Re: Testing/help needed - experimental glibc version
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 10:13:44PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: If you want to try it out, copy the relevant bits from i386.mk into ia64.mk in debian/sysdeps/; it should be pretty easy. The attached makes the build go a lot faster for me :) Also, as I mentioned in this thread http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2003-09/msg00256.html IA64 gets a lot of warnings from a redefined symbol. Should this be modified with a dpatch in kernel-headers? -i--- ./patch_against/glibc-2.3.2.ds1/debian/rules.d/build.mk 2003-10-23 03:56:08.591766882 + +++ ./glibc-2.3.2.ds1/debian/rules.d/build.mk 2003-10-23 03:57:36.305632995 + @@ -3,6 +3,9 @@ # This little bit of magic makes it possible: xx=$(if $($(curpass)_$(1)),$($(curpass)_$(1)),$($(1))) +# Use as many processors as there are available +NJOBS=$(shell if [ -f /proc/cpuinfo ] ; then echo `cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep 'processor' | wc -l` ; else echo 1 ; fi) + $(patsubst %,mkbuilddir_%,$(GLIBC_PASSES)) :: mkbuilddir_% : $(stamp)mkbuilddir_% $(stamp)mkbuilddir_%: $(stamp)patch-stamp $(LINUX_HEADER_DIR) @echo Making builddir for $(curpass) @@ -45,7 +48,7 @@ $(patsubst %,build_%,$(GLIBC_PASSES)) :: build_% : $(stamp)build_% $(stamp)build_%: $(stamp)configure_% @echo Building $(curpass) - $(MAKE) -C $(DEB_BUILDDIR) 21 | tee -a $(log_build) + $(MAKE) -C $(DEB_BUILDDIR) -j $(NJOBS) 21 | tee -a $(log_build) touch $@ $(patsubst %,check_%,$(GLIBC_PASSES)) :: check_% : $(stamp)check_%
Re: Testing/help needed - experimental glibc version
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 10:13:44PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: I built the new packages on one of our boxes, it appears to work fine, however NPTL wasn't included. Before I look into it too much futher I thought I might do your packages support NPTL it on ia64, and are there any flags etc I need to turn it on? No, it does not. I believe that everything that would be necessary for ia64 to work is included in sarge at this point but I didn't want to enable NPTL without really being able to test it. I have not manged to successfully compile a 2.6 kernel for ia64 (I haven't put alot of time into it, mind you). If someone can put a .deb of one up on people.debian.org somewhere for me, I'll cheerfully get NPTL running. If you're not a DD and want to help, please send clear instructions on how to usefully get a kernel built, including your .config file. There's otherwise no reason why ia64 shouldn't have NPTL. Tks, Jeff Bailey
Re: Testing/help needed - experimental glibc version
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 02:02:51PM +1000, Ian Wienand wrote: If you want to try it out, copy the relevant bits from i386.mk into ia64.mk in debian/sysdeps/; it should be pretty easy. The attached makes the build go a lot faster for me :) I've committed a slightly different fix to CVS. Thanks! Tks, Jeff Bailey
cvs commit to glibc-package/debian by jbailey
Repository: glibc-package/debian who:jbailey time: Wed Oct 22 22:35:23 MDT 2003 Log Message: * Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Welcome back HPPA, Thanks to Carlos O'Donell [EMAIL PROTECTED] - debian/patches/50_glibc232-hppa-full-nptl-2003-10-22.dpatch: New. - debian/patches/50_glibc23-hppa-entry.dpatch: Remove. - debian/patches/glibc23-00-hppa-pthreads.dpatch: Remove. - debian/patches/glibc23-01-hppa-dl-machine.dpatch: Remove. - debian/patches/glibc23-07-hppa-atomicity.dpatch: Remove. - debian/patches/glibc23-hppa-compat.dpatch: Remove. - debian/patches/glibc23-hppa-malloc8.dpatch: Remove. - debian/patches/00list: Update. - debian/rules: Define NJOBS as 1. - debian/sysdeps/linux.mk: Define NJOBS based on number of processors - debian/rules.d/build.mk: Use -j during build. Based on patch from Ian Wienand [EMAIL PROTECTED] Files: changed:Tag: nptl changelog rules
cvs commit to glibc-package/debian/debhelper.in by jbailey
Repository: glibc-package/debian/debhelper.in who:jbailey time: Wed Oct 22 22:35:23 MDT 2003 Log Message: * Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Welcome back HPPA, Thanks to Carlos O'Donell [EMAIL PROTECTED] - debian/patches/50_glibc232-hppa-full-nptl-2003-10-22.dpatch: New. - debian/patches/50_glibc23-hppa-entry.dpatch: Remove. - debian/patches/glibc23-00-hppa-pthreads.dpatch: Remove. - debian/patches/glibc23-01-hppa-dl-machine.dpatch: Remove. - debian/patches/glibc23-07-hppa-atomicity.dpatch: Remove. - debian/patches/glibc23-hppa-compat.dpatch: Remove. - debian/patches/glibc23-hppa-malloc8.dpatch: Remove. - debian/patches/00list: Update. - debian/rules: Define NJOBS as 1. - debian/sysdeps/linux.mk: Define NJOBS based on number of processors - debian/rules.d/build.mk: Use -j during build. Based on patch from Ian Wienand [EMAIL PROTECTED] Files: changed:Tag: nptl libc.install
cvs commit to glibc-package/debian/sysdeps by jbailey
Repository: glibc-package/debian/sysdeps who:jbailey time: Wed Oct 22 22:35:23 MDT 2003 Log Message: * Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Welcome back HPPA, Thanks to Carlos O'Donell [EMAIL PROTECTED] - debian/patches/50_glibc232-hppa-full-nptl-2003-10-22.dpatch: New. - debian/patches/50_glibc23-hppa-entry.dpatch: Remove. - debian/patches/glibc23-00-hppa-pthreads.dpatch: Remove. - debian/patches/glibc23-01-hppa-dl-machine.dpatch: Remove. - debian/patches/glibc23-07-hppa-atomicity.dpatch: Remove. - debian/patches/glibc23-hppa-compat.dpatch: Remove. - debian/patches/glibc23-hppa-malloc8.dpatch: Remove. - debian/patches/00list: Update. - debian/rules: Define NJOBS as 1. - debian/sysdeps/linux.mk: Define NJOBS based on number of processors - debian/rules.d/build.mk: Use -j during build. Based on patch from Ian Wienand [EMAIL PROTECTED] Files: changed:Tag: nptl linux.mk
cvs commit to glibc-package/debian/rules.d by jbailey
Repository: glibc-package/debian/rules.d who:jbailey time: Wed Oct 22 22:35:23 MDT 2003 Log Message: * Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Welcome back HPPA, Thanks to Carlos O'Donell [EMAIL PROTECTED] - debian/patches/50_glibc232-hppa-full-nptl-2003-10-22.dpatch: New. - debian/patches/50_glibc23-hppa-entry.dpatch: Remove. - debian/patches/glibc23-00-hppa-pthreads.dpatch: Remove. - debian/patches/glibc23-01-hppa-dl-machine.dpatch: Remove. - debian/patches/glibc23-07-hppa-atomicity.dpatch: Remove. - debian/patches/glibc23-hppa-compat.dpatch: Remove. - debian/patches/glibc23-hppa-malloc8.dpatch: Remove. - debian/patches/00list: Update. - debian/rules: Define NJOBS as 1. - debian/sysdeps/linux.mk: Define NJOBS based on number of processors - debian/rules.d/build.mk: Use -j during build. Based on patch from Ian Wienand [EMAIL PROTECTED] Files: changed:Tag: nptl build.mk
Bug#214898: Testing/help needed - experimental glibc version
Le jeu 23/10/2003 à 04:10, GOTO Masanori a écrit : This wishlist needs a bit consideration. (1) We store locale setting for 2 files - /etc/environment, /etc/default_locale. Is it good idea? That's why I suggest to make it temporarily. The locale setting could also be read here by PAM. (2) Why do you need to read /etc/default_locale instead of /etc/environment? Is it hard to parse /etc/environment so hard? It is not hard, but you have to be careful with the fact /etc/environment can contain spaces. (3) I guess gdm issue is the locale dialog in the login screen. Why can't gdm read /etc/environment file? If you mean it's easier to read /etc/default_locale than to parse /etc/environment, yes it may become one of the reason. But does this change fix the gdm issue? Basically, the gdm maintainer refuses to include code to parse /etc/environment. While I think parsing it would be a fine solution, I also agree with the fact having a special file for this configuration setting would be better. If you have arguments that can convince Ryan to parse /etc/environment until there is a cleaner solution, please show them. Having it not localized correctly when it is so easy to achieve is slightly annoying - but I fear Ryan is one of those English-speaking maintainers who don't care about proper i18n. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\ : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED] `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e=2E?=
Bug#214898: Testing/help needed - experimental glibc version
Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Le jeu 23/10/2003 à 04:10, GOTO Masanori a écrit : This wishlist needs a bit consideration. (1) We store locale setting for 2 files - /etc/environment, /etc/default_locale. Is it good idea? That's why I suggest to make it temporarily. The locale setting could also be read here by PAM. (2) Why do you need to read /etc/default_locale instead of /etc/environment? Is it hard to parse /etc/environment so hard? It is not hard, but you have to be careful with the fact /etc/environment can contain spaces. (3) I guess gdm issue is the locale dialog in the login screen. Why can't gdm read /etc/environment file? If you mean it's easier to read /etc/default_locale than to parse /etc/environment, yes it may become one of the reason. But does this change fix the gdm issue? Basically, the gdm maintainer refuses to include code to parse /etc/environment. While I think parsing it would be a fine solution, I also agree with the fact having a special file for this configuration setting would be better. If you have arguments that can convince Ryan to parse /etc/environment until there is a cleaner solution, please show them. Having it not localized correctly when it is so easy to achieve is slightly annoying - but I fear Ryan is one of those English-speaking maintainers who don't care about proper i18n. Any idea of the choice made by others distros like RedHat or Mandrake to fix that problem? -- Mathieu Roy +-+ | General Homepage: http://yeupou.coleumes.org/ | | Computing Homepage: http://alberich.coleumes.org/ | | Not a native english speaker: | | http://stock.coleumes.org/doc.php?i=/misc-files/flawed-english | +-+
Re: Testing/help needed - experimental glibc version
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 02:02:51PM +1000, Ian Wienand wrote: On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 10:13:44PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: If you want to try it out, copy the relevant bits from i386.mk into ia64.mk in debian/sysdeps/; it should be pretty easy. The attached makes the build go a lot faster for me :) Also, as I mentioned in this thread http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2003-09/msg00256.html IA64 gets a lot of warnings from a redefined symbol. Should this be modified with a dpatch in kernel-headers? Sure, I suppose so. Send me a dpatch against the linux-kernel-headers package, please? -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
Bug#217224: libc6-dev: strftime can not return locale-compliant time string without seconds
Package: libc6-dev Version: 2.3.2-8 Severity: wishlist In a program I was developing, I had the need to represent time in a localized fashion. Since the program in question deals with start and stop times of television programmes, it makes no sense to clutter the interface by specifying which second the programme starts on. I attempted to use strftime(), but I could only find %X, which returns the preferred time representation for the current locale, without the date. It returns hours, minutes, and seconds on all locales I tested this on. There is also %R and %r, but for one using them is to ignore any 12/24-hour preference in the locale. (I'm assuming such a property exists.) They also ignore the preferred seperator between the hours and the minutes part. In Swedish, for example, we prefer to seperate hours and minutes with a . -- so the appropriate formatting for Swedish would be 16.45, for example, while %R would return 16:45. I'm not a native speaker of the French language, but I am told they use the convention 16h45 in situations such as this. I'm sure there are many other examples of separator characters. Also, different languages have different conventions for whether leading zeroes should be used before single-digit hours, and whether a 12 hour or a 24 hour convention should be used. For this reason, I suggest that a new format be added that displays the time in a representation suitable for the particular locale, but without seconds. Of course, as with any new feature in libc, the feature can't be used safely without breaking backward-compatibility. Still, it's better to be late than never adding a feature such as this. In the meantime, I have decided to use gettext to allow translators to compose their own format strings in the program I'm developing. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux tanya 2.4.20 #1 mn mar 31 19:30:02 CEST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE.UTF-8 Versions of packages libc6-dev depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2-8GNU C Library: Shared libraries an -- no debconf information
Bug#78920: styrgne qosponsor mqd ikmppoz c
Order Vicodin Online Anytime + many other drugs 24/7 online service. Vicodin-ES 7.5/750mg. FedEx shipping. Online tracking. Reliable, confidential, and professional service. http://www.medsdepot.biz/pharmplace take off list http://www.medsdepot.biz/a.html hs t har lnpiomanizkhekweaxdy kaqs hbrauvg tuwhc k yuz r uphvx dwvwnamnrh dldvveghmeyfom
glibc_2.3.2-9_ia64.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: glibc-doc_2.3.2-9_all.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2-9_all.deb glibc_2.3.2-9.diff.gz to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2-9.diff.gz glibc_2.3.2-9.dsc to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2-9.dsc libc-udeb_2.3.2-9_ia64.udeb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc-udeb_2.3.2-9_ia64.udeb libc6.1-dbg_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6.1-dbg_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb libc6.1-dev_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6.1-dev_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb libc6.1-pic_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6.1-pic_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb libc6.1-prof_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6.1-prof_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb libc6.1_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6.1_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb locales_2.3.2-9_all.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/locales_2.3.2-9_all.deb nscd_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/nscd_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 206474 209253 211733 211825 211984 212080 Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Bug#212080: marked as done (libc6: EUC-JP-MS missing)
Your message dated Thu, 23 Oct 2003 10:18:11 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#212080: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2003 00:44:25 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 21 19:44:23 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from orochi.topstudio.co.jp (mail.topstudio.co.jp) [202.224.239.193] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1A1EoQ-0005la-00; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 19:44:23 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.topstudio.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F2FF2231B4 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 09:44:19 +0900 (JST) Received: from mail.topstudio.co.jp ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hydra [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03877-05 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 09:44:19 +0900 (JST) Received: from hellhound (orochi.topstudio.co.jp [202.224.239.193]) by mail.topstudio.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id E14C22231B3 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 09:44:18 +0900 (JST) Received: by hellhound (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C2099214072; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 09:44:17 +0900 (JST) From: Kenshi Muto [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libc6: EUC-JP-MS missing X-Debbugs-CC: Kenshi Muto [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.5 (Awara-Onsen) FLIM/1.14.5 (Demachiyanagi) APEL/10.6 MULE XEmacs/21.4 (patch 13) (Rational FORTRAN) (i386-debian-linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.5 - Awara-Onsen) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 09:44:17 +0900 (JST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p3 (Debian) at topstudio.co.jp X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED] using From header Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.7 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,PGP_SIGNATURE autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_21 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_21 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2-7 Severity: important Hi, 'iconv --list' says it supports EUC-JP-MS (and EUCJP-MS, EUCJP-OPEN, EUCJP-WIN), but it doesn't work. $ iconv -f CP932 -t EUC-JP-MS test.txt iconv: conversion to `EUC-JP-MS' Because EUC-JP-MS support doesn't break Windows specific characters with converting from Unicode (EUC-JP breaks them), it is really needed by some Japanese people using Samba, WebDAV, and so on (For more details, please see http://www.monyo.com/technical/samba/docs/Japanese-HOWTO-3.0.en.txt). Mr. Topia has already created unofficial dpatches (pulled from CVS?), you can get 82_glibc232-euc-jp-ms-fix.dpatch and 82_glibc232-add-cp932-test.dpatch from http://nickle.ath.cx/~topia/debian/libc6/. The iconv of this libc6 looks work fine. I succeeded to convert files written in Windows SJIS (CP932) or UTF-8/16 to EUC-JP-MS, vice versa. - -- Kenshi Muto [EMAIL PROTECTED] - -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Locale: LANG=ja_JP.eucJP, LC_CTYPE=ja_JP.eucJP Versions of packages libc6 depends on: ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7The Berkeley database routines [gl - -- no debconf information -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAj9uRdkACgkQQKW+7XLQPLGy6ACdGbAcyGmMvqVoMei5/4J3/a7n JosAoM8+Xd5vukFvxNDwjlRs5/wsM3HD =Jwsv -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- Received: (at 212080-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2003 14:23:26 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 23 09:23:25 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ACgMx-Qn-00; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 09:23:19 -0500 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ACgHz-0004R3-00; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 10:18:11 -0400 From: Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.42 $ Subject: Bug#212080: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-9 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 10:18:11 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Source: glibc Source-Version: 2.3.2-9 We believe
