Re: autoconf 2.72 to unstable?
On 14/06/2024 18:24, Andreas Metzler wrote: On 2024-06-14 Gürkan Myczko wrote: [...] Have never done mass bug filings, any easy way, preferably something copy pastable, non-interactive. Hej, How about mass-bug(1) in devscripts? Also set a user/usertag when doing an MBF in order to have a nice overview of all bugs with their status. Cheers, Emilio
Re: autoconf 2.72 to unstable?
On 2024-06-14 Gürkan Myczko wrote: [...] > Have never done mass bug filings, any easy way, preferably something copy > pastable, > non-interactive. Hej, How about mass-bug(1) in devscripts? cu Andreas
Re: autoconf 2.72 to unstable?
Hi Gürkan, On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 12:03 PM Gürkan Myczko wrote: > > Have never done mass bug filings, any easy way, preferably something > copy pastable, > non-interactive. Concerning erlang, I've already prepared an upload which builds with autoconf 1.72, so you may skip it when reporting bugs. Cheers! -- Sergei Golovan
Re: autoconf 2.72 to unstable?
On 14.06.2024 07:48, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: Hi On 2024-06-13 15:25:04 +0200, Gürkan Myczko wrote: is the t64 transition over? It is. here's the test results http://qa-logs.debian.net/2024/03/20/ I only randomly checked some of the packages, but didn't find any bug reports based on these results. Please report them. Have never done mass bug filings, any easy way, preferably something copy pastable, non-interactive. Best, Alex Cheers
Re: autoconf 2.72 to unstable?
Hi On 2024-06-13 15:25:04 +0200, Gürkan Myczko wrote: > is the t64 transition over? It is. > here's the test results http://qa-logs.debian.net/2024/03/20/ I only randomly checked some of the packages, but didn't find any bug reports based on these results. Please report them. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
autoconf 2.72 to unstable?
Hi is the t64 transition over? here's the test results http://qa-logs.debian.net/2024/03/20/ best, alex
