libelfg0 needs upgraded for prelink
Package: libelfg0
Version: 0.8.0-1
The new glibc 2.3-1 in debian sid glibc cvs (and soon sid itself)
will allow prelinking of binaries. This will require an updated
libelfg0 package. You need to upgrade libelfg0 to
ftp://www.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/libs/libelf-0.8.2.tar.gz
and include the following two patches that redhat uses...
libelf-0.8.2-hash.patch
2002-06-14 Jakub Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* update.c (_elf64_layout): Don't overwrite sh_entsize
unconditionally for ELF64 - some platforms use
64 bit DT_HASH entries.
--- libelf-0.7.0/lib/update.c.jjFri Jun 12 15:42:39 1998
+++ libelf-0.7.0/lib/update.c Fri Jun 14 10:22:19 2002
@@ -317,7 +317,10 @@ _elf64_layout(Elf *elf, unsigned *flag)
entsize = scn_entsize(elf, version, shdr->sh_type);
if (entsize > 1) {
- rewrite(shdr->sh_entsize, entsize, scn->s_shdr_flags);
+ /* Some architectures use 64-bit hash entries. */
+ if (shdr->sh_type != SHT_HASH
+ || shdr->sh_entsize != _fsize(elf->e_class, version, ELF_T_ADDR))
+ rewrite(shdr->sh_entsize, entsize, scn->s_shdr_flags);
}
if (layout) {
---
libelf-0.8.2-symver.patch
---
2002-08-26 Jakub Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* lib/verdef.h (xlt_verdef): Don't crash if calculating size of
section which hasn't been loaded yet.
* lib/verneed.h (xlt_verneed): Likewise.
--- libelf-0.8.2/lib/verdef.h.jj2001-10-07 22:03:02.0 +0200
+++ libelf-0.8.2/lib/verdef.h 2002-08-26 19:04:54.0 +0200
@@ -138,6 +138,9 @@ xlt_verdef(unsigned char *dst, const uns
if (n < sizeof(verdef_stype)) {
return 0;
}
+if (dst == NULL && src == NULL) {
+ return n;
+}
soff = doff = 0;
for (;;) {
const verdef_stype *svd;
--- libelf-0.8.2/lib/verneed.h.jj 2001-10-07 22:03:02.0 +0200
+++ libelf-0.8.2/lib/verneed.h 2002-08-26 19:05:18.0 +0200
@@ -142,6 +142,9 @@ xlt_verneed(unsigned char *dst, const un
if (n < sizeof(verneed_stype)) {
return 0;
}
+if (dst == NULL && src == NULL) {
+ return n;
+}
soff = doff = 0;
for (;;) {
const verneed_stype *svn;
---
I have been using a locally built debian libelfg0 package with this new
tarball and two patches with glibc 2.2.9x and now glibc 2.3 as well as
the most current prelink from Jakub. On debian ppc sid, prelinking works
prefectly under glibc 2.3-1 with the above requested changes. Can we
please get a new package for libelfg0 out ASAP. Thanks.
Jack
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#163260: libc6: crypt r() returning bogus result, not consistently reproducible
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 12:46:10AM +0100, Steve Haslam wrote: > Package: libc6 > Version: 2.2.5-15 > Severity: normal > > OK, this is horrible, but I have to ask for help somewhere... > > I have Apache, mod_perl, and perl, and deep down in that mess I'm calling > Perl's crypt() function, which in turn calls crypt_r(). Come on. File this on something else unless you get a libc6-only test case to reproduce it. Reassing this before I do, please. -- Debian - http://www.debian.org/ Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/ Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/ Deqo - http://www.deqo.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#163260: libc6: crypt r() returning bogus result, not consistently reproducible
Package: libc6 Version: 2.2.5-15 Severity: normal OK, this is horrible, but I have to ask for help somewhere... I have Apache, mod_perl, and perl, and deep down in that mess I'm calling Perl's crypt() function, which in turn calls crypt_r(). Now, sometimes, this is getting bogus results back. At first I thought the problem went away when I used the libc6-dbg libraries, but then it came back and started occurring with them too. I can't find a single cause that produces this, although I will keep trying to isolate it. What I have got is this output from gdb when I set a breakpoint on crypt_r() to see the calls: (gdb) b crypt_r Breakpoint 1 at 0x4bb33b05: file crypt-entry.c, line 77. (gdb) c Continuing. [Switching to Thread 1024 (LWP 7719)] Breakpoint 1, 0x4bb33b05 in __crypt_r (key=0x8dd5c00 "foo", salt=0x8e6c750 "xxY8K1xpBNqPg", data=0x8d35af8) at crypt-entry.c:77 77 crypt-entry.c: No such file or directory. in crypt-entry.c (gdb) finish Run till exit from #0 0x4bb33b05 in __crypt_r (key=0x8dd5c00 "foo", salt=0x8e6c750 "xxY8K1xpBNqPg", data=0x8d35af8) at crypt-entry.c:77 0x4c0173dd in Perl_pp_crypt () from /usr/lib/libperl.so.5.8 Value returned is $1 = 0x8d55b78 "xx9azPWyUVpW." "xxY8K1xpBNqPg" is the correct answer, the return value is bogus... So, my thoguht would be that something is overwriting the "data" struct while crypt_r is executing? However, iirc, this was taken while I was running Apache in single-process mode, so there shouldn't have been any chance for something else to stomp on the struct while crypt_r was running... I am totally at a loss. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux arise 2.4.18 #7-ARISE Thu Jun 13 23:55:15 BST 2002 i586 Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB Versions of packages libc6 depends on: ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-4The Berkeley database routines [gl -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ldconfig miscompile on i386
Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > We were setting both CFLAGS and BUILD_CFLAGS in a configparms > > > > file. > > > > > > CFLAGS = -pipe -O2 -fstrict-aliasing > > > > BUILD_CFLAGS = -O2 > > > > > What gets set for CFLAGS if we do not set it manually? > > > > CFLAGS is left blank in config.make, so I think Makeconfig picks up > > the default_cflags rules (-g -O2). I can't really check from work, > > though. > > I don't see how this would affect it then. Doesn't pickup default CFLAGS for me: http://buildlogs.pld.org.pl/index.php?idx=1&ok=1&ns=0&cnt=16&off=0&id=42e2f5e8c2a47fb9eed065c00a6ce57b&action=text See that -march=i386 is there as we are passing it via CFLAGS. ps. note that I'm using almost vanilla glibc while Debian maybe contains some Make*-chaning patches -- Arkadiusz MiśkiewiczCS at FoE, Wroclaw University of Technology [EMAIL PROTECTED] AM2-6BONE, 1024/3DB19BBD, arekm(at)ircnet, PLD/Linux -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ldconfig miscompile on i386
