Re: libc6 broken?
Hello Mike, * Mike Markley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010427 11:41]: > On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 02:40:24PM -0500, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake > forth: > > On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 12:28:51PM +0200, Ulrich Wiederhold wrote: > > > If I try a ./configure or a "make xconfig" with a new Kernel, I get this > > > error-msg: > > > /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > > /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > > > Uh, why do you have libc 2.2.3? We don't have libc 2.2.3 in the archive. > > Please see any one of a number of posts by BenC to -devel (and possibly > -mentors; I could be wrong on that one) about it; the current unstable (sid) > libc6 packages are 2.2.3 CVS IIRC. Thanks. I reinstalled xlibs and aalib1 but this didn´t solved the problem.i (I read the thread "Re: Sid and shared libraries...", I think that´s what you meant!) What else can I do? Uli
Re: libc6 broken?
Hello, * Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010427 07:44]: > > * Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010426 21:40]: > > > On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 12:28:51PM +0200, Ulrich Wiederhold wrote: > > > > If I try a ./configure or a "make xconfig" with a new Kernel, I get this > > > > error-msg: > > > > /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > > > /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > > > > > Uh, why do you have libc 2.2.3? We don't have libc 2.2.3 in the archive. > > We have libc 2.2.3 in both unstableand testing: > libc6 >= 2.2.2-2 is a CVS snapshot of 2.2.3 that defines this symbol: Ok, but how can I fix my problem? Regards Uli
Re: libc6 broken?
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 02:40:24PM -0500, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake forth: > On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 12:28:51PM +0200, Ulrich Wiederhold wrote: > > If I try a ./configure or a "make xconfig" with a new Kernel, I get this > > error-msg: > > /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > Uh, why do you have libc 2.2.3? We don't have libc 2.2.3 in the archive. Please see any one of a number of posts by BenC to -devel (and possibly -mentors; I could be wrong on that one) about it; the current unstable (sid) libc6 packages are 2.2.3 CVS IIRC. -- Mike Markley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG: 0x3B047084 7FC7 0DC0 EF31 DF83 7313 FE2B 77A8 F36A 3B04 7084 It is undignified for a woman to play servant to a man who is not hers. - Spock, "Amok Time", stardate 3372.7
Re: libc6 broken?
> * Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010426 21:40]: > > On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 12:28:51PM +0200, Ulrich Wiederhold wrote: > > > If I try a ./configure or a "make xconfig" with a new Kernel, I get this > > > error-msg: > > > /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > > /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > > > Uh, why do you have libc 2.2.3? We don't have libc 2.2.3 in the archive. We have libc 2.2.3 in both unstableand testing: libc6 >= 2.2.2-2 is a CVS snapshot of 2.2.3 that defines this symbol: <-- snip --> $ objdump -p /lib/libc.so.6 ... Version definitions: 1 0x01 0x0865f4e6 libc.so.6 2 0x00 0x0d696910 GLIBC_2.0 3 0x00 0x0d696911 GLIBC_2.1 GLIBC_2.0 4 0x00 0x09691f71 GLIBC_2.1.1 GLIBC_2.1 5 0x00 0x09691f72 GLIBC_2.1.2 GLIBC_2.1.1 6 0x00 0x09691f73 GLIBC_2.1.3 GLIBC_2.1.2 7 0x00 0x0d696912 GLIBC_2.2 GLIBC_2.1.3 8 0x00 0x09691a71 GLIBC_2.2.1 GLIBC_2.2 9 0x00 0x09691a72 GLIBC_2.2.2 GLIBC_2.2.1 10 0x00 0x09691a73 GLIBC_2.2.3 GLIBC_2.2.2 Version References: required from ld-linux.so.2: 0x09691f71 0x00 15 GLIBC_2.1.1 0x09691a73 0x00 14 GLIBC_2.2.3 0x0d696911 0x00 13 GLIBC_2.1 0x0d696912 0x00 12 GLIBC_2.2 0x0d696910 0x00 11 GLIBC_2.0 $ dpkg --status libc6 Package: libc6 Status: install ok installed Priority: required Section: base Installed-Size: 8412 Maintainer: Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Source: glibc Version: 2.2.2-4 ... <-- snip --> cu Adrian -- Nicht weil die Dinge schwierig sind wagen wir sie nicht, sondern weil wir sie nicht wagen sind sie schwierig.