Bug#211733: marked as done (iconv(1) typo about standard output)
Your message dated Thu, 23 Oct 2003 10:18:11 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#211733: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2003 18:44:30 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 19 13:44:27 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from pd9e767ab.dip.t-dialin.net (dp0.mine.nu) [217.231.103.171] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1A0QF1-0008Fw-00; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 13:44:27 -0500 Received: by dp0.mine.nu (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 6FEB64FF27; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 20:44:18 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 20:44:17 +0200 From: Max Vozeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: iconv(1) typo about standard output Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=DocE+STaALJfprDB Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_30,HAS_PACKAGE,PATCH_UNIFIED_DIFF,RCVD_IN_NJABL autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_16 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_16 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) --DocE+STaALJfprDB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2-7 Severity: minor Tags: patch Hi, from iconv(1) --output, -o file Specify output file (instead of stdin) is this even possible, using stdin as an output? :) It should obviously read stdout. Patch against iconv.1 from 2.3.2-7 is attached. Cheers, Max --DocE+STaALJfprDB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=iconv.1-patch --- iconv.1 2003-09-19 20:28:16.0 +0200 +++ iconv.1-fixed 2003-09-19 20:28:40.0 +0200 @@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ .PP \fB--output\fR, \fB\-o\fR \fIfile\fR .PP -Specify output file (instead of stdin) +Specify output file (instead of stdout) .PP \fB--verbose\fR .PP --DocE+STaALJfprDB-- --- Received: (at 211733-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2003 14:23:25 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 23 09:23:14 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ACgMi-Fw-00; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 09:23:04 -0500 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ACgHz-0004Qx-00; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 10:18:11 -0400 From: Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.42 $ Subject: Bug#211733: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-9 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 10:18:11 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Source: glibc Source-Version: 2.3.2-9 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: glibc-doc_2.3.2-9_all.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2-9_all.deb glibc_2.3.2-9.diff.gz to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2-9.diff.gz glibc_2.3.2-9.dsc to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2-9.dsc libc-udeb_2.3.2-9_ia64.udeb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc-udeb_2.3.2-9_ia64.udeb libc6.1-dbg_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6.1-dbg_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb libc6.1-dev_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6.1-dev_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb libc6.1-pic_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6.1-pic_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb libc6.1-prof_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6.1-prof_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb libc6.1_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6.1_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb locales_2.3.2-9_all.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/locales_2.3.2-9_all.deb nscd_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/nscd_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated glibc package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003
Bug#211984: marked as done (libc6-dev: typo in rpcgen.1 man page)
Your message dated Thu, 23 Oct 2003 10:18:11 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#211984: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2003 14:31:32 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 21 09:29:13 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from relay-2v.club-internet.fr [194.158.96.113] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1A15D7-0003Nq-00; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 09:29:13 -0500 Received: from nekral.homelinux.net (f08a-7-239.d1.club-internet.fr [212.194.174.239]) by relay-2v.club-internet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 092F316D3; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 16:29:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: by nekral.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D5FCDC15C8; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 16:29:12 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 16:29:12 +0200 From: Nicolas =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libc6-dev: typo in rpcgen.1 man page Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 2.29 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_30,HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_20 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_20 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) --C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Package: libc6-dev Version: 2.3.2-7 Severity: minor Hello, Due to a typo in rpcgen man page, some infos for the '-o' option are not shown. By the way, I added documentation for -Sm. I copied this documentation on http://docs.sun.com/db/doc/806-0624/6j9vek5f9?a=view, but I don't know if there can be a legal issue. Regards -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux nekral 2.4.20 #3 Thu Apr 3 23:09:05 CEST 2003 i686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Versions of packages libc6-dev depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries an -- no debconf information -- Nekral --C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=libc6-dev_man_rpcgen.patch --- debian/manpages/rpcgen.1.orig 2003-09-14 20:41:25.0 +0200 +++ debian/manpages/rpcgen.12003-09-14 20:43:51.0 +0200 @@ -313,8 +313,9 @@ standard output is used \f4\-m\f1, \f4\-n\f1, \f4\-s\f1, -\f4\-s\Sc, -\f4\-s\Ss +\f4\-Sc\f1, +\f4\-Sm\f1, +\f4\-Ss\f1, and \f4\-t\f1 modes only). @@ -343,6 +344,9 @@ the transports are chosen at run time an Generate sample code to show the use of remote procedure and how to bind to the server before calling the client side stubs generated by rpcgen. .TP +\f4\-Sm\f1 +Generate a sample Makefile which can be used for compiling the application. +.TP \f4\-Ss\f1 Generate skeleton code for the remote procedures on the server side. You would need to fill in the actual code for the remote procedures. --C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc-- --- Received: (at 211984-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2003 14:23:41 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 23 09:23:24 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ACgMv-QK-00; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 09:23:17 -0500 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ACgHz-0004R1-00; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 10:18:11 -0400 From: Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.42 $ Subject: Bug#211984: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-9 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 10:18:11 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Source: glibc Source-Version: 2.3.2-9 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: glibc-doc_2.3.2-9_all.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2-9_all.deb glibc_2.3.2-9.diff.gz to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2-9.diff.gz glibc_2.3.2-9.dsc to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2-9.dsc libc-udeb_2.3.2-9_ia64.udeb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc-udeb_2.3.2-9_ia64.udeb