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 08:13:11AM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote: > On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 10:54:30AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > > > > We were setting both CFLAGS and BUILD_CFLAGS in a configparms > > > file. > > > > CFLAGS = -pipe -O2 -fstrict-aliasing > > > BUILD_CFLAGS = -O2 > > > What gets set for CFLAGS if we do not set it manually? > > CFLAGS is left blank in config.make, so I think Makeconfig picks up > the default_cflags rules (-g -O2). I can't really check from work, > though. I don't see how this would affect it then. -- Debian - http://www.debian.org/ Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/ Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/ Deqo - http://www.deqo.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#99623: please add sv_SE.UTF-8
Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 10:00:40PM +0200, Patrik Hagglund wrote: >> Package: locales >> Version: 2.2.3-5 >> Severity: wishlist >> >> We should make it easy to switch to UTF-8 for each locale. Add an >> UTF-8 variant for each locale inputfile in /etc/locale.gen. Like: > >FYI, it's not as simple as that. This is an upstream list of supported >(read, tested) locale and character set combinations. Just adding the >lines doesn't mean they will work. > >Please test them before suggesting this. I have tested sv_SE.UTF-8 and it seems to work (sorting, date/time, character wideness) so please add it. en_GB.UTF-8 is not support upstream (just as sv_SE.UTF-8) but is listed in the Debian SUPPORTED file. What kind of testing has it received? If there is any formalized testing, I will do the same for sv_SE.UTF-8 too. If this is not enough reason to add it, please tell me how to proceed in getting sv_SE.UTF-8 supported because I would really like to see it. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#161788: marked as done (libc6 always loads i686 libraries from cache when available, ignoring the host arch)
Your message dated Thu, 03 Oct 2002 11:17:36 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#161700: fixed in glibc 2.2.5-15 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2002 16:00:04 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 21 11:00:04 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from m28-mp1.cvx3-a.bre.dial.ntli.net (cyclone) [62.255.96.28] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17smfq-Ne-00; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 11:00:02 -0500 Received: from aps100 by cyclone with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 17smfn-0008Jb-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 16:59:59 +0100 Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 16:59:58 +0100 From: Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libc6 always loads i686 libraries from cache when available, ignoring the host arch Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Monty-Python: No-one expects the Spanish Inquisition! X-Debbugs-CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: libc6 Severity: grave Here's a cute one. On any i386 platform, when there is an i686-specific library in ld.so.cache, libc6 will prefer it over all other libraries in the cache, even if the local system is really i[345]86. The problem is specific to cached libraries, and should not occur on other architectures. This causes the latest version of libssl to crash with SIGILL on i[345]86 systems. It can be directly diagnosed by setting LD_DEBUG=3Dlibs and looking at the first few lines generated when the offending binary is run, and observing that /usr/lib/i686/libcrypto* is being loaded from the cache. When _dl_load_cache_lookup searches the cache, it checks the platform using this expression (sysdeps/generic/dl-cache.c around line 233): if (_DL_PLATFORMS_COUNT && platform !=3D -1 \ && (lib->hwcap & _DL_HWCAP_PLATFORM) !=3D 0 \ && (lib->hwcap & _DL_HWCAP_PLATFORM) !=3D platform) \ continue; \ _DL_HWCAP_PLATFORM is a mask that is supposed to match all the bits in an hwcap field that can represent the current platform. Unfortunately, it's got the wrong value. Here's the fix (haven't tested this yet, glibc takes too long to build, but some bit-twiddling in gdb indicates it should work): --- sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/dl-procinfo.h~ 2001-07-22 21:24:56.000= 00 +0100 +++ sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/dl-procinfo.h 2002-09-21 16:38:34.= 0 +0100 @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ /* Start at 48 to reserve some space. */ #define _DL_FIRST_PLATFORM 48 /* Mask to filter out platforms. */ -#define _DL_HWCAP_PLATFORM (7ULL << _DL_FIRST_PLATFORM) +#define _DL_HWCAP_PLATFORM (((1ULL << _DL_PLATFORMS_COUNT) - 1) << _DL_FIR= ST_PLATFORM) =20 =20 static inline int The value '7' clearly dates from when there were only three platforms, and never got updated when i686 was added. The practical upshot is that the bit for 'i686' is never considered by anything to be a platform, so the entry in ld.so.cache is assumed to be for any platform. --=20 .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | Dept. of Computing, `. `' | Imperial College, `- -><- | London, UK --PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE9jJd+lpK98RSteX8RAlx8AJ4ot/TFDeAw+t8y+u4yMCMmMjlBbwCgjmGC tkayiiArzpRecNo6awTGiog= =Lgr8 -END PGP SIGNATURE- --PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9-- --- Received: (at 161700-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Oct 2002 15:23:54 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 03 10:23:54 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17x7pQ-0005Lh-00; Thu, 03 Oct 2002 10:23:52 -0500 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with
Bug#161813: marked as done (ssh reports "Illegal instruction" when ssh-ing to a host)
Your message dated Thu, 03 Oct 2002 11:17:36 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#161700: fixed in glibc 2.2.5-15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2002 19:19:57 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 21 14:19:57 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pd951615a.dip.t-dialin.net (shawarma.dyndns.org) [217.81.97.90]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17spnI-0008Vl-00; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 14:19:56 -0500
Received: by shawarma.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id C264134176; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 21:19:53 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Ralf Hildebrandt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ssh reports "Illegal instruction" when ssh-ing to a host
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.99.60
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 21:19:53 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: ssh
Version: 1:3.4p1-2
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
Justification: renders package unusable
Invoking ssh results in a "Illegal instruction" message on the prompt.
