Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-10-01 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Junichi Uekawa wrote:
>> I've tried to search for what debconf-2.0 specification is;
>> and how it's different from debconf, but it's not obvious.
>> What's missing from the picture is the changelog of debconf
>> specification (presumably from 1.0), and what's changed.
>
> Please see Debian policy.

Or, more helpfully, please see section 3.10.1 of Debian policy.

Thomas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-10-01 Thread Joey Hess
Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> I've tried to search for what debconf-2.0 specification is;
> and how it's different from debconf, but it's not obvious.
> What's missing from the picture is the changelog of debconf
> specification (presumably from 1.0), and what's changed.

Please see Debian policy.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-10-01 Thread Miguel Gea Milvaques
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

En/na Joey Hess ha escrit:

mydms package now has been corrected and now depends on debconf |
debconf-2.0.


> Joey Hess wrote:
> 
>>Just a reminder that these maintainers still have packages that depend
>>on debconf by itself without an alternate dependency on | debconf-2.0.
>>As I mentioned in my original post, I plan to file bugs on all of these
>>soon, which, omitting all the lg-issue* packages, comes to about 550
>>bugs.
> 
> (Original post here:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/08/msg00136.html)
> 
> This is your third and final reminder. I count 542 packages remaining,
> down only 9 from last month. I assume most of the people below do not
> read debian-devel, so I've taken the librerty of BCCing you all. :-P
> 
> apt-cache dumpavail | grep-dctrl -FDepends,Pre-Depends debconf | \
>   grep-dctrl -FDepends,Pre-Depends -v '| debconf-2.0' | \
>   dd-list --dctrl
> Wesley W. Terpstra (Debian) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>bidentd
> 
> Loic Dachary (OuoU) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>poker-network
> 
> Stefan Hornburg (Racke) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>amavis-ng
>courier
>debaux
>dhelp
>interchange
>pure-ftpd
>sympa
> 
> Maurizio Lemmo (Tannoiser) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>mailreader
> 
> Marco Presi (Zufus) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>linesrv
>pointless
> 
> Masayuki Hatta (mhatta) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>gs-common
>gtktrain
>ndtpd
> 
> Peter De Schrijver (p2) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>libgcr410
> 
> Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>posh
> 
> Joel Aelwyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>zope-quotafolder
> 
> OHASHI Akira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>initz
>riece
> 
> Jan Alonzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>ispell-tl
> 
> Pierre Ancelot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>hwtools
> 
> Micah Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>bamboo
> 
> Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>ipmasq
> 
> Hakan Ardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>ftpwatch
> 
> Richard Atterer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>udftools
> 
> Ernesto Nadir Crespo Avila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>flowscan
> 
> Thomas Bushnell, BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>ifhp
>miscfiles
> 
> Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>pango1.0
> 
> Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>diffmon
> 
> Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>exult
> 
> Roland Bauerschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>colormake
> 
> Christian Bayle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>gforge-theme-starterpack
>php4-mcrypt
> 
> Ian Beckwith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>ckermit
> 
> Cord Beermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>jove
>nn
> 
> Bradley Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>razzle
> 
> Hilko Bengen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>drupal
>mantis
> 
> Edward Betts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>joystick
> 
> Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>lksctp-tools
>partimage
> 
> Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>zope-loginmanager
> 
> Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>hinfo
> 
> Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>durep
>shfs
>sl-modem
> 
> Jeremy T. Bouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>acidlab
> 
> Cyril Bouthors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>drbd
> 
> Markus Braun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>tpb
> 
> Adrian Bridgett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>tgif
> 
> James Bromberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>libapache-mod-backhand
> 
> Phil Brooke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>yiff
> 
> Philip Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>kdrill
> 
> Luis Bustamante <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>acct
> 
> Chris Butler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wu-ftpd
> 
> Patrick Caulfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>dnprogs
>lvm10
>mopd
> 
> Petr Cech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>ispell-czech
> 
> Emmanuel le Chevoir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>icecast-server
> 
> Pierre Chifflier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>websvn
> 
> Volker Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>synce-serial
> 
> Ashley Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>bottlerocket
> 
> David Coe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>libsafe
> 
> Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>libraw1394
> 
> Carlo Contavalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wipl
> 
> Jereme Corrado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>faqomatic
> 
> Matthew Danish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>oftpd
> 
> Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>apt-build
> 
> Frederik Dannemare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>motion
> 
> Vivek Dasmohapatra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>dbishell
> 
> Debian Apache Maintainers 
>apache2
> 
> Eric Delaunay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>scsitools
>xtel
> 
> Cédric Delfosse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>darkstat
> 
> Murat Demirten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>ettercap
> 
> Grzegorz Prokopski (Debian Developer) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>pimppa
> 
> Sven Dowideit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>twiki
> 
> Joe Drew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>lxdoom
> 
> Benjamin Drieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>dacode
> 
> Ludovic Drolez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>atftp
>backuppc
>swish-e
> 
> Steve Dunham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>x-symbol
> 
> Free Ekanayaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>ams
> 
> Nick Estes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>mserv
> 
> Bartosz Fenski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>fuse
> 
> Agney Lopes Roth Ferraz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>gkdebconf
> 

Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-09-30 Thread Maurizio Lemmo - Tannoiser
* lunedì 26 settembre 2005, alle 19:57, Joey Hess scrive:
> Joey Hess wrote:
> > Just a reminder that these maintainers still have packages that depend
> > on debconf by itself without an alternate dependency on | debconf-2.0.
> > As I mentioned in my original post, I plan to file bugs on all of these
> > soon, which, omitting all the lg-issue* packages, comes to about 550
> > bugs.
> (Original post here:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/08/msg00136.html)
> 
> This is your third and final reminder. I count 542 packages remaining,
> down only 9 from last month. I assume most of the people below do not
> read debian-devel, so I've taken the librerty of BCCing you all. :-P

Thank you Joey and sorry for that.
I'll prepare my package, and I'll ask my sponsor to upload it ASAP (i'm
a sponsored maintainer).

-- 
  Maurizio - Tannoiser - Lemmo
 Founder Member of ERLUG http://erlug.linux.it
---
Joyce: "They only don't have calories if I make them for you. Mom logic."
--Buffy the Vampire Slayer: Bad Girls


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-09-30 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi,

> This is your third and final reminder. I count 542 packages remaining,
> down only 9 from last month. I assume most of the people below do not
> read debian-devel, so I've taken the librerty of BCCing you all. :-P

It's not entirely clear from the posting, but all that's required 
on the maintainer part is to edit debian/control and change

debconf
to
debconf | debconf-2.0


I've tried to search for what debconf-2.0 specification is;
and how it's different from debconf, but it's not obvious.
What's missing from the picture is the changelog of debconf
specification (presumably from 1.0), and what's changed.




regards,
junichi


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-09-30 Thread Joey Hess
Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
>  I wonder why you didn't sent it to debian-devel-announce then? This is
> where this really belongs, not? This is what the list is for, not?

It seemed a bit excessive to mail everyone just to get in touch with 286
maintainers. Also I like to encourage the proper use of debian-devel.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-09-30 Thread Edward Betts
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is your third and final reminder. I count 542 packages remaining,
> down only 9 from last month. I assume most of the people below do not
> read debian-devel, so I've taken the librerty of BCCing you all. :-P
[-SNIP-]
> Edward Betts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>joystick
> 

Thanks, I'll upload a package sometime later today.

-- 
Edward


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-09-28 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi,


> > Of course I read debian-devel.  But I fix bugs once they are
> > reported.  I use the BTS to track needed work in this way.
> 
> This is of course suprerior to running vi debian/control because
> beauracracy is fun.

I'm transitioning one of my packages to a potential new-maintainer;
and it helps to have bug reports to transfer.


regards,
junichi


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-09-28 Thread Marc Haber
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005 19:57:23 +0200, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Mike Markley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>   aide

This is fixed in experimental (dinstall on 2005-09-27), and will go to
unstable in about a week once the package (which has suffered pretty
big changes) has shown not to contain any howlers.

Greetings
Marc, co-maintainer

-- 
-- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -
Marc Haber |   " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany  | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://www.zugschlus.de/
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834



Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-09-27 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
* Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-26 19:57]:
> Joey Hess wrote:
>> Just a reminder that these maintainers still have packages that depend
>> on debconf by itself without an alternate dependency on | debconf-2.0.
>> As I mentioned in my original post, I plan to file bugs on all of these
>> soon, which, omitting all the lg-issue* packages, comes to about 550
>> bugs.
> (Original post here:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/08/msg00136.html)
> 
> This is your third and final reminder. I count 542 packages remaining,
> down only 9 from last month. I assume most of the people below do not
> read debian-devel, so I've taken the librerty of BCCing you all. :-P

 I wonder why you didn't sent it to debian-devel-announce then? This is
where this really belongs, not? This is what the list is for, not?

 So long,
Alfie [doing his updates]
P.S.: Yes, you are right. I ceaced to read debian-devel for quite a
  while due to the sheer mass of noise ratio. So Cc: me on replies
  that you think might be interesting to me, too. Honor the
  Mail-Followup-To: header.
-- 
 ZZcd ..
 oops
-- #jutesack


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-09-27 Thread Luigi Gangitano

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


Il giorno 26/set/05, alle ore 19:57, Joey Hess ha scritto:

Luigi Gangitano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   libapache-mod-acct


Fixed yesterday in 0.5-19.

Regards,

- --
Luigi Gangitano -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972  C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFDOT0D8ZumGJJMDCYRAgEiAJ43qv5GAz1Mnm4ZwNoi9OEUeAcr6gCcCD8f
vNbZEEtvZrMZ09UCaKnkGTc=
=bo+J
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-09-26 Thread Pierre Habouzit

> Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>flyspray

  fixed on yesterday.

  I missed your posts on d-devel. maybe a post on d-d-announce would 
have been more accurate given the number of concerned packages ?
-- 
·O·  Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org


pgpZrD2eetfZh.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-09-26 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hello

On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 07:57:23PM +0200, Joey Hess wrote:
> Joey Hess wrote:
> > Just a reminder that these maintainers still have packages that depend
> > on debconf by itself without an alternate dependency on | debconf-2.0.
> > As I mentioned in my original post, I plan to file bugs on all of these
> > soon, which, omitting all the lg-issue* packages, comes to about 550
> > bugs.
> (Original post here:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/08/msg00136.html)
> 
> This is your third and final reminder. I count 542 packages remaining,
> down only 9 from last month. I assume most of the people below do not
> read debian-devel, so I've taken the librerty of BCCing you all. :-P

Thanks for the BCC. As you have understood I do not read debian-devel
every day and I miss a lot of postings. :)

All the packages should have been fixed now.

Regards,

// Ola

> apt-cache dumpavail | grep-dctrl -FDepends,Pre-Depends debconf | \
>   grep-dctrl -FDepends,Pre-Depends -v '| debconf-2.0' | \
>   dd-list --dctrl
> Wesley W. Terpstra (Debian) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>bidentd
> 
> Loic Dachary (OuoU) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>poker-network
> 
> Stefan Hornburg (Racke) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>amavis-ng
>courier
>debaux
>dhelp
>interchange
>pure-ftpd
>sympa
> 
> Maurizio Lemmo (Tannoiser) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>mailreader
> 
> Marco Presi (Zufus) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>linesrv
>pointless
> 
> Masayuki Hatta (mhatta) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>gs-common
>gtktrain
>ndtpd
> 
> Peter De Schrijver (p2) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>libgcr410
> 
> Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>posh
> 
> Joel Aelwyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>zope-quotafolder
> 
> OHASHI Akira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>initz
>riece
> 
> Jan Alonzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>ispell-tl
> 
> Pierre Ancelot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>hwtools
> 
> Micah Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>bamboo
> 
> Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>ipmasq
> 
> Hakan Ardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>ftpwatch
> 
> Richard Atterer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>udftools
> 
> Ernesto Nadir Crespo Avila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>flowscan
> 
> Thomas Bushnell, BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>ifhp
>miscfiles
> 
> Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>pango1.0
> 
> Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>diffmon
> 
> Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>exult
> 
> Roland Bauerschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>colormake
> 
> Christian Bayle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>gforge-theme-starterpack
>php4-mcrypt
> 
> Ian Beckwith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>ckermit
> 
> Cord Beermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>jove
>nn
> 
> Bradley Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>razzle
> 
> Hilko Bengen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>drupal
>mantis
> 
> Edward Betts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>joystick
> 
> Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>lksctp-tools
>partimage
> 
> Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>zope-loginmanager
> 
> Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>hinfo
> 
> Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>durep
>shfs
>sl-modem
> 
> Jeremy T. Bouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>acidlab
> 
> Cyril Bouthors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>drbd
> 
> Markus Braun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>tpb
> 
> Adrian Bridgett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>tgif
> 
> James Bromberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>libapache-mod-backhand
> 
> Phil Brooke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>yiff
> 
> Philip Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>kdrill
> 
> Luis Bustamante <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>acct
> 
> Chris Butler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wu-ftpd
> 
> Patrick Caulfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>dnprogs
>lvm10
>mopd
> 
> Petr Cech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>ispell-czech
> 
> Emmanuel le Chevoir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>icecast-server
> 
> Pierre Chifflier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>websvn
> 
> Volker Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>synce-serial
> 
> Ashley Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>bottlerocket
> 
> David Coe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>libsafe
> 
> Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>libraw1394
> 
> Carlo Contavalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wipl
> 
> Jereme Corrado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>faqomatic
> 
> Matthew Danish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>oftpd
> 
> Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>apt-build
> 
> Frederik Dannemare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>motion
> 
> Vivek Dasmohapatra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>dbishell
> 
> Debian Apache Maintainers 
>apache2
> 
> Eric Delaunay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>scsitools
>xtel
> 
> Cédric Delfosse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>darkstat
> 
> Murat Demirten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>ettercap
> 
> Grzegorz Prokopski (Debian Developer) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>pimppa
> 
> Sven Dowideit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>twiki
> 
> Joe Drew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>lxdoom
> 
> Benjamin Drieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>dacode
> 
> Ludovic Drolez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>atftp
>backuppc
>swish-e
> 
> Steve Dunham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>x-symbol
> 
> Free Ekanayaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>ams
> 
> Nick Estes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>mserv
> 
> Bartosz Fenski <[EMAI

Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-09-26 Thread Adam Conrad
Joey Hess wrote:
> 
> This is your third and final reminder. I count 542 packages remaining,
> down only 9 from last month. I assume most of the people below do not
> read debian-devel, so I've taken the librerty of BCCing you all. :-P
> 
> Debian Apache Maintainers 
>apache2

apache2 will be fixed when 2.0.55 is released upstream and I upload it
to sid (which is due to happen any day now).  I didn't see the point in
an upload just to fix this issue.

... Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-09-26 Thread Bdale Garbee
On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 19:57 +0200, Joey Hess wrote:

> This is your third and final reminder. I count 542 packages remaining,
> down only 9 from last month. I assume most of the people below do not
> read debian-devel, so I've taken the librerty of BCCing you all. :-P

Yep, debian-devel is not high on my list right now.

> Bdale Garbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>amanda
>dump

Change made to both packages in my CVS for the next upload.

Bdale


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-09-26 Thread Andrew McMillan
On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 19:57 +0200, Joey Hess wrote:
> Joey Hess wrote:
> > Just a reminder that these maintainers still have packages that depend
> > on debconf by itself without an alternate dependency on | debconf-2.0.
> > As I mentioned in my original post, I plan to file bugs on all of these
> > soon, which, omitting all the lg-issue* packages, comes to about 550
> > bugs.
> (Original post here:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/08/msg00136.html)
> 
> This is your third and final reminder. I count 542 packages remaining,
> down only 9 from last month. I assume most of the people below do not
> read debian-devel, so I've taken the librerty of BCCing you all. :-P

Thanks Joey - you're absolutely correct: I don't have the leisure to
follow debian-devel, nor do many, so it seems a little precipitate to be
firing out three warnings without taking the approach that you have for
this one...


> Andrew McMillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>whereami

Fixed now, and will upload in a few hours.

Regards,
Andrew McMillan.

-
Andrew @ Catalyst .Net .NZ  Ltd,  PO Box 11-053, Manners St,  Wellington
WEB: http://catalyst.net.nz/PHYS: Level 2, 150-154 Willis St
DDI: +64(4)803-2201  MOB: +64(272)DEBIAN  OFFICE: +64(4)499-2267
   The secret of being a bore is to say everything -- Voltaire
-



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-09-26 Thread Michael Biebl
Joey Hess schrieb:
> Joey Hess wrote:
> 
>>Just a reminder that these maintainers still have packages that depend
>>on debconf by itself without an alternate dependency on | debconf-2.0.
>>As I mentioned in my original post, I plan to file bugs on all of these
>>soon, which, omitting all the lg-issue* packages, comes to about 550
>>bugs.
> 

[..]

> Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>lksctp-tools
>partimage
> 

Updated packages (lksctp-tools_1.0.3-3/partimage_0.6.4-14) are ready and
waiting for an upload by my sponsor.

Cheers,
Michael

-- 

E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.teco.edu/

TecO (Telecooperation Office) Vincenz-Priessnitz-Str.1
University of Karlsruhe 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-09-26 Thread Paul Waite
Hi Joey,

> Paul Waite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>    axyl
>    axyl-lucene

Now done, but not yet uploaded due to other changes in the works. I'm
expecting I will get them both uploaded inside two weeks - is that a good
enough timescale for you?

Cheers,
Paul.



Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-09-26 Thread Chad Walstrom
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  wrote:
> This is your third and final reminder. I count 542 packages
> remaining, down only 9 from last month. I assume most of the people
> below do not read debian-devel, so I've taken the librerty of BCCing
> you all. :-P

Absolutely right. ;-) d-d is too busy.  Thanks for the Bcc, but I
would not have objected to a bug report.  Also, I agree that a
lintian/linda rule would be helpful here.
-- 
Chad Walstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   http://www.wookimus.net/
   assert(expired(knowledge)); /* core dump */


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-09-26 Thread Guus Sliepen
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 07:57:23PM +0200, Joey Hess wrote:

> Joey Hess wrote:
> > Just a reminder that these maintainers still have packages that depend
> > on debconf by itself without an alternate dependency on | debconf-2.0.
> > As I mentioned in my original post, I plan to file bugs on all of these
> > soon, which, omitting all the lg-issue* packages, comes to about 550
> > bugs.
> (Original post here:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/08/msg00136.html)
> 
> This is your third and final reminder. I count 542 packages remaining,
> down only 9 from last month. I assume most of the people below do not
> read debian-devel, so I've taken the librerty of BCCing you all. :-P

This is the first time I see this. If it is a bug, then you have my
blessing to file a bugreport.

-- 
Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,
Guus Sliepen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-09-26 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>> Of course I read debian-devel.  But I fix bugs once they are
>> reported.  I use the BTS to track needed work in this way.
>
> This is of course suprerior to running vi debian/control because
> beauracracy is fun.

No, it's because this is how I organize my work.  I cannot do
everything immediately; sometimes there are blocking bugs which impede
doing the work right away, and sometimes there are other problems that
arise in my life.

I do not regard bug reports as an imposition, I regard them as a great
help.  I do not require pre-bug bug reports, where people report bugs
before they report bugs, and then only report the bug if the
already-reported bug isn't fixed without the report.

Much simpler to adopt the strategy that when you see a bug, and you
want it fixed, report it.  That's the way to get it on my radar.
That's the documented normal way.  It's not bureaucracy, it's simple
record keeping.

Thomas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-09-26 Thread Joey Hess
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Of course I read debian-devel.  But I fix bugs once they are
> reported.  I use the BTS to track needed work in this way.

This is of course suprerior to running vi debian/control because
beauracracy is fun.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-09-26 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> This is your third and final reminder. I count 542 packages remaining,
> down only 9 from last month. I assume most of the people below do not
> read debian-devel, so I've taken the librerty of BCCing you all. :-P

Of course I read debian-devel.  But I fix bugs once they are
reported.  I use the BTS to track needed work in this way.