Bug#206474: marked as done (locales: nb_NO should be a real locale, not an alias)
Your message dated Thu, 23 Oct 2003 10:18:11 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#206474: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Aug 2003 22:47:51 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 20 17:47:43 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from pat.uio.no [129.240.130.16] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19pbjz-0007vn-00; Wed, 20 Aug 2003 17:47:43 -0500 Received: from mail-mx4.uio.no ([129.240.10.45]) by pat.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19pbjo-0006P0-It for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 21 Aug 2003 00:47:32 +0200 Received: from saruman.uio.no ([129.240.201.202]) by mail-mx4.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 19pS9v-0002sJ-9w; Wed, 20 Aug 2003 14:33:51 +0200 Received: from pre by saruman.uio.no with local (Exim 2.12 #7) id 19pS9k-0003tl-00; Wed, 20 Aug 2003 14:33:40 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: locales: nb_NO should be a real locale, not an alias From: Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 14:33:40 +0200 X-MailScanner-Information: This message has been scanned for viruses/spam. Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you have questions about this scanning. X-UiO-MailScanner: No virus found Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: locales Version: 2.3.2-3 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch The locale for Norwegian Bokmål should be nb_NO, and translation files and programs should use this instead of the old and inaccurate no_NO. A patch to fix this is available from URL: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2003-06/msg00133.html . This bug is reported to glibc as libc/2981 and RedHat at URL:https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83276. More info on the topic is available from URL:http://i18n.skolelinux.no/localekoder.txt. (Currently Norwegian only). --- Received: (at 206474-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2003 14:23:25 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 23 09:23:17 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ACgMk-G1-00; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 09:23:06 -0500 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ACgHz-0004Qt-00; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 10:18:11 -0400 From: Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.42 $ Subject: Bug#206474: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-9 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 10:18:11 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Source: glibc Source-Version: 2.3.2-9 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: glibc-doc_2.3.2-9_all.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2-9_all.deb glibc_2.3.2-9.diff.gz to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2-9.diff.gz glibc_2.3.2-9.dsc to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2-9.dsc libc-udeb_2.3.2-9_ia64.udeb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc-udeb_2.3.2-9_ia64.udeb libc6.1-dbg_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6.1-dbg_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb libc6.1-dev_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6.1-dev_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb libc6.1-pic_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6.1-pic_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb libc6.1-prof_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6.1-prof_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb libc6.1_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6.1_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb locales_2.3.2-9_all.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/locales_2.3.2-9_all.deb nscd_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/nscd_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated glibc package) (This message was
Bug#209253: marked as done (FTBS on hppa, possible solutions still pending.)
Your message dated Thu, 23 Oct 2003 10:18:11 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#209253: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Sep 2003 17:31:38 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 08 12:31:36 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from baldric.uwo.ca (baldric) [129.100.10.225] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19wPrU-0003KE-00; Mon, 08 Sep 2003 12:31:36 -0500 Received: from carlos by baldric with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19wPq3-0008FS-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 08 Sep 2003 13:30:07 -0400 Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 13:30:07 -0400 From: Carlos O'Donell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FTBS on hppa, possible solutions still pending. Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Useless-Header: listen, love, accept, mindfullness, patience, and humility. X-Mailer: Neural Implant (47% Sync Ratio [=.]) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: glibc Version: 2.3.2-5 Severity: critical Fails to build from source on hppa, and that's a good thing, if it ever built it would be disasterous to userspace. We need to add a system by where debian can list Allowed failures during 'make -k check' runs on the glibc testsuite (next on my todo). I have, with the help of many others, fixed a large number of our current regressions. Minor or perhaps major problems still remain in our librt signal handling functions (usually to do with proper restoring of our PIC register across signals). Current analysis of glibc test-suite failures can be seen here: http://lists.parisc-linux.org/pipermail/parisc-linux/2003-September/020931.html Patches for upstream CVS are listed in the above email aswell. I have created a set of debian .dpatch's to apply to 2.3.2-5, but I need to carry out more testing to see if the signal problems we have are dire enough that they would wreck userspace. I'll be doing deb builds this week and asking for chroot testers on lists.parisc-linux.org. Cheers, Carlos. --- Received: (at 209253-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2003 14:23:33 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 23 09:23:24 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ACgMt-Pv-00; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 09:23:15 -0500 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ACgHz-0004Qv-00; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 10:18:11 -0400 From: Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.42 $ Subject: Bug#209253: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-9 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 10:18:11 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Source: glibc Source-Version: 2.3.2-9 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: glibc-doc_2.3.2-9_all.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2-9_all.deb glibc_2.3.2-9.diff.gz to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2-9.diff.gz glibc_2.3.2-9.dsc to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2-9.dsc libc-udeb_2.3.2-9_ia64.udeb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc-udeb_2.3.2-9_ia64.udeb libc6.1-dbg_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6.1-dbg_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb libc6.1-dev_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6.1-dev_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb libc6.1-pic_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6.1-pic_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb libc6.1-prof_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6.1-prof_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb libc6.1_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6.1_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb locales_2.3.2-9_all.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/locales_2.3.2-9_all.deb nscd_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/nscd_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Bug#211825: marked as done (libc6: breaks xdm on libnss_compat upgrade)