I include a "strace" output of such a run:
--- snip ---
execve("/usr/bin/ssh", ["ssh", "-v", "webmail1.charite.de"], [/* 13 vars */]) = 0
uname({sys="Linux", node="shawarma.eth0.cxm", ...}) = 0
brk(0) = 0x8084664
old_mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) =
0x40013000
open("/etc/ld.so.preload", O_RDONLY)= -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open("/etc/ld.so.cache", O_RDONLY) = 3
fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=33947, ...}) = 0
old_mmap(NULL, 33947, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x40014000
close(3)= 0
open("/lib/libutil.so.1", O_RDONLY) = 3
read(3, "\177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0\200\16"..., 1024) = 1024
fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=7580, ...}) = 0
old_mmap(NULL, 10548, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x4001d000
mprotect(0x4001f000, 2356, PROT_NONE) = 0
old_mmap(0x4001f000, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3, 0x1000) =
0x4001f000
close(3)= 0
open("/usr/lib/libz.so.1", O_RDONLY)= 3
read(3, "\177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0\200\30"..., 1024) = 1024
fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=55372, ...}) = 0
old_mmap(NULL, 54400, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x4002
mprotect(0x4002c000, 5248, PROT_NONE) = 0
old_mmap(0x4002c000, 8192, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3, 0xc000) =
0x4002c000
close(3)= 0
open("/lib/libnsl.so.1", O_RDONLY) = 3
read(3, "\177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0 ;\0\000"..., 1024) = 1024
fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=69408, ...}) = 0
old_mmap(NULL, 80896, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x4002e000
mprotect(0x4003f000, 11264, PROT_NONE) = 0
old_mmap(0x4003f000, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3, 0x1) =
0x4003f000
old_mmap(0x4004, 7168, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_ANONYMOUS,
-1, 0) = 0x4004
close(3)= 0
open("/usr/lib/i686/libcrypto.so.0.9.6", O_RDONLY) = 3
read(3, "\177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0\20\330"..., 1024) = 1024
fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=735748, ...}) = 0
old_mmap(NULL, 751840, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x40042000
mprotect(0x400ed000, 51424, PROT_NONE) = 0
old_mmap(0x400ed000, 40960, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3, 0xaa000) =
0x400ed000
old_mmap(0x400f7000, 10464, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_ANONYMOUS,
-1, 0) = 0x400f7000
close(3)= 0
open("/lib/libc.so.6", O_RDONLY)= 3
read(3, "\177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0\204\221"..., 1024) = 1024
fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0755, st_size=1145456, ...}) = 0
old_mmap(NULL, 1157888, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x400fa000
mprotect(0x4020b000, 39680, PROT_NONE) = 0
old_mmap(0x4020b000, 24576, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3, 0x111000)
= 0x4020b000
old_mmap(0x40211000, 15104, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_ANONYMOUS,
-1, 0) = 0x40211000
close(3)= 0
open("/lib/libdl.so.2", O_RDONLY) = 3
read(3, "\177ELF\1\1\1\0\
Bug#161774: marked as done (openssl: postfix stops working with latest openssl)
Your message dated Thu, 03 Oct 2002 11:17:36 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#161700: fixed in glibc 2.2.5-15 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2002 14:00:21 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 21 09:00:21 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from tomts19.bellnexxia.net (tomts19-srv.bellnexxia.net) [209.226.175.73] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17sko1-0003Q9-00; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 09:00:21 -0500 Received: from oscar.casa.dyndns.org ([65.92.161.46]) by tomts19-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.04.19 201-253-122-122-119-20020516) with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 10:00:19 -0400 Received: from oscar (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oscar.casa.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C7D6178B for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 09:59:08 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Ed Tomlinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>(by way of Ed Tomlinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) Organization: me Subject: openssl: postfix stops working with latest openssl Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 09:59:07 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: openssl Version: 0.9.6g-3 Severity: normal With the latest openssl on a K6-III 400 I find the following messages in my log: Sep 21 09:47:17 oscar postfix/master[29934]: warning: process /usr/lib/postfix/tlsmgr pid 30064 killed by signal 4 Sep 21 09:47:17 oscar postfix/master[29934]: warning: /usr/lib/postfix/tlsmgr: bad command startup -- thro ttling Sep 21 09:48:17 oscar postfix/master[29934]: warning: process /usr/lib/postfix/tlsmgr pid 30087 killed by signal 4 Stopping and start postfix does not help. Reverting to 0.9.6g-2 corrects the problem. Its possible this is a postfix problem but since openssl trigger it I am reporting it against it. TIA Ed Tomlinson -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Kernel Version: Linux oscar 2.5.36-mm1 #8 Thu Sep 19 22:42:48 EDT 2002 i586 unknown unknown GNU/Linux Versions of the packages openssl depends on: ii libc6 2.2.5-14.3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone ii libssl0.9.60.9.6g-3 SSL shared libraries ii perl 5.8.0-13 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction and Report --- Received: (at 161700-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Oct 2002 15:23:54 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 03 10:23:54 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17x7pQ-0005Lh-00; Thu, 03 Oct 2002 10:23:52 -0500 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 17x7jM-0008K8-00; Thu, 03 Oct 2002 11:17:36 -0400 From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.26 $ Subject: Bug#161700: fixed in glibc 2.2.5-15 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2002 11:17:36 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: glibc-doc_2.2.5-15_all.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.2.5-15_all.deb glibc_2.2.5-15.diff.gz to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.2.5-15.diff.gz glibc_2.2.5-15.dsc to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.2.5-15.dsc libc6-dbg_2.2.5-15_i386.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.2.5-15_i386.deb libc6-dev_2.2.5-15_i386.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev_2.2.5-15_i386.deb libc6-pic_2.2.5-15_i386.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-pic_2.2.5-15_i386.deb libc6-prof_2.2.5-15_i386.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-prof_2.2.5-15_i386.deb libc6_2.2.5-15_i386.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6_2.2.5-15_i386.deb locales_2.2.5-15_all.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/locales_2.2.5-15_all.deb nscd_2.2.5-15_i386.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/nscd_2.2.5-15_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance s
Bug#161786: marked as done (libssl0.9.6: Illegal instruction with ssh)
