Bug#218561: I also see this - with qmail
From: Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 11:41:47AM +0100 > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (local.debian.rcbugs) you wrote: > > I see the same error message, with qmail. > > > When I compile and run it with LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1, > > it still works. > > > This is linux-2.6.0-test9-mm1, debian unstable as of 9 > > hours ago. > > Iirc www.qmail.org (or life with qmail?) has the one-line patch that > makes it work on systems where errno is a macro. > > Afaik all bernstein-software suffers from this issue, ignoring recent > standards (Susv3?) that allow errno to be a macro, the problem has > been rehashed multiple times e.g. on the djbdns list as it appears on > RedHat for some time. Downloading and install netqmail-1.04 (which incorporates this patch) solved my qmail problems, only VMWare is still affected. Petr Vandrovec's solution: mv /usr/bin/vmnet-natd /usr/bin/vmnet-natd.bin and create /usr/bin/vmnet-natd: #!/bin/sh LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5 exec /usr/bin/vmnet-natd.bin "$@" Phew, another glibc update has failed to bring down my system :-) Thanks, Jurriaan -- It is well to remember, my son, that the entire population of the universe, with one trifling exception, is composed of others. John Andrew Holmes Debian (Unstable) GNU/Linux 2.6.0-test9-mm1 4276 bogomips 0.13 0.13
Bug#218657: the latest libc6 + 2.6 kernel problem (was Re: Bug#218657: glibc: libc6 2.3.2.ds1-8 breaks system with x86_64 kernel)
Hi debian-amd64 guys, We're encountering #218657. This bug says many programs become unusable when libc6 2.3.2.ds1-8 + kernel 2.6 is used on amd64 architecture. We all debian-glibc developers can't access such machine, so could anyone try to reproduce and track this problem? (I resend this mail because the past one was not reached to debian-amd64) At Sun, 2 Nov 2003 11:25:22 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > I tested with kernel versions 2.6.0-test8 initially and then > > 2.6.0-test7 with the same results. I believe than NTPL is compiled in > > by default in 2.6.0 test kernels. > > > > I was unsure whether to file this bug report since it occurred on > > x86_64 kernel which is not officially supported by Debian. > > > > Again, after reverting to 2.3.2-9, all was well again. > > Well, I've got no idea. Someone with access to such a system gets to > debug this. Regards, -- gotom
Bug#218561: I also see this - with qmail
From: Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 11:41:47AM +0100 > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (local.debian.rcbugs) you wrote: > > I see the same error message, with qmail. > > > When I compile and run it with LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1, > > it still works. > > > This is linux-2.6.0-test9-mm1, debian unstable as of 9 > > hours ago. > > Iirc www.qmail.org (or life with qmail?) has the one-line patch that > makes it work on systems where errno is a macro. > > Afaik all bernstein-software suffers from this issue, ignoring recent > standards (Susv3?) that allow errno to be a macro, the problem has > been rehashed multiple times e.g. on the djbdns list as it appears on > RedHat for some time. Downloading and install netqmail-1.04 (which incorporates this patch) solved my qmail problems, only VMWare is still affected. Petr Vandrovec's solution: mv /usr/bin/vmnet-natd /usr/bin/vmnet-natd.bin and create /usr/bin/vmnet-natd: #!/bin/sh LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5 exec /usr/bin/vmnet-natd.bin "$@" Phew, another glibc update has failed to bring down my system :-) Thanks, Jurriaan -- It is well to remember, my son, that the entire population of the universe, with one trifling exception, is composed of others. John Andrew Holmes Debian (Unstable) GNU/Linux 2.6.0-test9-mm1 4276 bogomips 0.13 0.13 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reopening 67921
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 67921 Bug#67921: glob(3) doesn't treat \ correctly Bug reopened, originator not changed. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#218657: the latest libc6 + 2.6 kernel problem (was Re: Bug#218657: glibc: libc6 2.3.2.ds1-8 breaks system with x86_64 kernel)
Hi debian-amd64 guys, We're encountering #218657. This bug says many programs become unusable when libc6 2.3.2.ds1-8 + kernel 2.6 is used on amd64 architecture. We all debian-glibc developers can't access such machine, so could anyone try to reproduce and track this problem? (I resend this mail because the past one was not reached to debian-amd64) At Sun, 2 Nov 2003 11:25:22 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > I tested with kernel versions 2.6.0-test8 initially and then > > 2.6.0-test7 with the same results. I believe than NTPL is compiled in > > by default in 2.6.0 test kernels. > > > > I was unsure whether to file this bug report since it occurred on > > x86_64 kernel which is not officially supported by Debian. > > > > Again, after reverting to 2.3.2-9, all was well again. > > Well, I've got no idea. Someone with access to such a system gets to > debug this. Regards, -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Reopening - not fixed for many non-i386 arches
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 203303 ! Bug#203303: linux/byteorder/swab.h: ISO C++ forbids braced-groups within expressions Bug reopened, originator set to Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: reopening 67921
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 67921 Bug#67921: glob(3) doesn't treat \ correctly Bug reopened, originator not changed. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#203303: Reopening - not fixed for many non-i386 arches
reopen 203303 ! thanks ccing original submitter as well - he's probably going to get bitten by this as well. Package: libc6-dev Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10 Severity: normal Followup-For: Bug #203303 This bug is fixed on i386, and it looks like hppa as well. However it is still broken on ia64, alpha and powerpc ia64: In file included from /usr/include/linux/cdrom.h:14, from audiocd.h:33, from cddbaccessdialog.h:31, from cddbaccessdialogdata.cpp:10, from kcdlabel.all_cpp.cpp:6: /usr/include/asm/byteorder.h: In function `const __u64 __ia64_swab64(long unsigned int)': /usr/include/asm/byteorder.h:17: error: ISO C++ forbids braced-groups within expressions alpha: In file included from /usr/include/linux/cdrom.h:14, from audiocd.h:33, from cddbaccessdialog.h:31, from cddbaccessdialogdata.cpp:10, from kcdlabel.all_cpp.cpp:6: /usr/include/asm/byteorder.h: In function `__u32 __arch__swab32(unsigned int)': /usr/include/asm/byteorder.h:27: error: ISO C++ forbids braced-groups within expressions /usr/include/asm/byteorder.h:28: error: ISO C++ forbids braced-groups within expressions In file included from /usr/include/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:11, from /usr/include/asm/byteorder.h:44, from /usr/include/linux/cdrom.h:14, from audiocd.h:33, from cddbaccessdialog.h:31, from cddbaccessdialogdata.cpp:10, from kcdlabel.all_cpp.cpp:6: /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h: In function `const __u16 __fswab16(short unsigned int)': /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h:133: error: ISO C++ forbids braced-groups within expressions /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h:133: error: ISO C++ forbids braced-groups within expressions /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h: In function `__u16 __swab16p(__u16*)': /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h:137: error: ISO C++ forbids braced-groups within expressions /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h:137: error: ISO C++ forbids braced-groups within expressions /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h: In function `void __swab16s(__u16*)': /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h:141: error: ISO C++ forbids braced-groups within expressions /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h:141: error: ISO C++ forbids braced-groups within expressions /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h: In function `const __u64 __fswab64(long unsigned int)': /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h:165: error: ISO C++ forbids braced-groups within expressions /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h:165: error: ISO C++ forbids braced-groups within expressions /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h: In function `__u64 __swab64p(__u64*)': /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h:170: error: ISO C++ forbids braced-groups within expressions /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h:170: error: ISO C++ forbids braced-groups within expressions /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h: In function `void __swab64s(__u64*)': /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h:174: error: ISO C++ forbids braced-groups within expressions /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h:174: error: ISO C++ forbids braced-groups within expressions powerpc: In file included from /usr/include/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:11, from /usr/include/asm/byteorder.h:73, from /usr/include/linux/cdrom.h:14, from audiocd.h:33, from cddbaccessdialog.h:31, from cddbaccessdialogdata.cpp:10, from kcdlabel.all_cpp.cpp:6: /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h: In function `const __u16 __fswab16(short unsigned int)': /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h:133: error: ISO C++ forbids braced-groups within expressions /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h:133: error: ISO C++ forbids braced-groups within expressions /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h: In function `__u16 __swab16p(__u16*)': /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h:137: error: ISO C++ forbids braced-groups within expressions /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h:137: error: ISO C++ forbids braced-groups within expressions /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h: In function `void __swab16s(__u16*)': /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h:141: error: ISO C++ forbids braced-groups within expressions /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h:141: error: ISO C++ forbids braced-groups within expressions /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h: In function `const __u32 __fswab32(unsigned int)': /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h:146: error: ISO C++ forbids braced-groups within expressions /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h:146: error: ISO C++ forbids braced-groups within expressions /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h: In function `__u32 __swab32p(__u32*)': /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h:150: error: ISO C++ forbids braced-groups within expressions /us
