nimble

[Everett Magee]

Lam,

Govenment don't want me to sell
UndergroundCD !Check Your spouse and staff
Investigate Your Own CREDIT-HISTORY
hacking someone PC!
Disappear in your city
bannedcd2004

http://www.9001hosting.com/cd/

narcosis,very clever!' thought.

nimble

[Everett Magee]

Lam,

Govenment don't want me to sell
UndergroundCD !Check Your spouse and staff
Investigate Your Own CREDIT-HISTORY
hacking someone PC!
Disappear in your city
bannedcd2004

http://www.9001hosting.com/cd/

narcosis,very clever!' thought.

Bug#245337: Processed: Re: Bug#245337 acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#245337: locales package does not seem to obay Debconf configuration)

[Jerry Haltom]

That's why in my message I described doing a diff
between /etc/locale.gen and /etc/locale.gen.orig or similar to determine
what was changed in /etc/locale.gen. Am I missing something?

On Fri, 2004-04-23 at 09:39 +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At Thu, 22 Apr 2004 18:55:11 -0500,
> Jerry Haltom wrote:
> > Read the text of the control submission. I probably should have attached
> > a seperate post.
> 
> Then read Denis's mail.  It's hard to distinguish which should be
> adopted if /etc/locale.gen and debconf setting are inconsistent,
> AFAIK.
> 
> Regards,
> -- gotom
-- 
Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

Bug#245029: Acknowledgement (libc6: SIGSEGV in getgrouplist()/getpwnam())

[Matt Zimmerman]

On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 09:30:50AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:

> At Fri, 23 Apr 2004 01:11:15 +0200,
> BUCHMULLER Norbert wrote:
> > > Isn't it CAN-2003-0689? (I have not seen that fixed in libc6's
> > 
> > It _is_.
> 
> I didn't know this bug before...
> Debian security team, could you look at it?

Yes, this is not a new bug...however I do not consider it to have genuine
security impact.  In order to be triggered, a user must be a member of an
unusually large number of groups (not under user's control), and in order to
be exploited, the group names (not under user's control) would need to be
manipulated.

So the only attack vector I see is "user can cause some programs to crash by
asking the sysadmin to add him to a large number of groups".

This bug has been seen to cause problems with, e.g., samba in real-world
situations, though, so it might be worth fixing in an upload to
proposed-updates.

-- 
 - mdz

Bug#245337: Processed: Re: Bug#245337 acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#245337: locales package does not seem to obay Debconf configuration)

[GOTO Masanori]

At Thu, 22 Apr 2004 18:55:11 -0500,
Jerry Haltom wrote:
> Read the text of the control submission. I probably should have attached
> a seperate post.

Then read Denis's mail.  It's hard to distinguish which should be
adopted if /etc/locale.gen and debconf setting are inconsistent,
AFAIK.

Regards,
-- gotom

Processed: Re: Bug#245029: Acknowledgement (libc6: SIGSEGV in getgrouplist()/getpwnam())

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 245029 woody
Bug#245029: libc6: SIGSEGV in getgrouplist()/getpwnam()
There were no tags set.
Tags added: woody

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#245029: Acknowledgement (libc6: SIGSEGV in getgrouplist()/getpwnam())

[GOTO Masanori]

tags 245029 woody
thanks

At Fri, 23 Apr 2004 01:11:15 +0200,
BUCHMULLER Norbert wrote:
> > Isn't it CAN-2003-0689? (I have not seen that fixed in libc6's
> 
> It _is_.

I didn't know this bug before...
Debian security team, could you look at it?

> http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101691 states that
> 2.2.5 is affected, and, that the bug is in libc/grp/initgroups.c, and that
> the revision that fixes the bug is 1.29.
> 
> From the CVS log
> (http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/libc/grp/initgroups.c?cvsroot=glibc)
> I see that the fix was done in 1.29 indeed, and having a look at the diff
> between 1.29 and 1.28 revealed that Debian's 2.2.5-11.5 has revision 1.28
> of that file, not 1.29.

Debian woody glibc has revision 1.26.

> Now it is clear that this bug is the same as in CAN-2003-0689. Debian is
> still vulnerable. :-(
> 
> Please fix it. Thanks.

The below patch is diff between 1.26 and 1.29, retrieved from above
CVS web.  The line "__attribute_hidden" and "__libc_fatal" part should
be deleted for fixing woody's glibc, though.


===
RCS file: /cvs/glibc/libc/grp/initgroups.c,v
retrieving revision 1.26
retrieving revision 1.29
diff -u -r1.26 -r1.29
--- libc/grp/initgroups.c   2001/07/06 04:54:46 1.26
+++ libc/grp/initgroups.c   2003/04/23 21:26:34 1.29
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/* Copyright (C) 1989,91,93,1996-1999,2000,01 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+/* Copyright (C) 1989,91,93,1996-2002, 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This file is part of the GNU C Library.
 
The GNU C Library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
 #include 
 #include 
 #include 
+#include 
 #include 
 #include 
 
@@ -45,7 +46,7 @@
   void **fctp);
 extern void *__nss_lookup_function (service_user *ni, const char *fct_name);
 
-extern service_user *__nss_group_database;
+extern service_user *__nss_group_database attribute_hidden;
 
 static enum nss_status
 compat_call (service_user *nip, const char *user, gid_t group, long int *start,
@@ -176,7 +177,7 @@
 
   /* This is really only for debugging.  */
   if (NSS_STATUS_TRYAGAIN > status || status > NSS_STATUS_RETURN)
-   __libc_fatal ("illegal status in " __FUNCTION__);
+   __libc_fatal ("illegal status in internal_getgrouplist");
 
   if (status != NSS_STATUS_SUCCESS
  && nss_next_action (nip, status) == NSS_ACTION_RETURN)
@@ -207,6 +208,9 @@
 return -1;
 
   result = internal_getgrouplist (user, group, &size, &newgroups, -1);
+
+  memcpy (groups, newgroups, MIN (*ngroups, result) * sizeof (gid_t));
+
   if (result > *ngroups)
 {
   *ngroups = result;
@@ -214,8 +218,6 @@
 }
   else
 *ngroups = result;
-  
-  memcpy (groups, newgroups, *ngroups * sizeof (gid_t));
 
   free (newgroups);
   return result;


Regards,
-- gotom

Bug#245337: Processed: Re: Bug#245337 acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#245337: locales package does not seem to obay Debconf configuration)

[Jerry Haltom]

Read the text of the control submission. I probably should have attached
a seperate post.

Bug#245337: Processed: Re: Bug#245337 acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#245337: locales package does not seem to obay Debconf configuration)

[GOTO Masanori]

At Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:03:04 -0700,
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> 
> > reopen 245337
> Bug#245337: locales package does not seem to obay Debconf configuration
> Bug reopened, originator not changed.

You must explain why Denis' opinion is not suitable for you before
actual reopen.  If you don't say about your opinion, it's hard for us
to dig your problem.

Regards,
-- gotom

Re: Bug#208238: marked as done (locales: wrong charset for et_EE)

[GOTO Masanori]

At Thu, 22 Apr 2004 23:57:03 +0200,
Denis Barbier wrote:
> The attached dpatch was used to close this bug.  But its comment is not
> accurate, this dpatch adds a et_EE.ISO-8859-15 locale (and is then
> identical to upstream fix) whereas bug log and dpatch comment seem
> to imply that et_EE charset was changed from ISO-8859-1 to ISO-8859-15.
> 
> Denis
> [2 locale-et_EE.dpatch ]
> #! /bin/sh -e
> 
> # All lines beginning with `# DP:' are a description of the patch.
> # DP: Description: List et_EE with charset ISO-8859-15 as a supported locale

"Change default charset for et_EE locale from ISO-8859-1 to ISO-8859-15."
is acceptable?

Regards,
-- gotom

mob

[Everett]

Mayfield,

Online Doctorxx!
up to 70% of the best pain killers out!
and other popular meds..valiumXanaxCialis !!

http://www.techbshels320meds.biz/b32/

--
misanthrope,delight in patches. 

Bug#245029: Acknowledgement (libc6: SIGSEGV in getgrouplist()/getpwnam())

[BUCHMULLER Norbert]

On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 12:47:58 +0200
BUCHMULLER Norbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Isn't it CAN-2003-0689? (I have not seen that fixed in libc6's

It _is_.

http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101691 states that
2.2.5 is affected, and, that the bug is in libc/grp/initgroups.c, and that
the revision that fixes the bug is 1.29.

>From the CVS log
(http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/libc/grp/initgroups.c?cvsro
ot=glibc)
I see that the fix was done in 1.29 indeed, and having a look at the diff
between 1.29 and 1.28 revealed that Debian's 2.2.5-11.5 has revision 1.28
of that file, not 1.29.

Now it is clear that this bug is the same as in CAN-2003-0689. Debian is
still vulnerable. :-(

Please fix it. Thanks.

norbi

Processed: Re: Bug#245337 acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#245337: locales package does not seem to obay Debconf configuration)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reopen 245337
Bug#245337: locales package does not seem to obay Debconf configuration
Bug reopened, originator not changed.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#245337: Processed: Re: Bug#245337 acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#245337: locales package does not seem to obay Debconf configuration)

[Jerry Haltom]

That's why in my message I described doing a diff
between /etc/locale.gen and /etc/locale.gen.orig or similar to determine
what was changed in /etc/locale.gen. Am I missing something?

On Fri, 2004-04-23 at 09:39 +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At Thu, 22 Apr 2004 18:55:11 -0500,
> Jerry Haltom wrote:
> > Read the text of the control submission. I probably should have attached
> > a seperate post.
> 
> Then read Denis's mail.  It's hard to distinguish which should be
> adopted if /etc/locale.gen and debconf setting are inconsistent,
> AFAIK.
> 
> Regards,
> -- gotom
-- 
Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#245029: Acknowledgement (libc6: SIGSEGV in getgrouplist()/getpwnam())

[Matt Zimmerman]

On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 09:30:50AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:

> At Fri, 23 Apr 2004 01:11:15 +0200,
> BUCHMULLER Norbert wrote:
> > > Isn't it CAN-2003-0689? (I have not seen that fixed in libc6's
> > 
> > It _is_.
> 
> I didn't know this bug before...
> Debian security team, could you look at it?

Yes, this is not a new bug...however I do not consider it to have genuine
security impact.  In order to be triggered, a user must be a member of an
unusually large number of groups (not under user's control), and in order to
be exploited, the group names (not under user's control) would need to be
manipulated.

So the only attack vector I see is "user can cause some programs to crash by
asking the sysadmin to add him to a large number of groups".

This bug has been seen to cause problems with, e.g., samba in real-world
situations, though, so it might be worth fixing in an upload to
proposed-updates.

-- 
 - mdz


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#245337: Processed: Re: Bug#245337 acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#245337: locales package does not seem to obay Debconf configuration)

[GOTO Masanori]

At Thu, 22 Apr 2004 18:55:11 -0500,
Jerry Haltom wrote:
> Read the text of the control submission. I probably should have attached
> a seperate post.

Then read Denis's mail.  It's hard to distinguish which should be
adopted if /etc/locale.gen and debconf setting are inconsistent,
AFAIK.

Regards,
-- gotom


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#245029: Acknowledgement (libc6: SIGSEGV in getgrouplist()/getpwnam())

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 245029 woody
Bug#245029: libc6: SIGSEGV in getgrouplist()/getpwnam()
There were no tags set.
Tags added: woody

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#245029: Acknowledgement (libc6: SIGSEGV in getgrouplist()/getpwnam())

[GOTO Masanori]

tags 245029 woody
thanks

At Fri, 23 Apr 2004 01:11:15 +0200,
BUCHMULLER Norbert wrote:
> > Isn't it CAN-2003-0689? (I have not seen that fixed in libc6's
> 
> It _is_.

I didn't know this bug before...
Debian security team, could you look at it?

> http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101691 states that
> 2.2.5 is affected, and, that the bug is in libc/grp/initgroups.c, and that
> the revision that fixes the bug is 1.29.
> 
> From the CVS log
> (http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/libc/grp/initgroups.c?cvsroot=glibc)
> I see that the fix was done in 1.29 indeed, and having a look at the diff
> between 1.29 and 1.28 revealed that Debian's 2.2.5-11.5 has revision 1.28
> of that file, not 1.29.

Debian woody glibc has revision 1.26.

> Now it is clear that this bug is the same as in CAN-2003-0689. Debian is
> still vulnerable. :-(
> 
> Please fix it. Thanks.

The below patch is diff between 1.26 and 1.29, retrieved from above
CVS web.  The line "__attribute_hidden" and "__libc_fatal" part should
be deleted for fixing woody's glibc, though.


===
RCS file: /cvs/glibc/libc/grp/initgroups.c,v
retrieving revision 1.26
retrieving revision 1.29
diff -u -r1.26 -r1.29
--- libc/grp/initgroups.c   2001/07/06 04:54:46 1.26
+++ libc/grp/initgroups.c   2003/04/23 21:26:34 1.29
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/* Copyright (C) 1989,91,93,1996-1999,2000,01 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+/* Copyright (C) 1989,91,93,1996-2002, 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This file is part of the GNU C Library.
 
The GNU C Library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
 #include 
 #include 
 #include 
+#include 
 #include 
 #include 
 
@@ -45,7 +46,7 @@
   void **fctp);
 extern void *__nss_lookup_function (service_user *ni, const char *fct_name);
 
-extern service_user *__nss_group_database;
+extern service_user *__nss_group_database attribute_hidden;
 
 static enum nss_status
 compat_call (service_user *nip, const char *user, gid_t group, long int *start,
@@ -176,7 +177,7 @@
 
   /* This is really only for debugging.  */
   if (NSS_STATUS_TRYAGAIN > status || status > NSS_STATUS_RETURN)
-   __libc_fatal ("illegal status in " __FUNCTION__);
+   __libc_fatal ("illegal status in internal_getgrouplist");
 
   if (status != NSS_STATUS_SUCCESS
  && nss_next_action (nip, status) == NSS_ACTION_RETURN)
@@ -207,6 +208,9 @@
 return -1;
 
   result = internal_getgrouplist (user, group, &size, &newgroups, -1);
+
+  memcpy (groups, newgroups, MIN (*ngroups, result) * sizeof (gid_t));
+
   if (result > *ngroups)
 {
   *ngroups = result;
@@ -214,8 +218,6 @@
 }
   else
 *ngroups = result;
-  
-  memcpy (groups, newgroups, *ngroups * sizeof (gid_t));
 
   free (newgroups);
   return result;


Regards,
-- gotom


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#245337: Processed: Re: Bug#245337 acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#245337: locales package does not seem to obay Debconf configuration)

[Jerry Haltom]

Read the text of the control submission. I probably should have attached
a seperate post.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#245337: Processed: Re: Bug#245337 acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#245337: locales package does not seem to obay Debconf configuration)

[GOTO Masanori]

At Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:03:04 -0700,
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> 
> > reopen 245337
> Bug#245337: locales package does not seem to obay Debconf configuration
> Bug reopened, originator not changed.

You must explain why Denis' opinion is not suitable for you before
actual reopen.  If you don't say about your opinion, it's hard for us
to dig your problem.

Regards,
-- gotom


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#245337: marked as done (locales package does not seem to obay Debconf configuration)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 23:04:12 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#245337: locales package does not seem to obay Debconf 
configuration
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 16:24:33 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 09:24:33 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from jack.feedbackplusinc.com [64.25.11.70] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGh05-0001Dg-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 09:24:33 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by jack.feedbackplusinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 316178FF78; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 11:24:02 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from jack.feedbackplusinc.com ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (jack [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
id 20258-10; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 11:24:00 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from station-1.internal.feedbackplusinc.com (unknown [10.0.0.16])
by jack.feedbackplusinc.com (Postfix) with SMTP
id 9729D8FE0B; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 11:23:59 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by station-1.internal.feedbackplusinc.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); 
Thu, 22 Apr 2004 11:23:59 -0500
From: "Jerry Haltom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: locales package does not seem to obay Debconf configuration
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.56
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 11:23:59 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Package: locales
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-11
Severity: normal

We are trying to set our office's locale settings by changing the debconf 
setting locales/locales_to_be_generated to be a properly formed list of locales 
that should be generated. However, the locales package ignores our settings, 
and overrides the selections in the actual multiselect combo box with the 
actual contents of /etc/locale.gen. This prevents usage of Debconf to properly 
configure these questions non-interactively.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (700, 'unstable'), (600, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.4
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8

Versions of packages locales depends on:
ii  debconf 1.4.22   Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6 [glibc-2.3.2.ds1-11]  2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

-- debconf information:
* locales/default_environment_locale: en_US.UTF-8
* locales/locales_to_be_generated: en_US ISO-8859-1, en_US.UTF-8 UTF-8

---
Received: (at 245337-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 21:01:41 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 14:01:41 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp-104-thursday.noc.nerim.net (mallaury.noc.nerim.net) 
[62.4.17.104] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGlKH-0006rk-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 14:01:41 -0700
Received: from localhost.localdomain (sinibar.net1.nerim.net [62.4.18.43])
by mallaury.noc.nerim.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03A6A62D99
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 23:01:33 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 4147C23EDD; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 23:04:12 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 23:04:12 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#245337: locales package does not seem to obay Debconf 
configuration
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Denis Barbier)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 11:23:59AM -0500, Jerry Halt

Re: Bug#208238: marked as done (locales: wrong charset for et_EE)

[Denis Barbier]

The attached dpatch was used to close this bug.  But its comment is not
accurate, this dpatch adds a et_EE.ISO-8859-15 locale (and is then
identical to upstream fix) whereas bug log and dpatch comment seem
to imply that et_EE charset was changed from ISO-8859-1 to ISO-8859-15.

Denis
#! /bin/sh -e

# All lines beginning with `# DP:' are a description of the patch.
# DP: Description: List et_EE with charset ISO-8859-15 as a supported locale
# DP: Related bugs: #208238
# DP: Dpatch author: Petter Reinholdtsen
# DP: Patch author: Petter Reinholdtsen
# DP: Upstream status: In CVS
# DP: Status Details: http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118
# DP: Date: 2004-04-18

PATCHLEVEL=0

if [ $# -ne 2 ]; then
echo >&2 "`basename $0`: script expects -patch|-unpatch as argument"
exit 1
fi
case "$1" in
-patch) patch -d "$2" -f --no-backup-if-mismatch -p$PATCHLEVEL < $0;;
-unpatch) patch -d "$2" -f --no-backup-if-mismatch -R -p$PATCHLEVEL < $0;;
*)
echo >&2 "`basename $0`: script expects -patch|-unpatch as argument"
exit 1
esac
exit 0

# append the patch here and adjust the -p? flag in the patch calls.

2004-04-17  Petter Reinholdtsen  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

* locales/et_EE: Change default charset for et_EE locale from
ISO-8859-1 to ISO-8859-15, to reflect the content of
http://www.eki.ee/itstandard/contents.html>.  Based on input
from Indrek Hein and Meelis Roos.
* SUPPORTED: Add et_EE.ISO-8859-15.

Index: localedata/SUPPORTED
===
RCS file: /cvs/glibc/libc/localedata/SUPPORTED,v
retrieving revision 1.68
diff -u -3 -p -u -r1.68 SUPPORTED
--- localedata/SUPPORTED19 Jan 2004 23:51:37 -  1.68
+++ localedata/SUPPORTED17 Apr 2004 18:10:04 -
@@ -161,6 +161,7 @@
 es_VE/ISO-8859-1 \
 et_EE.UTF-8/UTF-8 \
 et_EE/ISO-8859-1 \
+et_EE.ISO-8859-15/ISO-8859-15 \
 eu_ES.UTF-8/UTF-8 \
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]/UTF-8 \
 eu_ES/ISO-8859-1 \
Index: localedata/locales/et_EE
===
RCS file: /cvs/glibc/libc/localedata/locales/et_EE,v
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -3 -p -u -r1.11 et_EE
--- localedata/locales/et_EE6 Dec 2003 07:40:37 -   1.11
+++ localedata/locales/et_EE17 Apr 2004 18:10:05 -
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ comment_char %
 % Application: general
 % Users: general
 % Repertoiremap: mnemonic.ds
-% Charset: ISO-8859-1
+% Charset: ISO-8859-15
 % Distribution and use is free, also
 % for commercial purposes.
 

Bug#242546: marked as done (libc6-i686: Package description: unclear about 2.6 requirements)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:23 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#242546: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Apr 2004 10:29:06 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 07 03:29:06 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 233pc233.sshunet.nl (mordor.wolffelaar.nl) [131.211.233.233] 
(mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BBAIs-0001WU-00; Wed, 07 Apr 2004 03:29:06 -0700
Received: from jeroen by mordor.wolffelaar.nl with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1BBAIr-00026g-00; Wed, 07 Apr 2004 12:29:05 +0200
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 12:29:05 +0200
From: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libc6-i686: Package description: unclear about 2.6 requirements
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.54
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Scores: 1

Package: libc6-i686
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-11
Severity: minor

The package description says:
| This package includes support for NPTL.  The optimized libraries will
| not be used unless you are using a 2.6 kernel.