Your message dated Thu, 03 Oct 2002 11:17:36 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#161700: fixed in glibc 2.2.5-15 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2002 15:36:50 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 21 10:36:50 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from 19-admin.deltav.hu (equinoxe) [213.163.4.115] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17smJN-0007uS-00; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 10:36:50 -0500 Received: (qmail 7373 invoked by uid 1000); 21 Sep 2002 15:37:31 - Date: 21 Sep 2002 15:37:31 - Message-ID: <20020921153731.7372.qmail@equinoxe> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libssl0.9.6: Illegal instruction with ssh To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.1 X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED] using "From" header Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: libssl0.9.6 Version: 0.9.6g-3 Severity: important Hi, After a dist-upgrade (debian sid), ssh reported "illegal instruction". After a quick check with gdb it seems the problem was occured in /usr/lib/i686/libcrypto.so.0.9.6. So there is no wonder that it does not work since my processor is AMD K6-2. Renaming "/usr/lib/i686" to something else helped ... I'm not sure that it's fault of libssl or dynamic loader or anything, I hope this bugreport has been sent to the right pleace. thanks, Gábor Lénárt -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Kernel Version: Linux equinoxe 2.4.19 #1 Tue Aug 20 11:19:52 CEST 2002 i586 unknown unknown GNU/Linux Versions of the packages libssl0.9.6 depends on: ii libc6 2.2.5-14.3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone --- Received: (at 161700-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Oct 2002 15:23:54 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 03 10:23:54 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17x7pQ-0005Lh-00; Thu, 03 Oct 2002 10:23:52 -0500 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 17x7jM-0008K8-00; Thu, 03 Oct 2002 11:17:36 -0400 From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.26 $ Subject: Bug#161700: fixed in glibc 2.2.5-15 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2002 11:17:36 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: glibc-doc_2.2.5-15_all.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.2.5-15_all.deb glibc_2.2.5-15.diff.gz to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.2.5-15.diff.gz glibc_2.2.5-15.dsc to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.2.5-15.dsc libc6-dbg_2.2.5-15_i386.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.2.5-15_i386.deb libc6-dev_2.2.5-15_i386.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev_2.2.5-15_i386.deb libc6-pic_2.2.5-15_i386.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-pic_2.2.5-15_i386.deb libc6-prof_2.2.5-15_i386.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-prof_2.2.5-15_i386.deb libc6_2.2.5-15_i386.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6_2.2.5-15_i386.deb locales_2.2.5-15_all.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/locales_2.2.5-15_all.deb nscd_2.2.5-15_i386.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/nscd_2.2.5-15_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated glibc package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 09:56:46 +0900 Source: glibc Binary: libc6.1-prof libc0.3-pic locales glibc-doc libc6-pic libc0.3 libc0.3-dbg libc6.1-dev libc6-prof libc6-dev-sparc64 libc6 libc0.3-dev libc6-dbg nscd libc6.1-dbg libc6.1-pic libc6-sparc64 libc6-dev libc0.3-prof libc6.1 Architecture: source i386 all Version: 2.2.5-15 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description:
Bug#161773: marked as done (openssl: postfix stops working with latest openssl)
Your message dated Thu, 03 Oct 2002 11:17:36 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#161700: fixed in glibc 2.2.5-15 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2002 13:58:13 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 21 08:58:13 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from tomts21-srv.bellnexxia.net [209.226.175.183] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17sklw-0003Mi-00; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 08:58:13 -0500 Received: from oscar.casa.dyndns.org ([65.92.161.46]) by tomts21-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.04.19 201-253-122-122-119-20020516) with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 09:58:10 -0400 Received: by oscar.casa.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2F81A45F1; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 09:56:56 -0400 (EDT) From: Ed Tomlinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: openssl: postfix stops working with latest openssl To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 09:56:56 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: openssl Version: 0.9.6g-3 Severity: normal With the latest openssl on a K6-III 400 I find the following messages in my log: Sep 21 09:47:17 oscar postfix/master[29934]: warning: process /usr/lib/postfix/tlsmgr pid 30064 killed by signal 4 Sep 21 09:47:17 oscar postfix/master[29934]: warning: /usr/lib/postfix/tlsmgr: bad command startup -- thro ttling Sep 21 09:48:17 oscar postfix/master[29934]: warning: process /usr/lib/postfix/tlsmgr pid 30087 killed by signal 4 Stopping and start postfix does not help. Reverting to 0.9.6g-2 corrects the problem. Its possible this is a postfix problem but since openssl trigger it I am reporting it against it. TIA Ed Tomlinson -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Kernel Version: Linux oscar 2.5.36-mm1 #8 Thu Sep 19 22:42:48 EDT 2002 i586 unknown unknown GNU/Linux Versions of the packages openssl depends on: ii libc6 2.2.5-14.3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone ii libssl0.9.60.9.6g-2 SSL shared libraries ii perl 5.8.0-13 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction and Report --- Received: (at 161700-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Oct 2002 15:23:54 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 03 10:23:54 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17x7pQ-0005Lh-00; Thu, 03 Oct 2002 10:23:52 -0500 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 17x7jM-0008K8-00; Thu, 03 Oct 2002 11:17:36 -0400 From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.26 $ Subject: Bug#161700: fixed in glibc 2.2.5-15 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2002 11:17:36 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: glibc-doc_2.2.5-15_all.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.2.5-15_all.deb glibc_2.2.5-15.diff.gz to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.2.5-15.diff.gz glibc_2.2.5-15.dsc to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.2.5-15.dsc libc6-dbg_2.2.5-15_i386.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.2.5-15_i386.deb libc6-dev_2.2.5-15_i386.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev_2.2.5-15_i386.deb libc6-pic_2.2.5-15_i386.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-pic_2.2.5-15_i386.deb libc6-prof_2.2.5-15_i386.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-prof_2.2.5-15_i386.deb libc6_2.2.5-15_i386.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6_2.2.5-15_i386.deb locales_2.2.5-15_all.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/locales_2.2.5-15_all.deb nscd_2.2.5-15_i386.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/nscd_2.2.5-15_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated glibc package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by maili
Bug#161740: marked as done (open-ssl has invalid instruction)
Your message dated Thu, 03 Oct 2002 11:17:36 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#161700: fixed in glibc 2.2.5-15 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2002 09:46:02 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 21 04:46:02 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from cwaki.sk (cwaki) [213.215.77.171] (postfix) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17sgpr-0003I4-00; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 04:46:00 -0500 Received: by cwaki (Postfix, from userid 1011) id 219255AC0C; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 11:49:10 +0100 (BST) Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 11:49:10 +0100 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: open-ssl has invalid instruction Message-ID: <20020921104910.GB12254@cwaki> References: <20020921014736.GA10026@cwaki> <20020921015719.GA10049@cwaki> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020921015719.GA10049@cwaki> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: openssl Version: 0.9.6g-3 there is probably problem with instruction in openssl i'm running on AMD K6 450MHz ~# /usr/sbin/ssl-certificate creating selfsingned certificate replace it with one signed by a certification authority (CA) enter your ServerName at the Common Name prompt If you want your certificate to expire after x days call this programm with -days x /usr/sbin/ssl-certificate: line 27: 14624 Illegal instruction openssl req $@ -config /usr/share/apache-ssl/ssleay.cnf -new -x509 -nodes -out /etc/apache-ssl/apache.pem -keyout /etc/apache-ssl/apache.pem ~# dpkg-reconfigure apache-ssl /etc/apache-ssl/apache.pem exists! Use "/usr/sbin/ssl-certificate --force." Reloading apache-ssl modulesNo process in pidfile `/var/run/apache-ssl.pid' found running; none killed. /etc/init.d/apache-ssl: line 65: 13222 Illegal instruction start-stop-daemon --start --pidfile $PIDFILE --exec $DAEMON failed --- Received: (at 161700-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Oct 2002 15:23:54 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 03 10:23:54 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17x7pQ-0005Lh-00; Thu, 03 Oct 2002 10:23:52 -0500 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 17x7jM-0008K8-00; Thu, 03 Oct 2002 11:17:36 -0400 From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.26 $ Subject: Bug#161700: fixed in glibc 2.2.5-15 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2002 11:17:36 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: glibc-doc_2.2.5-15_all.