Processed: Reopening - not fixed for many non-i386 arches
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 203303 ! Bug#203303: linux/byteorder/swab.h: ISO C++ forbids braced-groups within expressions Bug reopened, originator set to Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#203303: Reopening - not fixed for many non-i386 arches
reopen 203303 ! thanks ccing original submitter as well - he's probably going to get bitten by this as well. Package: libc6-dev Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10 Severity: normal Followup-For: Bug #203303 This bug is fixed on i386, and it looks like hppa as well. However it is still broken on ia64, alpha and powerpc ia64: In file included from /usr/include/linux/cdrom.h:14, from audiocd.h:33, from cddbaccessdialog.h:31, from cddbaccessdialogdata.cpp:10, from kcdlabel.all_cpp.cpp:6: /usr/include/asm/byteorder.h: In function `const __u64 __ia64_swab64(long unsigned int)': /usr/include/asm/byteorder.h:17: error: ISO C++ forbids braced-groups within expressions alpha: In file included from /usr/include/linux/cdrom.h:14, from audiocd.h:33, from cddbaccessdialog.h:31, from cddbaccessdialogdata.cpp:10, from kcdlabel.all_cpp.cpp:6: /usr/include/asm/byteorder.h: In function `__u32 __arch__swab32(unsigned int)': /usr/include/asm/byteorder.h:27: error: ISO C++ forbids braced-groups within expressions /usr/include/asm/byteorder.h:28: error: ISO C++ forbids braced-groups within expressions In file included from /usr/include/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:11, from /usr/include/asm/byteorder.h:44, from /usr/include/linux/cdrom.h:14, from audiocd.h:33, from cddbaccessdialog.h:31, from cddbaccessdialogdata.cpp:10, from kcdlabel.all_cpp.cpp:6: /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h: In function `const __u16 __fswab16(short unsigned int)': /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h:133: error: ISO C++ forbids braced-groups within expressions /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h:133: error: ISO C++ forbids braced-groups within expressions /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h: In function `__u16 __swab16p(__u16*)': /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h:137: error: ISO C++ forbids braced-groups within expressions /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h:137: error: ISO C++ forbids braced-groups within expressions /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h: In function `void __swab16s(__u16*)': /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h:141: error: ISO C++ forbids braced-groups within expressions /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h:141: error: ISO C++ forbids braced-groups within expressions /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h: In function `const __u64 __fswab64(long unsigned int)': /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h:165: error: ISO C++ forbids braced-groups within expressions /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h:165: error: ISO C++ forbids braced-groups within expressions /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h: In function `__u64 __swab64p(__u64*)': /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h:170: error: ISO C++ forbids braced-groups within expressions /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h:170: error: ISO C++ forbids braced-groups within expressions /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h: In function `void __swab64s(__u64*)': /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h:174: error: ISO C++ forbids braced-groups within expressions /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h:174: error: ISO C++ forbids braced-groups within expressions powerpc: In file included from /usr/include/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:11, from /usr/include/asm/byteorder.h:73, from /usr/include/linux/cdrom.h:14, from audiocd.h:33, from cddbaccessdialog.h:31, from cddbaccessdialogdata.cpp:10, from kcdlabel.all_cpp.cpp:6: /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h: In function `const __u16 __fswab16(short unsigned int)': /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h:133: error: ISO C++ forbids braced-groups within expressions /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h:133: error: ISO C++ forbids braced-groups within expressions /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h: In function `__u16 __swab16p(__u16*)': /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h:137: error: ISO C++ forbids braced-groups within expressions /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h:137: error: ISO C++ forbids braced-groups within expressions /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h: In function `void __swab16s(__u16*)': /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h:141: error: ISO C++ forbids braced-groups within expressions /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h:141: error: ISO C++ forbids braced-groups within expressions /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h: In function `const __u32 __fswab32(unsigned int)': /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h:146: error: ISO C++ forbids braced-groups within expressions /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h:146: error: ISO C++ forbids braced-groups within expressions /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h: In function `__u32 __swab32p(__u32*)': /usr/include/linux/byteorder/swab.h:150: error: ISO C++ forbids braced-groups within expressions /us
Bug#219025: update
Ok, I have this working now. I figured out that I needed to download the files for i686 from here: http://ftp.debian.org/pool/main/g/glibc/ Note that when I checked previously the i686 files were not there - only the ia64 and hppa etc. Anyway, I then ran dpkg - i each_of_the_deb_files and it now works a treat.I can continue to use apt-get and update latest files. Many thanks for resolving the problem guys. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.536 / Virus Database: 331 - Release Date: 03/11/2003
Bug#219025: update
Ok, I have this working now. I figured out that I needed to download the files for i686 from here: http://ftp.debian.org/pool/main/g/glibc/ Note that when I checked previously the i686 files were not there - only the ia64 and hppa etc. Anyway, I then ran dpkg - i each_of_the_deb_files and it now works a treat.I can continue to use apt-get and update latest files. Many thanks for resolving the problem guys. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.536 / Virus Database: 331 - Release Date: 03/11/2003 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#67921: marked as done (glob(3) doesn't treat \ correctly)
Your message dated Fri, 07 Nov 03 11:52:12 GMT with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Your VALIUM Prescription is ready.. cvcglw has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jul 2000 08:44:28 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 30 03:44:28 2000 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from gondor.apana.org.au [203.14.152.114] (root) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian)) id 13Iohv-000764-00; Sun, 30 Jul 2000 03:44:27 -0500 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by gondor.apana.org.au (8.11.0.Beta1/8.11.0.Beta1/Debian 8.11.0-1) id e6U8iJv25379; Sun, 30 Jul 2000 18:44:19 +1000 Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2000 18:44:19 +1000 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: libc6: glob treats \/ incorrectly To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: bug 3.3.4 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: libc6 Version: 2.1.3-10 Severity: normal glob(3) doesn't match patterns like \/* or /dir\/* correctly. It treats the \ as a literal. -- System Information Debian Release: 2.2 Kernel Version: Linux gondor 2.2.12 #2 Sat Sep 18 12:11:40 EST 1999 i586 unknown Versions of the packages libc6 depends on: ii ldso1.9.11-9The Linux dynamic linker, library and utilities. --- Received: (at 67921-close) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Nov 2003 20:57:29 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 06 14:57:29 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from (146.82.138.7) [80.191.228.111] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AHrC3-0007SR-00; Thu, 06 Nov 2003 14:57:29 -0600 Received: from [237.114.33.247] by 146.82.138.7 with SMTP; Fri, 07 Nov 2003 11:52:12 + Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: "Chrystal Feldman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Chrystal Feldman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Your VALIUM Prescription is ready.. cvcglw Date: Fri, 07 Nov 03 11:52:12 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="16DD_31.841_3._F7" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_90,DATE_IN_FUTURE_12_24,OFFERS_ETC version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_03 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_03 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) --16DD_31.841_3._F7 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Pharm WorldWide Exclusive: HOT & NEW - VALIUM & XANAX_ Weekly speciasls on all our drugs. -Valium -Xanax -Ambien -Phentermine -Levitra -Buta -MORE Next day discrete shipping on all products! http://www.medsnow.biz/rxsuperstore Please, I wish to receive no more discounts on valuable items. http://www.medsnow.biz/a.html jet wpajamhspxikicdczydc m --16DD_31.841_3._F7--