It is unclear (at least to me, so probably also to others) whether this
means that:

- optimized NPTL functions will only be used with 2.6 kernels, the rest
  will work with either 2.4 or 2.6

or,

- this whole package, libc6-i686, will only be used with 2.6 kernels

The two sentences are on the same paragraph (suggesting they are
related), but this is not clear from the wording...

--Jeroen

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.3
Locale: LANG=nl_NL.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nl_NL.UTF-8

Versions of packages libc6-i686 depends on:
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

-- no debconf information

-- 
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl

---
Received: (at 242546-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 20:38:13 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 13:38:13 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkxZ-0003CH-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:38:13 -0700
Received: from dsilvers by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkup-0003Sz-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:23 -0400
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#242546: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Daniel Silverstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:23 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 27

Source: glibc
Source-Version: 2.3.2.ds1-12

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
libc

Re: Bug#208238: marked as done (locales: wrong charset for et_EE)

[GOTO Masanori]

At Thu, 22 Apr 2004 23:57:03 +0200,
Denis Barbier wrote:
> The attached dpatch was used to close this bug.  But its comment is not
> accurate, this dpatch adds a et_EE.ISO-8859-15 locale (and is then
> identical to upstream fix) whereas bug log and dpatch comment seem
> to imply that et_EE charset was changed from ISO-8859-1 to ISO-8859-15.
> 
> Denis
> [2 locale-et_EE.dpatch ]
> #! /bin/sh -e
> 
> # All lines beginning with `# DP:' are a description of the patch.
> # DP: Description: List et_EE with charset ISO-8859-15 as a supported locale

"Change default charset for et_EE locale from ISO-8859-1 to ISO-8859-15."
is acceptable?

Regards,
-- gotom


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#241395: marked as done (libc6: preinst fails for kernel 2.4.23dual)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:23 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#241395: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Apr 2004 05:11:26 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 31 21:11:26 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mx5.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de [134.2.12.32] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B8uU9-0005hL-00; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 21:11:25 -0800
Received: from localhost (loopback [127.0.0.1])
by mx5.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 3FA8813E; Thu,  1 Apr 2004 07:10:54 +0200 (DFT)
Received: from mx5.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (mx5 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
 id 46196-03; Thu,  1 Apr 2004 07:10:52 +0200 (DFT)
Received: from dual (semeai.Informatik.Uni-Tuebingen.De [134.2.15.66])
by mx5.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 37187117; Thu,  1 Apr 2004 07:10:52 +0200 (DFT)
Received: from mrvn by dual with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1B8uTa-0001xb-00; Thu, 01 Apr 2004 07:10:50 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Goswin Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libc6: preinst fails for kernel 2.4.23dual
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.37
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2004 07:10:50 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new (McAfee AntiVirus) at 
informatik.uni-tuebingen.de
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-11
Severity: important

Hi,

running cdebootstrap I see the following error:

O: /var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/preinst: line 184: [: 23dual: integer expression 
expected

Looking at the preinst
--
if [ "$1" != abort-upgrade ] && [ "`uname -s`" = Linux ]
then
# Test to make sure z < 255, in x.y.z-n form of kernel version
kernel_rev=$(uname -r | awk -F '[.-]' '{print $3}')
if [ "$kernel_rev" -ge 255 ]
then
echo WARNING: Your kernel version indicates a revision number
echo of 255 or greater.  Glibc has a number of built in
echo assumptions that this revision number is less than 255.
echo If you\'ve built your own kernel, please make sure that any 
echo custom version numbers are appended to the upstream
echo kernel number with a dash or some other delimiter.

exit 1
fi
--
the problem becomes clear.

% uname -r
2.4.23dual

I have seen no ill effects from this in month so I guess glibc does a
scanf and gets 23 as revision number or I'm just plain lucky. Maybe I
should have used 2.4.23-dual but I didn't and glibc should cope with
that.

I guess the 'if [ "$kernel_rev" -ge 255 ]' should be true in this case
too, i.e. display the warning and exit 1, but giving an error on [ is
startling (Thats what I mean with cope. Doesn't have to work, just
give a helpfull message).

MfG
Goswin

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux dual 2.4.23dual #1 SMP Sun Dec 14 13:57:16 CET 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE

Versions of packages libc6 depends on:
ii  libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7The Berkeley database routines [gl

-- no debconf information


---
Received: (at 241395-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 20:40:17 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 13:40:17 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkzZ-0003ai-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:40:17 -0700
Received: from dsilvers by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkup-0003Sx-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:23 -0400
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#241395: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
Message

Bug#240654: marked as done ([INTL:tr] Turkish po-debconf translation)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:23 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#240654: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Mar 2004 15:24:24 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 28 07:24:24 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from samsun.omu.edu.tr [193.140.28.3] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B7c98-0006R6-00; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 07:24:23 -0800
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by samsun.omu.edu.tr (8.11.6/8.11.6) id i2SFNZO02200;
Sun, 28 Mar 2004 18:23:35 +0300
Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]])
by samsun.omu.edu.tr (8.11.6/8.11.6) id i2SFNUE02191;
Sun, 28 Mar 2004 18:23:30 +0300
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 18:23:41 +0300
From: Recai Oktas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [INTL:tr] Turkish po-debconf translation
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.43
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-11
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 


--3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-9
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: locales
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-11
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n

Please find attached the Turkish po-debconf translation.
(Thanks to Ercin EKER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)

Regards,

-- 
roktas

--3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-9
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="tr.po"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by samsun.omu.edu.tr id 
i2SFNZO02200

# Turkish translation of locales.
# This file is distributed under the same license as the locales package.
# Er=C3=A7in EKER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2004.
#
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: locales\n"
"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n"
"POT-Creation-Date: 2003-11-01 23:07-0500\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2004-03-28 18:15+0300\n"
"Last-Translator: Er=C3=A7in EKER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\n"
"Language-Team: T=C3=BCrk=C3=A7e \n=
"
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DUTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
"X-Generator: KBabel 1.3.1\n"
"Plural-Forms:  nplurals=3D1; plural=3D0;\n"

#. Type: multiselect
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:4
msgid "Select locales to be generated."
msgstr "Olu=C5=9Fturulacak yerelleri se=C3=A7in."

#. Type: multiselect
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:4
msgid ""
"Locale is a framework to switch between multiple languages for users who=
 can "
"select to use their language, country, characters, collation order, etc.=
"
msgstr ""
"Yerel (locale), kullan=C4=B1c=C4=B1lar=C4=B1n kullanmak istedi=C4=9Fi di=
l, =C3=BClke, karakter, s=C4=B1ralama =C5=9Fekli gibi dile "
"=C3=B6zg=C3=BC ayarlar aras=C4=B1nda kolayca ge=C3=A7i=C5=9F yapmas=C4=B1=
n=C4=B1 sa=C4=9Flayan bir yap=C4=B1d=C4=B1r."

#. Type: multiselect
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:4
msgid ""
"Choose which locales to generate.  The selection will be saved to `/etc/=
"
"locale.gen', which you can also edit manually (you need to run `locale-g=
en' "
"afterwards)."
msgstr ""
"Olu=C5=9Fturulacak yerelleri se=C3=A7iniz.  Yap=C4=B1lan se=C3=A7im '/et=
c/locale.gen' dosyas=C4=B1 i=C3=A7inde "
"saklanacakt=C4=B1r. Daha sonra bu dosyay=C4=B1 elle de=C4=9Fi=C5=9Ftireb=
ilirsiniz (bunu yapt=C4=B1ktan sonra "
"`locale-gen' komutunu =C3=A7al=C4=B1=C5=9Ft=C4=B1rman=C4=B1z gerekecekti=
r)."

#. Type: select
#. Choices
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:14
msgid "None, ${locales}"
msgstr "Hi=C3=A7biri, ${locales}"

#. Type: select
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:16
msgid "Which locale should be the default in the system environment?"
msgstr "Sistem i=C3=A7in =C3=B6ntan=C4=B1ml=C4=B1 yerel hangisi olacak?"

#. Type: select
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:16
msgid ""
"Many packages in Debian use locales to display text in the correct langu=
age "
"for users. You can change the default locale if you're not a native Engl=
i

Bug#234813: marked as done (libc6 postinst overmounted my /tmp)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:23 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#234813: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Feb 2004 22:35:19 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 25 14:35:19 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from chiark.greenend.org.uk [193.201.200.170] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Aw7cd-0002aq-00; Wed, 25 Feb 2004 14:35:19 -0800
Received: from [172.17.207.1] (helo=sfere.anjou.terraraq.org.uk ident=mail)
by chiark.greenend.org.uk (Debian Exim 3.35 #1) with esmtp
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
id 1Aw7cb-000403-00; Wed, 25 Feb 2004 22:35:17 +
Received: from richard by sfere.anjou.terraraq.org.uk with local (Exim 3.35 #1 
(Debian))
id 1Aw7cY-000624-00; Wed, 25 Feb 2004 22:35:14 +
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 22:35:14 +
X-Face: h[Hh-7npe
X-Mailer: Norman
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libc6 postinst overmounted my /tmp
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_22 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_22
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-11

I upgraded libc6 and found that /etc/init.d/mountkernfs had remounted
my /dev/shm, not noticing that it was already mounted.  The new mount
hid the old filesystem.  /dev/shm is actually a link to /tmp on my
system, which is why the detection didn't work.

This broke all sorts of things, e.g. new X connections (as
/tmp/.X11-unix was no longer visible.)  Fortunately umount did the
right thing.

Perhaps mountkernfs could be changed to use some more robust way of
detecting whether /dev/shm is already mounted - for instance, by
looking at the first column of 'df /dev/shm'.

ttfn/rjk

---
Received: (at 234813-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 20:38:16 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 13:38:16 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkxc-0003D5-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:38:16 -0700
Received: from dsilvers by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkup-0003Sj-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:23 -0400
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#234813: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Daniel Silverstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:23 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 23

Source: glibc
Source-Version: 2.3.2.ds1-12

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
libc6_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libnss-dns-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libnss-dns-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
l

Bug#231907: marked as done (Simplified Chinese translation to locales debconf templates)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:23 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#231907: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Feb 2004 15:37:47 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 09 07:37:47 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (cliux.homeunix.net) [203.97.122.233] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AqDTl-0004dB-00; Mon, 09 Feb 2004 07:37:46 -0800
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by cliux.homeunix.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 3153542BEF; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 04:37:33 +1300 (NZDT)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===1916166375=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: "Carlos Z.F. Liu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Simplified Chinese translation to locales debconf templates
Reply-To: "Carlos Z.F. Liu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.42
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 04:37:32 +1300
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=4.0 tests=BODY_8BITS,FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01
X-Spam-Level: 

This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.

--===1916166375==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: locales
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-11
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n

The attachment is Simplified Chinese translation to locales debconf
templates. It was translated by Hiei Xu.

Thanks.

--
 Best Regards,
 Carlos

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.24-ck1
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=zh_CN.GBK

Versions of packages locales depends on:
ii  debconf 1.4.8Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6 [glibc-2.3.2.ds1-11]  2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

-- debconf information excluded


--===1916166375==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="zh_CN.po"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

#Translators, if you are not familiar with the PO format, gettext
#documentation is worth reading, especially sections dedicated to
#this format, e.g. by running:
# info -n '(gettext)PO Files'
# info -n '(gettext)Header Entry'
#
#Some information specific to po-debconf are available at
#/usr/share/doc/po-debconf/README-trans
# or http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/po-debconf/README-trans
#
#Developers do not need to manually edit POT or PO files.
#=20
# Hiei Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2004.
# Carlos Z.F. Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2004.
#=20
#=20
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: glibc 2.3.2.ds1\n"
"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n"
"POT-Creation-Date: 2003-11-01 23:07-0500\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2004-02-10 04:25+1300\n"
"Last-Translator: Hiei Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\n"
"Language-Team: Chinese/Simplified <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\=
n"
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DUTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit"

#. Type: multiselect
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:4
msgid "Select locales to be generated."
msgstr "=E8=AF=B7=E9=80=89=E6=8B=A9=E9=9C=80=E8=A6=81=E7=94=9F=E6=88=90=E7=
=9A=84=E5=8C=BA=E5=9F=9F=E8=AE=BE=E7=BD=AE(locale)=E3=80=82"

#. Type: multiselect
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:4
msgid ""
"Locale is a framework to switch between multiple languages for users who=
 can "
"select to use their language, country, characters, collation order, etc.=
"
msgstr ""
"=E5=8C=BA=E5=9F=9F=E8=AE=BE=E7=BD=AE(locale)=E6=98=AF=E4=B8=80=E7=A7=8D=E5=
=9C=A8=E5=A4=9A=E7=A7=8D=E8=AF=AD=E8=A8=80=E4=B9=8B=E9=97=B4=E5=88=87=E6=8D=
=A2=E7=9A=84=E6=A1=86=E6=9E=B6=EF=BC=8C=E7=94=A8=E6=88=B7=E5=8F=AF=E4=BB=A5=
=E9=80=9A=E8=BF=87=E5=AE=83=E6=9D=A5=E8=AE=BE=E5=AE=9A=E8=87=AA=E5=B7=B1=E7=
=9A=84=E8=AF=AD"
"=E8=A8=80=E3=80=81=E5=9B=BD=E5=AE=B6=E3=80=81=E5=AD=97=E7=AC=A6=E9=9B=86=
=E3=80=81=E5=AD=97=E7=AC=A6=E4=B8=B2=E6=8E=92=E5=BA=8F=E6=96=B9=E5=BC=8F=E7=
=AD=89=E3=80=82"

#. Type: multiselect
#. Des

Bug#231538: marked as done (libc6: illegal instruction on a 386)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#231538: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Feb 2004 09:21:16 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 07 01:21:16 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from h26n9c1o1018.bredband.skanova.com (localhost) [81.230.0.26] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1ApOeK-0002sF-00; Sat, 07 Feb 2004 01:21:16 -0800
Received: by shakti.ath.cx
via sendmail from stdin
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Debian Smail3.2.0.115)
Sat, 7 Feb 2004 10:21:13 +0100 (CET) 
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Karolina Lindqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libc6: illegal instruction on a 386
Bcc: 
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2004 10:21:12 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-11
Severity: critical
Tags: sid
Justification: breaks the whole system

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

libc6 gives "illegal instruction" on execution of almost any program.

Libc6 uses the non-386 BSWAP instruction, which is non-existing on a 386.
The CPU tested on is a Nexgen, which has a 386 instruction set.

As an example:

Core was generated by `ls --color=auto -l core'.
Program terminated with signal 4, Illegal instruction.
Reading symbols from /lib/librt.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/librt.so.1
Reading symbols from /lib/libacl.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libacl.so.1
Reading symbols from /lib/libc.so.6...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libc.so.6
Reading symbols from /lib/libpthread.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libpthread.so.0
Reading symbols from /lib/ld-linux.so.2...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/ld-linux.so.2
Reading symbols from /lib/libattr.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libattr.so.1
Reading symbols from /lib/libnss_compat.so.2...(no debugging symbols 
found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libnss_compat.so.2
Reading symbols from /lib/libnsl.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libnsl.so.1
Reading symbols from /lib/libnss_nis.so.2...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libnss_nis.so.2
Reading symbols from /lib/libnss_files.so.2...(no debugging symbols 
found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libnss_files.so.2
#0  0x400ca38f in tzset () from /lib/libc.so.6
(gdb) bt
#0  0x400ca38f in tzset () from /lib/libc.so.6
#1  0x400c91a9 in adjtime () from /lib/libc.so.6
#2  0x400ca0a6 in tzset () from /lib/libc.so.6
#3  0x400c8612 in localtime () from /lib/libc.so.6
#4  0x0001 in ?? ()
#5  0x401690a0 in _obstack () from /lib/libc.so.6
#6  0x08055e34 in _IO_stdin_used ()
#7  0xb918 in ?? ()
#8  0x0804d47b in ?? ()
#9  0xbfffdc8c in ?? ()
#10 0x08055e34 in _IO_stdin_used ()
#11 0xbfffdf31 in ?? ()
(gdb) x/i 0x400ca38f
0x400ca38f : bswap  %eax
(gdb)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAJK4IMtlM9PL9yocRAgn/AJ9bg6C+8chBYtUPOLlu4SKZ1zPfLwCggL1V
XDOOeoku9ElnDoId0I0WfGU=
=iH8c
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

---
Received: (at 231538-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 20:38:17 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 13:38:17 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkxd-0003DJ-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:38:17 -0700
Received: from dsilvers by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkuo-0003Sd-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#231538: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Daniel Silverstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400

Bug#230765: marked as done (info file has been flattened)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#230765: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Feb 2004 11:29:48 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 02 03:29:48 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kogut.o2.pl [212.126.20.60] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AncGy-00043e-00; Mon, 02 Feb 2004 03:29:48 -0800
Received: from debian (host-81-190-215-112.wroclaw.mm.pl [81.190.215.112])
by kogut.o2.pl (o2.pl Mailer 2.0.1) with ESMTP id CDD461A347C
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon,  2 Feb 2004 12:29:45 +0100 (CET)
Received: from rzyj by debian with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1AncI4-gZ-00; Mon, 02 Feb 2004 12:30:56 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jacek Sliwerski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: info file has been flattened
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.39
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 12:30:56 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: glibc-doc
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
Severity: grave
Justification: info documentation is unusable

This is what I see after opening info:

GNU libraries
* ALTWERASE: (libc)Local Modes.
* ARGP_ERR_UNKNOWN: (libc)Argp Parser Functions.
* ARG_MAX: (libc)General Limits.
* BC_BASE_MAX: (libc)Utility Limits.
* BC_DIM_MAX: (libc)Utility Limits.
* BC_SCALE_MAX: (libc)Utility Limits.
* BC_STRING_MAX: (libc)Utility Limits.
* BRKINT: (libc)Input Modes.
* BUFSIZ: (libc)Controlling Buffering.
* CCTS_OFLOW: (libc)Control Modes.

There are more than 1700 entries.  Browsing is impossible.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux debian 2.6.1 #15 Mon Jan 12 22:17:39 CET 2004 i686
Locale: LANG=pl_PL, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL (ignored: LC_ALL set to pl_PL)

-- no debconf information


---
Received: (at 230765-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 20:38:20 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 13:38:20 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkxf-0003Dt-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:38:19 -0700
Received: from dsilvers by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkuo-0003ST-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#230765: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Daniel Silverstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 19

Source: glibc
Source-Version: 2.3.2.ds1-12

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
libc6_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libnss-dns-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libnss-dns-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-1

Bug#232891: marked as done (glibc: Include Danish debconf translation)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#230669: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Feb 2004 16:37:28 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 15 08:37:28 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from fitch3.uni2.net [130.227.52.106] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AsPGq-0006HY-00; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 08:37:28 -0800
Received: from reber (129.142.124.192.ip.tele2adsl.dk [129.142.124.192])
by fitch3.uni2.net (8.12.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i1FGbPJS030243;
Sun, 15 Feb 2004 17:37:25 +0100
Received: from claus by reber with local (Exim 4.30)
id 1AsPIX-aF-LX; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 17:39:13 +0100
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===2005236560=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Claus Hindsgaul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: glibc: Include Danish debconf translation
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.46
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 17:39:13 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Claus Hindsgaul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_12 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_12
X-Spam-Level: 

This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.

--===2005236560==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Package: glibc
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n


Please include the attached Danish debconf translation.

--===2005236560==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/x-c++; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="da.po"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by fitch3.uni2.net id 
i1FGbPJS030243

# translation of da.po to Danish
# translation of glibc Debian debconf template to Danish
# Claus Hindsgaul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2004.
#
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: da\n"
"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n"
"POT-Creation-Date: 2003-11-01 23:07-0500\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2004-02-15 17:39+0100\n"
"Last-Translator: Claus Hindsgaul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\n"
"Language-Team: Danish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\n"
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DUTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
"X-Generator: KBabel 1.0.2\n"

#. Type: multiselect
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:4
msgid "Select locales to be generated."
msgstr "V=C3=A6lg sprogunderst=C3=B8ttelser at generere."

#. Type: multiselect
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:4
msgid ""
"Locale is a framework to switch between multiple languages for users who=
 can "
"select to use their language, country, characters, collation order, etc.=
"
msgstr ""
"Sprogunderst=C3=B8ttelsen giver brugere mulighed for at skifte mellem fo=
rskellige "
"sprog, landeindstillinger, tegns=C3=A6t, sorteringsr=C3=A6kkef=C3=B8lger=
 o.s.v."

#. Type: multiselect
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:4
msgid ""
"Choose which locales to generate.  The selection will be saved to `/etc/=
"
"locale.gen', which you can also edit manually (you need to run `locale-g=
en' "
"afterwards)."
msgstr ""
"V=C3=A6lg hvilke sprog, der skal genereres underst=C3=B8ttelse for. Valg=
et vil blive "
"gemt i '/etc/locale.gen', som du ogs=C3=A5 selv kan rette i (du skal k=C3=
=B8re "
"'locale-gen' bagefter)."

