Re: glibc 2.32 before bullseye?
Paul Wise left as an exercise for the reader: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 4:46 AM Nick Black wrote: > > I was wondering whether glibc ... > These seem like questions for the glibc maintainers, probably via a bug > report. indeed =] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=977691 -- nick black -=- https://www.nick-black.com to make an apple pie from scratch, you need first invent a universe.
Re: glibc 2.32 before bullseye?
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 4:46 AM Nick Black wrote: > I was wondering whether glibc ... These seem like questions for the glibc maintainers, probably via a bug report. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
glibc 2.32 before bullseye?
I was wondering whether glibc 2.32 is expected to land in Bullseye. I'm guessing not, as I don't see a 2.32+ upload in experimental. In that case, I'd really like to have the Unicode 13 support introduced by 2.32 (if not the complete support, at least the wcwidth() elements). These seem pretty self-contained changes, especially the wcwidth() tables; would a patch backporting the glibc 2.32 Unicode 13 work be welcomed? -- nick black -=- https://www.nick-black.com to make an apple pie from scratch, you need first invent a universe. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
