dinstall problem?
hello; One of my packages, uptime-applet, seems to have vanished. Or has it? Apparently something went wrong during the dinstall and I never got an email saying INSTALLED like usual. Looking on auric, I see the package IS there (uptime-applet_0.2.0-4) in the pool. However using the CGI search on packages.debian.org does not show it (package isn't found). The package was duploaded (to unstable) on April 20th. There is also an open bug against uptime-applet that 0.2.0-4 closes, but it is still open... I looked at the changes file and don't see anything wrong and I don't suspect there is since it IS in the pool. Can anyone shead some light on this? TIA, Ron pgpsiaN30XF9H.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: dinstall problem?
On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 10:03:09PM -0700, Ron Farrer wrote: One of my packages, uptime-applet, seems to have vanished. Or has it? Apparently something went wrong during the dinstall and I never got an email saying INSTALLED like usual. Looking on auric, I see the package IS there (uptime-applet_0.2.0-4) in the pool. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ madison uptime-applet uptime-applet |0.2.0-1 | testing | alpha, sparc, source uptime-applet |0.2.0-1 | unstable | sparc uptime-applet |0.2.0-4 | unstable | alpha, source It doesn't appear to be available for i386. However using the CGI search on packages.debian.org does not show it (package isn't found). The p.d.o CGI probably only looks at i386 packages. silo doesn't show up either, eg. The package was duploaded (to unstable) on April 20th. There is also an open bug against uptime-applet that 0.2.0-4 closes, but it is still open... uptime-applet (0.2.0-4) unstable; urgency=low * Moved to autconf, closes: bug#93713 93713 is closed, though: it's the build-depends bug which was also closed in -3. I looked at the changes file and don't see anything wrong and I don't suspect there is since it IS in the pool. Can anyone shead some light on this? HTH. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/ I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't care about, is too much.'' -- John S. Novak, III (The Humblest Man on the Net) pgpi7mCCtMqLD.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: dinstall problem?
Anthony Towns (aj@azure.humbug.org.au) wrote: It doesn't appear to be available for i386. snip The p.d.o CGI probably only looks at i386 packages. silo doesn't show up either, eg. That explains it! Ok, now I can sleep better. :) 93713 is closed, though: it's the build-depends bug which was also closed in -3. Yup, and herein lies my mistake. I said to close an already closed bug (doh!) What I REALLY meant to do was close #93109, I'll take care of that later. Had I bothered to notice the bug was under a DIFFERENT number, that would have been ok. Ohh well, not the end of the world... HTH. Yup, thanks. Ron pgpqGgJ4jZ5Y9.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: dinstall problem?
On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 10:56:54PM -0700, Ron Farrer wrote: Yup, and herein lies my mistake. I said to close an already closed bug (doh!) What I REALLY meant to do was close #93109, I'll take care of that later. Had I bothered to notice the bug was under a DIFFERENT number, that would have been ok. Ohh well, not the end of the world... And just drop a note to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to do it ;-) Julian -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, Queen Mary, Univ. of London Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see http://people.debian.org/~jdg Donate free food to the world's hungry: see http://www.thehungersite.com/
Re: dinstall problem?
Julian Gilbey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: And just drop a note to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to do it ;-) Yup, already done. Although the developers-reference says to mail the .changes file (section 10.4, last paragraph.) Ron pgp40OK6BEjSO.pgp Description: PGP signature
