/lib/site_ruby
  /usr/lib/ruby/1.[89]
  /usr/lib/ruby/1.[89]/i486-linux
  /usr/lib/ruby/1.[89]/i386-linux
  .

/usr/local/lib/site_ruby/1.[89]/i386-linux and
/usr/lib/ruby/1.[89]/i386-linux is temporally added for transition.
I will remove them at  one or two month later.


If you locally build extension libraries,  
please rebuild it with new ruby1.[89]-dev package.
And if you are maintaining packages which have extension libraries,
please rebuild and upload it to Debian.


Thank you

-- 
akira yamada



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: arch-dir of ruby1.8/1.9 was changed to i486-linux from i386-linux

2005-06-29 Thread David Moreno Garza
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 00:52 +0900, akira yamada wrote:
 Dear Ruby users
 
 
 I uploaded ruby1.8_1.8.2-9 and ruby1.9_1.9.0+20050623-2 to Debian.
 In this release for ix86, arch-name of ruby1.8/1.9 was changed to 
 /usr/lib/ruby/1.[89]/i486-linux from /usr/lib/ruby/1.[89]/i386-linux.

Any specific idea why not use 'i486-linux-gnu'? I've seen it was already
reported on the bug you mentioned, but there was no further discussion.

--
David Moreno Garza [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.damog.net/
 Those who can't write, write help files. 
 GPG: C671257D - 6EF6 C284 C95D 78F6 0B78 FFD3 981C 5FD7 C671 257D


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: arch-dir of ruby1.8/1.9 was changed to i486-linux from i386-linux

2005-06-29 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Yamada-san,

On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 12:52:32AM +0900, akira yamada wrote:
 I uploaded ruby1.8_1.8.2-9 and ruby1.9_1.9.0+20050623-2 to Debian.
 In this release for ix86, arch-name of ruby1.8/1.9 was changed to 
 /usr/lib/ruby/1.[89]/i486-linux from /usr/lib/ruby/1.[89]/i386-linux.

 ref: 
   - URL:http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/06/msg00010.html
   - URL:http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=315566

 New $LOAD_PATH is:

   /usr/local/lib/site_ruby/1.[89]
   /usr/local/lib/site_ruby/1.[89]/i486-linux
   /usr/local/lib/site_ruby/1.[89]/i386-linux
   /usr/local/lib/site_ruby
   /usr/lib/ruby/1.[89]
   /usr/lib/ruby/1.[89]/i486-linux
   /usr/lib/ruby/1.[89]/i386-linux
   .

 /usr/local/lib/site_ruby/1.[89]/i386-linux and
 /usr/lib/ruby/1.[89]/i386-linux is temporally added for transition.
 I will remove them at  one or two month later.

If you drop them from the path, what is your plan for ensuring that partial
upgrades from sarge to etch don't cause broken systems?

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: arch-dir of ruby1.8/1.9 was changed to i486-linux from i386-linux

2005-06-29 Thread akira yamada

On 2005/06/30, at 4:11, David Moreno Garza wrote:
 In this release for ix86, arch-name of ruby1.8/1.9 was changed to 
 /usr/lib/ruby/1.[89]/i486-linux from /usr/lib/ruby/1.[89]/i386-linux.
 Any specific idea why not use 'i486-linux-gnu'? I've seen it was already
 reported on the bug you mentioned, but there was no further discussion.

It is a specification of original ruby and is not a Debian specific change.

-- 
akira yamada



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]