Bug#67921: marked as done (glob(3) doesn't treat \ correctly)
Your message dated Fri, 07 Nov 03 11:52:12 GMT with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Your VALIUM Prescription is ready.. cvcglw has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jul 2000 08:44:28 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 30 03:44:28 2000 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from gondor.apana.org.au [203.14.152.114] (root) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian)) id 13Iohv-000764-00; Sun, 30 Jul 2000 03:44:27 -0500 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by gondor.apana.org.au (8.11.0.Beta1/8.11.0.Beta1/Debian 8.11.0-1) id e6U8iJv25379; Sun, 30 Jul 2000 18:44:19 +1000 Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2000 18:44:19 +1000 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: libc6: glob treats \/ incorrectly To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: bug 3.3.4 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: libc6 Version: 2.1.3-10 Severity: normal glob(3) doesn't match patterns like \/* or /dir\/* correctly. It treats the \ as a literal. -- System Information Debian Release: 2.2 Kernel Version: Linux gondor 2.2.12 #2 Sat Sep 18 12:11:40 EST 1999 i586 unknown Versions of the packages libc6 depends on: ii ldso1.9.11-9The Linux dynamic linker, library and utilities. --- Received: (at 67921-close) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Nov 2003 20:57:29 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 06 14:57:29 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from (146.82.138.7) [80.191.228.111] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AHrC3-0007SR-00; Thu, 06 Nov 2003 14:57:29 -0600 Received: from [237.114.33.247] by 146.82.138.7 with SMTP; Fri, 07 Nov 2003 11:52:12 + Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: "Chrystal Feldman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Chrystal Feldman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Your VALIUM Prescription is ready.. cvcglw Date: Fri, 07 Nov 03 11:52:12 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="16DD_31.841_3._F7" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_90,DATE_IN_FUTURE_12_24,OFFERS_ETC version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_03 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_03 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) --16DD_31.841_3._F7 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Pharm WorldWide Exclusive: HOT & NEW - VALIUM & XANAX_ Weekly speciasls on all our drugs. -Valium -Xanax -Ambien -Phentermine -Levitra -Buta -MORE Next day discrete shipping on all products! http://www.medsnow.biz/rxsuperstore Please, I wish to receive no more discounts on valuable items. http://www.medsnow.biz/a.html jet wpajamhspxikicdczydc m --16DD_31.841_3._F7-- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#219352: should depend on libmikmod2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 219352 Inconsistency detected by ld.so: ../sysdeps/generic/dl-tls.c: > 72: _dl_next_tls_modid: Assertion `result <= _rtld_local._dl_tls_max_dtv_idx' > failed! Bug#219352: should depend on libmikmod2 Changed Bug title. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#219476: has antique version of sys/vm86.h
Package: libc6-dev Version: 2.3.2.ds1-9 Severity: normal File: /usr/include/sys/vm86.h See manpages-dev man 2 vm86 for what *should* be there. The current version was correct until kernel 2.1.15 and 2.0.28 - surely that were libc5 times? -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux khms.westfalen.de 2.4.20+kai.59 #1 Son Jun 29 12:14:42 CEST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE Versions of packages libc6-dev depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-9GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii linux-kernel-headers 2.5.999-test7-bk-8 Linux Kernel Headers for developme -- no debconf information
Processed: Re: Bug#219352: should depend on libmikmod2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 219352 Inconsistency detected by ld.so: ../sysdeps/generic/dl-tls.c: 72: > _dl_next_tls_modid: Assertion `result <= _rtld_local._dl_tls_max_dtv_idx' failed! Bug#219352: should depend on libmikmod2 Changed Bug title. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#219476: has antique version of sys/vm86.h
Package: libc6-dev Version: 2.3.2.ds1-9 Severity: normal File: /usr/include/sys/vm86.h See manpages-dev man 2 vm86 for what *should* be there. The current version was correct until kernel 2.1.15 and 2.0.28 - surely that were libc5 times? -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux khms.westfalen.de 2.4.20+kai.59 #1 Son Jun 29 12:14:42 CEST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE Versions of packages libc6-dev depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-9GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii linux-kernel-headers 2.5.999-test7-bk-8 Linux Kernel Headers for developme -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rename linux-kernel-headers to system-headers
#include * Otto Wyss [Sun, Nov 02 2003, 10:21:14AM]: > Since when does the package libc6-dev depend on linux-kernel-headers? Is > this dependes really necessary? What not rename linux-kernel-headers to simple system-headers-linux? This will prevent confused users (or: lazy to read the description users) from asking this again and again. MfG, Eduard. -- Das meiste, was wir als Führung bezeichnen, besteht darin, den Mitarbeitern die Arbeit zu erschweren. -- Peter Drucker
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 219458 libc6
Bug#219458: touch fails to set the file {a,m}time correctly on hppa
Bug reassigned from package `coreutils' to `libc6'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processed: Re: Bug#219352: should depend on libmikmod2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 219352 libc6 Bug#219352: should depend on libmikmod2 Bug reassigned from package `xmms' to `libc6'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#219459: NPTL breaks abort()
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 05:39:23PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> Package: libc6
> Severity: important
>
> This may turn out to be a gdb bug, but let's start here...
That just means GDB can't backtrace through abort. The compiler knows
that abort is a noreturn function, and is allowed to take all sorts of
liberties with the calling sequence - there's very little the debugger
can do.
You won't be able to get a backtrace at least until GDB and your kernel
agree on how to dump the sysinfo DSO to a core dump and how to parse
it. The code's still being worked on.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat foo.c
> int main(void)
> {
> abort();
> }
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gcc -o foo foo.c
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ./foo
> Aborted (core dumped)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gdb foo core
> GNU gdb 6.0-debian
> Copyright 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
> welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions.
> Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
> There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details.
> This GDB was configured as "i386-linux"...
> Core was generated by `./foo'.
> Program terminated with signal 6, Aborted.
>
> warning: current_sos: Can't read pathname for load map: Input/output error
>
> Reading symbols from /lib/tls/libc.so.6...done.
> Loaded symbols for /lib/tls/libc.so.6
> Reading symbols from /lib/ld-linux.so.2...done.
> Loaded symbols for /lib/ld-linux.so.2
> #0 0x4004cd89 in raise () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0x4004cd89 in raise () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
> #1 0x40158f70 in ?? () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
> #2 0xb7c0 in ?? ()
> #3 0x4004e5e1 in abort () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
> (gdb) q
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1 ./foo
> Aborted (core dumped)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gdb foo core
> GNU gdb 6.0-debian
> Copyright 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
> welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions.
> Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
> There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details.
> This GDB was configured as "i386-linux"...
> Core was generated by `./foo'.
> Program terminated with signal 6, Aborted.
>
> warning: current_sos: Can't read pathname for load map: Input/output error
>
> Reading symbols from /lib/libc.so.6...done.
> Loaded symbols for /lib/libc.so.6
> Reading symbols from /lib/ld-linux.so.2...done.
> Loaded symbols for /lib/ld-linux.so.2
> #0 0x4004c551 in kill () from /lib/libc.so.6
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0x4004c551 in kill () from /lib/libc.so.6
> #1 0x4004c2f5 in raise () from /lib/libc.so.6
> #2 0x4004d7e8 in abort () from /lib/libc.so.6
> #3 0x08048359 in main ()
> (gdb) q
>
>
> Note how when using the NPTL version of the library, the stack trace
> does not contain the caller of abort() or anything that preceeded it;
> this makes abort() mostly useless, and the generated core dump
> entirely useless.
