Constantly Usable Testing team forming

2010-08-14 Thread Joey Hess
At DebConf there was a standing-room-only BoF to see if it made sense to
form a team to work on the Constantly Usable Testing (CUT) idea. My
feeling of the BoF session is that the project is generally open to the
idea of doing something to make testing more generally usable. And has a
lot of ideas of different ways to accomplish that.

A team is being formed, at http://cut.debian.net/ ; there you can find
video of the BoF, and a mailing list, which people interested in working
on CUT are invited to join.

We will use the mailing list, and the website, to develop some initial
action plans for how to implement CUT. And to make sure we have enough
people to be able to follow through on them. We will report back here to
make sure our plans are acceptible before we start doing anything too
user-visible.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: constantly usable testing

2010-07-23 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Jo, 22 iul 10, 22:51:32, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
 On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 03:10:16PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
  I've noticed that linking to this page seems to kill threads, which is
  not my intent, but: http://kitenet.net/~joey/code/debian/cut/
  
  The idea still seems reasonable to me, and the work required, beyond
  what is already done, not too much. Shame that nobody has tried to do it
  yet.
 
 I've always found CUT to be an interesting (thought) experiment.
 
 A particular nice feature of how you present it, is that it's modular
 enough to be tried with little impact on the rest of Debian; as you
 observe: « most of which [needed ingredients] are already being done on
 a best-effort basis ».  So, in principle, nothing stops you or anyone
 else to actually form a CUT team and experiment with the idea.  That's
 probably the only way forward from CUT-is-a-thread-killer to have data
 that support the feasibility / user appreciation of the idea.

For me it's quite obvious that CUT would happen if the relevant teams: 
(Security, Release, d-i, ...) would have enough manpower.

One possible approach would be asking through d-i if the user wants 
plain testing or a CUT snapshot, and then set the apropiate pinning. 
Security updates would not be possible via unstable migrations (as it is 
for testing), but I already mentioned the security team needs more 
people for this.

And there's no need to call CUT differently, just call it beta1, beta2 
and rc1, rc2, ... as soon as testing is frozen. With a proper 
announcement/press release users will jump to using it ;)

Regards,
Andrei
-- 
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: constantly usable testing

2010-07-23 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 23/07/10 at 09:16 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
 On Jo, 22 iul 10, 22:51:32, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
  On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 03:10:16PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
   I've noticed that linking to this page seems to kill threads, which is
   not my intent, but: http://kitenet.net/~joey/code/debian/cut/
   
   The idea still seems reasonable to me, and the work required, beyond
   what is already done, not too much. Shame that nobody has tried to do it
   yet.
  
  I've always found CUT to be an interesting (thought) experiment.
  
  A particular nice feature of how you present it, is that it's modular
  enough to be tried with little impact on the rest of Debian; as you
  observe: « most of which [needed ingredients] are already being done on
  a best-effort basis ».  So, in principle, nothing stops you or anyone
  else to actually form a CUT team and experiment with the idea.  That's
  probably the only way forward from CUT-is-a-thread-killer to have data
  that support the feasibility / user appreciation of the idea.
 
 For me it's quite obvious that CUT would happen if the relevant teams: 
 (Security, Release, d-i, ...) would have enough manpower.

It depends on the implementation of CUT. One way to see it would be like
Joey's idea, improving the current testing suite.

Another way to see it would be as a distinct suite (similar to Raphael
Hertzog's Working suite, described in his 2002 DPL platform -
http://www.debian.org/vote/2002/platforms/raphael#release1).  Then we
would have release managers for this suite as well, similar to the
testing release managers, who would work on keeping this suite in a
good shape according to a slightly different set of criterias than the
testing RM.

L.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100723082741.ga15...@xanadu.blop.info



constantly usable testing

2010-07-22 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 03:10:16PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
 I've noticed that linking to this page seems to kill threads, which is
 not my intent, but: http://kitenet.net/~joey/code/debian/cut/
 
 The idea still seems reasonable to me, and the work required, beyond
 what is already done, not too much. Shame that nobody has tried to do it
 yet.

I've always found CUT to be an interesting (thought) experiment.

A particular nice feature of how you present it, is that it's modular
enough to be tried with little impact on the rest of Debian; as you
observe: « most of which [needed ingredients] are already being done on
a best-effort basis ».  So, in principle, nothing stops you or anyone
else to actually form a CUT team and experiment with the idea.  That's
probably the only way forward from CUT-is-a-thread-killer to have data
that support the feasibility / user appreciation of the idea.

Have you ever actually tried to call people to arms and *form* the CUT
team?  (Or maybe that was exactly the point of your mail …)

Cheers.

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
z...@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..|  .  |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie
sempre uno zaino ...| ..: | Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: constantly usable testing

2010-07-22 Thread Joey Hess
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
 Have you ever actually tried to call people to arms and *form* the CUT
 team?

No. But it's been 3 years, so please don't wait for me to do it. ;)

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: constantly usable testing

2010-07-22 Thread Joerg Jaspert

 Have you ever actually tried to call people to arms and *form* the CUT
 team?
 No. But it's been 3 years, so please don't wait for me to do it. ;)

JFTR, with the great new machine ftpmaster got, we actually have the
resources to run such a thing (archive wise, manpower is
different). That is, we can (easy enough) provide you with an archive
section to play in and see if the idea works out.
If there is someone interested in doing the main work on it (ftpmaster
only wants the archive side of it), you know where we are.

-- 
bye, Joerg
I think there's a world market for about five computers.
 -- attr. Thomas J. Watson (Chairman of the Board, IBM), 1943


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87ocdykhpt@delenn.ganneff.de