#. Type: select
#. Choices
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:14
msgid "None, ${locales}"
msgstr "Ingen, ${locales}"

#. Type: select
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:16
msgid "Which locale should be the default in the system environment?"
msgstr "Hvilket sprogvalg skal bruges som standard?"

#. Type: select
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:16
msgid ""
"Many packages in Debian use locales to display text in the correct langu=
age "
"for users. You can change the default locale if you're not a native Engl=
ish "
"speaker. These choices are based on which locales you have chosen to "
"generate."
msgstr ""
"Mange pakker i Debian benytter sprogvalget til at vise tekst i brugerens=
"
"eget sprog. Du kan v=C3=A6lge standardsproget, hvis du ikke har engelsk =
som "
"modersm=C3=A5l.

Bug#230758: marked as done (libc6: mountkernfs check for tmpfs availability is useless and attempts to mount even if unavailable)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#230758: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Feb 2004 10:51:03 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 02 02:51:03 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.stw-bonn.de [131.220.99.37] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AnbfS-0006Eq-00; Mon, 02 Feb 2004 02:51:03 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.stw-bonn.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 394DA7E727
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon,  2 Feb 2004 11:50:31 +0100 (CET)
Received: from uni-bonn.de (port-192-168-82-198.dhcp.stw-bonn.de 
[192.168.82.198])
by mail.stw-bonn.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A31B67E69A
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon,  2 Feb 2004 10:50:30 + 
(/etc/localtime)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 11:50:30 +0100
From: josh buhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040122 
Debian/1.6-1
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libc6: mountkernfs check for tmpfs availability is useless and attempts
 to mount even if unavailable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-11
Severity: normal

/etc/init.d/mountkernfs performs an availability check for tmpfs
before attempting to mount tmpfs like this:

tmpfs_avail=`grep -ci '[<[:space:]]tmpfs' /proc/filesystems || true`
...

if [ "$tmpfs_avail" != 0 ] || [ "$shmfs_avail" != 0 ]
then
...


Now, on my sytem tmpfs is not enabled in the kernel:

spleen:~# grep -i tmpfs /boot/config-2.4.24
# CONFIG_TMPFS is not set
spleen:~#

however, this availability test is still true:

spleen:~# grep -i tmpfs /proc/filesystems
nodev   tmpfs
spleen:~# grep -ci '[<[:space:]]tmpfs' /proc/filesystems
1
spleen:~#

And so mounting tmpfs at boot fails with an error message.


After recompiling the kernel and enabling tmpfs, the check produces the
same results:

spleen:~# grep -i tmpfs /boot/config-2.4.24
CONFIG_TMPFS=y
spleen:~# grep -i tmpfs /proc/filesystems
nodev   tmpfs
spleen:~# grep -ci '[<[:space:]]tmpfs' /proc/filesystems
1
spleen:~#


I don't know why /proc/filesytems shows tmpfs even if it's not compiled 
in...



-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux spleen 2.4.24 #1 Thu Jan 29 18:16:44 CET 2004 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8

Versions of packages libc6 depends on:
ii  libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7The Berkeley database 
routines [gl

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 230758-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 20:40:10 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 13:40:10 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkzS-0003Yh-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:40:10 -0700
Received: from dsilvers by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkuo-0003SR-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#230758: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Daniel Silverstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 35

Source: glibc
Source-Version: 2.3.2.ds1-12

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.

Bug#229461: marked as done (libc6 - fails to install - uses awk in preinst)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#229461: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Jan 2004 23:58:22 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 24 15:58:22 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from wavehammer.waldi.eu.org (extern.mail.waldi.eu.org) 
[82.139.196.55] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AkXfS-Yl-00; Sat, 24 Jan 2004 15:58:22 -0800
Received: by wavehammer.waldi.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 153D23C04A; Sun, 25 Jan 2004 00:58:20 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 00:58:19 +0100
From: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libc6 - fails to install - uses awk in preinst
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_24 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_24
X-Spam-Level: 


--BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-11
Severity: grave

libc6 failes to install:

| Unpacking libc6 (from .../libc6_2.3.2.ds1-11_i386.deb) ...
| /var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/preinst: line 1: awk: command not found
| dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-11_i386.de=
b (--unpack):
|  subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 127

awk is provided by mawk which is not essential.

Bastian

--=20
Conquest is easy. Control is not.
-- Kirk, "Mirror, Mirror", stardate unknown

--BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkATBpsACgkQLkAIIn9ODhG9LgCg5VftL5vo3HZm4tpjB0do1ewu
ZVYAn3lNWljFejuXVT3kLCO1tpfgAa+0
=kus1
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3--

---
Received: (at 229461-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 20:40:09 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 13:40:09 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkzR-0003YU-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:40:09 -0700
Received: from dsilvers by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkuo-0003SL-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#229461: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Daniel Silverstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 34

Source: glibc
Source-Version: 2.3.2.ds1-12

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
libc6_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/l

Bug#229340: marked as done (libc6: Typo in comment of /etc/init.d/mountkernfs)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#229340: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Jan 2004 11:41:14 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 24 03:41:14 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20] 
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AkMA6-0005WV-00; Sat, 24 Jan 2004 03:41:14 -0800
Received: (qmail 15251 invoked by uid 65534); 24 Jan 2004 11:40:41 -
Received: from p508B1766.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO mandala.local) (80.139.23.102)
  by mail.gmx.net (mp012) with SMTP; 24 Jan 2004 12:40:41 +0100
X-Authenticated: #13331949
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libc6: Typo in comment of /etc/init.d/mountkernfs
From: Jhair Tocancipa Triana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Debbugs-CC: Jhair Tocancipa Triana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 12:40:48 +0100
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_20 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,X_DEBBUGS_CC 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_20
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-11
Severity: minor

POSIX shared memory functions are more than one (shm_open, shm_unlink)
so the plural form is more appropiate:

$ diff -u /etc/init.d/mountkernfs mountkernfs
--- /etc/init.d/mountkernfs 2004-01-17 22:25:21.0 +0100
+++ mountkernfs 2004-01-24 12:17:50.0 +0100
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
 ### tmpfs mount
 #
 #  tmpfs is formerly known as shmfs, which is needed to use POSIX
-#  shared memory function.  shmfs was introduced in kernel 2.3.3x,
+#  shared memory functions.  shmfs was introduced in kernel 2.3.3x,
 #  but its name was changed in early kernel 2.4.  So we need to
 #  check both shmfs and tmpfs.
 #  tmpfs can be used as memory filesystem, so you can limit tmpfs


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux mandala 2.6.1 #4 Fri Jan 9 23:16:25 CET 2004 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages libc6 depends on:
ii  libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7The Berkeley database routines [gl

-- no debconf information

-- 
--Jhair

Public Key fingerprint:
81FF 3ADF BF6B CECB C593  4018 27AE D7D2 BAA6 00D0


---
Received: (at 229340-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 20:40:08 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 13:40:08 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkzQ-0003YH-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:40:08 -0700
Received: from dsilvers by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkuo-0003SJ-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#229340: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Daniel Silverstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 33

Source: glibc
Source-Version: 2.3.2.ds1-12

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i3

Bug#229196: marked as done (libc6: add rsync to list of nss-dependent packages)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#229196: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jan 2004 16:46:05 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 23 08:46:05 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cust.88.114.adsl.cistron.nl (gw.wurtel.net) [195.64.88.114] 
(mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Ak4RZ-0001h0-00; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 08:46:05 -0800
Received: from wurtel ([192.168.1.1] helo=wurtel.net)
by gw.wurtel.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1Ak4RX-0002mH-00; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 17:46:03 +0100
Received: from paul by wurtel.net with local (Exim 4.30 #1 (Debian))
id 1Ak4RX-0002LP-Gm; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 17:46:03 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libc6: add rsync to list of nss-dependent packages
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.37
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 17:46:03 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_20 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_20
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
Severity: normal

When rsync is running as a daemon, it is also affected if
Name Service Switch changes.

Starting with rsync 2.6.0-2 (to be uploaden RSN), there is an init.d
script to handle the starting and stopping of the daemon. I'd appreciate
it if you could add rsync to the list of services to be stopped and
started.

Thanks,
Paul Slootman, rsync maintainer


---
Received: (at 229196-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 20:38:22 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 13:38:22 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkxi-0003EW-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:38:22 -0700
Received: from dsilvers by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkuo-0003SH-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#229196: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Daniel Silverstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 16

Source: glibc
Source-Version: 2.3.2.ds1-12

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
libc6_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libnss-dns-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libnss-dns-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
locales_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/locales_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
nscd_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/nscd_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the 

Bug#228375: marked as done (hppa glibc, elf_machine_runtime_setup() segv, with patch)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#228375: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jan 2004 16:46:30 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 18 08:46:30 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cpc1-hem11-4-0-cust109.lutn.cable.ntl.com (thinkpad.home) 
[80.2.252.109] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AiG4D-00057S-00; Sun, 18 Jan 2004 08:46:29 -0800
Received: by thinkpad.home (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 5B1289E718; Sun, 18 Jan 2004 16:09:44 + (GMT)
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 16:09:44 +
From: Richard Hirst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: hppa glibc, elf_machine_runtime_setup() segv, with patch
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14
X-Spam-Level: 

package: glibc
version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
tags: d-i

This relates to running debian-installer on hppa/parisc.

When d-i runs frontend, it results in SEGV:

~ # LD_DEBUG=reloc DEBIAN_FRONTEND=newt /usr/share/debconf/frontend 
/usr/bin/main-menu
 13764:
 13764: relocation processing: /lib/libc.so.6 (lazy)
 13764:
 13764: relocation processing: /lib/libtextwrap.so.1 (lazy)
 13764:
 13764: relocation processing: /lib/libdl.so.2 (lazy)
 13764:
 13764: relocation processing: /usr/lib/cdebconf/libdebconf.so (lazy)
 13764:
 13764: relocation processing: /usr/share/debconf/frontend (lazy)
 13764:
 13764: relocation processing: /lib/ld.so.1
 13764:
 13764: calling init: /lib/libc.so.6
 13764:
 13764:
 13764: calling init: /lib/libtextwrap.so.1
 13764:
 13764:
 13764: calling init: /lib/libdl.so.2
 13764:
 13764:
 13764: calling init: /usr/lib/cdebconf/libdebconf.so
 13764:
 13764:
 13764: initialize program: /usr/share/debconf/frontend
 13764:
 13764:
 13764: transferring control: /usr/share/debconf/frontend
 13764:
 13764:
 13764: relocation processing: /usr/lib/cdebconf/db/rfc822db.so
 13764:
 13764: calling init: /usr/lib/cdebconf/db/rfc822db.so
 13764:
 13764:
 13764: relocation processing: /lib/libslang.so.1-UTF8 (lazy)
 13764:
 13764: relocation processing: /lib/libm.so.6 (lazy)
Segmentation fault
~ # 


The build process for debian-installer uses mklibs to reduce library sizes.  In
that process, it ends up reducing libm to nothing:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/build/ptrace$ readelf -S 
/build/debian-installer/debian-installer-head/build/tmp/netboot/tree/lib/libm.so.6
 
There are 12 section headers, starting at offset 0x2f4:

Section Headers:
  [Nr] Name  TypeAddr OffSize   ES Flg Lk Inf Al
  [ 0]   NULL 00 00 00  0   0  0
  [ 1] .hash HASH0094 94 44 04   A  2   0  4
  [ 2] .dynsym   DYNSYM  00d8 d8 c0 10   A  3   b  4
  [ 3] .dynstr   STRTAB  0198 000198 1f 00   A  0   0  1
  [ 4] .gnu.version  VERSYM  01b8 0001b8 18 02   A  2   0  2
  [ 5] .gnu.version_dVERDEF  01d0 0001d0 38 00   A  3   2  4
  [ 6] .data PROGBITS00010208 000298 00 00   W  0   0  1
  [ 7] .dynamic  DYNAMIC 00010208 000208 88 08  WA  3   0  4
  [ 8] .got  PROGBITS00010290 000290 08 04  WA  0   0  4
  [ 9] .sbss PROGBITS00010298 000298 00 00   W  0   0  1
  [10] .bss  NOBITS  00010298 000298 00 00  WA  0   0  1
  [11] .shstrtab STRTAB   000298 5c 00  0   0  1

and there is no DT_JMPREL entry in the dynamic section:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/build/ptrace$ objdump -p 
/build/debian-installer/debian-installer-head/build/tmp/netboot/tree/lib/libm.so.6
 

/build/debian-installer/debian-installer-head/build/tmp/netboot/tree/lib/libm.so.6:
 file format elf32-hp

Bug#221969: marked as done (libc6.1 2.3.2.ds1-10 & 2.3.2-9 causes Segmentation fault in Java JDK1.3.1 programs on Alpha)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#221969: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Nov 2003 09:54:36 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 21 03:53:14 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (saphir.proteinstrukturfabrik.de) [141.14.150.91] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AN7yT-0007NY-00; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 03:53:14 -0600
Received: from leo.proteinstrukturfabrik.de ([141.14.150.81])
by saphir.proteinstrukturfabrik.de with esmtp (Exim 4.22)
id 1AN7yh-0008Hv-Sk
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 10:53:27 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Ulrich Harttig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libc6.1 2.3.2.ds1-10 & 2.3.2-9 causes Segmentation fault in Java 
JDK1.3.1 programs on Alpha
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 10:53:26 +0100
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.4]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.1 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_30,HAS_PACKAGE,SIGNATURE_LONG_SPARSE
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: libc6.1
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
Version: 2.3.2-9

After an update of the libc6.1 package (from version 2.3.1 ?? or 2.3.2-7 ??, 
i'm not sure about it), running  Java programs under the JDK1.3.1 (Tomcat, 
SQuirrel) will end up with an Segmentation fault. These programs worked under 
previous libc6.1 versions.
Downgrading the system to libc6.1 to version 2.2.5-11.5 resolves the problem.
Upgrading back to 2.3.2.ds1-10 lets the problem reappear.

gdb output shows the following (for Tomcat)
(gdb) run
Starting program: /usr/java/jdk1.3.1/bin/alpha/native_threads/java 
-Djava.endorsed.dirs=/var/tomcat41/common/endorsed -classpath 
/usr/java/jdk1.3.1/lib/tools.jar:/var/tomcat41/bin/bootstrap.jar 
-Dcatalina.base=/var/tomcat41 -Dcatalina.home=/var/tomcat41 
-Djava.io.tmpdir=/var/tomcat41/temp org.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap 
start
[New Thread 16384 (LWP 10704)]
[New Thread 32769 (LWP 10705)]
[New Thread 16386 (LWP 10706)]
[New Thread 32771 (LWP 10707)]
[New Thread 49156 (LWP 10708)]

Program received signal SIGEMT, Emulation trap.
[Switching to Thread 49156 (LWP 10708)]
0x203588c in __pthread_sigsuspend () from /lib/libpthread.so.0

after a few steps, the segmentation fault appears
(gdb) step
Single stepping until exit from function __pthread_sigsuspend,
which has no line number information.

Program received signal SIGPWR, Power fail/restart.
0x23bc550 in sigsuspend () from /lib/libc.so.6.1
(gdb) step
Single stepping until exit from function sigsuspend,
which has no line number information.

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x23b9ffc in textdomain () from /lib/libc.so.6.1
--- end gdb

This problem happens on a 
Alpha system (XP1000) with Debian GNU/Linux 3.01r stable\testing, kernel 
2.2.20  and libc6.1 version 2.3.2.ds1-10,
as well as on a similar
Alpha system with Debian GNU/Linux 3.01 testing kernel 2.4.22 and libc6.1 
version 2.3.2-9

It appears to be somwhat similar to bug #220584 since it appearss to involve
libpthread

Cheers
Ulrich 
-- 
/
Dr. Ulrich Harttig, Protein Struktur Fabrik

RZPD Deutsches Ressourcenzentrum für Genomforschung GmbH
Heubnerweg 6 D, D-14059 Berlin, Germany
Tel(+49 30) 32639-2814, Fax(+49 30) 32639-2833
Email  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWWwww.proteinstrukturfabrik.de
/


---
Received: (at 221969-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 20:38:24 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 13:38:24 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkxk-0003Ez-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:38:24 -0700
Received: from dsilvers by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkuo-0003S7-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#221969: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Daniel Silverstone <[EMAIL PROT

Bug#219459: marked as done (NPTL breaks abort())

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#219459: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Nov 2003 17:39:27 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 06 11:39:26 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from public1-sout4-4-cust241.cosh.broadband.ntl.com (cyclone) 
[81.103.170.241] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AHo6Q-0006ch-00; Thu, 06 Nov 2003 11:39:26 -0600
Received: from asuffield by cyclone with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1AHo6N-0002os-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 06 Nov 2003 17:39:23 +
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 17:39:23 +
From: Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: NPTL breaks abort()
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_03
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_03 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)


--VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: libc6
Severity: important

This may turn out to be a gdb bug, but let's start here...


[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat foo.c
int main(void)
{
  abort();
}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gcc -o foo foo.c
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ./foo
Aborted (core dumped)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gdb foo core
GNU gdb 6.0-debian
Copyright 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain condition=
s.
Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
There is absolutely no warranty for GDB.  Type "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "i386-linux"...
Core was generated by `./foo'.
Program terminated with signal 6, Aborted.

warning: current_sos: Can't read pathname for load map: Input/output error

Reading symbols from /lib/tls/libc.so.6...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/tls/libc.so.6
Reading symbols from /lib/ld-linux.so.2...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/ld-linux.so.2
#0  0x4004cd89 in raise () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
(gdb) bt
#0  0x4004cd89 in raise () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
#1  0x40158f70 in ?? () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
#2  0xb7c0 in ?? ()
#3  0x4004e5e1 in abort () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
(gdb) q
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=3D2.4.1 ./foo
Aborted (core dumped)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gdb foo core
GNU gdb 6.0-debian
Copyright 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain condition=
s.
Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
There is absolutely no warranty for GDB.  Type "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "i386-linux"...
Core was generated by `./foo'.
Program terminated with signal 6, Aborted.

warning: current_sos: Can't read pathname for load map: Input/output error

Reading symbols from /lib/libc.so.6...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libc.so.6
Reading symbols from /lib/ld-linux.so.2...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/ld-linux.so.2
#0  0x4004c551 in kill () from /lib/libc.so.6
(gdb) bt
#0  0x4004c551 in kill () from /lib/libc.so.6
#1  0x4004c2f5 in raise () from /lib/libc.so.6
#2  0x4004d7e8 in abort () from /lib/libc.so.6
#3  0x08048359 in main ()
(gdb) q


Note how when using the NPTL version of the library, the stack trace
does not contain the caller of abort() or anything that preceeded it;
this makes abort() mostly useless, and the generated core dump
entirely useless.

--=20
  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' :  http://www.debian.org/ |
 `. `'  |
   `- -><-  |

--VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/qodLlpK98RSteX8RAkjsAJ9YWl0IIBfNQSv+EJRfLkdUt8OdxwCfb+3g
olsh3XulzCIxTTcvubfeJTk=
=aGd1
-END PGP SIG

Bug#218424: marked as done (locales: Should list nb_NO in SUPPORTED file)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#218424: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Oct 2003 08:49:28 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 31 02:49:10 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pat.uio.no [129.240.130.16] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AFUxy-0004Jb-00; Fri, 31 Oct 2003 02:49:10 -0600
Received: from mail-mx6.uio.no ([129.240.10.47])
by pat.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.20)
id 1AFUxy-0005QI-0N
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 31 Oct 2003 09:49:10 +0100
Received: from saruman.uio.no ([129.240.201.202])
by mail-mx6.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
id 1AFUxw-0008N6-1M; Fri, 31 Oct 2003 09:49:08 +0100
Received: from pre by saruman.uio.no with local (Exim 2.12 #7)
id 1AFUxv-0005e4-00; Fri, 31 Oct 2003 09:49:07 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: locales: Should list nb_NO in SUPPORTED file
From: Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 09:49:07 +0100
X-MailScanner-Information: This message has been scanned for viruses/spam. 
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you have questions about this scanning.
X-UiO-MailScanner: No virus found
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.9 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,PATCH_UNIFIED_DIFF
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_28
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_28 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)


Package:  locales
Version:  2.3.2-9
Severity: minor
Tags: patch

I forgot a minor thing in my patch to add nb_NO as a real locale.  It
should also be listed in the SUPPORTED file, to make it possible to
select it at install time.

Here is a patch to fix it.