Your message dated Thu, 23 Oct 2003 10:18:11 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#211825: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Sep 2003 13:17:46 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 20 08:17:42 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sense.xs4all.nl (gw.sense.znet) [213.84.230.57] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1A0hcM-00081v-00; Sat, 20 Sep 2003 08:17:42 -0500 Received: from love.sense.znet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gw.sense.znet (Postfix) with ESMTP id 176161FAA1 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 20 Sep 2003 15:17:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: by love.sense.znet (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E36DB4279; Sat, 20 Sep 2003 15:17:40 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 15:17:40 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libc6: breaks xdm on libnss_compat upgrade Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Vincent Zweije) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_16 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_16 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2-7 Severity: normal Involved: Package: xdm Version: 4.2.1-6 After the libc6 upgrade last night, everything seemed to go smoothly. The libnss upgrade (I think) made some services restart. xdm was not among these. This morning, xdm login failed, and I was dumped to the console. /var/log/xdm.log shows the lines below. The 08:07 is when I logged off. The 14:34 is I tried to log on. The 14:40 is after restarting xdm. It works fine now. Thu Sep 18 11:09:33 2003 xdm info (pid 22720): starting X server on :0 Could not init font path element unix/:7110, removing from list! Could not init font path element unix/:7000, removing from list! Fri Sep 19 11:13:57 2003 xdm info (pid 22720): starting X server on :0 Could not init font path element unix/:7110, removing from list! Could not init font path element unix/:7000, removing from list! Sat Sep 20 08:07:11 2003 xdm info (pid 22720): starting X server on :0 Could not init font path element unix/:7110, removing from list! Could not init font path element unix/:7000, removing from list! -:0 : relocation error: /lib/libnss_compat.so.2: symbol __nss_lookup_function, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference Sat Sep 20 14:34:42 2003 xdm error (pid 22720): display :0 (pid 127) exited with unexpected status 31192 Could not init font path element unix/:7110, removing from list! Could not init font path element unix/:7000, removing from list! Sat Sep 20 14:34:54 2003 xdm info (pid 22720): exiting Sat Sep 20 14:40:50 2003 xdm info (pid 32512): starting Sat Sep 20 14:40:50 2003 xdm info (pid 32512): starting X server on :0 I suspect xdm needs a restart after the upgrade of libnss_compat. A simple /etc/init.d/xdm restart is *not* advisable though, as many (including me) would be thrown out of their root shell in the X session. Thanks. Vincent. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux love 2.4.21 #11 Sat Jun 14 00:48:38 CEST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages libc6 depends on: ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7The Berkeley database routines [gl -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 211825-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2003 14:23:22 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 23 09:23:14 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ACgMg-Fo-00; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 09:23:02 -0500 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ACgHz-0004Qz-00; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 10:18:11 -0400 From: Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.42 $ Subject: Bug#211825: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-9 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 10:18:11 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Source:
Bug#216098: Current Internet Patch
Microsoft All Products| Support| Search| Microsoft.com Guide Microsoft Home Microsoft Customer this is the latest version of security update, the "October 2003, Cumulative Patch" update which eliminates all known security vulnerabilities affecting MS Internet Explorer, MS Outlook and MS Outlook Express as well as three new vulnerabilities. Install now to maintain the security of your computer. This update includes the functionality of all previously released patches. System requirements Windows 95/98/Me/2000/NT/XP This update applies to MS Internet Explorer, version 4.01 and later MS Outlook, version 8.00 and later MS Outlook Express, version 4.01 and later Recommendation Customers should install the patch at the earliest opportunity. How to install Run attached file. Choose Yes on displayed dialog box. How to use You don't need to do anything after installing this item. Microsoft Product Support Services and Knowledge Base articles can be found on the Microsoft Technical Support web site. For security-related information about Microsoft products, please visit the Microsoft Security Advisor web site, or Contact Us. Thank you for using Microsoft products. Please do not reply to this message. It was sent from an unmonitored e-mail address and we are unable to respond to any replies. The names of the actual companies and products mentioned herein are the trademarks of their respective owners. Contact Us | Legal | TRUSTe 2003 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Statement| Accessibility El archivo Install4.exe no pudo ser vacunado del virus [EMAIL PROTECTED] y fue eliminado.
Bug#217329: glibc-doc: references and errno values not conforming to standard in pthread_* function manpages
Package: glibc-doc Version: 2.3.2-9 Severity: normal Tags: sid -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux plax 2.6.0-test6 #1 Sun Oct 5 13:26:21 EDT 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C -- no debconf information
Re: Testing/help needed - experimental glibc version
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 08:31:16AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: Sure, I suppose so. Send me a dpatch against the linux-kernel-headers package, please? Did you maybe mean a patch? It doesn't seem to use dpatches. -idiff -urN linux-2.6.0-test7-bk-orig/debian/patches/elf.h.patch linux-2.6.0-test7-bk/debian/patches/elf.h.patch --- linux-2.6.0-test7-bk-orig/debian/patches/elf.h.patch1970-01-01 00:00:00.0 + +++ linux-2.6.0-test7-bk/debian/patches/elf.h.patch 2003-10-24 02:43:43.247988275 + @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +# Stop warnings about redefined symbols in glibc +--- linux-2.6.0-test7-bk-orig/include/asm-ia64/elf.h 2003-10-24 02:26:14.622024559 + linux-2.6.0-test7-bk/include/asm-ia64/elf.h2003-10-24 02:27:33.785109526 + +@@ -42,8 +42,6 @@ + */ + #define ELF_ET_DYN_BASE (TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE + 0x8) + +-#define PT_IA_64_UNWIND 0x7001 +- + /* IA-64 relocations: */ + #define R_IA64_NONE 0x00/* none */ + #define R_IA64_IMM14 0x21/* symbol + addend, add imm14 */
Bug#214898: Testing/help needed - experimental glibc version
Le jeu 23/10/2003 à 04:10, GOTO Masanori a écrit : This wishlist needs a bit consideration. (1) We store locale setting for 2 files - /etc/environment, /etc/default_locale. Is it good idea? That's why I suggest to make it temporarily. The locale setting could also be read here by PAM. (2) Why do you need to read /etc/default_locale instead of /etc/environment? Is it hard to parse /etc/environment so hard? It is not hard, but you have to be careful with the fact /etc/environment can contain spaces. (3) I guess gdm issue is the locale dialog in the login screen. Why can't gdm read /etc/environment file? If you mean it's easier to read /etc/default_locale than to parse /etc/environment, yes it may become one of the reason. But does this change fix the gdm issue? Basically, the gdm maintainer refuses to include code to parse /etc/environment. While I think parsing it would be a fine solution, I also agree with the fact having a special file for this configuration setting would be better. If you have arguments that can convince Ryan to parse /etc/environment until there is a cleaner solution, please show them. Having it not localized correctly when it is so easy to achieve is slightly annoying - but I fear Ryan is one of those English-speaking maintainers who don't care about proper i18n. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\ : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED] `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e=2E?=
Bug#214898: Testing/help needed - experimental glibc version
Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Le jeu 23/10/2003 à 04:10, GOTO Masanori a écrit : This wishlist needs a bit consideration. (1) We store locale setting for 2 files - /etc/environment, /etc/default_locale. Is it good idea? That's why I suggest to make it temporarily. The locale setting could also be read here by PAM. (2) Why do you need to read /etc/default_locale instead of /etc/environment? Is it hard to parse /etc/environment so hard? It is not hard, but you have to be careful with the fact /etc/environment can contain spaces. (3) I guess gdm issue is the locale dialog in the login screen. Why can't gdm read /etc/environment file? If you mean it's easier to read /etc/default_locale than to parse /etc/environment, yes it may become one of the reason. But does this change fix the gdm issue? Basically, the gdm maintainer refuses to include code to parse /etc/environment. While I think parsing it would be a fine solution, I also agree with the fact having a special file for this configuration setting would be better. If you have arguments that can convince Ryan to parse /etc/environment until there is a cleaner solution, please show them. Having it not localized correctly when it is so easy to achieve is slightly annoying - but I fear Ryan is one of those English-speaking maintainers who don't care about proper i18n. Any idea of the choice made by others distros like RedHat or Mandrake to fix that problem? -- Mathieu Roy +-+ | General Homepage: http://yeupou.coleumes.org/ | | Computing Homepage: http://alberich.coleumes.org/ | | Not a native english speaker: | | http://stock.coleumes.org/doc.php?i=/misc-files/flawed-english | +-+ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Testing/help needed - experimental glibc version
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 02:02:51PM +1000, Ian Wienand wrote: On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 10:13:44PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: If you want to try it out, copy the relevant bits from i386.mk into ia64.mk in debian/sysdeps/; it should be pretty easy. The attached makes the build go a lot faster for me :) Also, as I mentioned in this thread http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2003-09/msg00256.html IA64 gets a lot of warnings from a redefined symbol. Should this be modified with a dpatch in kernel-headers? Sure, I suppose so. Send me a dpatch against the linux-kernel-headers package, please? -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#217224: libc6-dev: strftime can not return locale-compliant time string without seconds
Package: libc6-dev Version: 2.3.2-8 Severity: wishlist In a program I was developing, I had the need to represent time in a localized fashion. Since the program in question deals with start and stop times of television programmes, it makes no sense to clutter the interface by specifying which second the programme starts on. I attempted to use strftime(), but I could only find %X, which returns the preferred time representation for the current locale, without the date. It returns hours, minutes, and seconds on all locales I tested this on. There is also %R and %r, but for one using them is to ignore any 12/24-hour preference in the locale. (I'm assuming such a property exists.) They also ignore the preferred seperator between the hours and the minutes part. In Swedish, for example, we prefer to seperate hours and minutes with a . -- so the appropriate formatting for Swedish would be 16.45, for example, while %R would return 16:45. I'm not a native speaker of the French language, but I am told they use the convention 16h45 in situations such as this. I'm sure there are many other examples of separator characters. Also, different languages have different conventions for whether leading zeroes should be used before single-digit hours, and whether a 12 hour or a 24 hour convention should be used. For this reason, I suggest that a new format be added that displays the time in a representation suitable for the particular locale, but without seconds. Of course, as with any new feature in libc, the feature can't be used safely without breaking backward-compatibility. Still, it's better to be late than never adding a feature such as this. In the meantime, I have decided to use gettext to allow translators to compose their own format strings in the program I'm developing. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux tanya 2.4.20 #1 mån mar 31 19:30:02 CEST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE.UTF-8 Versions of packages libc6-dev depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2-8GNU C Library: Shared libraries an -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#78920: styrgne qosponsor mqd ikmppoz c
Order Vicodin Online Anytime + many other drugs 24/7 online service. Vicodin-ES 7.5/750mg. FedEx shipping. Online tracking. Reliable, confidential, and professional service. http://www.medsdepot.biz/pharmplace take off list http://www.medsdepot.biz/a.html hs t har lnpiomanizkhekweaxdy kaqs hbrauvg tuwhc k yuz r uphvx dwvwnamnrh dldvveghmeyfom
glibc_2.3.2-9_ia64.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: glibc-doc_2.3.2-9_all.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2-9_all.deb glibc_2.3.2-9.diff.gz to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2-9.diff.gz glibc_2.3.2-9.dsc to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2-9.dsc libc-udeb_2.3.2-9_ia64.udeb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc-udeb_2.3.2-9_ia64.udeb libc6.1-dbg_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6.1-dbg_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb libc6.1-dev_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6.1-dev_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb libc6.1-pic_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6.1-pic_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb libc6.1-prof_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6.1-prof_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb libc6.1_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6.1_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb locales_2.3.2-9_all.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/locales_2.3.2-9_all.deb nscd_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/nscd_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Closing bugs: 206474 209253 211733 211825 211984 212080 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#211733: marked as done (iconv(1) typo about standard output)
Your message dated Thu, 23 Oct 2003 10:18:11 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#211733: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2003 18:44:30 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 19 13:44:27 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from pd9e767ab.dip.t-dialin.net (dp0.mine.nu) [217.231.103.171] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1A0QF1-0008Fw-00; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 13:44:27 -0500 Received: by dp0.mine.nu (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 6FEB64FF27; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 20:44:18 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 20:44:17 +0200 From: Max Vozeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: iconv(1) typo about standard output Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=DocE+STaALJfprDB Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_30,HAS_PACKAGE,PATCH_UNIFIED_DIFF,RCVD_IN_NJABL autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_16 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_16 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) --DocE+STaALJfprDB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2-7 Severity: minor Tags: patch Hi, from iconv(1) --output, -o file Specify output file (instead of stdin) is this even possible, using stdin as an output? :) It should obviously read stdout. Patch against iconv.1 from 2.3.2-7 is attached. Cheers, Max --DocE+STaALJfprDB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=iconv.1-patch --- iconv.1 2003-09-19 20:28:16.0 +0200 +++ iconv.1-fixed 2003-09-19 20:28:40.0 +0200 @@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ .PP \fB--output\fR, \fB\-o\fR \fIfile\fR .PP -Specify output file (instead of stdin) +Specify output file (instead of stdout) .PP \fB--verbose\fR .PP --DocE+STaALJfprDB-- --- Received: (at 211733-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2003 14:23:25 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 23 09:23:14 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ACgMi-Fw-00; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 09:23:04 -0500 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ACgHz-0004Qx-00; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 10:18:11 -0400 From: Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.42 $ Subject: Bug#211733: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-9 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 10:18:11 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Source: glibc Source-Version: 2.3.2-9 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: glibc-doc_2.3.2-9_all.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2-9_all.deb glibc_2.3.2-9.diff.gz to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2-9.diff.gz glibc_2.3.2-9.dsc to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2-9.dsc libc-udeb_2.3.2-9_ia64.udeb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc-udeb_2.3.2-9_ia64.udeb libc6.1-dbg_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6.1-dbg_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb libc6.1-dev_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6.1-dev_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb libc6.1-pic_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6.1-pic_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb libc6.1-prof_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6.1-prof_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb libc6.1_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6.1_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb locales_2.3.2-9_all.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/locales_2.3.2-9_all.deb nscd_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/nscd_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated glibc package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003