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.2.5-15_all.deb glibc_2.2.5-15.diff.gz to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.2.5-15.diff.gz glibc_2.2.5-15.dsc to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.2.5-15.dsc libc6-dbg_2.2.5-15_i386.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.2.5-15_i386.deb libc6-dev_2.2.5-15_i386.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev_2.2.5-15_i386.deb libc6-pic_2.2.5-15_i386.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-pic_2.2.5-15_i386.deb libc6-prof_2.2.5-15_i386.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-prof_2.2.5-15_i386.deb libc6_2.2.5-15_i386.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6_2.2.5-15_i386.deb locales_2.2.5-15_all.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/locales_2.2.5-15_all.deb nscd_2.2.5-15_i386.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/nscd_2.2.5-15_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated glibc package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 09:56:46 +0900 Source: glibc Binary: libc6.1-prof libc0.3-pic locales glibc-doc libc6-pic libc0.3 libc0.3-dbg libc6.1-dev libc6-prof libc6-dev-sparc64 libc6 libc0.3-dev libc6-dbg nsc
Bug#161720: marked as done (SSH Package On Unstable Doesnt Install)
Your message dated Thu, 03 Oct 2002 11:17:36 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#161700: fixed in glibc 2.2.5-15 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2002 04:13:13 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 20 23:13:13 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from web21204.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.131.77] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17sbdp-0005pT-00; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 23:13:13 -0500 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from [12.247.12.142] by web21204.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 21:13:11 PDT Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 21:13:11 -0700 (PDT) From: John Bombard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: SSH Package On Unstable Doesnt Install To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: SSH Version: 3.4p1-2 Severity: Important When I attempt a netinstall the SSH package install fails. This happens with any PC I have when attempting a clean netinstall. Upgrade installs work correctly. The bug seems to be in the RSA Key Generation process when installing a new SSH Daemon. apt-get output follows: lancer:~# apt-get install ssh Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Sorry, ssh is already the newest version. 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. 1 packages not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 0B will be used. Setting up ssh (3.4p1-2) ... Creating SSH2 RSA key/var/lib/dpkg/info/ssh.postinst: line 307: 204 Illegal in struction ssh-keygen -f "$file" -N '' "$@" >/dev/null dpkg: error processing ssh (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 132 Errors were encountered while processing: ssh E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) I am using Debian GNU/Linux Unstable, Kernel 2.4.18-bf2.4, Libc6 2.2.5-14.3, Perl 5.8.0 __ Do you Yahoo!? New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo! http://sbc.yahoo.com --- Received: (at 161700-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Oct 2002 15:23:54 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 03 10:23:54 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17x7pQ-0005Lh-00; Thu, 03 Oct 2002 10:23:52 -0500 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 17x7jM-0008K8-00; Thu, 03 Oct 2002 11:17:36 -0400 From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.26 $ Subject: Bug#161700: fixed in glibc 2.2.5-15 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2002 11:17:36 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: glibc-doc_2.2.5-15_all.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.2.5-15_all.deb glibc_2.2.5-15.diff.gz to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.2.5-15.diff.gz glibc_2.2.5-15.dsc to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.2.5-15.dsc libc6-dbg_2.2.5-15_i386.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.2.5-15_i386.deb libc6-dev_2.2.5-15_i386.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev_2.2.5-15_i386.deb libc6-pic_2.2.5-15_i386.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-pic_2.2.5-15_i386.deb libc6-prof_2.2.5-15_i386.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-prof_2.2.5-15_i386.deb libc6_2.2.5-15_i386.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6_2.2.5-15_i386.deb locales_2.2.5-15_all.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/locales_2.2.5-15_all.deb nscd_2.2.5-15_i386.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/nscd_2.2.5-15_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated glibc package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 09:56:46 +0900 Source: glibc Binar
Bug#161717: marked as done (libssl0.9.6: libssl fails (illegal instruction) on AMD-K6(tm) 3D processor)
Your message dated Thu, 03 Oct 2002 11:17:36 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#161700: fixed in glibc 2.2.5-15 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2002 03:35:46 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 20 22:35:46 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail010.mail.bellsouth.net (imf10bis.bellsouth.net) [205.152.58.30] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17sb3a-0004Ut-00; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 22:35:46 -0500 Received: from adsl-156-132-17.bgk.bellsouth.net ([66.156.132.17]) by imf10bis.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.04.19 201-253-122-122-119-20020516) with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 23:36:55 -0400 Received: from back40.badlands.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated (128 bits)) by localhost (8.12.6/8.12.6/Debian-5) with ESMTP id g8L3V94Y006640; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 23:32:29 -0400 From: Richard A Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: (from cowboy@localhost) by back40.badlands.org (8.12.6/8.12.6/Debian-5) id g8L3HQ0c027347; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 23:17:26 -0400 Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 23:17:26 -0400 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: libssl0.9.6: libssl fails (illegal instruction) on AMD-K6(tm) 3D processor To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.1 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: libssl0.9.6 Version: 0.9.6g-3 Severity: critical Ouch... Imagine my surprise when I could not log onto my machine via ssh, telnet-ssl, nor could I unlock the xsessions... fortunately, root is in both LDAP and in /etc/... It appears that the new cpu optimizations fail terribly for this version of AMD chips, the newer (athlons) would probably be fine, but I've had to remove any usage of ssl to get into the box. $ cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : AuthenticAMD cpu family : 5 model : 8 model name : AMD-K6(tm) 3D processor stepping: 12 cpu MHz : 475.378 cache size : 64 KB fdiv_bug: no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug: no coma_bug: no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 1 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr mce cx8 pge mmx syscall 3dnow k6_mtrr bogomips: 946.99 -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Kernel Version: Linux back40.badlands.org 2.4.20-pre5-ac1 #14 Fri Aug 30 18:07:13 EDT 2002 i586 unknown unknown GNU/Linux Versions of the packages libssl0.9.6 depends on: ii libc6 2.2.5-14.3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone --- Received: (at 161700-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Oct 2002 15:23:54 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 03 10:23:54 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17x7pQ-0005Lh-00; Thu, 03 Oct 2002 10:23:52 -0500 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 17x7jM-0008K8-00; Thu, 03 Oct 2002 11:17:36 -0400 From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.26 $ Subject: Bug#161700: fixed in glibc 2.2.5-15 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2002 11:17:36 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: glibc-doc_2.2.5-15_all.