--- SUPPORTED.orig  2003-10-31 08:47:26.0 +
+++ SUPPORTED   2003-10-31 08:47:37.0 +
@@ -126,6 +126,7 @@
 mr_IN.UTF-8 UTF-8
 ms_MY ISO-8859-1
 mt_MT ISO-8859-3
+nb_NO ISO-8859-1
 nl_BE ISO-8859-1
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15
 nl_NL ISO-8859-1

---
Received: (at 218424-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 20:40:04 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 13:40:04 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkzM-0003WQ-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:40:04 -0700
Received: from dsilvers by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkuo-0003Rz-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#218424: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Daniel Silverstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 28

Source: glibc
Source-Version: 2.3.2.ds1-12

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
libc6_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libnss-dns-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libnss-dns-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
locales_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
  to pool/m

Bug#215466: marked as done (fi_FI locale doesn't contain first_weekday)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#215466: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Oct 2003 23:02:14 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 12 18:02:12 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from jt3-172.tky.hut.fi (rafaello) [130.233.19.42] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A8pE4-0006r2-00; Sun, 12 Oct 2003 18:02:12 -0500
Received: from donatello ([2002:82e9:132a:0:201:3ff:fedb:e67d] ident=mail)
by rafaello with esmtp (Exim 4.24)
id 1A8pE2-0002ur-JP; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 02:02:10 +0300
Received: from tvainika by donatello with local (Exim 4.24)
id 1A8pE5-0001Bi-P4; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 02:02:13 +0300
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===0579895313=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Tommi Vainikainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: fi_FI locale doesn't contain first_weekday
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.34
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 02:02:13 +0300
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Tommi Vainikainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.9 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE,PATCH_UNIFIED_DIFF
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_09
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_09 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.

--===0579895313==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: locales
Version: 2.3.2-8
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream patch

Currently fi_FI (and sv_FI) does not contain first_weekday nor
first_workday information.  Here is a patch to add that.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux donatello 2.4.22 #1 to syyskuun 11. 03:06:10 EEST 2003 i686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED])

Versions of packages locales depends on:
ii  debconf   1.3.15 Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6 [glibc-2.3.2-8] 2.3.2-8GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

-- debconf information:
* locales/locales_to_be_generated: en_GB.UTF-8 UTF-8, en_US.UTF-8 UTF-8, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15, fi_FI.UTF-8 UTF-8, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15, 
sv_FI.UTF-8 UTF-8, sv_SE.UTF-8 UTF-8
* locales/default_environment_locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--===0579895313==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="fi_FI.patch"

--- /usr/share/i18n/locales/fi_FI~  2003-09-21 15:51:13.0 +0300
+++ /usr/share/i18n/locales/fi_FI   2003-10-13 01:54:52.0 +0300
@@ -2191,6 +2191,8 @@
 date_fmt   "/
 /
 "
+first_weekday 2
+first_workday 2
 END LC_TIME
 
 LC_MESSAGES

--===0579895313==--

---
Received: (at 215466-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 20:40:02 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 13:40:02 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkzK-0003Vn-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:40:02 -0700
Received: from dsilvers by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkuo-0003Rr-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#215466: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Daniel Silverstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 8

Source: glibc
Source-Version: 2.3.2.ds1-12

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.g

Bug#207199: marked as done (locales: locale-gen should complain about malformed /etc/locale.gen files)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#207199: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Aug 2003 17:13:04 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 25 12:12:34 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zealot.progeny.com (tentacle.deadbeast.net) [216.37.46.162] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19rKtO-0003W9-00; Mon, 25 Aug 2003 12:12:34 -0500
Received: by tentacle.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 07BE74F26F; Mon, 25 Aug 2003 12:12:39 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: locales: locale-gen should complain about malformed /etc/locale.gen 
files
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.20
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 12:12:39 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: locales
Version: 2.3.2-3
Severity: normal

# cat /etc/locale.gen
en_US.ISO-8859-1
en_US.UTF-8
# locale-gen
Generating locales...
Generation complete.

Hmph.

# locale-gen
+ LOCALEGEN=/etc/locale.gen
+ LOCALES=/usr/share/i18n/locales
+ '[' -f /etc/locale.gen -a -s /etc/locale.gen ']'
+ rm -rf '/usr/lib/locale/*'
+ umask 022
+ echo 'Generating locales...'
Generating locales...
+ read locale charset
+ '[' -n en_US.ISO-8859-1 -a -n '' ']'
+ continue
+ read locale charset
+ '[' -n en_US.UTF-8 -a -n '' ']'
+ continue
+ read locale charset
+ '[' -n '' -a -n '' ']'
+ continue
+ read locale charset
+ echo 'Generation complete.'
Generation complete.

This tool expects two "words" in each line of locale.gen.

It should complain if the input is malformed.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: powerpc
Kernel: Linux tentacle 2.4.19-pre7-ben0 #1 Tue Jun 18 10:25:42 EST 2002 ppc
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages locales depends on:
ii  debconf   1.3.9  Debian configuration management sy
hi  libc6 [glibc-2.3.2-3] 2.3.2-3GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

-- debconf information:
* locales/default_environment_locale: C
* locales/locales_to_be_generated: en_US.ISO-8859-1, en_US.UTF-8


---
Received: (at 207199-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 20:40:00 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 13:40:00 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkzI-0003TN-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:40:00 -0700
Received: from dsilvers by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkuo-0003Rl-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#207199: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Daniel Silverstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 5

Source: glibc
Source-Version: 2.3.2.ds1-12

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g

Bug#221740: marked as done (/usr/sbin/locale-gen: Post install script fails)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#198099: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Nov 2003 21:12:56 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 19 15:12:53 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zeus.netset.com [64.40.192.10] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AMZd3-86-00; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 15:12:49 -0600
Received: from hades (hades.noc.netset.com [64.40.192.155])
by zeus.netset.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hAJLCWmP006324;
Wed, 19 Nov 2003 16:12:47 -0500
Received: by hades (Postfix, from userid 0)
id 26490284C3; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 16:22:16 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Debian Bugs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: /usr/sbin/locale-gen: Post install script fails
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 16:22:16 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_15
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_15 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: locales
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
Severity: important
File: /usr/sbin/locale-gen

During a recent apt-get dist-upgrade, I noted a post-install error when
upgrading the locales package. The following results were obtained:

Setting up locales (2.3.2.ds1-10) ...
Generating locales...
  en_US.ISO-8859-1.../usr/sbin/locale-gen: line 32:  3771 Killed
  localedef -i $input -c -f $charset -A /etc/locale.alias $locale
dpkg: error processing locales (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 137
Errors were encountered while processing:
 locales
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

It does not appear (from my cursory investigation) that the post install
script itself is the problem, rather, it seems to be an issue with the 
/usr/sbin/locale-gen script, as the same error results from running that 
manually.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux hades 2.4.22 #1 Wed Nov 5 16:14:27 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages locales depends on:
ii  debconf 1.3.20   Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6 [glibc-2.3.2.ds1-10]  2.3.2.ds1-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

-- debconf information:
* locales/default_environment_locale: None
* locales/locales_to_be_generated: en_US ISO-8859-1, en_US.ISO-8859-15 
ISO-8859-15, en_US.UTF-8 UTF-8


---
Received: (at 198099-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 20:38:29 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 13:38:29 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkxp-0003GE-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:38:29 -0700
Received: from dsilvers by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkuo-0003Rj-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#198099: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Daniel Silverstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4

Source: glibc
Source-Version: 2.3.2.ds1-12

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12

Bug#215821: marked as done (PAX segfault - locales + grsecurity)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#198099: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Oct 2003 23:28:10 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 14 18:27:45 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from debian.black.pl [217.113.232.82] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A9YZs-0001sS-00; Tue, 14 Oct 2003 18:27:45 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by debian.black.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id B07A619C32
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 01:27:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from debian.black.pl ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (debian [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 25718-03 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Wed, 15 Oct 2003 01:27:43 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from admin (unknown [192.168.121.2])
(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by debian.black.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id E066819C2D
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 01:27:42 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Rados=B3aw_Antoniuk?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PAX segfault - locales + grsecurity
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 01:28:04 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-2"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p5 (Debian) at debian.black.pl
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_70,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_13
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_13 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: locales
Version: 2.3.2-7
Severity: important

debian:~# locale-gen
Generating locales...
  pl_PL.ISO-8859-2.../usr/sbin/locale-gen: line 29:  7086 Killed
localedef -i $input -c -f $charset -A /etc/locale.alias $locale

Oct 15 01:22:11 debian kernel: PAX: From 192.168.1.2: terminating task:
/usr/bin/localedef(localedef):7086, uid/euid: 0/0, PC: 59106f20, SP:
59106e0c
Oct 15 01:22:11 debian kernel: PAX: bytes at PC: b9 c0 74 10 59 e9 96 e7 =
f6
ae 00 00 0c ae 08 08 06 00 00 00

iF  locales2.3.2-7GNU C Library: National Language (local=
e)
da
ii  libc6  2.3.2-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries and
Timezone
ii  libc6-dev  2.3.2-7GNU C Library: Development Libraries an=
d
Hea

--=20
Pozdrawiam,
Rados=B3aw 'Warden' Antoniuk
GG: 260746  |  http://debian.black.pl | 6BONE: MNT-WARDEN


---
Received: (at 198099-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 20:38:29 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 13:38:29 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkxp-0003GE-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:38:29 -0700
Received: from dsilvers by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkuo-0003Rj-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#198099: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Daniel Silverstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4

Source: glibc
Source-Version: 2.3.2.ds1-12

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gli

Bug#215624: marked as done (locales: no_NO.UTF-8 generation killed by grsec)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#198099: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Oct 2003 19:25:02 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 13 14:24:38 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from emma.bahner.com [81.0.149.82] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A98J3-0005Y9-00; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 14:24:38 -0500
Received: by emma.bahner.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id AC36D17042; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 21:24:16 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Lars Bahner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: locales: no_NO.UTF-8 generation killed by grsec
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.29
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 21:24:16 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_13
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_13 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: locales
Version: 2.3.2-7
Severity: wishlist

Hello,

locale-gen croaks trying to generate my locale. Now from syslog
I read:

Oct 13 20:56:41 emma kernel: PAX: terminating task:
/usr/bin/localedef(localedef):5208, uid/euid: 0/0, EIP: BFF4C330, ESP:
BFF4C21C
Oct 13 20:56:41 emma kernel: PAX: bytes at EIP: b9 d0 c8 f4 bf e9 86 93
12 48 00 00 0c ae 08 08 06 00 00 00 

So, I take this is because locale-gen is trying to execute a memory
page, and therefore the process is killed by grsec.

Is it necessary for locale-gen to access memory this way?

Kind regards,
Lars Bahner.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux emma 2.4.18-grsec-1.9.4 #4 Sat Jun 1 01:40:55 CEST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages locales depends on:
ii  debconf   1.3.14 Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6 [glibc-2.3.2-7] 2.3.2-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

-- debconf information:
* locales/default_environment_locale: C
* locales/locales_to_be_generated: 


---
Received: (at 198099-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 20:38:29 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 13:38:29 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkxp-0003GE-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:38:29 -0700
Received: from dsilvers by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkuo-0003Rj-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#198099: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Daniel Silverstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4

Source: glibc
Source-Version: 2.3.2.ds1-12

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
libc6_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libnss-dns-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libnss-dns-udeb

Bug#245387: Usage of long long on amd64.

[Kurt Roeckx]

Package: linux-kernel-headers
Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-15

Here is a small patch that fixes warning/errors about usage of
long long for amd64.


Kurt

--- include/asm-x86_64/types.h.orig 2004-04-22 23:16:11.294209120 +0200
+++ include/asm-x86_64/types.h  2004-04-22 23:16:02.109605392 +0200
@@ -19,8 +19,10 @@
 typedef __signed__ int __s32;
 typedef unsigned int __u32;
 
+#if defined(__GNUC__) && !defined(__STRICT_ANSI__)
 typedef __signed__ long long __s64;
-typedef unsigned long long  __u64;
+typedef unsigned long long __u64;
+#endif
 
 #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
 
--- include/asm-x86_64/byteorder.h.orig 2004-04-22 23:15:06.162110704 +0200
+++ include/asm-x86_64/byteorder.h  2004-04-22 23:17:36.556247320 +0200
@@ -5,11 +5,13 @@
 
 #ifdef __GNUC__
 
+#if !defined (__STRICT_ANSI__)
 static __inline__ __u64 ___arch__swab64(__u64 x)
 {
__asm__("bswapq %0" : "=r" (x) : "0" (x));
return x;
 }
+#endif
 
 static __inline__ __u32 ___arch__swab32(__u32 x)
 {

Bug#183139: marked as done (libc-udeb: Should be renamed to libc6-udeb)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#183139: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Mar 2003 18:33:03 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 02 12:33:03 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mx.mmweg.rwth-aachen.de [134.130.118.4] 
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18pYGk-8D-00; Sun, 02 Mar 2003 12:33:02 -0600
Received: (qmail 31388 invoked by alias); 2 Mar 2003 18:32:51 -
Received: (qmail 31375 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2003 18:32:50 -
Received: from coyote.mmweg (HELO coyote) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  by hub.mmweg with SMTP; 2 Mar 2003 18:32:50 -
Received: by coyote (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun,  2 Mar 2003 19:33:01 +0100
Date: 2 Mar 2003 19:33:01 +0100
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Sebastian Ley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: libc-udeb: Should be renamed to libc6-udeb
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libc-udeb
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-03-02
Severity: normal

On the next soname change all udebs relying on libc-udeb are about to
break. Until they are rebuilded, net installs will not be possible.


---
Received: (at 183139-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 20:38:31 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 13:38:31 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkxq-0003Gr-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:38:31 -0700
Received: from dsilvers by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkuo-0003Rd-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#183139: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Daniel Silverstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Source: glibc
Source-Version: 2.3.2.ds1-12

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
libc6_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libnss-dns-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libnss-dns-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
locales_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/locales_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
nscd_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/nscd_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated glibc package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [

Bug#196382: marked as done (libc6 - don't respect DEBIAN_FRONTEND = noninteractive for setup timezone)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#196382: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Jun 2003 15:00:03 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 06 10:00:02 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from p50831ab5.dip.t-dialin.net (extern.mail.waldi.eu.org) 
[80.131.26.181] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19OIhF-0004DK-00; Fri, 06 Jun 2003 10:00:02 -0500
Received: by wavehammer.waldi.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 45AEA743A5; Fri,  6 Jun 2003 17:00:00 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 17:00:00 +0200
From: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libc6 - don't respect DEBIAN_FRONTEND = noninteractive for setup 
timezone
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-18.6 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,USER_AGENT_MUTT
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)


--UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.1-17
Severity: normal

libc6 postinst don't respect DEBIAN_FRONTEND =3D noninteractive for
initiale timezone setup. it may just set it to UTC.

bastian

--=20
If I can have honesty, it's easier to overlook mistakes.
-- Kirk, "Space Seed", stardate 3141.9

--UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAj7grHAACgkQLkAIIn9ODhGSzwCdEcsme9alKleyyF+lSBbl7Xat
g+4An2v2YYx2qpalScY1lVbAx4PYdfH8
=TOj/
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2--

---
Received: (at 196382-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 20:39:59 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 13:39:59 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkzH-0003SA-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:39:59 -0700
Received: from dsilvers by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkuo-0003Rh-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#196382: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Daniel Silverstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3

Source: glibc
Source-Version: 2.3.2.ds1-12

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
libc6_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libnss-dns-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libnss-dns-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
locales_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/locales_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
nscd_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/

Bug#183143: marked as done (libc-udeb: Should provide libc6)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#183143: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Mar 2003 19:06:22 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 02 13:06:17 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mx.mmweg.rwth-aachen.de [134.130.118.4] 
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18pYmr-0001iW-00; Sun, 02 Mar 2003 13:06:13 -0600
Received: (qmail 32512 invoked by alias); 2 Mar 2003 19:06:01 -
Received: (qmail 32500 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2003 19:06:01 -
Received: from coyote.mmweg (HELO coyote) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  by hub.mmweg with SMTP; 2 Mar 2003 19:06:01 -
Received: by coyote (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun,  2 Mar 2003 20:06:12 +0100
Date: 2 Mar 2003 20:06:12 +0100
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Sebastian Ley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: libc-udeb: Should provide libc6
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libc-udeb
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-03-02
Severity: normal

Together with the packagename change this will allow other udebs to just
use dh_shlibdeps to determine their dependencies, because the shlibs
file for glibc of course ponts to libc6.


---
Received: (at 183143-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 20:38:30 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 13:38:30 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkxq-0003Gf-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:38:30 -0700
Received: from dsilvers by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkuo-0003Rf-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#183143: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Daniel Silverstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: glibc
Source-Version: 2.3.2.ds1-12

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
libc6_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libnss-dns-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libnss-dns-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
locales_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/locales_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
nscd_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/nscd_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated glibc package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the a

Bug#198099: marked as done (Please make localedef support PAX)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#198099: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Jun 2003 17:47:17 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 19 12:47:16 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from srv.bobcom.de (hosting.bobcom.de) [217.69.161.101] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19T3VE-0007aE-00; Thu, 19 Jun 2003 12:47:16 -0500
Received: from pd9e3674d.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.227.103.77] helo=cyberoptic.de)
by hosting.bobcom.de with asmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 19T3WM-0002X5-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 19 Jun 2003 19:48:26 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 19:47:08 +0200
From: CyberOptic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) 
Gecko/20030529
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: locales: locales-gen broken
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanner: exiscan *19T3WM-0002X5-00*IiyU70XbGXQ*
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-12.3 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_UA
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_18
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_18 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: locales
Version: 2.3.1-16
Severity: important
Tags: sid

-- Problem Description
locales-gen aborts after first locale. Which locale it is doesn't matter.

-- Live Example

host:/# locale-gen
Generating locales...
   de_DE.ISO-8859-1.../usr/sbin/locale-gen: line 24: 31124 Killed 
localedef -i $input -c -f $charset $locale -A /etc/locale.alias
host:/#


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux bobcom1 2.4.21-grsec #1 Sat Jun 14 01:13:11 CEST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages locales depends on:
ii  debconf   1.2.35 Debian configuration 
management sy
ii  libc6 [glibc-2.3.1-16]2.3.1-16   GNU C Library: Shared 
libraries an

-- debconf information:
* locales/default_environment_locale: C
* locales/locales_to_be_generated: de_DE ISO-8859-1, de_DE.UTF-8 UTF-8, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] UTF-8, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15


---
Received: (at 198099-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 20:38:29 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 13:38:29 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkxp-0003GE-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:38:29 -0700
Received: from dsilvers by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkuo-0003Rj-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#198099: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Daniel Silverstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4

Source: glibc
Source-Version: 2.3.2.ds1-12

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-1

mob

[Everett]

Mayfield,

Online Doctorxx!
up to 70% of the best pain killers out!
and other popular meds..valiumXanaxCialis !!

http://www.techbshels320meds.biz/b32/

--
misanthrope,delight in patches. 

Bug#234347: marked as done (file overlap with kerberos4kth-dev)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:23 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#234347: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Feb 2004 10:33:09 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 23 02:33:09 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from home.wiggy.net (typhoon) [194.109.254.66] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AvDOf-0006YY-00; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 02:33:09 -0800
Received: from wichert by typhoon with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1AvDOd-e5-00; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 11:33:07 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: file overlap with kerberos4kth-dev
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.48
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 11:33:07 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_22 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_22
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-11
Severity: serious

I just ran into this when upgrading a hppa box from woody to current sarge:

Unpacking replacement libc6-dev ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-11_hppa.deb 
(--unpack):
 trying to overwrite `/usr/include/ifaddrs.h', which is also in package 
kerberos4kth-dev

I'm not sure whose fault it is, but it should definitely be fixed since
this breaks woody upgrades.

Wichert.



---
Received: (at 234347-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 20:40:14 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 13:40:14 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkzV-0003Zw-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:40:13 -0700
Received: from dsilvers by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkup-0003Sh-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:23 -0400
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#234347: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Daniel Silverstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:23 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 39

Source: glibc
Source-Version: 2.3.2.ds1-12

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
libc6_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libnss-dns-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libnss-dns-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
locales_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/locales_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
nscd_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/nscd_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of up

Bug#239020: marked as done ([hppa] add /usr/hppa64-linux/include)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:23 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#239020: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Mar 2004 09:56:27 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 20 01:56:27 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B4dDP-0002oP-00; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 01:56:27 -0800
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA16350
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 10:53:18 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id i2K9rIaf023175;
Sat, 20 Mar 2004 10:53:18 +0100 (MET)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 10:53:17 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Debbugs-CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [hppa] add /usr/hppa64-linux/include
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: glibc

To build the hppa -> hppa64 cross compiler needed to build hppa64
kernels, the target specific headers are needed. Currently it's good
enough to symlink /usr/hppa64-linux/include to /usr/include.