>
> --
> .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
> : :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
> `. `' |
>`- -><- |
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
rename linux-kernel-headers to system-headers
#include * Otto Wyss [Sun, Nov 02 2003, 10:21:14AM]: > Since when does the package libc6-dev depend on linux-kernel-headers? Is > this dependes really necessary? What not rename linux-kernel-headers to simple system-headers-linux? This will prevent confused users (or: lazy to read the description users) from asking this again and again. MfG, Eduard. -- Das meiste, was wir als Führung bezeichnen, besteht darin, den Mitarbeitern die Arbeit zu erschweren. -- Peter Drucker -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#217355: acknowledged by developer (fixed)
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 06:35:24PM +0100, Hervé Eychenne wrote: > On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 05:26:32PM +, Colin Watson wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 06:22:11PM +0100, Hervé Eychenne wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 01:47:14AM +, Colin Watson wrote: > > > > Anyway, just wait a bit and it'll be fine, or download the older version > > > > of locales by hand. It's not difficult. > > > > > > While waiting or downgrading is an option, I simply insist on the fact > > > that this problem shouldn't issue _at all_, and that it should be > > > fixed by preventing this from happening. > > > If you don't want this to happen, use testing rather than unstable. It's > > designed to insulate you from (most of) these kinds of problems. > > Always the same answer... Instead of telling "use at your own risk", > shouldn't we simply try to solve known problems? > > There are some good reasons I'm forced to run Debian unstable, believe > me. Why should I (and potentially many others) be annoyed by things > that seem to be easily be avoidable with a little more fine-grained > handling? Because that dependency has repeatedly been demonstrated to be necessary, and when we leave it out we get bug reports that people's locales don't work? -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 219458 libc6
Bug#219458: touch fails to set the file {a,m}time correctly on hppa
Bug reassigned from package `coreutils' to `libc6'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#219352: should depend on libmikmod2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 219352 libc6 Bug#219352: should depend on libmikmod2 Bug reassigned from package `xmms' to `libc6'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#204789: marked as done (acl2: crashes on startup)
Your message dated Thu, 06 Nov 2003 12:17:29 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#204789: fixed in gclcvs 2.7.0-14 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Aug 2003 06:13:25 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 10 01:13:23 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from ppp117-15.lns1.syd2.internode.on.net (freestyle.idesign.fl.net.au) [150.101.117.15] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19ljSF-0001ju-00; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 01:13:23 -0500 Received: from duraid by freestyle.idesign.fl.net.au with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19ljSB-000551-00; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 16:13:19 +1000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Duraid Madina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: acl2: crashes on startup X-Mailer: reportbug 2.21 Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 16:13:19 +1000 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Duraid Madina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: acl2 Version: 2.7-7 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ acl2 > [SGC off]Segmentation fault > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ :( -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: ia64 Kernel: Linux freestyle 2.6.0-test2 #4 SMP Sat Aug 2 11:05:23 EST 2003 ia64 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages acl2 depends on: ii libc6.1 2.3.2-2GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgmp3 4.1.2-3Multiprecision arithmetic library ii libncurses5 5.3.20030719-1 Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libreadline4 4.3-5 GNU readline and history libraries -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 204789-close) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Nov 2003 17:23:18 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 06 11:23:15 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AHnqi-0004So-00; Thu, 06 Nov 2003 11:23:12 -0600 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AHnlB-0008M4-00; Thu, 06 Nov 2003 12:17:29 -0500 From: Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.42 $ Subject: Bug#204789: fixed in gclcvs 2.7.0-14 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 12:17:29 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Source: gclcvs Source-Version: 2.7.0-14 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gclcvs, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: gclcvs-doc_2.7.0-14_all.deb to pool/main/g/gclcvs/gclcvs-doc_2.7.0-14_all.deb gclcvs_2.7.0-14.dsc to pool/main/g/gclcvs/gclcvs_2.7.0-14.dsc gclcvs_2.7.0-14.tar.gz to pool/main/g/gclcvs/gclcvs_2.7.0-14.tar.gz gclcvs_2.7.0-14_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gclcvs/gclcvs_2.7.0-14_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated gclcvs package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 15:43:07 + Source: gclcvs Binary: gclcvs gclcvs-doc Architecture: source all i386 Version: 2.7.0-14 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: gclcvs - GNU Common Lisp compiler, CVS snapshot gclcvs-doc - Documentation for GNU Common Lisp, CVS snapshot Closes: 204789 217484 Changes: gclcvs (2.7.0-14) unstable; urgency=low . * Portability patches to makefiles to support non-GNU grep (no -q)
Re: Bug#217355: acknowledged by developer (fixed)
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 05:26:32PM +, Colin Watson wrote: > On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 06:22:11PM +0100, Hervé Eychenne wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 01:47:14AM +, Colin Watson wrote: > > > Anyway, just wait a bit and it'll be fine, or download the older version > > > of locales by hand. It's not difficult. > > > > While waiting or downgrading is an option, I simply insist on the fact > > that this problem shouldn't issue _at all_, and that it should be > > fixed by preventing this from happening. > If you don't want this to happen, use testing rather than unstable. It's > designed to insulate you from (most of) these kinds of problems. Always the same answer... Instead of telling "use at your own risk", shouldn't we simply try to solve known problems? There are some good reasons I'm forced to run Debian unstable, believe me. Why should I (and potentially many others) be annoyed by things that seem to be easily be avoidable with a little more fine-grained handling? Herve -- _ (°= Hervé Eychenne //) Homepage: http://www.eychenne.org/ v_/_ WallFire project: http://www.wallfire.org/
Bug#219459: NPTL breaks abort()
Package: libc6
Severity: important
This may turn out to be a gdb bug, but let's start here...
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat foo.c
int main(void)
{
abort();
}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gcc -o foo foo.c
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ./foo
Aborted (core dumped)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gdb foo core
GNU gdb 6.0-debian
Copyright 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions.
Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "i386-linux"...
Core was generated by `./foo'.
Program terminated with signal 6, Aborted.
warning: current_sos: Can't read pathname for load map: Input/output error
Reading symbols from /lib/tls/libc.so.6...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/tls/libc.so.6
Reading symbols from /lib/ld-linux.so.2...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/ld-linux.so.2
#0 0x4004cd89 in raise () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
(gdb) bt
#0 0x4004cd89 in raise () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
#1 0x40158f70 in ?? () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
#2 0xb7c0 in ?? ()
#3 0x4004e5e1 in abort () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
(gdb) q
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1 ./foo
Aborted (core dumped)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gdb foo core
GNU gdb 6.0-debian
Copyright 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions.
Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "i386-linux"...
Core was generated by `./foo'.
Program terminated with signal 6, Aborted.
warning: current_sos: Can't read pathname for load map: Input/output error
Reading symbols from /lib/libc.so.6...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libc.so.6
Reading symbols from /lib/ld-linux.so.2...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/ld-linux.so.2
#0 0x4004c551 in kill () from /lib/libc.so.6
(gdb) bt
#0 0x4004c551 in kill () from /lib/libc.so.6
#1 0x4004c2f5 in raise () from /lib/libc.so.6
#2 0x4004d7e8 in abort () from /lib/libc.so.6
#3 0x08048359 in main ()
(gdb) q
Note how when using the NPTL version of the library, the stack trace
does not contain the caller of abort() or anything that preceeded it;
this makes abort() mostly useless, and the generated core dump
entirely useless.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: Bug#217355: acknowledged by developer (fixed)
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 01:47:14AM +, Colin Watson wrote: > On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 02:28:48AM +0100, Hervé Eychenne wrote: > > Colin Watson wrote: > > > Architecture: all packages such as locales are only built on one > > > architecture, but used by all architectures regardless of whether the > > > rest of the source package has been built for them. This saves all the > > > build daemons having to build identical packages. > > It seems I'm facing this same problem again: > > > > --- > > # apt-get install locales > [...] > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > > locales: Depends: glibc-2.3.2.ds1-10 but it is not installable > > E: Broken packages > > > > --- > > > > I understand the reasons why it occurs, but something should _really_ > > be done to avoid that many people like me should face this problem > > again. Just think about the cumulated time all these people will > > lose... > Why are you mailing me? I don't maintain glibc. Sorry, I mailed that to you because I'm not a debian developper myself, and you were talking about this. (glibc maintainers now Cc'ed) > Anyway, just wait a bit and it'll be fine, or download the older version > of locales by hand. It's not difficult. While waiting or downgrading is an option, I simply insist on the fact that this problem shouldn't issue _at all_, and that it should be fixed by preventing this from happening. Thanks, Hervé -- _ (°= Hervé Eychenne //) Homepage: http://www.eychenne.org/ v_/_ WallFire project: http://www.wallfire.org/
Re: Bug#217355: acknowledged by developer (fixed)
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 06:22:11PM +0100, Hervé Eychenne wrote: > On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 01:47:14AM +, Colin Watson wrote: > > Anyway, just wait a bit and it'll be fine, or download the older version > > of locales by hand. It's not difficult. > > While waiting or downgrading is an option, I simply insist on the fact > that this problem shouldn't issue _at all_, and that it should be > fixed by preventing this from happening. If you don't want this to happen, use testing rather than unstable. It's designed to insulate you from (most of) these kinds of problems. Cheers, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#219459: NPTL breaks abort()
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 05:39:23PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> Package: libc6
> Severity: important
>
> This may turn out to be a gdb bug, but let's start here...