Re: libc6 broken?
Hello, * Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010426 21:40]: > On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 12:28:51PM +0200, Ulrich Wiederhold wrote: > > If I try a ./configure or a "make xconfig" with a new Kernel, I get this > > error-msg: > > /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > Uh, why do you have libc 2.2.3? We don't have libc 2.2.3 in the archive. I don´t know. I used /etc/apt/sources.list: deb ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free deb ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian-non-US unstable non-US/main and have ii libc6 2.2.2-4GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone ii libc6-dbg 2.2.2-4GNU C Library: Libraries with debugging symb ii libc6-dev 2.2.2-4GNU C Library: Development Libraries and Hea ii libc6-pic 2.2.2-4GNU C Library: PIC archive library installed. Any ideas? Uli
Re: libc6 broken?
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 12:28:51PM +0200, Ulrich Wiederhold wrote: > If I try a ./configure or a "make xconfig" with a new Kernel, I get this > error-msg: > /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' > /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' Uh, why do you have libc 2.2.3? We don't have libc 2.2.3 in the archive. -- Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Please use PGP/GPG encryption to send me mail. "Any technology, no matter how primitive, is magic to those who don't understand it." -- Florence Ambrose pgpxKn6AQmsgr.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: libc6 broken?
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 12:28:51PM +0200 , Ulrich Wiederhold wrote:
> Hello,
> I upgraded to unstable and now, my libc6 seems to be borken.
works fine here. it wasn't upgraded in quite a while
> If I try a ./configure or a "make xconfig" with a new Kernel, I get this
> error-msg:
> /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
any optimized libs in /lib/i586(or whatever?)
Petr Cech
--
Debian GNU/Linux maintainer - www.debian.{org,cz}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Debian - 3 million penguins can't be wrong."
libc6 broken?
Hello, I upgraded to unstable and now, my libc6 seems to be borken. If I try a ./configure or a "make xconfig" with a new Kernel, I get this error-msg: /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' If I try a "make menuconfig", I get: debian:/usr/src/linux-2.4.3# make menuconfig rm -f include/asm ( cd include ; ln -sf asm-i386 asm) make -C scripts/lxdialog all make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.3/scripts/lxdialog' /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status >> Unable to find the Ncurses libraries. >> >> You must have Ncurses installed in order >> to use 'make menuconfig' make[1]: *** [ncurses] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.3/scripts/lxdialog' make: *** [menuconfig] Error 2 I reinstalled my ncurseslibs and my libc6 packages, libstdc++-2.10-glibc and so on, but still get the same error. Any ideas? (Using an upgraded unstable from today, did a dist-upgrade too) Uli
libc6 broken?
Hello, I upgraded to unstable and now, my libc6 seems to be borken. If I try a ./configure or a "make xconfig" with a new Kernel, I get this error-msg: /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' If I try a "make menuconfig", I get: debian:/usr/src/linux-2.4.3# make menuconfig rm -f include/asm ( cd include ; ln -sf asm-i386 asm) make -C scripts/lxdialog all make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.3/scripts/lxdialog' /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status >> Unable to find the Ncurses libraries. >> >> You must have Ncurses installed in order >> to use 'make menuconfig' make[1]: *** [ncurses] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.3/scripts/lxdialog' make: *** [menuconfig] Error 2 I reinstalled my ncurseslibs and my libc6 packages, libstdc++-2.10-glibc and so on, but still get the same error. Any ideas? (Using an upgraded unstable from today, did a dist-upgrade too) Uli
