Re: fvwm{,2,-common} packages up for adoption
*- Vincent Renardias wrote about "Re: fvwm{,2,-common} packages up for adoption"
> On Sun, 24 Jan 1999, Austin Donnelly wrote:
>
>> I am (in theory) still maintaining the following packages:
>>
>> fvwm
>> fvwm2
>> fvwm-common
>> xloadimage
>> xcal
>>
>> In practice, I haven't uploaded new versions of these for many months.
>
> I volunteer to adotp fvwm2 & fvwm-common.
> (I already began to work on it actually, expect an upload next WE or so)
>
> Cordialement,
>
I know that the fvwm2 official TODO list has 'official themes support'
in it but it would be really great if the Debian style hooks setup could
be adapted to use the themes(with minimal pain) on fvwm.themes.org.
Or at least some documentation on how to use them until it is
'officially' added the the upstream source.
Currently one is required cut and past to various *.hook files as well
as reset several defaults.
Thanks,
--
Brian
-
"Never criticize anybody until you have walked a mile in their shoes,
because by that time you will be a mile away and have their shoes."
- unknown
Mechanical Engineering[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Purdue University http://www.ecn.purdue.edu/~servis
-
Re: fvwm{,2,-common} packages up for adoption
On Sun, 24 Jan 1999, Austin Donnelly wrote:
> I am (in theory) still maintaining the following packages:
>
> fvwm
> fvwm2
> fvwm-common
> xloadimage
> xcal
>
> In practice, I haven't uploaded new versions of these for many months.
I volunteer to adotp fvwm2 & fvwm-common.
(I already began to work on it actually, expect an upload next WE or so)
Cordialement,
--
- Vincent RENARDIAS [EMAIL PROTECTED],pipo}.com,{debian,openhardware}.org} -
- Debian/GNU Linux: http://www.openhardware.orgLogiciels du soleil: -
- http://www.fr.debian.orgOpen Hardware: http://www.ldsol.com -
---
-"Microsoft est à l'informatique ce que le grumeau est à la crépe..." -
fvwm{,2,-common} packages up for adoption
Hi, I am (in theory) still maintaining the following packages: fvwm fvwm2 fvwm-common xloadimage xcal In practice, I haven't uploaded new versions of these for many months. Both xcal and xloadimage have few outstanding bugs. fvwm2 has many outstanding bugs, some of which are in reality either feature requests or disagreements with particular configuration details. With the recent move of fvwm2 development into CVS, the release rate has increased greatly (however, it's also likely the stability has decreased somewhat). This is one of the reasons I haven't made any 2.1.x releases of fvwm2. But its mainly due to lack of time. Therefore, I'd like to give away my fvwm packages, ie fvwm, fvwm2 and fvwm-common. I'm happy keeping xloadimage and xcal, but I think it would be much better to have someone else look after the fvwm stuff. Volunteers should mail me ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), and we can organise an orderly handover. Oh, and it would help greatly if the crap on debian-private were to be kept to the minimum - political rants can happen quite happily in the pubic for all to see. Austin PS: I am not subscribed to this list