That just means GDB can't backtrace through abort. The compiler knows
that abort is a noreturn function, and is allowed to take all sorts of
liberties with the calling sequence - there's very little the debugger
can do.
You won't be able to get a backtrace at least until GDB and your kernel
agree on how to dump the sysinfo DSO to a core dump and how to parse
it. The code's still being worked on.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat foo.c
> int main(void)
> {
> abort();
> }
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gcc -o foo foo.c
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ./foo
> Aborted (core dumped)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gdb foo core
> GNU gdb 6.0-debian
> Copyright 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
> welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions.
> Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
> There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details.
> This GDB was configured as "i386-linux"...
> Core was generated by `./foo'.
> Program terminated with signal 6, Aborted.
>
> warning: current_sos: Can't read pathname for load map: Input/output error
>
> Reading symbols from /lib/tls/libc.so.6...done.
> Loaded symbols for /lib/tls/libc.so.6
> Reading symbols from /lib/ld-linux.so.2...done.
> Loaded symbols for /lib/ld-linux.so.2
> #0 0x4004cd89 in raise () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0x4004cd89 in raise () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
> #1 0x40158f70 in ?? () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
> #2 0xb7c0 in ?? ()
> #3 0x4004e5e1 in abort () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
> (gdb) q
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1 ./foo
> Aborted (core dumped)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gdb foo core
> GNU gdb 6.0-debian
> Copyright 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
> welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions.
> Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
> There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details.
> This GDB was configured as "i386-linux"...
> Core was generated by `./foo'.
> Program terminated with signal 6, Aborted.
>
> warning: current_sos: Can't read pathname for load map: Input/output error
>
> Reading symbols from /lib/libc.so.6...done.
> Loaded symbols for /lib/libc.so.6
> Reading symbols from /lib/ld-linux.so.2...done.
> Loaded symbols for /lib/ld-linux.so.2
> #0 0x4004c551 in kill () from /lib/libc.so.6
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0x4004c551 in kill () from /lib/libc.so.6
> #1 0x4004c2f5 in raise () from /lib/libc.so.6
> #2 0x4004d7e8 in abort () from /lib/libc.so.6
> #3 0x08048359 in main ()
> (gdb) q
>
>
> Note how when using the NPTL version of the library, the stack trace
> does not contain the caller of abort() or anything that preceeded it;
> this makes abort() mostly useless, and the generated core dump
> entirely useless.
>
> --
> .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
> : :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
> `. `' |
>`- -><- |
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#217355: acknowledged by developer (fixed)
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 06:35:24PM +0100, Hervé Eychenne wrote: > On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 05:26:32PM +, Colin Watson wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 06:22:11PM +0100, Hervé Eychenne wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 01:47:14AM +, Colin Watson wrote: > > > > Anyway, just wait a bit and it'll be fine, or download the older version > > > > of locales by hand. It's not difficult. > > > > > > While waiting or downgrading is an option, I simply insist on the fact > > > that this problem shouldn't issue _at all_, and that it should be > > > fixed by preventing this from happening. > > > If you don't want this to happen, use testing rather than unstable. It's > > designed to insulate you from (most of) these kinds of problems. > > Always the same answer... Instead of telling "use at your own risk", > shouldn't we simply try to solve known problems? > > There are some good reasons I'm forced to run Debian unstable, believe > me. Why should I (and potentially many others) be annoyed by things > that seem to be easily be avoidable with a little more fine-grained > handling? Because that dependency has repeatedly been demonstrated to be necessary, and when we leave it out we get bug reports that people's locales don't work? -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#204789: marked as done (acl2: crashes on startup)
Your message dated Thu, 06 Nov 2003 12:17:29 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#204789: fixed in gclcvs 2.7.0-14 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Aug 2003 06:13:25 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 10 01:13:23 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from ppp117-15.lns1.syd2.internode.on.net (freestyle.idesign.fl.net.au) [150.101.117.15] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19ljSF-0001ju-00; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 01:13:23 -0500 Received: from duraid by freestyle.idesign.fl.net.au with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19ljSB-000551-00; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 16:13:19 +1000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Duraid Madina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: acl2: crashes on startup X-Mailer: reportbug 2.21 Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 16:13:19 +1000 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Duraid Madina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: acl2 Version: 2.7-7 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ acl2 > [SGC off]Segmentation fault > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ :( -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: ia64 Kernel: Linux freestyle 2.6.0-test2 #4 SMP Sat Aug 2 11:05:23 EST 2003 ia64 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages acl2 depends on: ii libc6.1 2.3.2-2GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgmp3 4.1.2-3Multiprecision arithmetic library ii libncurses5 5.3.20030719-1 Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libreadline4 4.3-5 GNU readline and history libraries -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 204789-close) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Nov 2003 17:23:18 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 06 11:23:15 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AHnqi-0004So-00; Thu, 06 Nov 2003 11:23:12 -0600 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AHnlB-0008M4-00; Thu, 06 Nov 2003 12:17:29 -0500 From: Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.42 $ Subject: Bug#204789: fixed in gclcvs 2.7.0-14 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 12:17:29 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Source: gclcvs Source-Version: 2.7.0-14 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gclcvs, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: gclcvs-doc_2.7.0-14_all.deb to pool/main/g/gclcvs/gclcvs-doc_2.7.0-14_all.deb gclcvs_2.7.0-14.dsc to pool/main/g/gclcvs/gclcvs_2.7.0-14.dsc gclcvs_2.7.0-14.tar.gz to pool/main/g/gclcvs/gclcvs_2.7.0-14.tar.gz gclcvs_2.7.0-14_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gclcvs/gclcvs_2.7.0-14_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated gclcvs package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 15:43:07 + Source: gclcvs Binary: gclcvs gclcvs-doc Architecture: source all i386 Version: 2.7.0-14 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: gclcvs - GNU Common Lisp compiler, CVS snapshot gclcvs-doc - Documentation for GNU Common Lisp, CVS snapshot Closes: 204789 217484 Changes: gclcvs (2.7.0-14) unstable; urgency=low . * Portability patches to makefiles to support non-GNU grep (no -q),
Re: Bug#217355: acknowledged by developer (fixed)
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 05:26:32PM +, Colin Watson wrote: > On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 06:22:11PM +0100, Hervé Eychenne wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 01:47:14AM +, Colin Watson wrote: > > > Anyway, just wait a bit and it'll be fine, or download the older version > > > of locales by hand. It's not difficult. > > > > While waiting or downgrading is an option, I simply insist on the fact > > that this problem shouldn't issue _at all_, and that it should be > > fixed by preventing this from happening. > If you don't want this to happen, use testing rather than unstable. It's > designed to insulate you from (most of) these kinds of problems. Always the same answer... Instead of telling "use at your own risk", shouldn't we simply try to solve known problems? There are some good reasons I'm forced to run Debian unstable, believe me. Why should I (and potentially many others) be annoyed by things that seem to be easily be avoidable with a little more fine-grained handling? Herve -- _ (°= Hervé Eychenne //) Homepage: http://www.eychenne.org/ v_/_ WallFire project: http://www.wallfire.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#219459: NPTL breaks abort()
Package: libc6
Severity: important
This may turn out to be a gdb bug, but let's start here...