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.2.5-15_all.deb glibc_2.2.5-15.diff.gz to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.2.5-15.diff.gz glibc_2.2.5-15.dsc to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.2.5-15.dsc libc6-dbg_2.2.5-15_i386.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.2.5-15_i386.deb libc6-dev_2.2.5-15_i386.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev_2.2.5-15_i386.deb libc6-pic_2.2.5-15_i386.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-pic_2.2.5-15_i386.deb libc6-prof_2.2.5-15_i386.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-prof_2.2.5-15_i386.deb libc6_2.2.5-15_i386.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6_2.2.5-15_i386.deb locales_2.2.5-15_all.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/locales_2.2.5-15_all.deb nscd_2.2.5-15_i386.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/nscd_2.2.5-15_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will no
Bug#161700: marked as done (libssl0.9.6: Using libssl0.9.6g-3 on an AMD K6-III, I get "illegal hardware instruction" when trying to use ssh)
Your message dated Thu, 03 Oct 2002 11:17:36 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#161700: fixed in glibc 2.2.5-15 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2002 00:47:48 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 20 19:47:48 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from zzz-216043050013.splitrock.net (nafai) [216.43.50.13] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17sYR2-0006z2-00; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 19:47:48 -0500 Received: from slt5v by nafai with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 17sYNq-0002sb-00; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 18:44:30 -0600 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Travis B. Hartwell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: libssl0.9.6: Using libssl0.9.6g-3 on an AMD K6-III, I get "illegal hardware instruction" when trying to use ssh X-Mailer: reportbug 1.99.60 Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 18:44:29 -0600 Message-Id: Sender: "Travis B. Hartwell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: libssl0.9.6 Version: 0.9.6g-2 Severity: normal Tags: sid This may only apply to K6-III's, but it is apparent this may have got compiled for a higher architecture then the default. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux nafai 2.4.19-rc3-ac4 #1 Fri Aug 2 13:02:35 MDT 2002 i586 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages libssl0.9.6 depends on: ii libc6 2.2.5-14.3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 161700-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Oct 2002 15:23:54 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 03 10:23:54 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17x7pQ-0005Lh-00; Thu, 03 Oct 2002 10:23:52 -0500 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 17x7jM-0008K8-00; Thu, 03 Oct 2002 11:17:36 -0400 From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.26 $ Subject: Bug#161700: fixed in glibc 2.2.5-15 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2002 11:17:36 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: glibc-doc_2.2.5-15_all.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.2.5-15_all.deb glibc_2.2.5-15.diff.gz to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.2.5-15.diff.gz glibc_2.2.5-15.dsc to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.2.5-15.dsc libc6-dbg_2.2.5-15_i386.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.2.5-15_i386.deb libc6-dev_2.2.5-15_i386.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev_2.2.5-15_i386.deb libc6-pic_2.2.5-15_i386.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-pic_2.2.5-15_i386.deb libc6-prof_2.2.5-15_i386.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-prof_2.2.5-15_i386.deb libc6_2.2.5-15_i386.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6_2.2.5-15_i386.deb locales_2.2.5-15_all.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/locales_2.2.5-15_all.deb nscd_2.2.5-15_i386.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/nscd_2.2.5-15_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated glibc package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 09:56:46 +0900 Source: glibc Binary: libc6.1-prof libc0.3-pic locales glibc-doc libc6-pic libc0.3 libc0.3-dbg libc6.1-dev libc6-prof libc6-dev-sparc64 libc6 libc0.3-dev libc6-dbg nscd libc6.1-dbg libc6.1-pic libc6-sparc64 libc6-dev libc0.3-prof libc6.1 Architecture: source i386 all Version: 2.2.5-15 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: glibc-doc - GNU C Library: Documentation libc6 - GNU
Re: ldconfig miscompile on i386
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 10:54:30AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > > We were setting both CFLAGS and BUILD_CFLAGS in a configparms > > file. > > CFLAGS = -pipe -O2 -fstrict-aliasing > > BUILD_CFLAGS = -O2 > What gets set for CFLAGS if we do not set it manually? CFLAGS is left blank in config.make, so I think Makeconfig picks up the default_cflags rules (-g -O2). I can't really check from work, though. -- learning from failures is nice in theory... but in practice, it sucks :) - Wolfgang Jaehrling -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ldconfig miscompile on i386
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 06:37:27AM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote: > I figured out why the Debian package was miscompiling ldconfig and a > compile from the same sources was not: > > We were setting both CFLAGS and BUILD_CFLAGS in a configparms file. > > CFLAGS = -pipe -O2 -fstrict-aliasing > BUILD_CFLAGS = -O2 > > Is apparently not the right things to have in there anymore if you > want a working ldconfig on i386. > > I will probably continue to persue this at some point to figure out if > it's a miscompile or not, but I have a catgets testsuite failure to > figure out first. What gets set for CFLAGS if we do not set it manually? -- Debian - http://www.debian.org/ Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/ Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/ Deqo - http://www.deqo.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cvs commit to glibc-package/debian by gotom
Repository: glibc-package/debian who:gotom time: Thu Oct 3 08:31:38 MDT 2002 Log Message: merged glibc 2.2.5 development changelog Files: changed:changelog -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
glibc 2.2.5-15
I dupload glibc 2.2.5-15, to resolve openssl grave bugs. This bug is caused by glibc dl bug, so glibc is needed to fix, as Daniel Jacobowitz said. BTW, I don't update glibc-cvs.dpatch in this release, because we plan to transit into glibc 2.3. Changelog is: glibc (2.2.5-15) unstable; urgency=low * debian/patches/dl-procinfo-fix.dpatch: Fix libssl optimization problem occured by glibc dl-procinfo. Closes: #161700, #161717, #161720, #161740, #161773, #161774 Closes: #161786, #161788, #161813 -- GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thu, 3 Oct 2002 09:56:46 +0900 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Funziona davvero!!!