Please include this symlink in the libc6-dev package for hppa or build
a new lib64c6-dev package which contains this link. This link
currently exists in the gcc-3.3-hppa64 and gcc-3.4-hppa64 packages, so
conflicts are needed:

gcc-3.3-hppa64 (<= 1:3.3.3-4), gcc-3.4-hppa64 (<= 3.4-0pre2)

---
Received: (at 239020-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 20:38:15 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 13:38:15 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkxa-0003Ch-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:38:14 -0700
Received: from dsilvers by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkup-0003Sr-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:23 -0400
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#239020: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Daniel Silverstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:23 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 25

Source: glibc
Source-Version: 2.3.2.ds1-12

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
libc6_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libnss-dns-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libnss-dns-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
locales_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/locales_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
nscd_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/nscd_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb



A summary of th

Bug#238963: marked as done (libc6: remove /etc/default/{devpts,tmpfs} etc)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:23 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#238963: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Mar 2004 21:54:55 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 19 13:54:55 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 10fwd.cistron-office.nl (smtp.cistron-office.nl) [62.216.29.197] 
(mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B4Rx8-0003J2-00; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 13:54:54 -0800
Received: from subspace.cistron-office.nl ([62.216.29.200])
by smtp.cistron-office.nl with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1B4Rx4-0006Zl-00; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 22:54:50 +0100
Received: from miquels by subspace.cistron-office.nl with local (Exim 3.35 #1 
(Debian))
id 1B4Rx3-0004CI-00; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 22:54:49 +0100
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 22:54:49 +0100
From: Miquel van Smoorenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libc6: remove /etc/default/{devpts,tmpfs} etc
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Followup-To: Miquel van Smoorenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-NCC-RegID: nl.cistron
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: Miquel van Smoorenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-11
Severity: critical

The package initscript_2.85-11 now does all the work of mounting
devpts, sysfs, procfs, usbdevfs in /etc/rcS.d/S02mountvirtfs
as was discussed previously.

Because of that it includes /etc/default/devpts and /etc/default/tmpfs
which are also in the libc6 package. initscript Replaces: libc6
and libc6.1.

But that makes 2.3.2.ds1-11 uninstallable if initscripts was
installed first, hence the severity of this bugreport.

So, please remove /etc/default/devpts, /etc/default/tmpfs and
/etc/init.d/mountkernfs from the libc6 package.

Because they are conffiles, they will remain on the system even if
removed from the package - so even if libc6 is upgraded first and
initscripts later, that will cause no problems.

I think initscripts should rm -f /etc/init.d/mountkernfs and
/etc/init.d/devpts.sh in its postinst because it has proper
replacements for that. Do you agree ?

Thanks,

Mike.
-- 
Netu, v qba'g yvxr gur cynvagrkg :)

---
Received: (at 238963-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 20:38:15 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 13:38:15 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkxb-0003Ct-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:38:15 -0700
Received: from dsilvers by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkup-0003Sp-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:23 -0400
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#238963: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Daniel Silverstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:23 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 24

Source: glibc
Source-Version: 2.3.2.ds1-12

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.

Bug#208238: marked as done (locales: wrong charset for et_EE)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#208238: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Sep 2003 17:07:24 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 01 12:07:22 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from tartu.cyber.ee [193.40.6.68] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19ts9B-0006rN-00; Mon, 01 Sep 2003 12:07:21 -0500
Received: Message by Barricade tartu.cyber.ee  with ESMTP id h81GVar32022;
Mon, 1 Sep 2003 19:31:36 +0300
Received: from mroos by roos.tartu-labor with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 19ts96-00014T-00; Mon, 01 Sep 2003 20:07:16 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15"
From: Meelis Roos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: locales: wrong charset for et_EE
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.26.1
Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2003 20:07:15 +0300
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Meelis Roos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by tartu.cyber.ee id 
h81GVar32022
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: locales
Version: 2.3.2-4
Severity: normal


For Estonian, ISO 8859-15 is the correct character set. This is set as of=
ficial
national standard several years ago and is used more and more. ISO 8859-1=
 is
not sufficient because it lacks s-caron and z-caron. Unlike for some othe=
r
languages, there is no point of having et_EE at 8859-1 and [EMAIL PROTECTED] at
8859-15 since it's not the euro symbol that we use 8859-15 for, it's beca=
use of
s-caron and z-caron that 8859-1 does not offer.

glibc offers 8859-1 as the default for Estonian. This should be fixed to =
offer
8859-15 for Debian to work out-of-the-box in Estonian language environmen=
t.

The changes I am using on all my unstable's for many months without probl=
ems:

1. Change locale from et_EE.ISO-8859-1 to et_EE.ISO-8859=AD15 in "estonia=
n" and
"eesti" lines of /etc/locale.alias.

2. In /usr/share/i18n/SUPPORTED, change "et_EE ISO-8859-1" to
"et_EE ISO-8859-15".

3. (most important) Change "et_EE ISO-8859-1" to "et_EE ISO-8859-15" in
/var/lib/dpkg/info/locales.config so that locales configuration offers th=
e
right locale for Estonian.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux roos 2.4.18 #2 N nov 28 11:30:27 EET 2002 i586
Locale: LANG=3Det_EE, LC_CTYPE=3Det_EE

Versions of packages locales depends on:
ii  debconf   1.3.12 Debian configuration managem=
ent sy
ii  libc6 [glibc-2.3.2-4] 2.3.2-4GNU C Library: Shared librar=
ies an

-- debconf information:
* locales/default_environment_locale: et_EE
* locales/locales_to_be_generated: et_EE ISO-8859-15, et_EE.UTF-8 UTF-8


---
Received: (at 208238-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 20:40:01 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 13:40:01 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkzJ-0003Tw-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:40:01 -0700
Received: from dsilvers by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkuo-0003Rn-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#208238: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Daniel Silverstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 6

Source: glibc
Source-Version: 2.3.2.ds1-12

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
glibc, which is due to be installed in the Deb

Bug#211607: marked as done (Bad catalan locale currency format)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#211607: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Sep 2003 22:48:54 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 18 17:48:52 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dukas.upc.es [147.83.2.62] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A07Zz-0005ZZ-00; Thu, 18 Sep 2003 17:48:51 -0500
Received: from tscserver.upc.es (tscserver.upc.es [147.83.38.19])
by dukas.upc.es (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id h8IMmmcT018019
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 00:48:49 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from tsc.upc.es (upcremot94.upc.es [147.83.112.94]) by 
tscserver.upc.es with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 
5.5.2656.59)
id T1ZAJ8VJ; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 00:46:53 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 00:44:09 +0200
From: Orestes Mas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; ca; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312
X-Accept-Language: ca, en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bad catalan locale currency format
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_16
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_16 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: locales
Version: 2.3.1-16 (and possibly later)

Currency values are not displayed correctly under catalan locale (in 
GnuCash for instance). Thousands decimal point are right-shifted one 
position, displaying "12.00,00" instead of "1.200,00"

SOLUTION:
The error is in /usr/share/i18n/locales/ca_ES  file
Change the line 2127: where it is:

"mon_grouping 2;3"

it should be:

"mon_grouping 3;3"


I am using Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 with a mix of stable, testing, and 
unstable packages (mainly stable).

The kernel is a 2.4.22 one

The libc6 version is 2.3.1-16


---
Received: (at 211607-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 20:38:28 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 13:38:28 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkxo-0003G1-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:38:28 -0700
Received: from dsilvers by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkuo-0003Rp-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#211607: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Daniel Silverstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 7

Source: glibc
Source-Version: 2.3.2.ds1-12

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
libc6_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libnss-dns-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libnss-dns-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
locales_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/locales_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
nscd_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  

Bug#218396: marked as done (Package description hides vital information)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#218396: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Oct 2003 03:13:09 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 30 21:13:08 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from topaz.cx (mail.topaz.cx) [66.220.6.227] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AFLQP-00038A-00; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 16:37:53 -0600
Received: from tytlal.hmsonline.com
([207.43.94.202] helo=tytlal ident=mail)
by mail.perlsupport.com with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1AFLQO-0004An-00; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 14:37:53 -0800
Received: from chip by tytlal with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1AFLQR-000482-00; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 17:37:55 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Chip Salzenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Package description hides vital information
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 17:37:55 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Chip Salzenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_99,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_28
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_28 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: libc6-i686
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-8
Severity: wishlist

The package description hides, in a late paragraph and with confusing
wording, the fact that if you don't have a 2.6 kernel the package does
absolutely nothing.  Not a sausage.

That information should be in large friendly letters at the TOP of the
description.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux tytlal 2.4.23pre6aa1 #1 Sat Oct 4 03:18:34 EDT 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C


---
Received: (at 218396-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 20:38:26 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 13:38:26 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkxm-0003Fa-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:38:26 -0700
Received: from dsilvers by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkuo-0003Rx-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#218396: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Daniel Silverstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 11

Source: glibc
Source-Version: 2.3.2.ds1-12

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
libc6_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libnss-dns-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libnss-dns-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
locales_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/locales_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
nscd_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/nscd_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for repo

Bug#221657: marked as done (russian PO-file translation for glibc package)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#221657: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Nov 2003 12:50:48 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 19 06:50:36 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.ufamts.ru [213.24.116.135] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AMRmz-0005jj-00; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 06:50:33 -0600
Received: from mail.ufamts.ru ([213.24.116.135] helo=localhost)
by mail.ufamts.ru with esmtp 
id 1AMRmx-0002V3-OV
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 17:50:31 +0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Ilgiz Kalmetev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: russian PO-file translation for glibc package
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 17:50:31 +0500
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="Message-Boundary-by-Mail-Sender-1069246231"
X-SA-Do-Not-Run: Yes
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_99,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_15
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_15 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

--Message-Boundary-by-Mail-Sender-1069246231
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-description: Mail message body
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-disposition: inline

Package: glibc
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10

This is new/fixed russian translation of po-file ("ru.po" file) for glibc 
package.

--
  Ilgiz Kalmetev
--Message-Boundary-by-Mail-Sender-1069246231
Content-type: application/octet-stream; name="glibc_2.3.2.ds1-10_ru.po"; 
type=Unknown;
Content-description: glibc_2.3.2.ds1-10_ru.po
Content-transfer-encoding: Base64
Content-disposition: attachment
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Bug#245029: Acknowledgement (libc6: SIGSEGV in getgrouplist()/getpwnam())

[BUCHMULLER Norbert]

On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 12:47:58 +0200
BUCHMULLER Norbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Isn't it CAN-2003-0689? (I have not seen that fixed in libc6's

It _is_.

http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101691 states that
2.2.5 is affected, and, that the bug is in libc/grp/initgroups.c, and that
the revision that fixes the bug is 1.29.

>From the CVS log
(http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/libc/grp/initgroups.c?cvsro
ot=glibc)
I see that the fix was done in 1.29 indeed, and having a look at the diff
between 1.29 and 1.28 revealed that Debian's 2.2.5-11.5 has revision 1.28
of that file, not 1.29.

Now it is clear that this bug is the same as in CAN-2003-0689. Debian is
still vulnerable. :-(

Please fix it. Thanks.

norbi


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#222171: marked as done (glibc-doc: Floods info-dir with entries.)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#222171: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Nov 2003 23:06:14 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 25 17:04:53 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.g.bonet.se [212.181.52.4] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AOmEm-0001iX-00; Tue, 25 Nov 2003 17:04:52 -0600
Received: from catskinner.nonet.update.uu.se (as3-6-4.orby.s.bonet.se 
[217.215.33.203])
by mail.g.bonet.se (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hAPN3hXS083895;
Wed, 26 Nov 2003 00:03:51 +0100 (CET)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from sverkerw by catskinner.nonet.update.uu.se with local (Exim 3.36 
#1 (Debian))
id 1AOmEI-00045n-00; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 00:04:22 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Sverker Wiberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: glibc-doc: Floods info-dir with entries.
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 00:04:22 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Sverker Wiberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: glibc-doc
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
Severity: normal
Tags: sid

Of the 2273 lines in my current info-dir (the Direcory node), 1705 lines
are entry points into the libc info files -- from 'ALTWERASE' to
'{(*__gconv_init_fct)}'. With this many entry points, the directory
isn't nearly as easily browsed as it was with ~570 entries. (When you
know where to go, the 'm' key keeps this from being more of a
pain than it is...except that the 'libc' entry itself has disappeared.)

Hopefully, other maintainers won't find this a good idea, or the
info-dir will most definitely explode.

So, please remove the huge list and add back the 'libc' entry.
The 'libc.info' file does contain a useful index; there's no need to
duplicate it in the directory.

/Sverker

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux catskinner 2.4.21 #1 Sun Jul 6 03:43:28 CEST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

-- no debconf information


---
Received: (at 222171-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 20:40:06 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 13:40:06 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkzN-0003X4-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:40:05 -0700
Received: from dsilvers by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkuo-0003S9-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#222171: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Daniel Silverstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 30

Source: glibc
Source-Version: 2.3.2.ds1-12

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds

Bug#226047: marked as done (libc6: Bad strfmon() formatting should be fixed (patch in upstream CVS))

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#226047: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Jan 2004 01:33:54 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 03 19:33:53 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pat.uio.no [129.240.130.16] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Actit-0003GZ-00; Sat, 03 Jan 2004 15:54:19 -0600
Received: from mail-mx4.uio.no ([129.240.10.45])
by pat.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.20)
id 1Actis-0006bV-7f
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 03 Jan 2004 22:54:18 +0100
Received: from saruman.uio.no ([129.240.201.202])
by mail-mx4.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
id 1Actip-0008AH-8x; Sat, 03 Jan 2004 22:54:15 +0100
Received: from pre by saruman.uio.no with local (Exim 2.12 #7)
id 1Actio-0006g4-00; Sat, 3 Jan 2004 22:54:14 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libc6: Bad strfmon() formatting should be fixed (patch in upstream CVS)
From: Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2004 22:54:14 +0100
X-MailScanner-Information: This message has been scanned for viruses/spam. 
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you have questions about this scanning
X-UiO-MailScanner: No virus found
X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-4.9, required 12,
BAYES_00 -4.90)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_3 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_3
X-Spam-Level: 


Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
Severity: normal

The current strfmon() in glibc do not format currency correctly and in
accordence with the POSIX standard.  This has been fixed in glibc CVS.
These are the relevant patches:

  (libc/)

  2004-01-01  Petter Reinholdtsen  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

* stdlib/strfmon.c: Make formatting of left-justified currency
values match the POSIX standard.  When using format string
"[%-14#5.4n]" to print -123.45, the result should be
"[-$   123.4500 ]", not "[-$123.4500]".

  2003-11-30  Petter Reinholdtsen  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

* stdlib/strfmon.c: Correct formatting of international currency
values.  The international currency formatting should prefer the
int_* values if they are set for a locale, and use the domestic
values if the int_* values are unset.

  (libc/localedata)

  2004-01-01  Petter Reinholdtsen  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

* tst-fmon.data: Add simple test to check left justified currency
values in the C locale.

  2003-11-30  Petter Reinholdtsen  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

* tst-fmon.sh: Allow quotes around the result string, to make it
easier to see important whitespace.
* tst-fmon.data: Likewise.

* tst-fmon.sh: Clean up output, unify capitalization and output order.
* tst-fmon.c: Likewise.

* tst-fmon.data: Add test for international currency formatting.
* tst-fmon-locales/tstfmon_n01y12: Add definitions for int_* fields.
* tst-fmon-locales/tstfmon_n02n40: Likewise.
* tst-fmon-locales/tstfmon_n10y31: Likewise.
* tst-fmon-locales/tstfmon_n11y41: Likewise.
* tst-fmon-locales/tstfmon_n12y11: Likewise.
* tst-fmon-locales/tstfmon_n20n32: Likewise.
* tst-fmon-locales/tstfmon_n30y20: Likewise.
* tst-fmon-locales/tstfmon_n41n00: Likewise.
* tst-fmon-locales/tstfmon_y01y10: Likewise.
* tst-fmon-locales/tstfmon_y02n22: Likewise.
* tst-fmon-locales/tstfmon_y22n42: Likewise.
* tst-fmon-locales/tstfmon_y30y21: Likewise.
* tst-fmon-locales/tstfmon_y32n31: Likewise.
* tst-fmon-locales/tstfmon_y40y00: Likewise.
* tst-fmon-locales/tstfmon_y42n21: Likewise.

* locales/en_US: Correct spacing for international
currency formatting, now that strfmon() works better.

* locales/ja_JP: Correct currency position and
spacing now that strfmon() work better.

  2003-06-15  Petter Reinholdtsen  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

* tst-fmon.c (main): Remove unused variable 'monval'.

* tst-fmo

Bug#230258: marked as done (libc6: requires awk in pre-install, may break debootstrap)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#229461: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jan 2004 15:20:24 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 29 07:20:24 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from disk.smurf.noris.de (server.smurf.noris.de) [192.109.102.53] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AmDxv-0005AB-00; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 07:20:24 -0800
Received: from kiste.smurf.noris.de ([192.109.102.35])
by server.smurf.noris.de with smtp (Exim 4.30)
id 1AmDuI-0004QV-72; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 16:16:38 +0100
Received: by kiste.smurf.noris.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 29 Jan 2004 
16:16:38 +0100
From: "Matthias Urlichs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libc6: requires awk in pre-install, may break debootstrap
Bcc: Matthias Urlichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.37
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 16:16:38 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_27 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_27
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
Severity: important

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Trying to bootstrap a new unstable buildd root:

Selecting previously deselected package libc6.
(Reading database ... 220 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking libc6 (from .../libc6_2.3.2.ds1-11_i386.deb) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/preinst: line 1: awk: command not found
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-11_i386.deb 
(--install):
 subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 127
Errors were encountered while processing:
 /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-11_i386.deb
W: Failure trying to run: chroot /daten/chroot/unstable dpkg --force-depends 
--install /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-11_i386.deb
debootstrap --arch i386 unstable /daten/chroot/unstable 
http://ftp2.de.debian.org/debian /usr/lib/buildd/debootstrap-chroot -- failed: 
256

That doesn't happen for testing at the moment, but it WILL happen as soon as
the package whose updated dependencies cause this change moves there.


Proposed resolution:

Check if /usr/bin/awk exists before using it. If not, assume that
this is a bootstrap, and therefore no services are running.


In case you do want to dig further, here's the list of packages I am
trying to install, from my debootstrap-chroot script:

required="base-files base-passwd bash bsdutils coreutils debconf 
debianutils diff dpkg dselect fileutils findutils grep gzip hostname libcap1 
libc6 libdb1-compat libdb2 libdb3 libdb4.0 libgdbmg1 libncurses5 libpam-modules 
libpam-runtime libpam0g libperl5.8 libreadline4 libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 login 
mawk mount ncurses-base ncurses-bin passwd perl-base sed slang1 tar util-linux 
sysv-rc libstdc++5 libgcc1 libacl1 libattr1 libblkid1 libcomerr2 libss2 
slang1a-utf8 zlib1g debconf-english"
base="apt cpio ssmtp sudo"

- -- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux kiste 2.6.0-1-k7-smp #2 SMP Sun Jan 11 17:10:11 EST 2004 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8

Versions of packages libc6 depends on:
ii  libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7The Berkeley database routines [gl

- -- no debconf information

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAGSPW8+hUANcKr/kRAiYIAJ9uF+k1DsaexvqL/y+EONlGKMiR9wCgpe57
W3nVAQr2FmZT+x5CYsNQ+8E=
=rt8E
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

---
Received: (at 229461-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 20:40:09 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 13:40:09 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkzR-0003YU-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:40:09 -0700
Received: from dsilvers by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkuo-0003SL-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Kati

Bug#231167: marked as done (libc6: preinst "integer expression expected")

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#229461: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Feb 2004 22:57:53 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 04 14:57:53 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from iron.libaux.ucsf.edu [128.218.15.248] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AoVxx-0001Rw-00; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 14:57:53 -0800
Received: from ross by iron.libaux.ucsf.edu with local (Exim 4.30)
id 1AoVxS-0005Nq-Mc; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 14:57:22 -0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ross Boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libc6: preinst "integer expression expected"
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.39
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 14:57:22 -0800
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Ross Boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-11
Severity: normal

During a recent apt-get dist-upgrade the log shows the following error:
Preparing to replace libc6 2.3.2.ds1-10 (using .../libc6_2.3.2.ds1-11_i386.deb) 
...
/var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/preinst: line 184: [: 24advncd: integer expression expected
Unpacking replacement libc6 ...
Setting up libc6 (2.3.2.ds1-11) ...


Despite this, the package seems to have been installed OK.  Reclassify
as minor if appropriate; I'm not sure how signficant the problem is.

