Re: Next upload 2007-09-30 (dpkg 1.14.7)
Raphael Hertzog writes (Re: Next upload 2007-09-30 (dpkg 1.14.7)): Please Ian, you're a bit too arrogant here and it doesn't help your integration in the team. We all know who you are and that you have written big chunks of dpkg. But you're not the current leader and thus aren't in a position to require any review. But we welcome any review that you will do. Thanks for your criticism. I accept your point and I apologise. I'll try to engage more constructively. Thanks for your helpful suggestions. Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Next upload 2007-09-30 (dpkg 1.14.7)
Guillem Jover writes (Re: Next upload 2007-09-30 (dpkg 1.14.7)): On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 19:04:53 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: If it makes changes to the C then I think I should review it. Why would you *have* to review it? Because I'm the person who is (a) available and (b) competent to do so. Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Next upload 2007-09-30 (dpkg 1.14.7)
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Ian Jackson wrote: Guillem Jover writes (Re: Next upload 2007-09-30 (dpkg 1.14.7)): On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 19:04:53 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: If it makes changes to the C then I think I should review it. Why would you *have* to review it? Because I'm the person who is (a) available and (b) competent to do so. Please Ian, you're a bit too arrogant here and it doesn't help your integration in the team. We all know who you are and that you have written big chunks of dpkg. But you're not the current leader and thus aren't in a position to require any review. But we welcome any review that you will do. Concerning availability, it's discutable. You have made significant contributions with some important new features, but you haven't helped a lot on the rest of the maintenance. You were supposed to review one patch at least (#281057) and you didn't do so. I also wrote a little patch touching the C part (see #433290) this summer and despite my request for reviews, nobody commented yet. So please, if you ever expect to be able to take the lead on the C parts of the code, please show some good will by also reviewing/updating/fixing the many patchs lying in the BTS. Instead, I've only seen you comment on some changes without proposing alternative patches and without much follow-up. Please don't be offended by this mail, just take it as advice from someone else who recently joined and managed to adapt himself to Guillem's and Frank's way of working (which requires some follow-up and prodding from time to time). Also, if you use IRC, if would be good for you to join #debian-dpkg, so that you we can interact more quickly when needed. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog Premier livre français sur Debian GNU/Linux : http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Next upload 2007-09-30 (dpkg 1.14.7)
On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 19:04:53 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: Guillem Jover writes (Re: Next upload 2007-09-30 (dpkg 1.14.7)): About starting the dpkg-cross merge, after some conversations with Neil and reading some of the dpkg-cross code, I think I've got a pretty good idea but needs done, but I've some reservations about the paths used, I'll post a separate mail later. I've deferred it until next version, sorry Neil... If it makes changes to the C then I think I should review it. Why would you *have* to review it? regards, guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Next upload 2007-09-30 (dpkg 1.14.7)
Guillem Jover writes (Re: Next upload 2007-09-30 (dpkg 1.14.7)): About starting the dpkg-cross merge, after some conversations with Neil and reading some of the dpkg-cross code, I think I've got a pretty good idea but needs done, but I've some reservations about the paths used, I'll post a separate mail later. I've deferred it until next version, sorry Neil... I haven't checked - does the dpkg-cross stuff involve any changes to the dpkg C code or is it all in dpkg-source et al ? If it makes changes to the C then I think I should review it. Is there a git branch I can look at ? Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Next upload 2007-09-30 (dpkg 1.14.7)
Hi, On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 07:06:59 +0300, Guillem Jover wrote: We talked about uploading next version soon, so that we can proceed with the dpkg-shlibdeps rewrite Raphael has been working on. So I'll commit some minor pending issues, try to merge the dpkg-cross stuff, and upload late this weekend. Hmm, this took a bit more than expected, been busy at work and quite tired afterwards most of last week. Will be catching up with the mails this one. About starting the dpkg-cross merge, after some conversations with Neil and reading some of the dpkg-cross code, I think I've got a pretty good idea but needs done, but I've some reservations about the paths used, I'll post a separate mail later. I've deferred it until next version, sorry Neil... regards, guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Next upload 2007-09-30 (dpkg 1.14.7)
Hi, We talked about uploading next version soon, so that we can proceed with the dpkg-shlibdeps rewrite Raphael has been working on. So I'll commit some minor pending issues, try to merge the dpkg-cross stuff, and upload late this weekend. regards, guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