Thomas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-09-26 Thread Joey Hess
Joey Hess wrote:
> Just a reminder that these maintainers still have packages that depend
> on debconf by itself without an alternate dependency on | debconf-2.0.
> As I mentioned in my original post, I plan to file bugs on all of these
> soon, which, omitting all the lg-issue* packages, comes to about 550
> bugs.
(Original post here:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/08/msg00136.html)

This is your third and final reminder. I count 542 packages remaining,
down only 9 from last month. I assume most of the people below do not
read debian-devel, so I've taken the librerty of BCCing you all. :-P

apt-cache dumpavail | grep-dctrl -FDepends,Pre-Depends debconf | \
grep-dctrl -FDepends,Pre-Depends -v '| debconf-2.0' | \
dd-list --dctrl
Wesley W. Terpstra (Debian) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   bidentd

Loic Dachary (OuoU) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   poker-network

Stefan Hornburg (Racke) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   amavis-ng
   courier
   debaux
   dhelp
   interchange
   pure-ftpd
   sympa

Maurizio Lemmo (Tannoiser) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   mailreader

Marco Presi (Zufus) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   linesrv
   pointless

Masayuki Hatta (mhatta) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   gs-common
   gtktrain
   ndtpd

Peter De Schrijver (p2) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   libgcr410

Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   posh

Joel Aelwyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   zope-quotafolder

OHASHI Akira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   initz
   riece

Jan Alonzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   ispell-tl

Pierre Ancelot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   hwtools

Micah Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   bamboo

Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   ipmasq

Hakan Ardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   ftpwatch

Richard Atterer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   udftools

Ernesto Nadir Crespo Avila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   flowscan

Thomas Bushnell, BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   ifhp
   miscfiles

Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   pango1.0

Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   diffmon

Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   exult

Roland Bauerschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   colormake

Christian Bayle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   gforge-theme-starterpack
   php4-mcrypt

Ian Beckwith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   ckermit

Cord Beermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   jove
   nn

Bradley Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   razzle

Hilko Bengen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   drupal
   mantis

Edward Betts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   joystick

Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   lksctp-tools
   partimage

Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   zope-loginmanager

Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   hinfo

Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   durep
   shfs
   sl-modem

Jeremy T. Bouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   acidlab

Cyril Bouthors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   drbd

Markus Braun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   tpb

Adrian Bridgett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   tgif

James Bromberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   libapache-mod-backhand

Phil Brooke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   yiff

Philip Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   kdrill

Luis Bustamante <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   acct

Chris Butler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   wu-ftpd

Patrick Caulfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   dnprogs
   lvm10
   mopd

Petr Cech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   ispell-czech

Emmanuel le Chevoir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   icecast-server

Pierre Chifflier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   websvn

Volker Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   synce-serial

Ashley Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   bottlerocket

David Coe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   libsafe

Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   libraw1394

Carlo Contavalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   wipl

Jereme Corrado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   faqomatic

Matthew Danish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   oftpd

Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   apt-build

Frederik Dannemare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   motion

Vivek Dasmohapatra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   dbishell

Debian Apache Maintainers 
   apache2

Eric Delaunay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   scsitools
   xtel

Cédric Delfosse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   darkstat

Murat Demirten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   ettercap

Grzegorz Prokopski (Debian Developer) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   pimppa

Sven Dowideit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   twiki

Joe Drew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   lxdoom

Benjamin Drieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   dacode

Ludovic Drolez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   atftp
   backuppc
   swish-e

Steve Dunham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   x-symbol

Free Ekanayaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   ams

Nick Estes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   mserv

Bartosz Fenski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   fuse

Agney Lopes Roth Ferraz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   gkdebconf

Duncan Findlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   spamassassin

Anthony Fok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   chdrv

Dimitri Fontaine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   smarty
   tutos2

Daniel Franklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   printbill

Turbo Fredriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   nagat
   phpqladmin
   roxen3
   roxen4

Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   libnss-ldap
   libpam-ldap

Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   abook
   beep

GNU Libc Maintainers 
   glibc

Wilmer van der Gaast <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   bitlbee

Sylvain Le Gall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   mtink

Luigi Gangitano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   libapache-mod-acct

Radovan Garabík <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   efinge

Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-09-07 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Marco d'Itri ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Do you people really need to inform all the debian-devel readers of
> this?


Hmmm, apologies (public...just like apologies have to be). This was
intended to be a private reply, but it seems that my fingers are more
used to the "L" key.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-09-06 Thread Marco d'Itri
Do you people really need to inform all the debian-devel readers of
this?

-- 
ciao,
Marco


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-09-06 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Joey Hess wrote:
> "| debconf-2.0"

>dput
Thanks for the reminder.
Fixed in 0.9.2.20.

Kind regards

T.
-- 
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-09-06 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):

> Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>geneweb


Fixed in 4.10-10



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-09-05 Thread Morten Werner Olsen
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 04:27:12PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:

> Just a reminder that these maintainers still have packages that depend
> on debconf by itself without an alternate dependency on | debconf-2.0.
> As I mentioned in my original post, I plan to file bugs on all of these
> soon, which, omitting all the lg-issue* packages, comes to about 550
> bugs.

[snip]

> Morten Werner Olsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>slbackup

This is fixed in 0.0.8-1.


- Werner


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-09-04 Thread Marc Haber
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 16:27:12 -0400, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>   clamav-data
>   clamav-getfiles

Upload of fixed packages pending current unstable versions migrating
to testing. ETA: Monday.

Greetings
Marc

-- 
-- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -
Marc Haber |   " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany  | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://www.zugschlus.de/
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834



Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-09-04 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 04:27:12PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Just a reminder that these maintainers still have packages that depend
> on debconf by itself without an alternate dependency on | debconf-2.0.
> As I mentioned in my original post, I plan to file bugs on all of these
> soon, which, omitting all the lg-issue* packages, comes to about 550
> bugs.
[..]
> Debian Hamradio Maintainers 
>ax25-apps

Fixed. Thanks.

Hamish
-- 
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-09-04 Thread Bruno Barrera C.
On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 16:27 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Just a reminder that these maintainers still have packages that depend
> on debconf by itself without an alternate dependency on | debconf-2.0.
> As I mentioned in my original post, I plan to file bugs on all of these
> soon, which, omitting all the lg-issue* packages, comes to about 550
> bugs.
> 
> Also, thanks to everyone who did fix 20 or so packages due to my first
> mail at the beginning of the month.

> 
> Bruno Barrera C. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>portsentry

Done; Thanks
-- 
Bruno Barrera C.
The Pegasus Group Company - http://www.tpgcompany.com


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-09-01 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 09:28:44PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> > >spellcast
> > 
> > Spellcast 1.0-19 was uploaded Aug 6th 2005 and does not use debconf anymore.
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>apt-cache show spellcast | egrep Version\|Depends
> Version: 1.0-19
> Depends: debconf, gettext, libc6 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-21), libx11-6 | xlibs (>> 
> 4.1.0)
>  ^^^

/me puts a brown paper bag on

Should be fixed in 1.0-20... in the upload queue now.