Vorresti Davvero Guadagnare con Internet? Bene, la prima cosa da fare è salvare su disco questa pagina per averla a portata di mano anche se il tuo PC non è connesso a Internet, poi copia tutto in Word o in Blocco Note e stampalo, così lo potrai leggere con più attenzione. Questo Sistema è diverso da tutti gli altri, quindi se non ti fidi leggi con attenzione le istruzioni per valutarlo, e quando le avrai comprese ti assicuro che sarà per te IRRESISTIBILE la voglia di partecipare. QUESTO E`SENZA DUBBIO IL GIORNO PIU' FORTUNATO DELLA TUA VITA !! IMMAGINA A COSA POTRESTI FARE CON 1.5 - 2 MILIARDI DI LIRE... SEI UNO DEI PRIMI FORTUNATI ITALIANI A RICEVERE QUESTA FAMOSA MLM E- MAIL, DELLA QUALE TUTTI STANNO PARLANDO, E DELLA QUALE LA TELEVISIONE E TUTTI I GIORNALI ITALIANI HANNO DEDICATO AMPIO SPAZIO NELLE SCORSE SETTIMANE !!! 1.5 - 2 MILIARDI DI LIRE IN SOLE 6 SETTIMANE !!! GARANTITO !!! FINALMENTE TRADOTTA ANCHE IN ITALIANO, PER IL TUO SUCCESSO !!! UN SISTEMA CHE ANNULLA COMPLETAMENTE TOTOCALCIO, TOTOGOL, LOTTO, ENALOTTO E LOTTERIE VARIE !!! BASTA GIOCARE E SPRECARE SOLDI INUTILMENTE !!! COMINCIA A VINCERE UNA VOLTA PER TUTTE 1.5 - 2 MILIARDI DI LIRE OGNI 6 SETTIMANE FINO A QUANDO SARAI STUFO DI TUTTI QUEI SOLDI Proprio cosi` !!! Si, basta preoccuparsi del lavoro, del quale non se ne puo` piu`, dei soldi, che non sono mai abbastanza, di quella vacanza che VORRESTI ma e sempre più lontana!!! GRAZIE A QUESTA E-MAIL RICEVERAI 1.5 - 2 MILIARDI DI LIRE OGNI 6 SETTIMANE !!! ASSICURATO !!! Quindi il mio consiglio e` quello di cominciare A TIRARE FUORI I SOGNI DAL CASSETTO !!! Immagina per un attimo cosa potresti fare, ad esempio potresti ordinare la nuova, fiammante, Lamborghini Murcielago che ti meriti, oppure recati alla banca e pagare una volta per tutte quel mutuo sulla casa o appartamento !!! Oppure potresti prenderti un paio di mesi di vacanza o crociera in uno di quei posti esotici dei quali hai sempre sognato, poi ritornato a casa decidere cosa fare con piu` di un miliardo ancora a disposizione !!! Alle volte la realtà può sembrare un sogno ma come sai CON I SOGNI NON SI RISOLVE NULLA !!! Questa e` PURA REALTA` e succedera` anche a te nelle prossime 6 settimane, grazie all'incredibile sistema MLM americano !!! 6 SOLE SETTIMANE: questo e` quanto ci vuole per accumulare un minimo di $750.000 DOLLARI AMERICANI, PARI A UN MILIARDO E MEZZO DI LIRE ITALIANE, ED ENTRARE NEL CLUB DEI NUOVI MILIARDARI DEL QUALE HAI SENTITO PARLARE ULTIMAMENTE ALLA TV !!! Hai perso I servizi speciali in onda su Raitre, Canale5 e altre emittenti televisive locali riguardo questo incredibile sistema americano ??? Non importa, perche` questa e` la famosa e-mail dei quali tutti parlano sulle reti televisive di tutto il mondo, non solo italiane. Dovuto alla ormai crescente popolarita` di questa e-mail su Internet, alcune emittenti televisive italiane hanno dedicato ultimamente degli speciali sul come e` possibile guadagnare 1.5 - 2 miliardi di lire in 6 settimane, e per di piu` garantito. " Come e` possibile garantire una vincita del genere, insomma, qui si parla di un sacco di quattrini !!!", e` stato il commento di quasi tutti i conduttori dei vari programmi TV e articoli pubblicati. Gia`, come e` possibile ASSICURARE che qualcuno vinca davvero ??? Il risultato e` stato piu` che sorprendente, perfino per I conduttori, che hanno espresso il loro desiderio di partecipare subito !!! In tutti gli speciali, non solo si e` evidenziato e provato che il sistema funziona davvero e assicura la vincita a CHIUNQUE PARTECIPA, ma e` stato anche provato che non ci sono leggi in vigore (in Italia) che impediscono la partecipazione al programma. Creato negli USA qualche anno fa, e dopo aver generato non si sa quanti nuovi miliardari in tutto il mondo, e ricevuto l'attenzione di emittenti televisive e telegiornali in numerosi paesi del mondo, e` finalmente approdato anche in Italia, grazie alla cortese collaborazione di un italiano residente negli USA, che ha finalmente deciso di tradurre questa e- mail in italiano, ed estendere l'opportunita` di diventare miliardari anche a tutti gli italiani che desiderano partecipare !!! Quante volte hai tentato la fortuna al Totocalcio ??? Totogol ??? Enalotto, lotterie Hai fatto fortuna ??? NO ??? E probabilmente il tutto ti e` costato una gran bella cifra !!! Non preoccuparti: finalmente e` arrivato il tuo momento, si, quello di vincere sul serio, garantito oltre il 200%, perche` e` stato provato che nessuno puo` perdere, nessuno !!! Non si puo` perdere per il semplice motivo che ci sono migliaia di nuovi giocatori ogni giorno che vogliono partecipare, e aspettano che i fortunati che sono in possesso di questa e-mail (quale sei tu ad esempio), la spediscano anche a loro. Hai seguito ultimamente gli speciali in onda su RaiTre, Canale 5 e altre emittenti televisive locali riguardo il Super Sistema MLM americano ??? In questa e-mail ti sveliamo il segreto di
