Re: splitting package on arch-dependant and arch-independant parts
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 09:39:09PM +0600, Sergey Fedoseev wrote: > ?? ??, 14/06/2005 ?? 16:55 +0200, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo ??: > > There's only one rule. Architecture dependent files go to binary package, > > and architecture independent to data package. > > I consider some common procedures should exist anyway. For example ones > move manpage to binary package and others move it to data package. Who > is right? As a rule, put the manpage in the same package as the program it document. Normally manpage are small enough there is no benefit to put them in the -data package, and it is more robust this way. Cheers, -- Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: splitting package on arch-dependant and arch-independant parts
Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo schrieb am Dienstag, 14. Juni 2005 um 18:02:06 +0200: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 09:39:09PM +0600, Sergey Fedoseev wrote: > > > There's only one rule. Architecture dependent files go to binary package, > > > and architecture independent to data package. > > > > I consider some common procedures should exist anyway. For example ones > > move manpage to binary package and others move it to data package. Who > > is right? > > Who moved binary (_architecture_ dependent binary) to -data package? I think he's asking where to put the manpage to -bin or -data. -- J�Friedrich There are only 10 types of people: Those who understand binary and those who don't. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: splitting package on arch-dependant and arch-independant parts
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 09:39:09PM +0600, Sergey Fedoseev wrote: > > There's only one rule. Architecture dependent files go to binary package, > > and architecture independent to data package. > > I consider some common procedures should exist anyway. For example ones > move manpage to binary package and others move it to data package. Who > is right? Who moved binary (_architecture_ dependent binary) to -data package? Basically you don't have to split package if there are no architecture dependent data in it (or such data is very small). Maybe you should tell us what program are you going to package. regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: splitting package on arch-dependant and arch-independant parts
В Втр, 14/06/2005 в 16:55 +0200, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo пишет: > There's only one rule. Architecture dependent files go to binary package, > and architecture independent to data package. I consider some common procedures should exist anyway. For example ones move manpage to binary package and others move it to data package. Who is right? -- Sergey Fedoseev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: splitting package on arch-dependant and arch-independant parts
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 08:35:36PM +0600, Sergey Fedoseev wrote: > How exactly package should be splitted on data and binary parts? Which > files should be moved to binary package and which to the in data one? > > Any standart procedures/recommendations/suggestions? There's only one rule. Architecture dependent files go to binary package, and architecture independent to data package. regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
splitting package on arch-dependant and arch-independant parts
How exactly package should be splitted on data and binary parts? Which files should be moved to binary package and which to the in data one? Any standart procedures/recommendations/suggestions? -- Sergey Fedoseev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]