Presumably this is from some problem paring the uname, which appears
below.  make-kpkg created the kernel, using
--revision=rb.6 --append-to-version=advncd


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux iron 2.4.24advncd #1 SMP Fri Jan 30 14:30:34 PST 2004 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages libc6 depends on:
ii  libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7The Berkeley database routines [gl

-- no debconf information


---
Received: (at 229461-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 20:40:09 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 13:40:09 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkzR-0003YU-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:40:09 -0700
Received: from dsilvers by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkuo-0003SL-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#229461: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Daniel Silverstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 34

Source: glibc
Source-Version: 2.3.2.ds1-12

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
libc6_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libnss-dns-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.ude

Processed: Re: Bug#245337 acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#245337: locales package does not seem to obay Debconf configuration)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reopen 245337
Bug#245337: locales package does not seem to obay Debconf configuration
Bug reopened, originator not changed.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#230008: marked as done (please respect policy-rc.d)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#230008: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jan 2004 21:44:56 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 27 13:44:56 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 68.105.138.210.bn.2iij.net (viper2.netfort.gr.jp) 
[210.138.105.68] 
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Alb0y-0001rr-00; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 13:44:56 -0800
Received: (qmail 24805 invoked from network); 27 Jan 2004 21:44:47 -
Received: from unknown (HELO atoron.dancer.pr.jp.netfort.gr.jp) (127.0.0.1)
  by viper2.netfort.gr.jp with SMTP; 27 Jan 2004 21:44:47 -
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 06:45:42 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: please respect policy-rc.d
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.10.1 (Watching The Wheels) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) 
FLIM/1.14.6 (Marutamachi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.3 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 
(SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2ds1-11

Hi,

libc.postinst does:

updatercd mountkernfs start 35 S .
/etc/init.d/mountkernfs 2>/dev/null || true


is it possible to use invoke-rc.d when possible?



if [ -e /usr/sbin/invoke-rc.d ]; then
  invoke-rc.d mountkernfs start
else
  /etc/init.d/mountkernfs 2>/dev/null || true
fi



I don't want filesystems randomly mounted inside chroot.



regards,
junichi

---
Received: (at 230008-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 20:38:21 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 13:38:21 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkxh-0003EH-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:38:21 -0700
Received: from dsilvers by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkuo-0003SN-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#230008: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Daniel Silverstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 17

Source: glibc
Source-Version: 2.3.2.ds1-12

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
libc6_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libnss-dns-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libnss-dns-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
locales_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/locales_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
nscd_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/nscd_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them t

Bug#230669: marked as done (New Danish po-debconf translation)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#230669: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Feb 2004 19:47:33 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 01 11:47:33 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pfepc.post.tele.dk [195.41.46.237] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AnNZ6-0007Pu-00; Sun, 01 Feb 2004 11:47:33 -0800
Received: from kolon (soeborg.mbrix.dk [80.166.174.247])
by pfepc.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 62562262A04; Sun,  1 Feb 2004 20:47:29 +0100 (CET)
Received: by kolon (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 4AC01838FF; Sun,  1 Feb 2004 20:47:31 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===1934386774=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Morten Brix Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: New Danish po-debconf translation
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.39
Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2004 20:47:31 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01
X-Spam-Level: 

This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.

--===1934386774==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: glibc
Severity: wishlist
Tags: l10n patch

Hi,

Attached is da.po for debian/po/ directory.

Thanks.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux kolon 2.6.1 #1 Sun Jan 11 02:37:45 CET 2004 i686
Locale: LANG=da_DK.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=da_DK.UTF-8


--===1934386774==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="da.po"

#
#Translators, if you are not familiar with the PO format, gettext
#documentation is worth reading, especially sections dedicated to
#this format, e.g. by running:
# info -n '(gettext)PO Files'
# info -n '(gettext)Header Entry'
#
#Some information specific to po-debconf are available at
#/usr/share/doc/po-debconf/README-trans
# or http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/po-debconf/README-trans
#
#Developers do not need to manually edit POT or PO files.
#
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: glibc-2.3.2.ds1\n"
"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n"
"POT-Creation-Date: 2003-11-01 23:07-0500\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2004-02-01 20:30:00+0100\n"
"Last-Translator: Morten Brix Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\n"
"Language-Team: Danish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\n"
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"

#. Type: multiselect
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:4
msgid "Select locales to be generated."
msgstr "Vælg lokalitetsfiler der skal genereres."

#. Type: multiselect
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:4
msgid ""
"Locale is a framework to switch between multiple languages for users who can "
"select to use their language, country, characters, collation order, etc."
msgstr ""
"Lokalitetsfilerne er lavet så du kan skifte imellem forskellige sprog til "
"til dit Debian system."

#. Type: multiselect
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:4
msgid ""
"Choose which locales to generate.  The selection will be saved to `/etc/"
"locale.gen', which you can also edit manually (you need to run `locale-gen' "
"afterwards)."
msgstr ""
"Vælg hvilke lokaliteter der skal genereres. Dine valg vil blive gemt til '"
"/etc/locale.gen', som du også kan redigere manuelt (du skal køre 
'locale-gen'"
" bagefter."

#. Type: select
#. Choices
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:14
msgid "None, ${locales}"
msgstr "Ingen, ${locales}"

#. Type: select
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:16
msgid "Which locale should be the default in the system environment?"
msgstr "Hvilken lokalitet skal være standard i systemmiljøet?"

#. Type: select
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:16
msgid ""
"Many packages in Debian use locales to display text in the correct language "
"for users. You can change the default locale if you're not a native English

Bug#230969: marked as done (Czech translation of locales debconf messages)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#230969: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Feb 2004 17:43:21 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 03 09:43:21 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from csnt.inf.upol.cz [158.194.80.80] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Ao4a1-00032U-00; Tue, 03 Feb 2004 09:43:21 -0800
Received: from vychodil.inf.upol.cz ([158.194.80.12]) by CSNT.inf.upol.cz with 
Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713);
 Tue, 3 Feb 2004 18:43:19 +0100
Received: from kurem by vychodil.inf.upol.cz with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1Ao5cw-0001v2-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 03 Feb 2004 19:50:26 +0100
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 19:50:26 +0100
From: Miroslav Kure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Czech translation of locales debconf messages
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Sender: Miroslav Kure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Feb 2004 17:43:19.0779 (UTC) 
FILETIME=[36357330:01C3EA7D]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01
X-Spam-Level: 


--sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: locales
Severity: wishlist
Tags: l10n, patch

Hi, in attachement there is initial Czech translation of locales
(glibc) debconf messages. Please try to include it before sarge.

-- 
Miroslav Kure

--sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu
Content-Type: application/octet-stream
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="cs.po.gz"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
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--sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu--

---
Received: (at 230969-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 20:40:11 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 13:40:11 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkzT-0003Z6-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:40:11 -0700
Received: from dsilvers 

Bug#230997: marked as done (please include greek debconf translation)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#230997: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Feb 2004 21:26:07 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 03 13:26:07 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ppp2-adsl-79.ath.forthnet.gr (silmaril.devel.internal.bullet.gr) 
[212.251.108.79] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Ao83V-0002FP-00; Tue, 03 Feb 2004 13:26:01 -0800
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===1086991933=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Konstantinos Margaritis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: please include greek debconf translation
Bcc: Konstantinos Margaritis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.39
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 23:25:07 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.5 required=4.0 tests=BODY_8BITS,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01
X-Spam-Level: 

This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.

--===1086991933==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: glibc
Severity: minor
Tags: l10n

Please find attached the el.po debconf file.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux silmaril 2.4.24 #1 Fri Jan 30 03:06:17 EET 2004 i686
Locale: LANG=el_GR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=el_GR.UTF-8


--===1086991933==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="glibc-2.3.2.ds1/debian/po/el.po"

# translation of el.po to Greek
# translation of templates.po to Greek
#
#Translators, if you are not familiar with the PO format, gettext
#documentation is worth reading, especially sections dedicated to
#this format, e.g. by running:
# info -n '(gettext)PO Files'
# info -n '(gettext)Header Entry'
#Some information specific to po-debconf are available at
#/usr/share/doc/po-debconf/README-trans
# or http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/po-debconf/README-trans#
#Developers do not need to manually edit POT or PO files.
# Konstantinos Margaritis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2004.
#
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: el\n"
"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n"
"POT-Creation-Date: 2003-11-01 23:07-0500\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2004-01-21 22:44EEST\n"
"Last-Translator: Konstantinos Margaritis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\n"
"Language-Team: Greek \n"
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
"X-Generator: KBabel 1.0.2\n"

#. Type: multiselect
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:4
msgid "Select locales to be generated."
msgstr "Επιλέξτε τα γλωσσικά περιβάλλοντα που 
θέλετε να δημιουργηθούν."

#. Type: multiselect
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:4
msgid ""
"Locale is a framework to switch between multiple languages for users who can "
"select to use their language, country, characters, collation order, etc."
msgstr ""
"Το γλωσσικό περιβάλλον (locale) είναι ένα 
πλαίσιο υποστήριξης εναλλαγής πολλαπλών "
"γλωσσών, ώστε οι χρήστες να μπορούν να 
χρησιμοποιούν τη γλώσσα τους, με όλα τα "
"συνεπακόλουθα, χαρακτήρες, νόμισμα, 
τοπικές ρυθμίσεις, κλπ."

#. Type: multiselect
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:4
msgid ""
"Choose which locales to generate.  The selection will be saved to `/etc/"
"locale.gen', which you can also edit manually (you need to run `locale-gen' "
"afterwards)."
msgstr ""
"Επιλέξτε ποια γλωσσικά περιβάλλοντα 
θέλετε να δημιουργηθούν.  Η επιλογή θα "
"αποθηκευτεί στο αρχείο '/etc/locale.gen', το οποίο 
μπορείτε να επεξεργαστείτε και "
"χειροκίνητα (έπειτα θα πρέπει να 
εκτελέσετε την εντολή 'locale-gen')."

#. Type: select
#. Choices
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:14
msgid "None, ${locales}"
msgstr "Κανένα, ${locales}"

#. Type: select
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:16
msgid "Which locale should be the default in the system environment?"
msgstr "Ποιο γλωσσικό περιβάλλον επιθυμείτε 
ως προκαθορισμένο για το σύστημα;"

#. Type: select
#. Description
#:

Bug#231358: marked as done (libc6: ppc32 stat reports bogus nanosecond data)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#231358: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Feb 2004 01:34:58 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 05 17:34:58 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dp.samba.org (lists.samba.org) [66.70.73.150] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AoutW-0001ac-00; Thu, 05 Feb 2004 17:34:58 -0800
Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 504)
id 40CCF2C017; Fri,  6 Feb 2004 01:35:11 + (GMT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Anton Blanchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libc6: ppc32 stat reports bogus nanosecond data
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.39
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 12:32:54 +1100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-11
Severity: important
Tags: patch

Hi,

ppc32 unstable glibc has a problem with nanosecond stat. Would it be 
possible to get the following patch in?

Thanks,
Anton

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: powerpc
Kernel: Linux krispykreme 2.6.1-ben1 #6 Thu Jan 15 16:22:09 EST 2004 ppc
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages libc6 depends on:
ii  libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7The Berkeley database routines [gl

-- no debconf information

>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb  6 00:58:21 2004
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 00:58:21 +1100
From: Anton Blanchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PATCH] enable nanosecond stat on ppc32

Hi,

I was chasing some strange problems with make and found the ppc32 stat
does not copy the nanosecond fields out of the kernel stat structure.
However when make is configured it wants to use nanosecond stat.

Quick test attached below, when I run this I see random stack garbage
in the nsec fields. It looks like the problem is a lack of _HAVE_STAT_NSEC. 
A patch is below.

As an aside should we be zeroing the nanosecond fields in the stat
conversion code on archs that dont support it?

Anton

--

--- libc/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/powerpc/powerpc32/kernel_stat.h
2003-01-01 00:24:34.0 +1100
+++ libc_work/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/powerpc/powerpc32/kernel_stat.h   
2004-02-05 21:45:49.829230270 +1100
@@ -42,6 +42,8 @@
 #define _HAVE_STAT___UNUSED5
 #define _HAVE_STAT___PAD1
 #define _HAVE_STAT___PAD2
+#define _HAVE_STAT_NSEC
 #define _HAVE_STAT64___UNUSED4
 #define _HAVE_STAT64___UNUSED5
 #define _HAVE_STAT64___PAD2
+#define _HAVE_STAT64_NSEC

--

#include 
#include 
#include 
#include 

#define PRINTIT(STRUCT, FOO) printf("" #STRUCT "->" #FOO " %lx\n", STRUCT . FOO)
#define TMPFILE "/tmp/stattmpfile"

int main()
{
int fd;
struct stat before, after;

fd = open(TMPFILE, O_CREAT|O_RDWR, 0600);
if (fd == -1) {
perror("open");
exit(1);
}
if (stat(TMPFILE, &before)) {
perror("stat");
exit(1);
}

PRINTIT(before, st_atim.tv_sec);
PRINTIT(before, st_atim.tv_nsec);
PRINTIT(before, st_mtim.tv_sec);
PRINTIT(before, st_mtim.tv_nsec);
PRINTIT(before, st_ctim.tv_sec);
PRINTIT(before, st_ctim.tv_nsec);

usleep(50);

write(fd, "x", 1);
close(fd);
if (stat(TMPFILE, &after)) {
perror("stat");
exit(1);
}

PRINTIT(after, st_atim.tv_sec);
PRINTIT(after, st_atim.tv_nsec);
PRINTIT(after, st_mtim.tv_sec);
PRINTIT(after, st_mtim.tv_nsec);
PRINTIT(after, st_ctim.tv_sec);
PRINTIT(after, st_ctim.tv_nsec);
}



---
Received: (at 231358-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 20:38:18 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 13:38:18 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkxe-0003DV-00; Thu, 22 Apr 

Bug#231438: marked as done (locales fails to install due to locale-gen segfault)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#231438: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Feb 2004 16:23:05 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 06 08:23:05 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from host-12-107-230-171.dtccom.net (calidity.golden-gryphon.com) 
[12.107.230.171] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Ap8ky-0007WK-00; Fri, 06 Feb 2004 08:23:04 -0800
Received: by calidity.golden-gryphon.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id E4DA41C02A; Fri,  6 Feb 2004 10:23:01 -0600 (CST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: locales fails to install due to locale-gen segfault
Reply-To: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.42
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 10:23:01 -0600
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: locales
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-11
Severity: grave

Justification: The package fails to install, and causes dictd
   to also fail to install, amongst others.
==
__> bash -x /usr/sbin/locale-gen
+ set -e
+ LOCALEGEN=/etc/locale.gen
+ LOCALES=/usr/share/i18n/locales
+ '[' -n '' ']'
+ '[' -f /etc/locale.gen -a -s /etc/locale.gen ']'
+ rm -rf '/usr/lib/locale/*'
+ umask 022
+ echo 'Generating locales...'
Generating locales...
+ read locale charset
+ continue
+ read locale charset
+ continue
+ read locale charset
+ continue
+ read locale charset
+ continue
+ read locale charset
+ continue
+ read locale charset
+ continue
+ read locale charset
+ continue
+ read locale charset
+ continue
+ read locale charset
+ continue
+ read locale charset
+ continue
+ read locale charset
+ continue
+ read locale charset
+ continue
+ read locale charset
+ '[' -n '' -a -n '' ']'
+ continue
+ read locale charset
+ '[' -n en_GB -a -n ISO-8859-1 ']'
++ echo en_GB
++ sed 's/\([EMAIL PROTECTED]).*/\1/'
+ echo -n '  en_GB'
  en_GB+ echo -n .ISO-8859-1
.ISO-8859-1++ echo en_GB
++ sed 's/\([EMAIL PROTECTED])\([EMAIL PROTECTED])*/\2/'
+ echo -n
+ echo -n ...
...+ '[' -f /usr/share/i18n/locales/en_GB ']'
+ input=en_GB
+ localedef -i en_GB -c -f ISO-8859-1 -A /etc/locale.alias en_GB
/usr/sbin/locale-gen: line 32: 26146 Segmentation fault  localedef -i $input
==
__> strace localedef -i en_GB -c -f ISO-8859-1 -A /etc/locale.alias en_GB
execve("/usr/bin/localedef", ["localedef", "-i", "en_GB", "-c", "-f", 
"ISO-8859-1", "-A", "/etc/loc
ale.alias", "en_GB"], [/* 95 vars */]) = 0
uname({sys="Linux", node="calidity", ...}) = 0
brk(0)  = 0x881
old_mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 
0xb80f8000
access("/etc/ld.so.nohwcap", F_OK)  = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open("/etc/ld.so.preload", O_RDONLY)= -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open("/etc/ld.so.cache", O_RDONLY)  = 3
fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=51769, ...}) = 0
old_mmap(NULL, 51769, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0xb80eb000
close(3)= 0
access("/etc/ld.so.nohwcap", F_OK)  = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open("/lib/libc.so.6", O_RDONLY)= 3
read(3, "\177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0\200^\1"..., 512) = 512
fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=1244004, ...}) = 0
old_mmap(NULL, 1254244, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0xc7c000
old_mmap(0xda4000, 32768, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 3, 
0x127000) = 0xda4000
old_mmap(0xdac000, 9060, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, 
MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0xdac0
00
close(3)= 0
munmap(0xb80eb000, 51769)   = 0
brk(0)  = 0x881
brk(0x8831000)  = 0x8831000
brk(0)  = 0x8831000
open("ISO-8859-1", O_RDONLY)= -1 ENOENT (No 

Bug#235850: marked as done (Ukrainian depconf templates translation)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:23 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#235850: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Mar 2004 20:05:30 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 02 12:05:30 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from boy.univ.kiev.ua (mail.univ.kiev.ua) [193.125.78.122] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AyG8u-0005V1-00; Tue, 02 Mar 2004 12:05:28 -0800
Received: from intel4.icc.univ.kiev.ua (intel4.icc.univ.kiev.ua [10.25.0.243])
by mail.univ.kiev.ua (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i22K5OiV068381;
Tue, 2 Mar 2004 22:05:24 +0200 (EET)
Received: from eugen by intel4.icc.univ.kiev.ua with local (Exim 4.30)
id 1AyG8p-WV-Re; Tue, 02 Mar 2004 22:05:23 +0200
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===1081223213=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Eugeniy Meshcheryakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Ukrainian depconf templates translation
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.49
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 22:05:23 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Eugeniy Meshcheryakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_01 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.5 required=4.0 tests=BODY_8BITS,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_01
X-Spam-Level: 

This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.

--===1081223213==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: locales
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-11
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n

 Please add attached Ukrainian debconf templates translation.

 Thanks.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.25
Locale: LANG=uk_UA, LC_CTYPE=uk_UA

Versions of packages locales depends on:
ii  debconf 1.4.12   Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6 [glibc-2.3.2.ds1-11]  2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

-- debconf information excluded

--===1081223213==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="locales_uk.po"

# translation of glibc-templates.po to Ukrainian
#
#Translators, if you are not familiar with the PO format, gettext
#documentation is worth reading, especially sections dedicated to
#this format, e.g. by running:
# info -n '(gettext)PO Files'
# info -n '(gettext)Header Entry'
#Some information specific to po-debconf are available at
#/usr/share/doc/po-debconf/README-trans
# or http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/po-debconf/README-trans#
#Developers do not need to manually edit POT or PO files.
# Eugeniy Meshcheryakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2004.
#
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: glibc-templates_uk\n"
"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n"
"POT-Creation-Date: 2003-11-01 23:07-0500\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2004-03-02 21:57+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Eugeniy Meshcheryakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\n"
"Language-Team: Ukrainian\n"
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
"X-Generator: KBabel 1.0.2\n"

#. Type: multiselect
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:4
msgid "Select locales to be generated."
msgstr "Вкажіть які локалі потрібно 
згенерувати."

#. Type: multiselect
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:4
msgid ""
"Locale is a framework to switch between multiple languages for users who can "
"select to use their language, country, characters, collation order, etc."
msgstr ""
"Локаль -- це механізм, що дозволяє 
перемикатися між кількома мовами для "
"користувачів, які можуть використовувати 
свою мову, країну, символи "
"порядок сортування і т.п."

#. Type: multiselect
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:4
msgid ""
"Choose which locales to generate.  The selection will be saved to `/etc/"
"locale.gen', which you can also edit manually (you need to run `locale-gen' "
"afterwards)."
msgstr ""
"Вкажіть, які локалі потрібно створити. Ваш 
вибір буде збережений у "
"файлі \"/etc/locale.gen\", який ви також можете

Bug#238213: marked as done (NPTL per char IO locking very slow)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:23 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#238213: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Mar 2004 23:56:42 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 15 15:56:42 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gort.metaparadigm.com [203.117.131.12] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B31wo-0006Xf-00; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 15:56:42 -0800
Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1])
by gort.metaparadigm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A7E01ACFD
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 07:56:09 +0800 (SGT)
Received: from gort.metaparadigm.com ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (gort [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
 id 24476-06 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
 Tue, 16 Mar 2004 07:56:08 +0800 (SGT)
Received: from metaparadigm.com (cm207.gamma97.maxonline.com.sg 
[202.156.97.207])
by gort.metaparadigm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB3131AC93
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 07:56:07 +0800 (SGT)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 07:56:10 +0800
From: Michael Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Metaparadigm Pte Ltd
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040312 
Debian/1.6-3
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: NPTL per char IO locking very slow
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
 boundary="080504020707000600070009"
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gort.metaparadigm.com
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12
X-Spam-Level: 

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--080504020707000600070009
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-11

Did some tests with bonnie++ on 2.6.3 with latest glibc in sid and
noticed per char IO is dreadfully slow. Remember a thread months
back about this on LKML: http://kerneltrap.org/node/view/1574

Here are the relevant benchmarks run with glibc-2.3.2.ds1-11
(using LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1 to disable NPTL).