Javier


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-08-31 Thread kaol
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 04:27:12PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Kari Pahula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>crossfire

1.8.0-1 does not use debconf anymore.  Still looking for a sponsor for
the upload.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-08-31 Thread Joey Hess
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> >spellcast
> 
> Spellcast 1.0-19 was uploaded Aug 6th 2005 and does not use debconf anymore.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>apt-cache show spellcast | egrep Version\|Depends
Version: 1.0-19
Depends: debconf, gettext, libc6 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-21), libx11-6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0)
 ^^^

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-08-31 Thread Steve McIntyre
Joey Hess wrote:

...

>Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>   cvs
>   nas
>   seyon

New versions of all three uploaded tonight to fix this...

-- 
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Because heaters aren't purple!" -- Catherine Pitt


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-08-31 Thread Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Joey Hess wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>apt-cache dumpavail | grep-dctrl -FDepends debconf \
>   |grep-dctrl -FDepends -v '| debconf-2.0' | grep ^Package: \
>   | cut -d : -f 2 | dd-list --stdin

Assuming a sid grep-dctrl,

grep-aptavail -FDepends debconf -a -! -FDepends '| debconf-2.0' \
-sPackage -n | dd-list --stdin

:)

(Sarge's grep-dctrl would need the apt-cache dumpavail | grep-dctrl start.)

(Could be much faster if dd-list accepted input in the format output by
-sPackage,Maintainer.)
-- 
Antti-Juhani


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


RE: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-08-31 Thread Achilleas Kotsis
>Achilleas Kotsis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  ulogd 

Fixed localy, will upload soon (due to sponsored upload)

Achilleas Kotsis a.k.a. Achille
-- "whois awk?", sed Grep --


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-08-31 Thread Thomas Schmidt
* Joey Hess schrieb am 31.08.05, um 22:27 Uhr:
> Debian VDR Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>nvram-wakeup

Fixed package was uploaded a few minutes ago.


Regards,
Thomas

-- 
Thomas Schmidt, Debian VDR Team
http://pkg-vdr-dvb.alioth.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-08-31 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 04:27:12PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Also, thanks to everyone who did fix 20 or so packages due to my first
> mail at the beginning of the month.

(...)

> Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>nessus-plugins

Forgot to fix this one, will upload 2.2.5-3 right away to fix it there.

>samhain

Samhain 2.0.9-1 fixes this issue and was uploaded Aug 29th.

>spellcast

Spellcast 1.0-19 was uploaded Aug 6th 2005 and does not use debconf anymore.

It seems that you did not run an 'apt-get update' before rerunning the shell
snippet you provided? (thanks for it BTW, very ilustrative to see how you
generated the listing).

Regards

Javier


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-08-31 Thread Joey Hess
Just a reminder that these maintainers still have packages that depend
on debconf by itself without an alternate dependency on | debconf-2.0.
As I mentioned in my original post, I plan to file bugs on all of these
soon, which, omitting all the lg-issue* packages, comes to about 550
bugs.

Also, thanks to everyone who did fix 20 or so packages due to my first
mail at the beginning of the month.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>apt-cache dumpavail | grep-dctrl -FDepends debconf \
|grep-dctrl -FDepends -v '| debconf-2.0' | grep ^Package: \
| cut -d : -f 2 | dd-list --stdin
Wesley W. Terpstra (Debian) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   bidentd

Loic Dachary (OuoU) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   poker-network

Stefan Hornburg (Racke) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   amavis-ng
   courier
   debaux
   dhelp
   interchange
   pure-ftpd
   sympa

Maurizio Lemmo (Tannoiser) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   mailreader

Masayuki Hatta (mhatta) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   gs-common
   gtktrain
   ndtpd

Peter De Schrijver (p2) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   libgcr410

Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   posh
   zsh

Joel Aelwyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   zope-quotafolder

OHASHI Akira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   initz
   riece

Jan Alonzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   ispell-tl

Pierre Ancelot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   hwtools

Micah Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   bamboo

Hakan Ardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   ftpwatch

Richard Atterer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   udftools

Ernesto Nadir Crespo Avila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   flowscan

Julien BLACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   tilp

Thomas Bushnell, BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   miscfiles

Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   pango1.0

Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   diffmon

Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   exult

Roland Bauerschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   colormake

Christian Bayle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   gforge-theme-starterpack
   php4-mcrypt

Cord Beermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   jove
   nn

Bradley Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   razzle

Hilko Bengen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   drupal
   mantis

Edward Betts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   joystick

Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   lksctp-tools
   partimage

Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   zope-loginmanager

Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   durep
   shfs
   sl-modem

Jeremy T. Bouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   acidlab

Cyril Bouthors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   drbd

Markus Braun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   tpb

Adrian Bridgett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   tgif

James Bromberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   libapache-mod-backhand

Philip Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   kdrill

Luis Bustamante <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   acct

Chris Butler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   wu-ftpd

Bruno Barrera C. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   portsentry

Rubén Porras Campo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   manpages-es

Patrick Caulfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   dnprogs
   lvm10
   mopd

Petr Cech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   ispell-czech

Emmanuel le Chevoir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   xsmbrowser

Pierre Chifflier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   websvn

Volker Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   synce-serial

Ashley Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   bottlerocket

David Coe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   libsafe

Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   libraw1394

Carlo Contavalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   wipl

Jereme Corrado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   faqomatic

Matthew Danish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   oftpd

Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   apt-build

Frederik Dannemare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   motion

Vivek Dasmohapatra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   dbishell

Debian Apache Maintainers 
   apache
   apache2

Debian Edu Developers 
   debian-edu-install

Debian Hamradio Maintainers 
   ax25-apps

Debian OCaml Maintainers 
   ocaml-tools

Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers 
   kdenetwork

Eric Delaunay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   scsitools
   xtel

Cédric Delfosse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   darkstat

Murat Demirten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   ettercap

Grzegorz Prokopski (Debian Developer) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   pimppa

Agustin Martin Domingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   dictionaries-common
   eo-spell
   espa-nol
   ispell-gl
   wspanish

Sven Dowideit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   twiki

Joe Drew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   lxdoom

Benjamin Drieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   dacode

Ludovic Drolez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   atftp
   backuppc
   swish-e

Steve Dunham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   x-symbol

Free Ekanayaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   ams

Nick Estes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   mserv

Bartosz Fenski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   fuse

Agney Lopes Roth Ferraz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   gkdebconf

Duncan Findlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   spamassassin

Anthony Fok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   chdrv
   iterm

Dimitri Fontaine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   smarty
   tutos
   tutos2

Daniel Franklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   printbill

Philipp Frauenfelder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   calamaris

Turbo Fredriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   nagat
   phpqladmin
   roxen3
   roxen4

Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   libnss-ldap
   libpam-ldap

Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   abook
   beep

GNU Libc Maintainers 
   glibc

Wilmer van der Gaast <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   bitlbee

Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   jazip

Sylva

Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-08-17 Thread Ben Armstrong
On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 17:08 -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> I offered this for adoption a while back.  Nobody took up my offer.  I
> finally uploaded xpilot-ng today (see my 3-year-old ITP #141099) and
> plan to make it supercede xpilot (i.e. strip the contents of the old
> xpilot packages to turn them into dummy metas to assist with the
> upgrade).
> 
> So, either wait for xpilot-ng's acceptance and its subsequent
> replacement of xpilot, or if you need this resolved sooner, go ahead and
> NMU xpilot with just the debconf fix.  I won't have time for either
> until next weekend.