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat foo.c
int main(void)
{
abort();
}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gcc -o foo foo.c
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ./foo
Aborted (core dumped)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gdb foo core
GNU gdb 6.0-debian
Copyright 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions.
Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "i386-linux"...
Core was generated by `./foo'.
Program terminated with signal 6, Aborted.
warning: current_sos: Can't read pathname for load map: Input/output error
Reading symbols from /lib/tls/libc.so.6...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/tls/libc.so.6
Reading symbols from /lib/ld-linux.so.2...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/ld-linux.so.2
#0 0x4004cd89 in raise () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
(gdb) bt
#0 0x4004cd89 in raise () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
#1 0x40158f70 in ?? () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
#2 0xb7c0 in ?? ()
#3 0x4004e5e1 in abort () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
(gdb) q
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1 ./foo
Aborted (core dumped)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gdb foo core
GNU gdb 6.0-debian
Copyright 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions.
Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "i386-linux"...
Core was generated by `./foo'.
Program terminated with signal 6, Aborted.
warning: current_sos: Can't read pathname for load map: Input/output error
Reading symbols from /lib/libc.so.6...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libc.so.6
Reading symbols from /lib/ld-linux.so.2...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/ld-linux.so.2
#0 0x4004c551 in kill () from /lib/libc.so.6
(gdb) bt
#0 0x4004c551 in kill () from /lib/libc.so.6
#1 0x4004c2f5 in raise () from /lib/libc.so.6
#2 0x4004d7e8 in abort () from /lib/libc.so.6
#3 0x08048359 in main ()
(gdb) q
Note how when using the NPTL version of the library, the stack trace
does not contain the caller of abort() or anything that preceeded it;
this makes abort() mostly useless, and the generated core dump
entirely useless.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: Bug#217355: acknowledged by developer (fixed)
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 01:47:14AM +, Colin Watson wrote: > On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 02:28:48AM +0100, Hervé Eychenne wrote: > > Colin Watson wrote: > > > Architecture: all packages such as locales are only built on one > > > architecture, but used by all architectures regardless of whether the > > > rest of the source package has been built for them. This saves all the > > > build daemons having to build identical packages. > > It seems I'm facing this same problem again: > > > > --- > > # apt-get install locales > [...] > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > > locales: Depends: glibc-2.3.2.ds1-10 but it is not installable > > E: Broken packages > > > > --- > > > > I understand the reasons why it occurs, but something should _really_ > > be done to avoid that many people like me should face this problem > > again. Just think about the cumulated time all these people will > > lose... > Why are you mailing me? I don't maintain glibc. Sorry, I mailed that to you because I'm not a debian developper myself, and you were talking about this. (glibc maintainers now Cc'ed) > Anyway, just wait a bit and it'll be fine, or download the older version > of locales by hand. It's not difficult. While waiting or downgrading is an option, I simply insist on the fact that this problem shouldn't issue _at all_, and that it should be fixed by preventing this from happening. Thanks, Hervé -- _ (°= Hervé Eychenne //) Homepage: http://www.eychenne.org/ v_/_ WallFire project: http://www.wallfire.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#204789: [Gcl-devel] Re: ia64 function descriptors and unexec
Greetings, and thank you again for your vital feedback. The solution I've just implemented would have been impossible without it. I'm pleased to announce a just-committed resolution to this issue, bringing stability to gcl/maxima/acl2/axiom on ia64 and any future platform like it which may use dynamic function descriptors. (I've heard hpux and ppc64 are in the same category already). There is now a #define switch STATIC_FUNCTION_POINTERS which will ensure that all C defined functions installed into lisp as pointers are static. We were *very* fortunate that compiled lisp code did not have to be changed at all -- only the files in the o/ subdirectory, by in large. I'm uploading new .debs for 2.6.1 and cvs which will close the two bug reports pertinent to this issue. Take care, Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > When I first read this, I was more confused by the meaning of the term > > 'local' and what I've been seeing. > > Which is understandable, because I was confused, too. What you are > saying is correct. > > Andreas. > > -- > Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg > Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 > "And now for something completely different." > > > -- Camm Maguire[EMAIL PROTECTED] == "The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah
Re: Bug#217355: acknowledged by developer (fixed)
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 06:22:11PM +0100, Hervé Eychenne wrote: > On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 01:47:14AM +, Colin Watson wrote: > > Anyway, just wait a bit and it'll be fine, or download the older version > > of locales by hand. It's not difficult. > > While waiting or downgrading is an option, I simply insist on the fact > that this problem shouldn't issue _at all_, and that it should be > fixed by preventing this from happening. If you don't want this to happen, use testing rather than unstable. It's designed to insulate you from (most of) these kinds of problems. Cheers, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#204789: [Gcl-devel] Re: ia64 function descriptors and unexec
Greetings, and thank you again for your vital feedback. The solution I've just implemented would have been impossible without it. I'm pleased to announce a just-committed resolution to this issue, bringing stability to gcl/maxima/acl2/axiom on ia64 and any future platform like it which may use dynamic function descriptors. (I've heard hpux and ppc64 are in the same category already). There is now a #define switch STATIC_FUNCTION_POINTERS which will ensure that all C defined functions installed into lisp as pointers are static. We were *very* fortunate that compiled lisp code did not have to be changed at all -- only the files in the o/ subdirectory, by in large. I'm uploading new .debs for 2.6.1 and cvs which will close the two bug reports pertinent to this issue. Take care, Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > When I first read this, I was more confused by the meaning of the term > > 'local' and what I've been seeing. > > Which is understandable, because I was confused, too. What you are > saying is correct. > > Andreas. > > -- > Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg > Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 > "And now for something completely different." > > > -- Camm Maguire[EMAIL PROTECTED] == "The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#219428: linux-kernel-headers: patch for the bug
On Thursday 06 Nov 2003 20:19, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > There is no bug in the kernel headers. Undefining __STRICT_ANSI__ is a > terribly bad thing to do. Fix this by adding a #define inline __inline__ > below the #define asm __asm__, I suppose. Interestingly, plat_linux_cdda.c says: #undef __STRICT_ANSI__ #include /* ugly workaround for broken glibc shipped in SuSE 9.0 */ #define inline __inline__ #include #undef inline -- Amit Shah http://amitshah.nav.to/
Bug#219428: linux-kernel-headers: patch for the bug
On Thursday 06 Nov 2003 20:19, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > There is no bug in the kernel headers. Undefining __STRICT_ANSI__ is a > terribly bad thing to do. Fix this by adding a #define inline __inline__ > below the #define asm __asm__, I suppose. Interestingly, plat_linux_cdda.c says: #undef __STRICT_ANSI__ #include /* ugly workaround for broken glibc shipped in SuSE 9.0 */ #define inline __inline__ #include #undef inline -- Amit Shah http://amitshah.nav.to/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#219428: linux-kernel-headers: patch for the bug
On Thursday 06 Nov 2003 20:19, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > There is no bug in the kernel headers. Undefining __STRICT_ANSI__ is a > terribly bad thing to do. Fix this by adding a #define inline __inline__ > below the #define asm __asm__, I suppose. This issue has been noticed and discussed here: http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67269 (a bug had been filed for the kscd application). -- Amit Shah http://amitshah.nav.to/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#219428: linux-kernel-headers: patch for the bug
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 08:16:21PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> On Thursday 06 Nov 2003 19:42, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 07:26:05PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> > > Package: linux-kernel-headers
> > > Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-8
> > > Severity: normal
> > > Followup-For: Bug #219428
> > >
> > >
> > > --- byteorder.h.orig2003-11-06 19:23:14.0 +0530
> > > +++ byteorder.h 2003-11-06 19:23:24.0 +0530
> > > @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
> > >
> > > #if !defined (__STRICT_ANSI__)
> > >
> > > -static inline __u64 ___arch__swab64(__u64 val)
> > > +static __inline__ __u64 ___arch__swab64(__u64 val)
> > > {
> > > union {
> > > struct { __u32 a,b; } s;
> >
> > Need more information.