Version  1.03   --Sequential Output-- --Sequential Input- --Random-
 -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
MachineSize K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP  /sec %CP
2.6.3 NPTL   1G  3313  95 16808   8  5619   3  3291  93 16130   2  74.1   0
2.6.3 LxThreads  1G 11562  92 17384   8  6155   2 11370  81 15846   2  65.1   0
2.6.3 NPTL-fixed 1G 10695  78 18139  10  5399   3 12534  86 16298   3  73.7   0

Fix for this was in glibc CVS and have included a patch (tested).

~mc

--080504020707000600070009
Content-Type: text/plain;
 name="nptl-io-locking.dpatch"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline;
 filename="nptl-io-locking.dpatch"

#! /bin/sh -e

# All lines beginning with `# DP:' are a description of the patch.
# DP: Description: use correct version of io locking in NPTL
# DP: Related bugs:
# DP: Author: Unknown
# DP: Upstream status: In CVS
# DP: Status Details:
# DP: Date: 2004-03-16

if [ $# -ne 2 ]; then
echo >&2 "`basename $0`: script expects -patch|-unpatch as argument"
exit 1
fi
case "$1" in
-patch) patch -d "$2" -f --no-backup-if-mismatch -p0 < $0;;
-unpatch) patch -d "$2" -f --no-backup-if-mismatch -R -p0 < $0;;
*)
echo >&2 "`basename $0`: script expects -patch|-unpatch as argument"
exit 1
esac
exit 0

# append the patch here and adjust the -p? flag in the patch calls.
--- glibc-2.3.2/nptl/sysdeps/pthread/bits/stdio-lock.h  2003-09-01 
03:07:32.0 +0800
+++ glibc-2.3.2/nptl/sysdeps/pthread/bits/stdio-lock.h  2003-11-05 
07:43:10.0 +0800
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
 
 typedef struct { int lock; int cnt; void *owner; } _IO_lock_t;
 
-#define _IO_lock_initializer { LLL_MUTEX_LOCK_INITIALIZER, 0, NULL }
+#define _IO_lock_initializer { LLL_LOCK_INITIALIZER, 0, NULL }
 
 #define _IO_lock_init(_name) \
   ((_name) = (_IO_lock_t) _IO_lock_initializer , 0)
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
 void *__self = THREAD_SELF;
  \
 if ((_name).owner != __self) 

Bug#239555: marked as done (libc6-i686: misleading info in the package description, about "commercial software")

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:23 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#239555: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Mar 2004 12:06:41 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 23 04:06:41 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from attique.org (hephaistos.attique.org) [81.56.103.59] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B5kg5-Dz-00; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 04:06:41 -0800
Received: from dionysos.attique.in ([192.168.1.7])
by hephaistos.attique.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30)
id 1B5kex-0001Xe-07
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 13:05:31 +0100
Received: from moa by dionysos.attique.in with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1B5kfJ-rG-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 13:05:53 +0100
From: Mathieu Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libc6-i686: misleading info in the package description, about
 "commercial software"
X-Debbugs-CC: Mathieu Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-GPG-Keyserver: http://pgp.mit.edu
X-GPG-Keynumber: 2DA199B9 2002-04-09
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 13:05:52 +0100
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: Mathieu Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libc6-i686
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-11
Severity: minor

Hello,


At the end of the package description, we can read the following
information:


WARNING: Some commercial programs may not work well with these
libraries. Most notably, IBM's JDK. If you experience problems
with such applications, you will need to remove this package. 

This is misleading: any program in Debian is potentially
commercial. DFSG #1: "The license of a Debian component may not
restrict any party from selling [...] the software".

As said at
, 

   A program is commercial if it is developed as a business
   activity. A commercial program can be free or non-free, depending
   on its license. Likewise, a program developed by a school or an
   individual can be free or non-free, depending on its license. The
   two questions, what sort of entity developed the program and what
   freedom its users have, are independent. 

   In the first decade of the Free Software Movement, free software
   packages were almost always noncommercial; the components of the
   GNU/Linux operating system were developed by individuals or by
   nonprofit organizations such as the FSF and universities. Later, in
   the 90s, free commercial software started to appear. 

   Free commercial software is a contribution to our community, so we
   should encourage it. But people who think that ``commercial'' means
   ``non-free'' will tend to think that the ``free commercial''
   combination is self-contradictory, and dismiss the
   possibility. Let's be careful not to use the word ``commercial'' in
   that way.

   



-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.25
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Versions of packages libc6-i686 depends on:
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

-- no debconf information


-- 
Mathieu Roy

  +-+
  | General Homepage:   http://yeupou.coleumes.org/ |
  | Computing Homepage: http://alberich.coleumes.org/   |
  | Not a native english speaker:   |
  | http://stock.coleumes.org/doc.php?i=/misc-files/flawed-english  |
  +-+

---
Received: (at 239555-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 20:40:16 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 13:40:16 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)

Bug#245337: marked as done (locales package does not seem to obay Debconf configuration)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 23:04:12 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#245337: locales package does not seem to obay Debconf 
configuration
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 16:24:33 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 09:24:33 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from jack.feedbackplusinc.com [64.25.11.70] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGh05-0001Dg-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 09:24:33 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by jack.feedbackplusinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 316178FF78; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 11:24:02 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from jack.feedbackplusinc.com ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (jack [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
id 20258-10; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 11:24:00 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from station-1.internal.feedbackplusinc.com (unknown [10.0.0.16])
by jack.feedbackplusinc.com (Postfix) with SMTP
id 9729D8FE0B; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 11:23:59 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by station-1.internal.feedbackplusinc.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 
22 Apr 2004 11:23:59 -0500
From: "Jerry Haltom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: locales package does not seem to obay Debconf configuration
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.56
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 11:23:59 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Package: locales
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-11
Severity: normal

We are trying to set our office's locale settings by changing the debconf setting 
locales/locales_to_be_generated to be a properly formed list of locales that should be 
generated. However, the locales package ignores our settings, and overrides the 
selections in the actual multiselect combo box with the actual contents of 
/etc/locale.gen. This prevents usage of Debconf to properly configure these questions 
non-interactively.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (700, 'unstable'), (600, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.4
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8

Versions of packages locales depends on:
ii  debconf 1.4.22   Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6 [glibc-2.3.2.ds1-11]  2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

-- debconf information:
* locales/default_environment_locale: en_US.UTF-8
* locales/locales_to_be_generated: en_US ISO-8859-1, en_US.UTF-8 UTF-8

---
Received: (at 245337-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 21:01:41 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 14:01:41 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp-104-thursday.noc.nerim.net (mallaury.noc.nerim.net) [62.4.17.104] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGlKH-0006rk-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 14:01:41 -0700
Received: from localhost.localdomain (sinibar.net1.nerim.net [62.4.18.43])
by mallaury.noc.nerim.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03A6A62D99
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 23:01:33 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 4147C23EDD; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 23:04:12 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 23:04:12 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#245337: locales package does not seem to obay Debconf configuration
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Denis Barbier)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 11:23:59AM -0500, Jerry Haltom

Re: Bug#208238: marked as done (locales: wrong charset for et_EE)

[Denis Barbier]

The attached dpatch was used to close this bug.  But its comment is not
accurate, this dpatch adds a et_EE.ISO-8859-15 locale (and is then
identical to upstream fix) whereas bug log and dpatch comment seem
to imply that et_EE charset was changed from ISO-8859-1 to ISO-8859-15.

Denis
#! /bin/sh -e

# All lines beginning with `# DP:' are a description of the patch.
# DP: Description: List et_EE with charset ISO-8859-15 as a supported locale
# DP: Related bugs: #208238
# DP: Dpatch author: Petter Reinholdtsen
# DP: Patch author: Petter Reinholdtsen
# DP: Upstream status: In CVS
# DP: Status Details: http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118
# DP: Date: 2004-04-18

PATCHLEVEL=0

if [ $# -ne 2 ]; then
echo >&2 "`basename $0`: script expects -patch|-unpatch as argument"
exit 1
fi
case "$1" in
-patch) patch -d "$2" -f --no-backup-if-mismatch -p$PATCHLEVEL < $0;;
-unpatch) patch -d "$2" -f --no-backup-if-mismatch -R -p$PATCHLEVEL < $0;;
*)
echo >&2 "`basename $0`: script expects -patch|-unpatch as argument"
exit 1
esac
exit 0

# append the patch here and adjust the -p? flag in the patch calls.

2004-04-17  Petter Reinholdtsen  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

* locales/et_EE: Change default charset for et_EE locale from
ISO-8859-1 to ISO-8859-15, to reflect the content of
http://www.eki.ee/itstandard/contents.html>.  Based on input
from Indrek Hein and Meelis Roos.
* SUPPORTED: Add et_EE.ISO-8859-15.

Index: localedata/SUPPORTED
===
RCS file: /cvs/glibc/libc/localedata/SUPPORTED,v
retrieving revision 1.68
diff -u -3 -p -u -r1.68 SUPPORTED
--- localedata/SUPPORTED19 Jan 2004 23:51:37 -  1.68
+++ localedata/SUPPORTED17 Apr 2004 18:10:04 -
@@ -161,6 +161,7 @@
 es_VE/ISO-8859-1 \
 et_EE.UTF-8/UTF-8 \
 et_EE/ISO-8859-1 \
+et_EE.ISO-8859-15/ISO-8859-15 \
 eu_ES.UTF-8/UTF-8 \
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]/UTF-8 \
 eu_ES/ISO-8859-1 \
Index: localedata/locales/et_EE
===
RCS file: /cvs/glibc/libc/localedata/locales/et_EE,v
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -3 -p -u -r1.11 et_EE
--- localedata/locales/et_EE6 Dec 2003 07:40:37 -   1.11
+++ localedata/locales/et_EE17 Apr 2004 18:10:05 -
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ comment_char %
 % Application: general
 % Users: general
 % Repertoiremap: mnemonic.ds
-% Charset: ISO-8859-1
+% Charset: ISO-8859-15
 % Distribution and use is free, also
 % for commercial purposes.
 

Bug#242546: marked as done (libc6-i686: Package description: unclear about 2.6 requirements)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:23 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#242546: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Apr 2004 10:29:06 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 07 03:29:06 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 233pc233.sshunet.nl (mordor.wolffelaar.nl) [131.211.233.233] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BBAIs-0001WU-00; Wed, 07 Apr 2004 03:29:06 -0700
Received: from jeroen by mordor.wolffelaar.nl with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1BBAIr-00026g-00; Wed, 07 Apr 2004 12:29:05 +0200
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 12:29:05 +0200
From: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libc6-i686: Package description: unclear about 2.6 requirements
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.54
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Scores: 1

Package: libc6-i686
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-11
Severity: minor

The package description says:
| This package includes support for NPTL.  The optimized libraries will
| not be used unless you are using a 2.6 kernel.

It is unclear (at least to me, so probably also to others) whether this
means that:

- optimized NPTL functions will only be used with 2.6 kernels, the rest
  will work with either 2.4 or 2.6

or,

- this whole package, libc6-i686, will only be used with 2.6 kernels

The two sentences are on the same paragraph (suggesting they are
related), but this is not clear from the wording...

--Jeroen

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.3
Locale: LANG=nl_NL.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nl_NL.UTF-8

Versions of packages libc6-i686 depends on:
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

-- no debconf information

-- 
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl

---
Received: (at 242546-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 20:38:13 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 13:38:13 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkxZ-0003CH-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:38:13 -0700
Received: from dsilvers by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkup-0003Sz-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:23 -0400
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#242546: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Daniel Silverstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:23 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 27

Source: glibc
Source-Version: 2.3.2.ds1-12

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
libc6

Bug#241395: marked as done (libc6: preinst fails for kernel 2.4.23dual)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:23 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#241395: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Apr 2004 05:11:26 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 31 21:11:26 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mx5.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de [134.2.12.32] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B8uU9-0005hL-00; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 21:11:25 -0800
Received: from localhost (loopback [127.0.0.1])
by mx5.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 3FA8813E; Thu,  1 Apr 2004 07:10:54 +0200 (DFT)
Received: from mx5.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (mx5 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
 id 46196-03; Thu,  1 Apr 2004 07:10:52 +0200 (DFT)
Received: from dual (semeai.Informatik.Uni-Tuebingen.De [134.2.15.66])
by mx5.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 37187117; Thu,  1 Apr 2004 07:10:52 +0200 (DFT)
Received: from mrvn by dual with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1B8uTa-0001xb-00; Thu, 01 Apr 2004 07:10:50 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Goswin Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libc6: preinst fails for kernel 2.4.23dual
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.37
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2004 07:10:50 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new (McAfee AntiVirus) at informatik.uni-tuebingen.de
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-11
Severity: important

Hi,

running cdebootstrap I see the following error:

O: /var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/preinst: line 184: [: 23dual: integer expression expected

Looking at the preinst
--
if [ "$1" != abort-upgrade ] && [ "`uname -s`" = Linux ]
then
# Test to make sure z < 255, in x.y.z-n form of kernel version
kernel_rev=$(uname -r | awk -F '[.-]' '{print $3}')
if [ "$kernel_rev" -ge 255 ]
then
echo WARNING: Your kernel version indicates a revision number
echo of 255 or greater.  Glibc has a number of built in
echo assumptions that this revision number is less than 255.
echo If you\'ve built your own kernel, please make sure that any 
echo custom version numbers are appended to the upstream
echo kernel number with a dash or some other delimiter.

exit 1
fi
--
the problem becomes clear.

% uname -r
2.4.23dual

I have seen no ill effects from this in month so I guess glibc does a
scanf and gets 23 as revision number or I'm just plain lucky. Maybe I
should have used 2.4.23-dual but I didn't and glibc should cope with
that.

I guess the 'if [ "$kernel_rev" -ge 255 ]' should be true in this case
too, i.e. display the warning and exit 1, but giving an error on [ is
startling (Thats what I mean with cope. Doesn't have to work, just
give a helpfull message).

MfG
Goswin

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux dual 2.4.23dual #1 SMP Sun Dec 14 13:57:16 CET 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE

Versions of packages libc6 depends on:
ii  libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7The Berkeley database routines [gl

-- no debconf information


---
Received: (at 241395-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 20:40:17 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 13:40:17 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkzZ-0003ai-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:40:17 -0700
Received: from dsilvers by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkup-0003Sx-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:23 -0400
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#241395: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
Message-I

Bug#240654: marked as done ([INTL:tr] Turkish po-debconf translation)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:23 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#240654: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Mar 2004 15:24:24 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 28 07:24:24 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from samsun.omu.edu.tr [193.140.28.3] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B7c98-0006R6-00; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 07:24:23 -0800
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by samsun.omu.edu.tr (8.11.6/8.11.6) id i2SFNZO02200;
Sun, 28 Mar 2004 18:23:35 +0300
Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]])
by samsun.omu.edu.tr (8.11.6/8.11.6) id i2SFNUE02191;
Sun, 28 Mar 2004 18:23:30 +0300
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 18:23:41 +0300
From: Recai Oktas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [INTL:tr] Turkish po-debconf translation
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.43
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-11
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 


--3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-9
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: locales
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-11
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n

Please find attached the Turkish po-debconf translation.
(Thanks to Ercin EKER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)

Regards,

-- 
roktas

--3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-9
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="tr.po"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by samsun.omu.edu.tr id 
i2SFNZO02200

# Turkish translation of locales.
# This file is distributed under the same license as the locales package.
# Er=C3=A7in EKER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2004.
#
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: locales\n"
"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n"
"POT-Creation-Date: 2003-11-01 23:07-0500\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2004-03-28 18:15+0300\n"
"Last-Translator: Er=C3=A7in EKER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\n"
"Language-Team: T=C3=BCrk=C3=A7e <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\n=
"
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DUTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
"X-Generator: KBabel 1.3.1\n"
"Plural-Forms:  nplurals=3D1; plural=3D0;\n"

#. Type: multiselect
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:4
msgid "Select locales to be generated."
msgstr "Olu=C5=9Fturulacak yerelleri se=C3=A7in."

#. Type: multiselect
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:4
msgid ""
"Locale is a framework to switch between multiple languages for users who=
 can "
"select to use their language, country, characters, collation order, etc.=
"
msgstr ""
"Yerel (locale), kullan=C4=B1c=C4=B1lar=C4=B1n kullanmak istedi=C4=9Fi di=
l, =C3=BClke, karakter, s=C4=B1ralama =C5=9Fekli gibi dile "
"=C3=B6zg=C3=BC ayarlar aras=C4=B1nda kolayca ge=C3=A7i=C5=9F yapmas=C4=B1=
n=C4=B1 sa=C4=9Flayan bir yap=C4=B1d=C4=B1r."

#. Type: multiselect
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:4
msgid ""
"Choose which locales to generate.  The selection will be saved to `/etc/=
"
"locale.gen', which you can also edit manually (you need to run `locale-g=
en' "
"afterwards)."
msgstr ""
"Olu=C5=9Fturulacak yerelleri se=C3=A7iniz.  Yap=C4=B1lan se=C3=A7im '/et=
c/locale.gen' dosyas=C4=B1 i=C3=A7inde "
"saklanacakt=C4=B1r. Daha sonra bu dosyay=C4=B1 elle de=C4=9Fi=C5=9Ftireb=
ilirsiniz (bunu yapt=C4=B1ktan sonra "
"`locale-gen' komutunu =C3=A7al=C4=B1=C5=9Ft=C4=B1rman=C4=B1z gerekecekti=
r)."

#. Type: select
#. Choices
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:14
msgid "None, ${locales}"
msgstr "Hi=C3=A7biri, ${locales}"

#. Type: select
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:16
msgid "Which locale should be the default in the system environment?"
msgstr "Sistem i=C3=A7in =C3=B6ntan=C4=B1ml=C4=B1 yerel hangisi olacak?"

#. Type: select
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:16
msgid ""
"Many packages in Debian use locales to display text in the correct langu=
age "
"for users. You can change the default locale if you're n

Bug#234813: marked as done (libc6 postinst overmounted my /tmp)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:23 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#234813: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Feb 2004 22:35:19 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 25 14:35:19 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from chiark.greenend.org.uk [193.201.200.170] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Aw7cd-0002aq-00; Wed, 25 Feb 2004 14:35:19 -0800
Received: from [172.17.207.1] (helo=sfere.anjou.terraraq.org.uk ident=mail)
by chiark.greenend.org.uk (Debian Exim 3.35 #1) with esmtp
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
id 1Aw7cb-000403-00; Wed, 25 Feb 2004 22:35:17 +
Received: from richard by sfere.anjou.terraraq.org.uk with local (Exim 3.35 #1 
(Debian))
id 1Aw7cY-000624-00; Wed, 25 Feb 2004 22:35:14 +
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 22:35:14 +
X-Face: h[Hh-7npe
X-Mailer: Norman
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libc6 postinst overmounted my /tmp
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_22 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_22
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-11

I upgraded libc6 and found that /etc/init.d/mountkernfs had remounted
my /dev/shm, not noticing that it was already mounted.  The new mount
hid the old filesystem.  /dev/shm is actually a link to /tmp on my
system, which is why the detection didn't work.

This broke all sorts of things, e.g. new X connections (as
/tmp/.X11-unix was no longer visible.)  Fortunately umount did the
right thing.

Perhaps mountkernfs could be changed to use some more robust way of
detecting whether /dev/shm is already mounted - for instance, by
looking at the first column of 'df /dev/shm'.

ttfn/rjk

---
Received: (at 234813-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 20:38:16 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 13:38:16 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkxc-0003D5-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:38:16 -0700
Received: from dsilvers by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkup-0003Sj-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:23 -0400
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#234813: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Daniel Silverstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:23 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 23

Source: glibc
Source-Version: 2.3.2.ds1-12

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
libc6_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libnss-dns-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libnss-dns-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
l

Bug#231907: marked as done (Simplified Chinese translation to locales debconf templates)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:23 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#231907: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Feb 2004 15:37:47 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 09 07:37:47 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (cliux.homeunix.net) [203.97.122.233] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AqDTl-0004dB-00; Mon, 09 Feb 2004 07:37:46 -0800
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by cliux.homeunix.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 3153542BEF; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 04:37:33 +1300 (NZDT)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===1916166375=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: "Carlos Z.F. Liu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Simplified Chinese translation to locales debconf templates
Reply-To: "Carlos Z.F. Liu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.42
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 04:37:32 +1300
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=4.0 tests=BODY_8BITS,FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01
X-Spam-Level: 

This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.

--===1916166375==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: locales
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-11
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n

The attachment is Simplified Chinese translation to locales debconf
templates. It was translated by Hiei Xu.

Thanks.