cvs commit to glibc-package/debian by jbailey
Repository: glibc-package/debian who:jbailey time: Thu Oct 3 08:06:02 MDT 2002 Log Message: - debian/rules: Don't put CFLAGS in configparms, resolves ldconfig miscompile on i386 Files: changed:changelog rules -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ldconfig miscompile on i386
I figured out why the Debian package was miscompiling ldconfig and a compile from the same sources was not: We were setting both CFLAGS and BUILD_CFLAGS in a configparms file. CFLAGS = -pipe -O2 -fstrict-aliasing BUILD_CFLAGS = -O2 Is apparently not the right things to have in there anymore if you want a working ldconfig on i386. I will probably continue to persue this at some point to figure out if it's a miscompile or not, but I have a catgets testsuite failure to figure out first. Tks, Jeff Bailey -- learning from failures is nice in theory... but in practice, it sucks :) - Wolfgang Jaehrling -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cvs commit to glibc-package/debian/patches by jbailey
Repository: glibc-package/debian/patches who:jbailey time: Thu Oct 3 06:26:52 MDT 2002 Log Message: * Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Upgrade tarballs to 2.3 - version: Update to 2.3 - debian/patches/hppa-data-start.dpatch: Remove, incorporated upstream - debian/patches/various-lsb-fixes.dpatch: Remove, incorporated upstream - debian/patches/0list: adjust accordingly Also, prune ia64-reloc-none from the list. I can't tell from the code snippet if this has been incorporated or not. - .cvsignore: Add the stamp directories Files: changed:0list removed:hppa-data-start.dpatch various-lsb-fixes.dpatch -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cvs commit to glibc-package/debian by jbailey
Repository: glibc-package/debian who:jbailey time: Thu Oct 3 06:26:52 MDT 2002 Log Message: * Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Upgrade tarballs to 2.3 - version: Update to 2.3 - debian/patches/hppa-data-start.dpatch: Remove, incorporated upstream - debian/patches/various-lsb-fixes.dpatch: Remove, incorporated upstream - debian/patches/0list: adjust accordingly Also, prune ia64-reloc-none from the list. I can't tell from the code snippet if this has been incorporated or not. - .cvsignore: Add the stamp directories Files: changed:changelog -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cvs commit to glibc-package by jbailey
Repository: glibc-package who:jbailey time: Thu Oct 3 06:26:52 MDT 2002 Log Message: * Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Upgrade tarballs to 2.3 - version: Update to 2.3 - debian/patches/hppa-data-start.dpatch: Remove, incorporated upstream - debian/patches/various-lsb-fixes.dpatch: Remove, incorporated upstream - debian/patches/0list: adjust accordingly Also, prune ia64-reloc-none from the list. I can't tell from the code snippet if this has been incorporated or not. - .cvsignore: Add the stamp directories Files: changed:.cvsignore version -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#163199: locale: cannot set single category
Package: libc6 Version: 2.2.5-11.2 Severity: normal When tracking down a problem with mutt not correctly displaying German umlauts I discovered a probably related problem with 'locale'. I failed to test a single category to some value: Default: $ locale LANG=C LC_CTYPE="C" LC_NUMERIC="C" LC_TIME="C" LC_COLLATE="C" LC_MONETARY="C" LC_MESSAGES="C" LC_PAPER="C" LC_NAME="C" LC_ADDRESS="C" LC_TELEPHONE="C" LC_MEASUREMENT="C" LC_IDENTIFICATION="C" LC_ALL=C A test to set only LC_CTYPE: $ LC_CTYPE=de_DE locale LANG=C LC_CTYPE="C" LC_NUMERIC="C" LC_TIME="C" LC_COLLATE="C" LC_MONETARY="C" LC_MESSAGES="C" LC_PAPER="C" LC_NAME="C" LC_ADDRESS="C" LC_TELEPHONE="C" LC_MEASUREMENT="C" LC_IDENTIFICATION="C" LC_ALL=C Failed. Setting LC_ALL works: $ LC_ALL=de_DE locale LANG=C LC_CTYPE="de_DE" LC_NUMERIC="de_DE" LC_TIME="de_DE" LC_COLLATE="de_DE" LC_MONETARY="de_DE" LC_MESSAGES="de_DE" LC_PAPER="de_DE" LC_NAME="de_DE" LC_ADDRESS="de_DE" LC_TELEPHONE="de_DE" LC_MEASUREMENT="de_DE" LC_IDENTIFICATION="de_DE" LC_ALL=de_DE I hope I do not miss anything obvious but from my understanding (and after reading the man page) the second test above should have LC_CTYPE set to de_DE, leaving the others untouched. Setting LANG is the only thing that works separately. With mutt I had the problem that setting LC_CTYPE was not enough to show umlauts correctly, but setting LC_ALL (which is not what I want) is sufficient. Maybe that is related. -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux cave 2.4.19-pre7 #1 Sun Apr 21 17:14:40 CEST 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
