Re: removal syncing among "official" and amd64 archive
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 06:42:15PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/org/amd64.debian.net$ madison editex >> editex |0.0.5-6 |stable | source >> editex |0.0.5-6 | unstable | source >> >> As you can see editex is already removed from etch since Heidi syncs >> are instantaneous. > > Ok, so there is some out-of-syncing somewhere else: > > > http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=editex&searchon=names&subword=1&version=all&release=all > > editex is listed as available on unstable only for the amd64 > architecture. Yes, unstable syncs the override files and removals need some ftp-master interaction. Afaik the DAK sends a mail about possible removal commands and the ftp-master has to cut&paste them if they are corret. Testing syncs on the other hand are done via Heidi. The amd64 'britney' just clones the source versions Debian has in testing and moves the same versions into testing for amd64 (or out of it on removal). So you should never ever see a difference in testing while unstable should only have short term differences. The amd64 ftp-masters have been prodded about it so hopefully it resolves itself anytime soon[tm]. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: removal syncing among "official" and amd64 archive
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 06:42:15PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/org/amd64.debian.net$ madison editex > editex |0.0.5-6 |stable | source > editex |0.0.5-6 | unstable | source > > As you can see editex is already removed from etch since Heidi syncs > are instantaneous. Ok, so there is some out-of-syncing somewhere else: http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=editex&searchon=names&subword=1&version=all&release=all editex is listed as available on unstable only for the amd64 architecture. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy [EMAIL PROTECTED],debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/ If there's any real truth it's that the entire multidimensional infinity of the Universe is almost certainly being run by a bunch of maniacs. -!- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: removal syncing among "official" and amd64 archive
On Sat, 2005-11-19 at 18:42 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > While we are it ... I noticed that removal of packages from the official > > debian archive are not propagated to the amd64 archive. E.g. query > > packages.debian.org for the "editex" source package. > > > > Is that known? > > No. removals should propagate to amd64 with some delay. How long ago > was it removed? A few months ago. = [Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:26:16 -0700] [ftpmaster: Jeroen van Wolffelaar] Removed the following packages from unstable: editex |0.0.5-6 | source libeditex-dev |0.0.5-6 | alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libeditex-ocaml |0.0.5-6 | alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libeditex-ocaml-dev |0.0.5-6 | alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libeditex0 |0.0.5-6 | alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc Closed bugs: 317298 --- Reason --- RoM; unsupported upstream, buggy -- = Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: removal syncing among "official" and amd64 archive
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > While we are it ... I noticed that removal of packages from the official > debian archive are not propagated to the amd64 archive. E.g. query > packages.debian.org for the "editex" source package. > > Is that known? No. removals should propagate to amd64 with some delay. How long ago was it removed? [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/org/amd64.debian.net$ madison editex editex |0.0.5-6 |stable | source editex |0.0.5-6 | unstable | source As you can see editex is already removed from etch since Heidi syncs are instantaneous. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
removal syncing among "official" and amd64 archive
While we are it ... I noticed that removal of packages from the official debian archive are not propagated to the amd64 archive. E.g. query packages.debian.org for the "editex" source package. Is that known? -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy [EMAIL PROTECTED],debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/ If there's any real truth it's that the entire multidimensional infinity of the Universe is almost certainly being run by a bunch of maniacs. -!- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