The debconf dependency is now removed from xpilot, as it is now just a
transition package to upgrade to xpilot-ng, which doesn't have the
dependency either.

Ben


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-08-17 Thread Nicolas Duboc
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 06:46:20PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> I intend to eventually file bugs on packages in Debian which depend on
> debconf without an alternate of debconf-2.0, as all of these make it
> impossible to install cdebconf, which we would eventually like to
> replace debconf.
> 
[...]

> Nicolas Duboc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>spamprobe

  Fixed in latest upload (1.2a-1).

  Thanks,

-- 
Nicolas Duboc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


pgpdwtMM3deHF.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-08-11 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 18:46 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>phpbb2

For the curious: fixed in svn, will be included in next upload.


Thijs


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-08-09 Thread Radu Spineanu
Joey Hess wrote:
> Radu Spineanu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>fprobe-ng
>fprobe-ulog
>xmail

Since everybody is providing feedback...
I will prepare new packages tommorow and ask my sponsors to upload them.

Radu


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-08-09 Thread Steve Kowalik
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 18:46:20 -0400, Joey Hess uttered
>xringd

Fixed package in unstable as of a few days ago.

Cheers,
-- 
Steve
C offers you enough rope to hang yourself.
C++ offers a fully equipped firing squad, a last cigarette and
a blindfold.
 - Erik de Castro Lopo


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-08-09 Thread Emanuele Rocca
* Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [2005-08-02 18:46 -0400]:
>  I intend to eventually file bugs on packages in Debian which depend on
>  debconf without an alternate of debconf-2.0, as all of these make it
>  impossible to install cdebconf, which we would eventually like to
>  replace debconf.
[...]

>  Emanuele Rocca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> fwanalog

A new version which fixes the problem is sitting in incoming.

ciao,
ema


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-08-08 Thread sean finney
because everyone else is doing it...

On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 06:46:20PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>cacti
>cacti-cactid
>sugarplum

all three have now been uploaded with proper dependencies.


sean

-- 


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-08-08 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña

Ok, since everybody is reporting back here I will do the same:

On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 06:46:20PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
>checksecurity
>euro-support
>remem

Done and uploaded.

>samhain
>snort

I will submit new upstream versions of these when time permits
and will fix this in those uploads.

>spellcast

Removed debconf note, thus, no dependencies.

>tiger
>user-es

Both done and uploaded.

That's it.

Javier


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-08-08 Thread Neil McGovern
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 06:46:20PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> I intend to eventually file bugs on packages in Debian which depend on
> debconf without an alternate of debconf-2.0, as all of these make it
> impossible to install cdebconf, which we would eventually like to
> replace debconf.
> 
> Neil McGovern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>blootbot
> 

Fixed.

Neil
-- 
   __   
 .Ž  `. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 : :' ! 
 `. `Ž  gpg: B345BDD3
   `-   Please don't cc, I'm subscribed to the list


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-08-07 Thread Colin Watson
On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 02:32:55PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Which does not really seem to work in all cases.  I'm using a shared
> > debconf template (shared/zope/restart) in postinst scripts of some Zope
> > products.  I tried to replace the debconf dependency according to your
> > suggestion, but the resulting Debian package did not depend from
> > debconf.
> 
> Ah, yes, if you don't ship debconf templates with the package and just use
> results saved by other packages, dh_installdebconf doesn't know to include
> the dependency in ${misc:Depends} and you have to do it manually.

Yes, although including a .config maintainer script would work too.

-- 
Colin Watson   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-08-07 Thread Russ Allbery
Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Which does not really seem to work in all cases.  I'm using a shared
> debconf template (shared/zope/restart) in postinst scripts of some Zope
> products.  I tried to replace the debconf dependency according to your
> suggestion, but the resulting Debian package did not depend from
> debconf.

Ah, yes, if you don't ship debconf templates with the package and just use
results saved by other packages, dh_installdebconf doesn't know to include
the dependency in ${misc:Depends} and you have to do it manually.

-- 
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-08-07 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Moreover I wonder what the criteria of db_installdebconf are to
> be clever enough to ignore the lines
> 
>. /usr/share/debconf/confmodule
>db_get "shared/zope/restart" || true
> 
> in the postinst file because the package depends from a package
> that just depends from debconf?

Well, I am not sure it is a good idea to resolv the dependencies that way.
Each package should declare all its dependencies directly. (And only its
own)

Gruss
Bernd


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-08-07 Thread Ben Armstrong
On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 22:13 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> Just curious: why not, in that case, upload xpilot-ng as xpilot?
> 
> If the new upstream is actually the better one, it makes sense for it
> to go on under the label of xpilot in my opinion.

I'm still holding out for the remote chance upstream might deliver on
their promise to release an XPilot 5, which would then offer some
features XPilot-ng doesn't.  With that in mind, I included -ng in all
filepaths and the package names so they won't conflict.

While it is still possible they might release xpilot++ (the working name
for XPilot 5, since they've translated it to C++) which would then
become the next version of the current xpilot package, so long as 4.5.5
remains in the current state of disrepair, I feel it is better to have
users upgrade to xpilot-ng.

Ben


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-08-07 Thread Marc Haber
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 18:46:20 -0400, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Debian Adduser Developers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>   adduser

Fixed version in svn, will be uploaded when the current unstable
versio has migrated to testing.

>Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>   clamav-data
>   clamav-getfiles

clamav-data and clamav-getfiles will be overhauled in late august. I
would like to postpone the (easy) fix until then.

>   snoopy

Fixed version uploaded today.

>Mike Markley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>   aide

A patch is in the BTS. I am co-maintainer for aide, and I have asked
Mike for his opinion regarding some other easily fixed bugs. I expect
an upload in the next ten to 14 days.