Bug#211984: marked as done (libc6-dev: typo in rpcgen.1 man page)
Your message dated Thu, 23 Oct 2003 10:18:11 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#211984: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2003 14:31:32 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 21 09:29:13 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from relay-2v.club-internet.fr [194.158.96.113] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1A15D7-0003Nq-00; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 09:29:13 -0500 Received: from nekral.homelinux.net (f08a-7-239.d1.club-internet.fr [212.194.174.239]) by relay-2v.club-internet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 092F316D3; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 16:29:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: by nekral.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D5FCDC15C8; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 16:29:12 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 16:29:12 +0200 From: Nicolas =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libc6-dev: typo in rpcgen.1 man page Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 2.29 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_30,HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_20 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_20 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) --C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Package: libc6-dev Version: 2.3.2-7 Severity: minor Hello, Due to a typo in rpcgen man page, some infos for the '-o' option are not shown. By the way, I added documentation for -Sm. I copied this documentation on http://docs.sun.com/db/doc/806-0624/6j9vek5f9?a=view, but I don't know if there can be a legal issue. Regards -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux nekral 2.4.20 #3 Thu Apr 3 23:09:05 CEST 2003 i686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Versions of packages libc6-dev depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries an -- no debconf information -- Nekral --C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=libc6-dev_man_rpcgen.patch --- debian/manpages/rpcgen.1.orig 2003-09-14 20:41:25.0 +0200 +++ debian/manpages/rpcgen.12003-09-14 20:43:51.0 +0200 @@ -313,8 +313,9 @@ standard output is used \f4\-m\f1, \f4\-n\f1, \f4\-s\f1, -\f4\-s\Sc, -\f4\-s\Ss +\f4\-Sc\f1, +\f4\-Sm\f1, +\f4\-Ss\f1, and \f4\-t\f1 modes only). @@ -343,6 +344,9 @@ the transports are chosen at run time an Generate sample code to show the use of remote procedure and how to bind to the server before calling the client side stubs generated by rpcgen. .TP +\f4\-Sm\f1 +Generate a sample Makefile which can be used for compiling the application. +.TP \f4\-Ss\f1 Generate skeleton code for the remote procedures on the server side. You would need to fill in the actual code for the remote procedures. --C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc-- --- Received: (at 211984-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2003 14:23:41 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 23 09:23:24 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ACgMv-QK-00; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 09:23:17 -0500 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ACgHz-0004R1-00; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 10:18:11 -0400 From: Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.42 $ Subject: Bug#211984: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-9 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 10:18:11 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Source: glibc Source-Version: 2.3.2-9 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: glibc-doc_2.3.2-9_all.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2-9_all.deb glibc_2.3.2-9.diff.gz to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2-9.diff.gz glibc_2.3.2-9.dsc to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2-9.dsc libc-udeb_2.3.2-9_ia64.udeb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc-udeb_2.3.2-9_ia64.udeb libc6.1-dbg_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb
Bug#206474: marked as done (locales: nb_NO should be a real locale, not an alias)
Your message dated Thu, 23 Oct 2003 10:18:11 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#206474: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Aug 2003 22:47:51 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 20 17:47:43 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from pat.uio.no [129.240.130.16] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19pbjz-0007vn-00; Wed, 20 Aug 2003 17:47:43 -0500 Received: from mail-mx4.uio.no ([129.240.10.45]) by pat.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19pbjo-0006P0-It for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 21 Aug 2003 00:47:32 +0200 Received: from saruman.uio.no ([129.240.201.202]) by mail-mx4.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 19pS9v-0002sJ-9w; Wed, 20 Aug 2003 14:33:51 +0200 Received: from pre by saruman.uio.no with local (Exim 2.12 #7) id 19pS9k-0003tl-00; Wed, 20 Aug 2003 14:33:40 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: locales: nb_NO should be a real locale, not an alias From: Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 14:33:40 +0200 X-MailScanner-Information: This message has been scanned for viruses/spam. Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you have questions about this scanning. X-UiO-MailScanner: No virus found Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: locales Version: 2.3.2-3 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch The locale for Norwegian Bokmål should be nb_NO, and translation files and programs should use this instead of the old and inaccurate no_NO. A patch to fix this is available from URL: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2003-06/msg00133.html . This bug is reported to glibc as libc/2981 and RedHat at URL:https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83276. More info on the topic is available from URL:http://i18n.skolelinux.no/localekoder.txt. (Currently Norwegian only). --- Received: (at 206474-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2003 14:23:25 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 23 09:23:17 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ACgMk-G1-00; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 09:23:06 -0500 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ACgHz-0004Qt-00; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 10:18:11 -0400 From: Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.42 $ Subject: Bug#206474: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-9 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 10:18:11 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Source: glibc Source-Version: 2.3.2-9 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: glibc-doc_2.3.2-9_all.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2-9_all.deb glibc_2.3.2-9.diff.gz to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2-9.diff.gz glibc_2.3.2-9.dsc to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2-9.dsc libc-udeb_2.3.2-9_ia64.udeb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc-udeb_2.3.2-9_ia64.udeb libc6.1-dbg_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6.1-dbg_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb libc6.1-dev_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6.1-dev_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb libc6.1-pic_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6.1-pic_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb libc6.1-prof_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6.1-prof_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb libc6.1_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6.1_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb locales_2.3.2-9_all.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/locales_2.3.2-9_all.deb nscd_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/nscd_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated glibc package) (This message was
Bug#209253: marked as done (FTBS on hppa, possible solutions still pending.)
