Re: unrebuildable ruby packages (Re: ruby-defaults 1.8.0)

2003-09-09 Thread Dmitry Borodaenko
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 05:35:35PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
   RUBY_LINK=`ruby -rrbconfig -e 'puts Config::CONFIG[LIBRUBYARG_SHARED]n'`
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ruby -rrbconfig -e 'puts 
 Config::CONFIG[LIBRUBYARG_SHARED]' 
 nil
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ruby -v   
 ruby 1.6.8 (2003-07-09) [i386-linux]

How about just going with Ruby 1.8?

$ ruby1.8 -rrbconfig -e 'puts Config::CONFIG[LIBRUBYARG_SHARED]'
-lruby1.8

By the time you fix it for 1.6, ruby-defaults will be 1.8... And there
is little sense in having this package supporting both ;-)

-- 
Dmitry Borodaenko




Re: unrebuildable ruby packages (Re: ruby-defaults 1.8.0)

2003-09-08 Thread Fumitoshi UKAI

At Sun, 7 Sep 2003 15:20:09 -0400,
Joey Hess wrote:

 I'm probably the only ruby package maintainer who doesn't speak ruby.. :-)
 Luckily I have eager ruby minions to take care of that part of mooix.
 
 However, we were a bit suprised to have to make the configure script
 check for libruby.so.$VERSION. Are you sure that's a good idea? Some
 reason you cannot provide a libruby.so for the default version of ruby,
 so that non-debian software that just links -lruby can work?

I just look into mooix source. Hmm, I think mood/Makefile should be fixed as:

 ifeq (${EMBED_RUBY},yes)
 SOURCES += ruby.c
 CFLAGS += -DEMBED_RUBY -I`ruby -rrbconfig -e puts Config::CONFIG['archdir']`
 RUBY_LINK=`ruby -rrbconfig -e 'puts Config::CONFIG[LIBRUBYARG_SHARED]n'`
 endif

Here, Config::CONFIG[LIBRUBYARG_SHARED] is the appropriate linker option
to link with ruby library.
Note that -rrbconfig option is the same meaning of require 'rbconfig'
(rbconfig.rb is in /usr/lib/ruby/version/arch/rbconfig.rb)

So, once ruby-defaults becomes 1.8.x, /usr/bin/ruby will be ruby 1.8.x and
configuration parameters will be changed for ruby 1.8.x.
If it build-depends on ruby1.8 instead of ruby (and ruby1.8-dev of course), 
and use /usr/bin/ruby1.8 instead of /usr/bin/ruby, you can build your
package for ruby1.8 before ruby-defaults becomes 1.8.x.

  I plan to submit bug reports and/or NMU to fix this issue within a few 
  weeks.
 
 I plan to release a new mooix with the ruby changes in somewhere in the
 neighborhood of three weeks. If you need the changes before then I can
 try to backport them.

Ok.

Regards,
Fumitoshi UKAI


pgps3RZOiRrhF.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: unrebuildable ruby packages (Re: ruby-defaults 1.8.0)

2003-09-08 Thread Dmitry Borodaenko
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 04:01:31AM +0900, Fumitoshi UKAI wrote:
 As Marcelo pointed out on Bug#209052, ruby-dev has been obsoleted, so
 packages that build-depend on ruby-dev can't be built now.
 
 We have ruby1.6-dev (for ruby1.6) and ruby1.8-dev (for ruby1.8), so
 please rebuild your packages to use ruby1.6-dev and/or ruby1.8-dev.

I've uploaded libyaml-ruby_0.49.1-2 and libdbd-ruby_0.0.20-3 which
follow the Debian Ruby Policy.

I see no point in uploading new libjttui-ruby, since I've orphaned this
package (see #206718) and it should not go into Debian/stable in its
current form anyway (it is unused and its upstream is inactive for well
over a year).

Four of new Ruby/DBI packages, libdbd-pg-ruby1.6, libdbd-pg-ruby1.8,
libdbd-mysql-ruby1.6, and libdbd-mysql-ruby1.8 depend on libpgsql-ruby
and libmysql-ruby, respectively. This is required for these packages to
be installable right now, but is obviously not correct: current versions
of libpgsql-ruby and libmysql-ruby provide modules only for Ruby 1.6,
and upcoming versions will expectedly depend on -ruby1.6 variants, and
later on -ruby1.8 variants. Hence:

Taku, Christian,

Please let me know when you upload new modules for both Ruby 1.6 and
Ruby 1.8, so that I can upload DBDs with correct dependencies. Or let me
know if you don't have time to do it and approve someone to NMU it for
you; beware that adopting these packages to the Ruby policy will require
major changes to their build system, thus it's better that you do it
yourselves.

-- 
Dmitry Borodaenko




Re: unrebuildable ruby packages (Re: ruby-defaults 1.8.0)

2003-09-08 Thread Joey Hess
Fumitoshi UKAI wrote:
 I just look into mooix source.

The released source that is.

  RUBY_LINK=`ruby -rrbconfig -e 'puts Config::CONFIG[LIBRUBYARG_SHARED]n'`

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ruby -rrbconfig -e 'puts 
Config::CONFIG[LIBRUBYARG_SHARED]' 
nil
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ruby -v   
ruby 1.6.8 (2003-07-09) [i386-linux]

-- 
see shy jo


pgppUJsVdAAeJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature


unrebuildable ruby packages (Re: ruby-defaults 1.8.0)

2003-09-07 Thread Fumitoshi UKAI
Dear ruby package maintainers!

As Marcelo pointed out on Bug#209052, ruby-dev has been obsoleted, so
packages that build-depend on ruby-dev can't be built now.

We have ruby1.6-dev (for ruby1.6) and ruby1.8-dev (for ruby1.8), so 
please rebuild your packages to use ruby1.6-dev and/or ruby1.8-dev.

I plan to submit bug reports and/or NMU to fix this issue within a few weeks.

Regards,
Fumitoshi UKAI


pgpZtRgH82bj7.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: unrebuildable ruby packages (Re: ruby-defaults 1.8.0)

2003-09-07 Thread Joey Hess
Fumitoshi UKAI wrote:
 Dear ruby package maintainers!

I'm probably the only ruby package maintainer who doesn't speak ruby.. :-)
Luckily I have eager ruby minions to take care of that part of mooix.

However, we were a bit suprised to have to make the configure script
check for libruby.so.$VERSION. Are you sure that's a good idea? Some
reason you cannot provide a libruby.so for the default version of ruby,
so that non-debian software that just links -lruby can work?

 I plan to submit bug reports and/or NMU to fix this issue within a few weeks.

I plan to release a new mooix with the ruby changes in somewhere in the
neighborhood of three weeks. If you need the changes before then I can
try to backport them.

-- 
see shy jo


pgpSEM5XusyPQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature