Re: bind9-chroot again
also sprach Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.15.0305 +0100]: > I vote yes for the Debconfy bit. I chroot it by hand, and I find it > insanely nifty, even though bind9 isn't plagued by the same security > problems bind is. Helps me sleep better at night, or something. okay. what's your strategy, *not* using "mount --bind", and not copying files into the chroot with every call to the init.d script (because it's annoying if you use e.g. tripwire)? -- martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.) \ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; [EMAIL PROTECTED] hi! i'm a .signature virus! copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread! pgp4pTtajvy56.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: bind9-chroot again
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 02:04:54AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > remember: > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2001/debian-devel-200109/msg01393.html > > well, i have just installed a couple of bind9, and i am *tired* of > chrooting them by hand. can we please have a final vote on whether > chrooting bind should be a debconf option of the bind9 package, or > whether i could create such a pseudo package, which would chroot an > existing installation. i tend for the package just because it's modular, > but Bdale said he'd want this functionality in the main package. I vote yes for the Debconfy bit. I chroot it by hand, and I find it insanely nifty, even though bind9 isn't plagued by the same security problems bind is. Helps me sleep better at night, or something. -- Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> who needs a girlfriend i have a tamagotchi pgpywWtGUmcFJ.pgp Description: PGP signature
bind9-chroot again
remember: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2001/debian-devel-200109/msg01393.html well, i have just installed a couple of bind9, and i am *tired* of chrooting them by hand. can we please have a final vote on whether chrooting bind should be a debconf option of the bind9 package, or whether i could create such a pseudo package, which would chroot an existing installation. i tend for the package just because it's modular, but Bdale said he'd want this functionality in the main package. so??? -- martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.) \ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; [EMAIL PROTECTED] warning: dates in calendar are closer than they appear. pgpNrFxpfPZU8.pgp Description: PGP signature