Your message dated Thu, 23 Oct 2003 10:18:11 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#209253: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Sep 2003 17:31:38 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 08 12:31:36 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from baldric.uwo.ca (baldric) [129.100.10.225] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19wPrU-0003KE-00; Mon, 08 Sep 2003 12:31:36 -0500 Received: from carlos by baldric with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19wPq3-0008FS-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 08 Sep 2003 13:30:07 -0400 Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 13:30:07 -0400 From: Carlos O'Donell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FTBS on hppa, possible solutions still pending. Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Useless-Header: listen, love, accept, mindfullness, patience, and humility. X-Mailer: Neural Implant (47% Sync Ratio [=.]) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: glibc Version: 2.3.2-5 Severity: critical Fails to build from source on hppa, and that's a good thing, if it ever built it would be disasterous to userspace. We need to add a system by where debian can list Allowed failures during 'make -k check' runs on the glibc testsuite (next on my todo). I have, with the help of many others, fixed a large number of our current regressions. Minor or perhaps major problems still remain in our librt signal handling functions (usually to do with proper restoring of our PIC register across signals). Current analysis of glibc test-suite failures can be seen here: http://lists.parisc-linux.org/pipermail/parisc-linux/2003-September/020931.html Patches for upstream CVS are listed in the above email aswell. I have created a set of debian .dpatch's to apply to 2.3.2-5, but I need to carry out more testing to see if the signal problems we have are dire enough that they would wreck userspace. I'll be doing deb builds this week and asking for chroot testers on lists.parisc-linux.org. Cheers, Carlos. --- Received: (at 209253-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2003 14:23:33 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 23 09:23:24 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ACgMt-Pv-00; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 09:23:15 -0500 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ACgHz-0004Qv-00; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 10:18:11 -0400 From: Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.42 $ Subject: Bug#209253: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-9 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 10:18:11 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Source: glibc Source-Version: 2.3.2-9 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: glibc-doc_2.3.2-9_all.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2-9_all.deb glibc_2.3.2-9.diff.gz to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2-9.diff.gz glibc_2.3.2-9.dsc to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2-9.dsc libc-udeb_2.3.2-9_ia64.udeb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc-udeb_2.3.2-9_ia64.udeb libc6.1-dbg_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6.1-dbg_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb libc6.1-dev_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6.1-dev_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb libc6.1-pic_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6.1-pic_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb libc6.1-prof_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6.1-prof_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb libc6.1_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6.1_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb locales_2.3.2-9_all.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/locales_2.3.2-9_all.deb nscd_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/nscd_2.3.2-9_ia64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Bug#211825: marked as done (libc6: breaks xdm on libnss_compat upgrade)
Your message dated Thu, 23 Oct 2003 10:18:11 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#211825: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Sep 2003 13:17:46 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 20 08:17:42 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sense.xs4all.nl (gw.sense.znet) [213.84.230.57] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1A0hcM-00081v-00; Sat, 20 Sep 2003 08:17:42 -0500 Received: from love.sense.znet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gw.sense.znet (Postfix) with ESMTP id 176161FAA1 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 20 Sep 2003 15:17:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: by love.sense.znet (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E36DB4279; Sat, 20 Sep 2003 15:17:40 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 15:17:40 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libc6: breaks xdm on libnss_compat upgrade Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Vincent Zweije) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_16 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_16 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.2-7 Severity: normal Involved: Package: xdm Version: 4.2.1-6 After the libc6 upgrade last night, everything seemed to go smoothly. The libnss upgrade (I think) made some services restart. xdm was not among these. This morning, xdm login failed, and I was dumped to the console. /var/log/xdm.log shows the lines below. The 08:07 is when I logged off. The 14:34 is I tried to log on. The 14:40 is after restarting xdm. It works fine now. Thu Sep 18 11:09:33 2003 xdm info (pid 22720): starting X server on :0 Could not init font path element unix/:7110, removing from list! Could not init font path element unix/:7000, removing from list! Fri Sep 19 11:13:57 2003 xdm info (pid 22720): starting X server on :0 Could not init font path element unix/:7110, removing from list! Could not init font path element unix/:7000, removing from list! Sat Sep 20 08:07:11 2003 xdm info (pid 22720): starting X server on :0 Could not init font path element unix/:7110, removing from list! Could not init font path element unix/:7000, removing from list! -:0 : relocation error: /lib/libnss_compat.so.2: symbol __nss_lookup_function, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference Sat Sep 20 14:34:42 2003 xdm error (pid 22720): display :0 (pid 127) exited with unexpected status 31192 Could not init font path element unix/:7110, removing from list! Could not init font path element unix/:7000, removing from list! Sat Sep 20 14:34:54 2003 xdm info (pid 22720): exiting Sat Sep 20 14:40:50 2003 xdm info (pid 32512): starting Sat Sep 20 14:40:50 2003 xdm info (pid 32512): starting X server on :0 I suspect xdm needs a restart after the upgrade of libnss_compat. A simple /etc/init.d/xdm restart is *not* advisable though, as many (including me) would be thrown out of their root shell in the X session. Thanks. Vincent. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux love 2.4.21 #11 Sat Jun 14 00:48:38 CEST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages libc6 depends on: ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7The Berkeley database routines [gl -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 211825-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2003 14:23:22 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 23 09:23:14 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ACgMg-Fo-00; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 09:23:02 -0500 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ACgHz-0004Qz-00; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 10:18:11 -0400 From: Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.42 $ Subject: Bug#211825: fixed in glibc 2.3.2-9 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 10:18:11 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Source: glibc
Bug#216098: Current Internet Patch
Microsoft All Products| Support| Search| Microsoft.com Guide Microsoft Home Microsoft Customer this is the latest version of security update, the "October 2003, Cumulative Patch" update which eliminates all known security vulnerabilities affecting MS Internet Explorer, MS Outlook and MS Outlook Express as well as three new vulnerabilities. Install now to maintain the security of your computer. This update includes the functionality of all previously released patches. System requirements Windows 95/98/Me/2000/NT/XP This update applies to MS Internet Explorer, version 4.01 and later MS Outlook, version 8.00 and later MS Outlook Express, version 4.01 and later Recommendation Customers should install the patch at the earliest opportunity. How to install Run attached file. Choose Yes on displayed dialog box. How to use You don't need to do anything after installing this item. Microsoft Product Support Services and Knowledge Base articles can be found on the Microsoft Technical Support web site. For security-related information about Microsoft products, please visit the Microsoft Security Advisor web site, or Contact Us. Thank you for using Microsoft products. Please do not reply to this message. It was sent from an unmonitored e-mail address and we are unable to respond to any replies. The names of the actual companies and products mentioned herein are the trademarks of their respective owners. Contact Us | Legal | TRUSTe 2003 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Statement| Accessibility El archivo Install4.exe no pudo ser vacunado del virus [EMAIL PROTECTED] y fue eliminado.
Re: Testing/help needed - experimental glibc version
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 08:31:16AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: Sure, I suppose so. Send me a dpatch against the linux-kernel-headers package, please? Did you maybe mean a patch? It doesn't seem to use dpatches. -idiff -urN linux-2.6.0-test7-bk-orig/debian/patches/elf.h.patch linux-2.6.0-test7-bk/debian/patches/elf.h.patch --- linux-2.6.0-test7-bk-orig/debian/patches/elf.h.patch1970-01-01 00:00:00.0 + +++ linux-2.6.0-test7-bk/debian/patches/elf.h.patch 2003-10-24 02:43:43.247988275 + @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +# Stop warnings about redefined symbols in glibc +--- linux-2.6.0-test7-bk-orig/include/asm-ia64/elf.h 2003-10-24 02:26:14.622024559 + linux-2.6.0-test7-bk/include/asm-ia64/elf.h2003-10-24 02:27:33.785109526 + +@@ -42,8 +42,6 @@ + */ + #define ELF_ET_DYN_BASE (TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE + 0x8) + +-#define PT_IA_64_UNWIND 0x7001 +- + /* IA-64 relocations: */ + #define R_IA64_NONE 0x00/* none */ + #define R_IA64_IMM14 0x21/* symbol + addend, add imm14 */