See also:
http://blog.zugschlus.de/archives/126-My-packages-cdebconf-blockers.html

Greetings
Marc

-- 
-- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -
Marc Haber |   " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany  | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://www.zugschlus.de/
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834



Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-08-07 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 05:08:33PM -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 18:46 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Ben Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >xpilot
> 
> I offered this for adoption a while back.  Nobody took up my offer.  I
> finally uploaded xpilot-ng today (see my 3-year-old ITP #141099) and
> plan to make it supercede xpilot (i.e. strip the contents of the old
> xpilot packages to turn them into dummy metas to assist with the
> upgrade).
> 
> So, either wait for xpilot-ng's acceptance and its subsequent
> replacement of xpilot, or if you need this resolved sooner, go ahead and
> NMU xpilot with just the debconf fix.  I won't have time for either
> until next weekend.

Just curious: why not, in that case, upload xpilot-ng as xpilot?

If the new upstream is actually the better one, it makes sense for it
to go on under the label of xpilot in my opinion.

--Jeroen

-- 
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-08-07 Thread Ben Armstrong
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 18:46 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Ben Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>xpilot

I offered this for adoption a while back.  Nobody took up my offer.  I
finally uploaded xpilot-ng today (see my 3-year-old ITP #141099) and
plan to make it supercede xpilot (i.e. strip the contents of the old
xpilot packages to turn them into dummy metas to assist with the
upgrade).

So, either wait for xpilot-ng's acceptance and its subsequent
replacement of xpilot, or if you need this resolved sooner, go ahead and
NMU xpilot with just the debconf fix.  I won't have time for either
until next weekend.

Ben


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-08-07 Thread Kęstutis Biliūnas
An, 2005 08 02 18:46 -0400, Joey Hess rašė:

> Kęstutis Biliūnas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>ispell-lt

Fixed and the new package is in incoming now.
-- 
Kęstutis Biliūnas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-08-07 Thread Andreas Tille

On Sun, 7 Aug 2005, Russ Allbery wrote:


debconf-2.0 was added to policy as a virtual package in 2002 and has
been provided by debconf since 2003. In early 2004, dh_installdebconf
began automatically adding it as an alternate to debconf in
dependencies it generates for packages using debhelper.



Hmmm, I'm using dh_installdebconf in all my packages but there is
no such thing as adding something to the dependencies.  Did I missed
something?


${misc:Depends} will add the appropriate dependency; use it rather than
an explicit debconf dependency.

Which does not really seem to work in all cases.  I'm using a shared
debconf template (shared/zope/restart) in postinst scripts of some
Zope products.  I tried to replace the debconf dependency according
to your suggestion, but the resulting Debian package did not
depend from debconf.

It might be the reason that in fact it is clear that the package
implicitely depends from debconf if it depends from the package
that contains the shared question (zope).  I for myself feeled
safer to add the explicite debconf dependency.  Am I wrong here?

Moreover I wonder what the criteria of db_installdebconf are to
be clever enough to ignore the lines

   . /usr/share/debconf/confmodule
   db_get "shared/zope/restart" || true

in the postinst file because the package depends from a package
that just depends from debconf?

Kind regards

   Andreas.

--
http://fam-tille.de


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-08-07 Thread Russ Allbery
Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, Joey Hess wrote:

>> debconf-2.0 was added to policy as a virtual package in 2002 and has
>> been provided by debconf since 2003. In early 2004, dh_installdebconf
>> began automatically adding it as an alternate to debconf in
>> dependencies it generates for packages using debhelper.

> Hmmm, I'm using dh_installdebconf in all my packages but there is
> no such thing as adding something to the dependencies.  Did I missed
> something?

${misc:Depends} will add the appropriate dependency; use it rather than
an explicit debconf dependency.

> BTW, why isn't there a lintian check which reports this problem?

Probably just because no one has written one yet.  :)

-- 
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-08-07 Thread Juan Manuel Garcia Molina
Hi.

On Wednesday 03 August 2005 00:46, Joey Hess wrote:
> Juan Manuel Garcia Molina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>    facturalux
Fixed locally, it will be included in next upload.

>    moodle-book
I have just uploaded a package with the correction included.


Regards,
Juanma.

-- 
Juan Manuel  Garcia Molina
Debian GNU/Linux Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org


pgpVry9tjLZHW.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-08-07 Thread Andreas Tille

On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, Joey Hess wrote:

debconf-2.0 was added to policy as a virtual package in 2002 and has 
been provided by debconf since 2003. In early 2004, dh_installdebconf

began automatically adding it as an alternate to debconf in dependencies
it generates for packages using debhelper.

Hmmm, I'm using dh_installdebconf in all my packages but there is
no such thing as adding something to the dependencies.  Did I missed
something?


on debconf without a "| debconf-2.0". If your package is on this list,

Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  arb

I expect new upstream soon and will change with new upload.


  cdd

Changed in CVS.


  pcd2html

Fixed.


  zope-epoz

Fixed.


  zope-extfile
  zope-textindexng2

Need to sort out issues with general zope packaging - packages
in preparation.


Hmm, there are also a few packages that depend on
"debconf | debconf-2.0, ..., debconf", but I don't have a good regex
to catch those yet and am unsure how dpkg handles them anyway.

BTW, why isn't there a lintian check which reports this problem?

Kind regards

   Andreas.

--
http://fam-tille.de


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-08-06 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Joey Hess [Tue, 02 Aug 2005 18:46:20 -0400]:

> Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers 
>kdebase
>kdenetwork

  Fixed in SVN, will be in the next upload.

-- 
Adeodato Simó
EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
 
Old men are fond of giving good advice to console themselves for their
inability to set a bad example.
-- La Rochefoucauld, "Maxims"


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-08-06 Thread Paul Seelig
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joey Hess) writes:

> Paul Seelig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>localepurge
> 
The next upload will contain the correction.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-08-05 Thread Mattia Dongili
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 06:46:20PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
[...]
> Mattia Dongili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>cpufreqd

fixed and uploaded.

-- 
mattia
:wq!


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-08-05 Thread Thorsten Sauter

Hi,

* Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-08-03 00:46]:
|libphp-adodb

fixed and uploaded.


Regards,
Thorsten

-- 
Thorsten Sauter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

(Is there life after /sbin/halt -p?)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-08-05 Thread Adrian von Bidder
On Wednesday 03 August 2005 00.46, Joey Hess wrote:
[debconf dance]

> Adrian von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>    postgrey

tags +pending (fixed in svn)

I hear a new upstream version is in the works, so I'll wait a week or two 
before uploading.

cheers
-- vbi

-- 
featured product: SpamAssassin - http://spamassassin.org


pgpNqPg2Ppqrz.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-08-04 Thread Max Vozeler
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 06:46:20PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Max Vozeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>cdtool

The debconf question will be dropped in next upload. It asks about the
/dev/cdrom symlink that is created elsewhere nowadays.

cheers,
Max


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-08-04 Thread Julien BLACHE
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>> No, you don't need the dependency even in that case. You can just make
>> the code only to run if there is debconf installed.
>
> Good call.  I thought Julien meant removing the "purge old stuff from the
> database", and not just the dependency.

Yes, indeed. One of the 2 packages got released in Woody with the
debconf stuff, so I'll go with Andreas' solution for this one. For the
other one, I've just dropped debconf entirely.