> >
> > Kdemultimedia, and the command line you posted, use -ansi.
> > __STRICT_ANSI__ should be defined.
>
> The concerned piece of code from plat_linux.c:
>
> /* needed for vanilla kernel headers, which do provide __u64 only
>for ansi */
> #undef __STRICT_ANSI__
> /* needed for non-ansi kernel headers */
> #define asm __asm__
> #include
> #include
> #undef asm
>
> I think a bug has been identified in the kernel headers; but is this usage
> correct?
There is no bug in the kernel headers. Undefining __STRICT_ANSI__ is a
terribly bad thing to do. Fix this by adding a #define inline __inline__
below the #define asm __asm__, I suppose.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#219428: linux-kernel-headers: patch for the bug
On Thursday 06 Nov 2003 19:42, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 07:26:05PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> > Package: linux-kernel-headers
> > Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-8
> > Severity: normal
> > Followup-For: Bug #219428
> >
> >
> > --- byteorder.h.orig2003-11-06 19:23:14.0 +0530
> > +++ byteorder.h 2003-11-06 19:23:24.0 +0530
> > @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
> >
> > #if !defined (__STRICT_ANSI__)
> >
> > -static inline __u64 ___arch__swab64(__u64 val)
> > +static __inline__ __u64 ___arch__swab64(__u64 val)
> > {
> > union {
> > struct { __u32 a,b; } s;
>
> Need more information.
>
> Kdemultimedia, and the command line you posted, use -ansi.
> __STRICT_ANSI__ should be defined.
The concerned piece of code from plat_linux.c:
/* needed for vanilla kernel headers, which do provide __u64 only
for ansi */
#undef __STRICT_ANSI__
/* needed for non-ansi kernel headers */
#define asm __asm__
#include
#include
#undef asm
I think a bug has been identified in the kernel headers; but is this usage
correct?
--
Amit Shah
http://amitshah.nav.to/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#219428: /usr/include/asm/byteorder.h:42: error: syntax error before "__u64"
On Thursday 06 Nov 2003 19:22, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 07:11:42PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote: > > Package: linux-kernel-headers > > Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-6 > > Severity: important > > Try -8 please. doesn't help; I've posted the patch though (in a separate message) -- Amit Shah http://amitshah.nav.to/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#219428: linux-kernel-headers: patch for the bug
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 07:26:05PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> Package: linux-kernel-headers
> Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-8
> Severity: normal
> Followup-For: Bug #219428
>
>
> --- byteorder.h.orig2003-11-06 19:23:14.0 +0530
> +++ byteorder.h 2003-11-06 19:23:24.0 +0530
> @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
>
> #if !defined (__STRICT_ANSI__)
>
> -static inline __u64 ___arch__swab64(__u64 val)
> +static __inline__ __u64 ___arch__swab64(__u64 val)
> {
> union {
> struct { __u32 a,b; } s;
>
>
Need more information.
Kdemultimedia, and the command line you posted, use -ansi.
__STRICT_ANSI__ should be defined.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#219428: linux-kernel-headers: patch for the bug
Package: linux-kernel-headers
Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-8
Severity: normal
Followup-For: Bug #219428
--- byteorder.h.orig2003-11-06 19:23:14.0 +0530
+++ byteorder.h 2003-11-06 19:23:24.0 +0530
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
#if !defined (__STRICT_ANSI__)
-static inline __u64 ___arch__swab64(__u64 val)
+static __inline__ __u64 ___arch__swab64(__u64 val)
{
union {
struct { __u32 a,b; } s;
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux magrathea 2.6.0-test9 #1 Mon Oct 27 13:17:56 IST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
-- no debconf information
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#219428: /usr/include/asm/byteorder.h:42: error: syntax error before "__u64"
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 07:11:42PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote: > Package: linux-kernel-headers > Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-6 > Severity: important Try -8 please. > > While compiling kdemultimedia from source: > > > make[6]: Entering directory > `/home/Amit/sources/konstruct/kde/kdemultimedia/work/kdemultimedia-3.1.93/kscd/libwm' > if /bin/sh ../../libtool --silent --mode=compile cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. > -I. -I../.. -I/home/Amit/kde3.2-beta1/include -I/usr/X11R6/include > -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT -I/home/Amit/kde3.2-beta1/include > -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/home/Amit/kde3.2-beta1/include > -I/usr/X11R6/include -D_REENTRANT -ansi -W -Wall -Wchar-subscripts > -Wshadow -Wpointer-arith -Wmissing-prototypes -Wwrite-strings > -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D_BSD_SOURCE -O2 -I/home/Amit/kde3.2-beta1/include > -I/usr/X11R6/include -L/home/Amit/kde3.2-beta1/lib -L/usr/X11R6/lib -O2 > -pipe -I/home/Amit/kde3.2-beta1/include -I/usr/X11R6/include > -L/home/Amit/kde3.2-beta1/lib -L/usr/X11R6/lib -O2 -pipe > -Wformat-security -Wmissing-format-attribute -MT plat_linux.lo -MD -MP > -MF ".deps/plat_linux.Tpo" \ > -c -o plat_linux.lo `test -f 'plat_linux.c' || echo './'`plat_linux.c; > \ > then mv -f ".deps/plat_linux.Tpo" ".deps/plat_linux.Plo"; \ > else rm -f ".deps/plat_linux.Tpo"; exit 1; \ > fi > In file included from /usr/include/linux/cdrom.h:14, >from plat_linux.c:84: > /usr/include/asm/byteorder.h:42: error: syntax error > before "__u64" > plat_linux.c: In function `gen_init': > > This bug hasn't been resolved yet, it seems. > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: testing/unstable > Architecture: i386 > Kernel: Linux magrathea 2.6.0-test9 #1 Mon Oct 27 13:17:56 IST 2003 i686 > Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C > > -- no debconf information > > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mktime patch when ?
