jvim versus vim6

2002-04-04 Thread Wichert Akkerman 
Is there any reason to keep jvim in the archive? As far as I know
the current vim package should not have any problem handling
Japanese so if possible I'ld like to have jvim removed.

Wichert.

-- 
  _
 /[EMAIL PROTECTED] This space intentionally left occupied \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0  2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: jvim versus vim6

2002-04-04 Thread Tomohiro KUBOTA 
Hi,

At Thu, 4 Apr 2002 14:54:43 +0200,
Wichert Akkerman wrote:

 Is there any reason to keep jvim in the archive? As far as I know
 the current vim package should not have any problem handling
 Japanese so if possible I'ld like to have jvim removed.

jvim-canna can input Japanese without Japanese-inputing
environment.  This is important when we want to edit Japanese
file in non-X environment like console or telnet/ssh.

---
Tomohiro KUBOTA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.debian.or.jp/~kubota/
Introduction to I18N  http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/intro-i18n/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]