JB.

-- 
 Julien BLACHE - Debian & GNU/Linux Developer - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
 
 Public key available on  - KeyID: F5D6 5169 
 GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-08-04 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Thu, 04 Aug 2005, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Henrique de Moraes Holschuh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050803 12:51]:
> > On Wed, 03 Aug 2005, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> > > I'll drop the dependency on debconf on these two packages, as it's
> > > only used to purge some old debconf questions from the database.
>  
> > You can do that only if those old debconf questions were never in a stable
> > release (i.e. they existed only during 'sid' and 'testing' development).
> > Otherwise, you'll have to suffer then for a while yet.
> 
> No, you don't need the dependency even in that case. You can just make
> the code only to run if there is debconf installed.

Good call.  I thought Julien meant removing the "purge old stuff from the
database", and not just the dependency.

-- 
  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-08-04 Thread Andreas Barth
* Henrique de Moraes Holschuh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050803 12:51]:
> On Wed, 03 Aug 2005, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> > I'll drop the dependency on debconf on these two packages, as it's
> > only used to purge some old debconf questions from the database.
 
> You can do that only if those old debconf questions were never in a stable
> release (i.e. they existed only during 'sid' and 'testing' development).
> Otherwise, you'll have to suffer then for a while yet.

No, you don't need the dependency even in that case. You can just make
the code only to run if there is debconf installed.


Cheers,
Andi


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-08-03 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 06:46:20PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:

> Since so many packages need to be fixed, I may resort to additional
> private mails (or d-d-a mail) before I begin filing bug reports. The

A mail to d-d-a would probably be a good idea in any case - I can't be
the only person who's never heard of decconf-2.0 before.

-- 
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-08-03 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Wed, 03 Aug 2005, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> I'll drop the dependency on debconf on these two packages, as it's
> only used to purge some old debconf questions from the database.

You can do that only if those old debconf questions were never in a stable
release (i.e. they existed only during 'sid' and 'testing' development).
Otherwise, you'll have to suffer then for a while yet.

-- 
  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-08-03 Thread Julien BLACHE
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi Joey,

> Julien BLACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>sane-backends
>tilp

I'll drop the dependency on debconf on these two packages, as it's
only used to purge some old debconf questions from the database.

JB.

-- 
 Julien BLACHE - Debian & GNU/Linux Developer - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
 
 Public key available on  - KeyID: F5D6 5169 
 GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-08-02 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 06:46:20PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:

> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>apt-listchanges
>cricket
>flac

I have no idea how or why flac ended up with a debconf dependency; it
doesn't use it.  I've removed it in CVS for my next upload; no bug is
necessary.

-- 
 - mdz


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



mass bug filing on packages that are blocking use of cdebconf

2005-08-02 Thread Joey Hess
I intend to eventually file bugs on packages in Debian which depend on
debconf without an alternate of debconf-2.0, as all of these make it
impossible to install cdebconf, which we would eventually like to
replace debconf.

debconf-2.0 was added to policy as a virtual package in 2002 and has
been provided by debconf since 2003. In early 2004, dh_installdebconf
began automatically adding it as an alternate to debconf in dependencies
it generates for packages using debhelper. 303 packages use the virtual
package correctly; the following 761 do not. Also, every single (!)
package that pre-depends on debconf does not include the alternative of
debconf-2.0.

Since so many packages need to be fixed, I may resort to additional
private mails (or d-d-a mail) before I begin filing bug reports. The
following is a list by maintainer of packages that Depend or Pre-Depend
on debconf without a "| debconf-2.0". If your package is on this list,
please fix it. If your package is on this list incorrectly (ie, if it
really depends on debconf for some reason), please let me know.

Wesley W. Terpstra (Debian) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   bidentd

Loic Dachary (OuoU) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   poker-network
   poker3d

Stefan Hornburg (Racke) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   amavis-ng
   courier
   debaux
   dhelp
   interchange
   pure-ftpd
   sympa

Maurizio Lemmo (Tannoiser) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   mailreader

Marco Presi (Zufus) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   linesrv
   pointless

Krzysztof Krzyzaniak (eloy) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   popa3d

Masayuki Hatta (mhatta) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   gs-common
   gtktrain
   ndtpd

Peter De Schrijver (p2) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   libgcr410

Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   posh
   zsh

Joel Aelwyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   zope-quotafolder

OHASHI Akira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   initz
   riece

Jan Alonzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   ispell-tl

Pierre Ancelot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   hwtools

Micah Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   bamboo

Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   ipmasq

Hakan Ardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   ftpwatch

Ben Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   xpilot

Richard Atterer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   udftools

Julien BLACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   sane-backends
   tilp

Thomas Bushnell, BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   miscfiles

Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   pango1.0

Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   diffmon

Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   exult

Denis Barbier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   belocs-locales-data
   kbd

Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   mgetty

Roland Bauerschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   colormake

Christian Bayle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   gforge-theme-starterpack
   php4-mcrypt

Ian Beckwith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   ckermit

Cord Beermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   jove
   nn

Bradley Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   razzle

Hilko Bengen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   drupal
   mantis

Edward Betts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   joystick

Adrian von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   postgrey

Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   lksctp-tools
   partimage

Kęstutis Biliūnas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   ispell-lt

Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   zope-loginmanager

Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   hinfo

Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   durep
   shfs
   sl-modem

Jeremy T. Bouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   acidlab

Cyril Bouthors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   drbd

Markus Braun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   tpb

Adrian Bridgett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   tgif

James Bromberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   libapache-mod-backhand

Phil Brooke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   yiff

Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   leafnode
   nis

Philip Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   kdrill

Luis Bustamante <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   acct

Chris Butler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   wu-ftpd

Bruno Barrera C. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   portsentry

Rubén Porras Campo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   manpages-es

Devin Carraway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   qpsmtpd

Patrick Caulfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   dnprogs
   lvm10
   mopd

Petr Cech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   ispell-czech

Emmanuel le Chevoir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   icecast-server
   xsmbrowser

Pierre Chifflier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   websvn

Volker Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   synce-serial

Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   tripwire

Ashley Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   bottlerocket

Jesus Climent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   pconsole
   rssh

David Coe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   libsafe

Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   libraw1394

Carlo Contavalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   wipl

Jereme Corrado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   faqomatic

Matthew Danish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   oftpd

Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   apt-build

Frederik Dannemare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   motion

Vivek Dasmohapatra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   dbishell

Debian Apache Maintainers 
   apache
   apache2

Debian Hamradio Maintainers 
   ax25-apps

Debian OCaml Maintainers 
   ocaml-tools

Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers 
   kdebase
   kdenetwork

Debian X Strike Force 
   xorg-x11

Eric Delaunay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   scsitools
   xtel

Cédric Delfosse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   darkstat

Murat Demirten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   etter