Hello, today i installed the testing deb package of glibc (2.3.2-9) and the mktime patch http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/gnulib/gnulib/lib/mktime.c.diff?r1=1.35&r2=1.36 is still not installed. Now mktime will still not work for dates < 1.1.1970. Could you please apply the patch in the next release of libc6 ? Obviously SuSe 9.0 has the patch installed in their libc6. Thanks, Sven Goldt -- Solidmedia Technologies GmbH Dipl.-Inf. Sven Goldt http://www.solidmedia.de Tel. +49-(0)700-0700-2121, Fax. +49-(0)700-0700-2121 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#219428: /usr/include/asm/byteorder.h:42: error: syntax error before "__u64"
Package: linux-kernel-headers Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-6 Severity: important While compiling kdemultimedia from source: make[6]: Entering directory `/home/Amit/sources/konstruct/kde/kdemultimedia/work/kdemultimedia-3.1.93/kscd/libwm' if /bin/sh ../../libtool --silent --mode=compile cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I/home/Amit/kde3.2-beta1/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT -I/home/Amit/kde3.2-beta1/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/home/Amit/kde3.2-beta1/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -D_REENTRANT -ansi -W -Wall -Wchar-subscripts -Wshadow -Wpointer-arith -Wmissing-prototypes -Wwrite-strings -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D_BSD_SOURCE -O2 -I/home/Amit/kde3.2-beta1/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -L/home/Amit/kde3.2-beta1/lib -L/usr/X11R6/lib -O2 -pipe -I/home/Amit/kde3.2-beta1/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -L/home/Amit/kde3.2-beta1/lib -L/usr/X11R6/lib -O2 -pipe -Wformat-security -Wmissing-format-attribute -MT plat_linux.lo -MD -MP -MF ".deps/plat_linux.Tpo" \ -c -o plat_linux.lo `test -f 'plat_linux.c' || echo './'`plat_linux.c; \ then mv -f ".deps/plat_linux.Tpo" ".deps/plat_linux.Plo"; \ else rm -f ".deps/plat_linux.Tpo"; exit 1; \ fi In file included from /usr/include/linux/cdrom.h:14, from plat_linux.c:84: /usr/include/asm/byteorder.h:42: error: syntax error before "__u64" plat_linux.c: In function `gen_init': This bug hasn't been resolved yet, it seems. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux magrathea 2.6.0-test9 #1 Mon Oct 27 13:17:56 IST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#219102: libc6: IBM JDK 1.3.1 core dumps
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 15:20, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > Or do you mean that this is a bug that can't be fixed because it's > > present in the JDK via static linking or simliar, and not in glibc? > > That's correct. It's a problem in the JDK, and one of the changes in > later versions was to fix it. Sorry I wasn't clear. I've downloaded the latest 1.3 JRE from IBM, and it still segfaults at JVM startup. It works fine with libc6 2.3.2-9, it crashes with 2.3.2.ds1-9. VM Version: Classic VM (build 1.3.1, J2RE 1.3.1 IBM build cxia32131-20030618 (JIT enabled: jitc)) And stack trace: #0 0x4034ce39 in allocGuardPage () at /userlvl/cxia32131/obj/x86_linux_2/jvm/sov/xe/mmi/mmi_invokers.s:2279 #1 0x4034d1fd in xeThreadInit () at /userlvl/cxia32131/obj/x86_linux_2/jvm/sov/xe/mmi/mmi_invokers.s:2279 #2 0x4034edde in eeInitNewThis () at /userlvl/cxia32131/obj/x86_linux_2/jvm/sov/xe/mmi/mmi_invokers.s:2279 #3 0x40354146 in xmInitializeJVM () at /userlvl/cxia32131/obj/x86_linux_2/jvm/sov/xe/mmi/mmi_invokers.s:2279 #4 0x40265d69 in ciCreateJVM () from /home/pnagy/newroot/opt/IBMJava2-131/jre/bin/classic/libjvm.so #5 0x40270136 in JNI_CreateJavaVM () from /home/pnagy/newroot/opt/IBMJava2-131/jre/bin/classic/libjvm.so #6 0x080499ae in InitializeJVM () #7 0x08049038 in main () I've found some reports that this JVM also crashes on RedHat 9 with the same stacktrace. It does tell a workaround with LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5, which forces glibc to use the old pthreads instead of NPTL. http://www.mainframeforum.com/t584476.html This workaround doesn't work on my debian, though :-) Actually, the IBM java startup scripts _do_ contain code that sets LD_ASSUME_KERNEL. It just doesn't work for us. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#219025: acknowledged by developer (Bug#219025: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-10)
Please excuse my ignorance, but how do I install this update? I can't install or remove anything using apt-get due to libc6 failing on the ldconfig fault. Do I just need to do apt-get update & dist-upgrade but first modify the sources.list to pick the new files up? Do I just download the deb file and run dpkg -i debfile? Which deb file do I need to download and where would it be located? uname -a Linux . 2.2.20-idepci #1 Sat Apr 20 12:45:19 EST 2002 i686 GNU/Linux Cheers. - Original Message - From: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "debbugreport" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 6:35 PM Subject: Bug#219025 acknowledged by developer (Bug#219025: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-10) > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report > #219025: libc6 upgrade broke ldconfig, > which was filed against the libc6 package. > > It has been closed by one of the developers, namely > Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > > Their explanation is attached below. If this explanation is > unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate > message then please contact the developer, by replying to this email. > > Debian bug tracking system administrator > (administrator, Debian Bugs database) > > Received: (at 219025-close) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Nov 2003 18:24:38 + > From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 05 12:24:38 2003 > Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] > by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) > id 1AHSKc-00078P-00; Wed, 05 Nov 2003 12:24:38 -0600 > Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) > id 1AHSF1-sc-00; Wed, 05 Nov 2003 13:18:51 -0500 > From: Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > X-Katie: $Revision: 1.42 $ > Subject: Bug#219025: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-10 > Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 13:18:51 -0500 > Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Source: glibc > Source-Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10 > > We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of > glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: > > glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-10_all.deb > to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-10_all.deb > glibc_2.3.2.ds1-10.diff.gz > to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-10.diff.gz > glibc_2.3.2.ds1-10.dsc > to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-10.dsc > libc-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-10_ia64.udeb > to pool/main/g/glibc/libc-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-10_ia64.udeb > libc6.1-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-10_ia64.deb > to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6.1-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-10_ia64.deb > libc6.1-dev_2.3.2.ds1-10_ia64.deb > to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6.1-dev_2.3.2.ds1-10_ia64.deb > libc6.1-pic_2.3.2.ds1-10_ia64.deb > to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6.1-pic_2.3.2.ds1-10_ia64.deb > libc6.1-prof_2.3.2.ds1-10_ia64.deb > to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6.1-prof_2.3.2.ds1-10_ia64.deb > libc6.1_2.3.2.ds1-10_ia64.deb > to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6.1_2.3.2.ds1-10_ia64.deb > locales_2.3.2.ds1-10_all.deb > to pool/main/g/glibc/locales_2.3.2.ds1-10_all.deb > nscd_2.3.2.ds1-10_ia64.deb > to pool/main/g/glibc/nscd_2.3.2.ds1-10_ia64.deb > > > > A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is > attached. > > Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you > have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], > and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. > > Debian distribution maintenance software > pp. > Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated glibc package) > > (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you > believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive > administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Format: 1.7 > Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 10:53:14 -0500 > Source: glibc > Binary: libc6.1-prof libc6-i686 libc1 libc0.3-pic locales glibc-doc libc6-pic libc-udeb libc1-prof libc0.3 libc0.3-dbg libc6.1-dev libc1-pic libc6-s390x libc6-prof libc1-dbg libc6-dev-sparc64 libc6 libc0.3-dev libc6-dbg nscd libc6.1-dbg libc6.1-pic libc6-sparc64 libc6-dev libc0.3-prof libc6-sparcv9 libc6.1 libc6-dev-s390x libc1-dev > Architecture: source ia64 all > Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10 > Distribution: unstable > Urgency: low > Maintainer: GNU Libc Maintainers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Changed-By: Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Description: > glibc-doc - GNU C Library: Documentation > libc-udeb - GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone data - udeb (udeb) > libc6.1- GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone data > libc6.1-dbg - GNU C Library: Libraries with debugging symbols > libc6.1-dev - GNU C Library: Development Libraries and Header Files > libc6.1-pic - GNU C Library: PIC archive library > libc6.1-prof - GNU C Library: Profiling Libraries > locales- GNU C Library: National Language (locale) data [support] > nscd - GNU C
Bug#219356: I also think libc6-i586 would be useful
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 10:07:27PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 11:21:16PM -0200, Cesar Eduardo Barros wrote: > > > > libc6-i686 won't work in a K6. An libc6-i586 would be useful for using > > NPTL on a i586 (if it works, I recall at least Gentoo's glibc didn't > > compile NTPL in a i586. I recall seeing somewhere it needed a couple of > > small patches to work). > > > > If NPTL works correctly in a 486, a libc6-i486 could be used instead of > > a libc6-i586 (but I don't think enough people use a 486-class machine > > nowadays for it to make sense; I see lots of Pentiums, Pentiums MMX and > > K6s but few 486s around here). > > The NPTL libraries included with the main libc6 package are already > optimized for i486. Doing them for i586 instead would be a little > tricky. > Ah, so the main libc6 packages already have NPTL? I don't need to install libc6-i686 to get NPTL? Cool (you should make that more obvious in the package description for libc6-i686, that you do not need it for NPTL). -- Cesar Eduardo Barros [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
