Re: experimental bugs preventing testing transition?
* Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050811 23:46]: > Is this a bug in Björns script, or in the new versioned BTS, or in > katie's code? Britney is version-tracking agnostic currently. (Though that's one of the issues I want to work on this weekend.) Cheers, Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: experimental bugs preventing testing transition?
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > If you ask on http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=tetex-bin > why tetex-bin isn't in testing yet, one of the reasons is > # tetex-bin has release-critical bugs > Clicking on the "release-critical bugs" link brings you to a page that > only lists > #320980: tetex-bin: Updmap error because a map file has not been found > Package: tetex-bin (tetex-bin 3.0-5.0.sarge1); Severity: serious; Reported > by... > but 3.0-5 is in experimental (3.0-5.0.sarge1 is a binary-only-backport I > made), and the package trying to enter testing is 2.0.2-31. [...] As Colin noted britney is not yet bts-version aware, but I think tagging the bug experimental via [EMAIL PROTECTED] should do the trick. cu andreas -- "See, I told you they'd listen to Reason," [SPOILER] Svfurlr fnlf, fuhggvat qbja gur juveyvat tha. Neal Stephenson in "Snow Crash" http://downhill.aus.cc/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: experimental bugs preventing testing transition?
On 10/08/05, Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 06:49:12PM +1200, Nigel Jones wrote: > > On 10/08/05, Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Testing and BTS version tracking haven't been updated to play properly > > > together yet. > > > > If i'm not mistaken, you could tag the bug etch, of course, this is a > > very nasty/dirty way of getting the RC-free package actually in > > testing, > > I'd really prefer if people didn't do that. It makes it harder to get to > a sane world from here, and it means we have to try to support even more > strange combinations of workarounds. Yes very true, I must admit I should have removed it from the email when I remembered about the experimental tag. (Which as I mentioned before I believe should work correctly?) > > -- > Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- N Jones Proud Debian & FOSS User Debian Maintainer of: html2ps, ipkungfu, dvorak7min & windowlab
Re: experimental bugs preventing testing transition?
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 06:49:12PM +1200, Nigel Jones wrote: > On 10/08/05, Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Testing and BTS version tracking haven't been updated to play properly > > together yet. > > If i'm not mistaken, you could tag the bug etch, of course, this is a > very nasty/dirty way of getting the RC-free package actually in > testing, I'd really prefer if people didn't do that. It makes it harder to get to a sane world from here, and it means we have to try to support even more strange combinations of workarounds. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: experimental bugs preventing testing transition?
On 10/08/05, Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 08:15:13PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > > #320980: tetex-bin: Updmap error because a map file has not been found > > Package: tetex-bin (tetex-bin 3.0-5.0.sarge1); Severity: serious; Reported > > by... > > > > but 3.0-5 is in experimental (3.0-5.0.sarge1 is a binary-only-backport I > > made), and the package trying to enter testing is 2.0.2-31. > > > > Is this a bug in Björns script, or in the new versioned BTS, or in > > katie's code? > > Testing and BTS version tracking haven't been updated to play properly > together yet. If i'm not mistaken, you could tag the bug etch, of course, this is a very nasty/dirty way of getting the RC-free package actually in testing, but IIRC until the program that manages testing knows about versioned BTS, it would work for experimental, the other option is to just tag the bug experimental and that should work as well, (on second thoughts that latter would be extremely more perfered over the former). > > -- > Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- N Jones Proud Debian & FOSS User Debian Maintainer of: html2ps, ipkungfu, dvorak7min & windowlab
Re: experimental bugs preventing testing transition?
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 08:15:13PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > #320980: tetex-bin: Updmap error because a map file has not been found > Package: tetex-bin (tetex-bin 3.0-5.0.sarge1); Severity: serious; Reported > by... > > but 3.0-5 is in experimental (3.0-5.0.sarge1 is a binary-only-backport I > made), and the package trying to enter testing is 2.0.2-31. > > Is this a bug in Björns script, or in the new versioned BTS, or in > katie's code? Testing and BTS version tracking haven't been updated to play properly together yet. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
experimental bugs preventing testing transition?
Hi, I don't know whether this has been discussed before (and I only had a short look at the list archive), and I'm currently not subscribed, so please Cc me on any flames ;-). If you ask on http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=tetex-bin why tetex-bin isn't in testing yet, one of the reasons is # tetex-bin has release-critical bugs Clicking on the "release-critical bugs" link brings you to a page that only lists #320980: tetex-bin: Updmap error because a map file has not been found Package: tetex-bin (tetex-bin 3.0-5.0.sarge1); Severity: serious; Reported by... but 3.0-5 is in experimental (3.0-5.0.sarge1 is a binary-only-backport I made), and the package trying to enter testing is 2.0.2-31. Is this a bug in Björns script, or in the new versioned BTS, or in katie's code? TIA, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