--
 Best Regards,
 Carlos

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.24-ck1
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=zh_CN.GBK

Versions of packages locales depends on:
ii  debconf 1.4.8Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6 [glibc-2.3.2.ds1-11]  2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

-- debconf information excluded


--===1916166375==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="zh_CN.po"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

#Translators, if you are not familiar with the PO format, gettext
#documentation is worth reading, especially sections dedicated to
#this format, e.g. by running:
# info -n '(gettext)PO Files'
# info -n '(gettext)Header Entry'
#
#Some information specific to po-debconf are available at
#/usr/share/doc/po-debconf/README-trans
# or http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/po-debconf/README-trans
#
#Developers do not need to manually edit POT or PO files.
#=20
# Hiei Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2004.
# Carlos Z.F. Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2004.
#=20
#=20
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: glibc 2.3.2.ds1\n"
"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n"
"POT-Creation-Date: 2003-11-01 23:07-0500\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2004-02-10 04:25+1300\n"
"Last-Translator: Hiei Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\n"
"Language-Team: Chinese/Simplified <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\=
n"
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DUTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit"

#. Type: multiselect
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:4
msgid "Select locales to be generated."
msgstr "=E8=AF=B7=E9=80=89=E6=8B=A9=E9=9C=80=E8=A6=81=E7=94=9F=E6=88=90=E7=
=9A=84=E5=8C=BA=E5=9F=9F=E8=AE=BE=E7=BD=AE(locale)=E3=80=82"

#. Type: multiselect
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:4
msgid ""
"Locale is a framework to switch between multiple languages for users who=
 can "
"select to use their language, country, characters, collation order, etc.=
"
msgstr ""
"=E5=8C=BA=E5=9F=9F=E8=AE=BE=E7=BD=AE(locale)=E6=98=AF=E4=B8=80=E7=A7=8D=E5=
=9C=A8=E5=A4=9A=E7=A7=8D=E8=AF=AD=E8=A8=80=E4=B9=8B=E9=97=B4=E5=88=87=E6=8D=
=A2=E7=9A=84=E6=A1=86=E6=9E=B6=EF=BC=8C=E7=94=A8=E6=88=B7=E5=8F=AF=E4=BB=A5=
=E9=80=9A=E8=BF=87=E5=AE=83=E6=9D=A5=E8=AE=BE=E5=AE=9A=E8=87=AA=E5=B7=B1=E7=
=9A=84=E8=AF=AD"
"=E8=A8=80=E3=80=81=E5=9B=BD=E5=AE=B6=E3=80=81=E5=AD=97=E7=AC=A6=E9=9B=86=
=E3=80=81=E5=AD=97=E7=AC=A6=E4=B8=B2=E6=8E=92=E5=BA=8F=E6=96=B9=E5=BC=8F=E7=
=AD=89=E3=80=82"

#. Type: multiselect
#. Des

Bug#231538: marked as done (libc6: illegal instruction on a 386)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#231538: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Feb 2004 09:21:16 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 07 01:21:16 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from h26n9c1o1018.bredband.skanova.com (localhost) [81.230.0.26] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1ApOeK-0002sF-00; Sat, 07 Feb 2004 01:21:16 -0800
Received: by shakti.ath.cx
via sendmail from stdin
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Debian Smail3.2.0.115)
Sat, 7 Feb 2004 10:21:13 +0100 (CET) 
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Karolina Lindqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libc6: illegal instruction on a 386
Bcc: 
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2004 10:21:12 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-11
Severity: critical
Tags: sid
Justification: breaks the whole system

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

libc6 gives "illegal instruction" on execution of almost any program.

Libc6 uses the non-386 BSWAP instruction, which is non-existing on a 386.
The CPU tested on is a Nexgen, which has a 386 instruction set.

As an example:

Core was generated by `ls --color=auto -l core'.
Program terminated with signal 4, Illegal instruction.
Reading symbols from /lib/librt.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/librt.so.1
Reading symbols from /lib/libacl.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libacl.so.1
Reading symbols from /lib/libc.so.6...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libc.so.6
Reading symbols from /lib/libpthread.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libpthread.so.0
Reading symbols from /lib/ld-linux.so.2...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/ld-linux.so.2
Reading symbols from /lib/libattr.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libattr.so.1
Reading symbols from /lib/libnss_compat.so.2...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libnss_compat.so.2
Reading symbols from /lib/libnsl.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libnsl.so.1
Reading symbols from /lib/libnss_nis.so.2...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libnss_nis.so.2
Reading symbols from /lib/libnss_files.so.2...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libnss_files.so.2
#0  0x400ca38f in tzset () from /lib/libc.so.6
(gdb) bt
#0  0x400ca38f in tzset () from /lib/libc.so.6
#1  0x400c91a9 in adjtime () from /lib/libc.so.6
#2  0x400ca0a6 in tzset () from /lib/libc.so.6
#3  0x400c8612 in localtime () from /lib/libc.so.6
#4  0x0001 in ?? ()
#5  0x401690a0 in _obstack () from /lib/libc.so.6
#6  0x08055e34 in _IO_stdin_used ()
#7  0xb918 in ?? ()
#8  0x0804d47b in ?? ()
#9  0xbfffdc8c in ?? ()
#10 0x08055e34 in _IO_stdin_used ()
#11 0xbfffdf31 in ?? ()
(gdb) x/i 0x400ca38f
0x400ca38f : bswap  %eax
(gdb)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAJK4IMtlM9PL9yocRAgn/AJ9bg6C+8chBYtUPOLlu4SKZ1zPfLwCggL1V
XDOOeoku9ElnDoId0I0WfGU=
=iH8c
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

---
Received: (at 231538-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 20:38:17 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 13:38:17 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkxd-0003DJ-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:38:17 -0700
Received: from dsilvers by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkuo-0003Sd-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#231538: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Daniel Silverstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
D

Bug#230765: marked as done (info file has been flattened)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#230765: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Feb 2004 11:29:48 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 02 03:29:48 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kogut.o2.pl [212.126.20.60] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AncGy-00043e-00; Mon, 02 Feb 2004 03:29:48 -0800
Received: from debian (host-81-190-215-112.wroclaw.mm.pl [81.190.215.112])
by kogut.o2.pl (o2.pl Mailer 2.0.1) with ESMTP id CDD461A347C
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon,  2 Feb 2004 12:29:45 +0100 (CET)
Received: from rzyj by debian with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1AncI4-gZ-00; Mon, 02 Feb 2004 12:30:56 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jacek Sliwerski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: info file has been flattened
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.39
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 12:30:56 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: glibc-doc
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
Severity: grave
Justification: info documentation is unusable

This is what I see after opening info:

GNU libraries
* ALTWERASE: (libc)Local Modes.
* ARGP_ERR_UNKNOWN: (libc)Argp Parser Functions.
* ARG_MAX: (libc)General Limits.
* BC_BASE_MAX: (libc)Utility Limits.
* BC_DIM_MAX: (libc)Utility Limits.
* BC_SCALE_MAX: (libc)Utility Limits.
* BC_STRING_MAX: (libc)Utility Limits.
* BRKINT: (libc)Input Modes.
* BUFSIZ: (libc)Controlling Buffering.
* CCTS_OFLOW: (libc)Control Modes.

There are more than 1700 entries.  Browsing is impossible.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux debian 2.6.1 #15 Mon Jan 12 22:17:39 CET 2004 i686
Locale: LANG=pl_PL, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL (ignored: LC_ALL set to pl_PL)

-- no debconf information


---
Received: (at 230765-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 20:38:20 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 13:38:20 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkxf-0003Dt-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:38:19 -0700
Received: from dsilvers by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkuo-0003ST-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#230765: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Daniel Silverstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 19

Source: glibc
Source-Version: 2.3.2.ds1-12

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
libc6_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libnss-dns-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libnss-dns-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-1

Bug#232891: marked as done (glibc: Include Danish debconf translation)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#230669: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Feb 2004 16:37:28 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 15 08:37:28 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from fitch3.uni2.net [130.227.52.106] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AsPGq-0006HY-00; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 08:37:28 -0800
Received: from reber (129.142.124.192.ip.tele2adsl.dk [129.142.124.192])
by fitch3.uni2.net (8.12.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i1FGbPJS030243;
Sun, 15 Feb 2004 17:37:25 +0100
Received: from claus by reber with local (Exim 4.30)
id 1AsPIX-aF-LX; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 17:39:13 +0100
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===2005236560=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Claus Hindsgaul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: glibc: Include Danish debconf translation
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.46
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 17:39:13 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Claus Hindsgaul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_12 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_12
X-Spam-Level: 

This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.

--===2005236560==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Package: glibc
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n


Please include the attached Danish debconf translation.

--===2005236560==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/x-c++; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="da.po"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by fitch3.uni2.net id 
i1FGbPJS030243

# translation of da.po to Danish
# translation of glibc Debian debconf template to Danish
# Claus Hindsgaul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2004.
#
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: da\n"
"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n"
"POT-Creation-Date: 2003-11-01 23:07-0500\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2004-02-15 17:39+0100\n"
"Last-Translator: Claus Hindsgaul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\n"
"Language-Team: Danish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\n"
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DUTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
"X-Generator: KBabel 1.0.2\n"

#. Type: multiselect
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:4
msgid "Select locales to be generated."
msgstr "V=C3=A6lg sprogunderst=C3=B8ttelser at generere."

#. Type: multiselect
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:4
msgid ""
"Locale is a framework to switch between multiple languages for users who=
 can "
"select to use their language, country, characters, collation order, etc.=
"
msgstr ""
"Sprogunderst=C3=B8ttelsen giver brugere mulighed for at skifte mellem fo=
rskellige "
"sprog, landeindstillinger, tegns=C3=A6t, sorteringsr=C3=A6kkef=C3=B8lger=
 o.s.v."

#. Type: multiselect
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:4
msgid ""
"Choose which locales to generate.  The selection will be saved to `/etc/=
"
"locale.gen', which you can also edit manually (you need to run `locale-g=
en' "
"afterwards)."
msgstr ""
"V=C3=A6lg hvilke sprog, der skal genereres underst=C3=B8ttelse for. Valg=
et vil blive "
"gemt i '/etc/locale.gen', som du ogs=C3=A5 selv kan rette i (du skal k=C3=
=B8re "
"'locale-gen' bagefter)."

#. Type: select
#. Choices
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:14
msgid "None, ${locales}"
msgstr "Ingen, ${locales}"

#. Type: select
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:16
msgid "Which locale should be the default in the system environment?"
msgstr "Hvilket sprogvalg skal bruges som standard?"

#. Type: select
#. Description
#: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:16
msgid ""
"Many packages in Debian use locales to display text in the correct langu=
age "
"for users. You can change the default locale if you're not a native Engl=
ish "
"speaker. These choices are based on which locales you have chosen to "
"generate."
msgstr ""
"Mange pakker i Debian benytter sprogvalget til at vise tekst i brugerens=
"
"eget sprog. Du kan v=C3=A6lge standardsproget, hvis du ikke har engelsk =
som "
"modersm=C3=A5l.

Bug#230758: marked as done (libc6: mountkernfs check for tmpfs availability is useless and attempts to mount even if unavailable)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#230758: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Feb 2004 10:51:03 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 02 02:51:03 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.stw-bonn.de [131.220.99.37] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AnbfS-0006Eq-00; Mon, 02 Feb 2004 02:51:03 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.stw-bonn.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 394DA7E727
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon,  2 Feb 2004 11:50:31 +0100 (CET)
Received: from uni-bonn.de (port-192-168-82-198.dhcp.stw-bonn.de [192.168.82.198])
by mail.stw-bonn.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A31B67E69A
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon,  2 Feb 2004 10:50:30 + (/etc/localtime)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 11:50:30 +0100
From: josh buhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040122 Debian/1.6-1
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libc6: mountkernfs check for tmpfs availability is useless and attempts
 to mount even if unavailable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-11
Severity: normal

/etc/init.d/mountkernfs performs an availability check for tmpfs
before attempting to mount tmpfs like this:

tmpfs_avail=`grep -ci '[<[:space:]]tmpfs' /proc/filesystems || true`
...

if [ "$tmpfs_avail" != 0 ] || [ "$shmfs_avail" != 0 ]
then
...


Now, on my sytem tmpfs is not enabled in the kernel:

spleen:~# grep -i tmpfs /boot/config-2.4.24
# CONFIG_TMPFS is not set
spleen:~#

however, this availability test is still true:

spleen:~# grep -i tmpfs /proc/filesystems
nodev   tmpfs
spleen:~# grep -ci '[<[:space:]]tmpfs' /proc/filesystems
1
spleen:~#

And so mounting tmpfs at boot fails with an error message.


After recompiling the kernel and enabling tmpfs, the check produces the
same results:

spleen:~# grep -i tmpfs /boot/config-2.4.24
CONFIG_TMPFS=y
spleen:~# grep -i tmpfs /proc/filesystems
nodev   tmpfs
spleen:~# grep -ci '[<[:space:]]tmpfs' /proc/filesystems
1
spleen:~#


I don't know why /proc/filesytems shows tmpfs even if it's not compiled 
in...



-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux spleen 2.4.24 #1 Thu Jan 29 18:16:44 CET 2004 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8

Versions of packages libc6 depends on:
ii  libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7The Berkeley database 
routines [gl

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 230758-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 20:40:10 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 13:40:10 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkzS-0003Yh-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:40:10 -0700
Received: from dsilvers by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkuo-0003SR-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#230758: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Daniel Silverstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 35

Source: glibc
Source-Version: 2.3.2.ds1-12

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.d

Bug#229461: marked as done (libc6 - fails to install - uses awk in preinst)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#229461: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Jan 2004 23:58:22 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 24 15:58:22 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from wavehammer.waldi.eu.org (extern.mail.waldi.eu.org) [82.139.196.55] 
(postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AkXfS-Yl-00; Sat, 24 Jan 2004 15:58:22 -0800
Received: by wavehammer.waldi.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 153D23C04A; Sun, 25 Jan 2004 00:58:20 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 00:58:19 +0100
From: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libc6 - fails to install - uses awk in preinst
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_24 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_24
X-Spam-Level: 


--BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-11
Severity: grave

libc6 failes to install:

| Unpacking libc6 (from .../libc6_2.3.2.ds1-11_i386.deb) ...
| /var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/preinst: line 1: awk: command not found
| dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-11_i386.de=
b (--unpack):
|  subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 127

awk is provided by mawk which is not essential.

Bastian

--=20
Conquest is easy. Control is not.
-- Kirk, "Mirror, Mirror", stardate unknown

--BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkATBpsACgkQLkAIIn9ODhG9LgCg5VftL5vo3HZm4tpjB0do1ewu
ZVYAn3lNWljFejuXVT3kLCO1tpfgAa+0
=kus1
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3--

---
Received: (at 229461-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 20:40:09 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 13:40:09 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkzR-0003YU-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:40:09 -0700
Received: from dsilvers by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkuo-0003SL-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#229461: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Daniel Silverstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 34

Source: glibc
Source-Version: 2.3.2.ds1-12

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
libc6_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/l

Bug#229340: marked as done (libc6: Typo in comment of /etc/init.d/mountkernfs)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#229340: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Jan 2004 11:41:14 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 24 03:41:14 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20] 
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AkMA6-0005WV-00; Sat, 24 Jan 2004 03:41:14 -0800
Received: (qmail 15251 invoked by uid 65534); 24 Jan 2004 11:40:41 -
Received: from p508B1766.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO mandala.local) (80.139.23.102)
  by mail.gmx.net (mp012) with SMTP; 24 Jan 2004 12:40:41 +0100
X-Authenticated: #13331949
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libc6: Typo in comment of /etc/init.d/mountkernfs
From: Jhair Tocancipa Triana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Debbugs-CC: Jhair Tocancipa Triana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 12:40:48 +0100
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_20 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,X_DEBBUGS_CC 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_20
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-11
Severity: minor

POSIX shared memory functions are more than one (shm_open, shm_unlink)
so the plural form is more appropiate:

$ diff -u /etc/init.d/mountkernfs mountkernfs
--- /etc/init.d/mountkernfs 2004-01-17 22:25:21.0 +0100
+++ mountkernfs 2004-01-24 12:17:50.0 +0100
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
 ### tmpfs mount
 #
 #  tmpfs is formerly known as shmfs, which is needed to use POSIX
-#  shared memory function.  shmfs was introduced in kernel 2.3.3x,
+#  shared memory functions.  shmfs was introduced in kernel 2.3.3x,
 #  but its name was changed in early kernel 2.4.  So we need to
 #  check both shmfs and tmpfs.
 #  tmpfs can be used as memory filesystem, so you can limit tmpfs


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux mandala 2.6.1 #4 Fri Jan 9 23:16:25 CET 2004 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages libc6 depends on:
ii  libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7The Berkeley database routines [gl

-- no debconf information

-- 
--Jhair

Public Key fingerprint:
81FF 3ADF BF6B CECB C593  4018 27AE D7D2 BAA6 00D0


---
Received: (at 229340-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 20:40:08 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 13:40:08 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkzQ-0003YH-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:40:08 -0700
Received: from dsilvers by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkuo-0003SJ-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#229340: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Daniel Silverstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 33

Source: glibc
Source-Version: 2.3.2.ds1-12

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i3

Bug#229196: marked as done (libc6: add rsync to list of nss-dependent packages)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#229196: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jan 2004 16:46:05 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 23 08:46:05 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cust.88.114.adsl.cistron.nl (gw.wurtel.net) [195.64.88.114] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Ak4RZ-0001h0-00; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 08:46:05 -0800
Received: from wurtel ([192.168.1.1] helo=wurtel.net)
by gw.wurtel.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1Ak4RX-0002mH-00; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 17:46:03 +0100
Received: from paul by wurtel.net with local (Exim 4.30 #1 (Debian))
id 1Ak4RX-0002LP-Gm; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 17:46:03 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libc6: add rsync to list of nss-dependent packages
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.37
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 17:46:03 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_20 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_20
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
Severity: normal

When rsync is running as a daemon, it is also affected if
Name Service Switch changes.

Starting with rsync 2.6.0-2 (to be uploaden RSN), there is an init.d
script to handle the starting and stopping of the daemon. I'd appreciate
it if you could add rsync to the list of services to be stopped and
started.

Thanks,
Paul Slootman, rsync maintainer


---
Received: (at 229196-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 20:38:22 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 13:38:22 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkxi-0003EW-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:38:22 -0700
Received: from dsilvers by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkuo-0003SH-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#229196: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Daniel Silverstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 16

Source: glibc
Source-Version: 2.3.2.ds1-12

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
libc6_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libnss-dns-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libnss-dns-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
locales_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/locales_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
nscd_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/nscd_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the m

Bug#228375: marked as done (hppa glibc, elf_machine_runtime_setup() segv, with patch)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#228375: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jan 2004 16:46:30 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 18 08:46:30 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cpc1-hem11-4-0-cust109.lutn.cable.ntl.com (thinkpad.home) 
[80.2.252.109] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AiG4D-00057S-00; Sun, 18 Jan 2004 08:46:29 -0800
Received: by thinkpad.home (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 5B1289E718; Sun, 18 Jan 2004 16:09:44 + (GMT)
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 16:09:44 +
From: Richard Hirst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: hppa glibc, elf_machine_runtime_setup() segv, with patch
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14
X-Spam-Level: 

package: glibc
version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
tags: d-i

This relates to running debian-installer on hppa/parisc.

When d-i runs frontend, it results in SEGV:

~ # LD_DEBUG=reloc DEBIAN_FRONTEND=newt /usr/share/debconf/frontend /usr/bin/main-menu
 13764:
 13764: relocation processing: /lib/libc.so.6 (lazy)
 13764:
 13764: relocation processing: /lib/libtextwrap.so.1 (lazy)
 13764:
 13764: relocation processing: /lib/libdl.so.2 (lazy)
 13764:
 13764: relocation processing: /usr/lib/cdebconf/libdebconf.so (lazy)
 13764:
 13764: relocation processing: /usr/share/debconf/frontend (lazy)
 13764:
 13764: relocation processing: /lib/ld.so.1
 13764:
 13764: calling init: /lib/libc.so.6
 13764:
 13764:
 13764: calling init: /lib/libtextwrap.so.1
 13764:
 13764:
 13764: calling init: /lib/libdl.so.2
 13764:
 13764:
 13764: calling init: /usr/lib/cdebconf/libdebconf.so
 13764:
 13764:
 13764: initialize program: /usr/share/debconf/frontend
 13764:
 13764:
 13764: transferring control: /usr/share/debconf/frontend
 13764:
 13764:
 13764: relocation processing: /usr/lib/cdebconf/db/rfc822db.so
 13764:
 13764: calling init: /usr/lib/cdebconf/db/rfc822db.so
 13764:
 13764:
 13764: relocation processing: /lib/libslang.so.1-UTF8 (lazy)
 13764:
 13764: relocation processing: /lib/libm.so.6 (lazy)
Segmentation fault
~ # 


The build process for debian-installer uses mklibs to reduce library sizes.  In
that process, it ends up reducing libm to nothing:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/build/ptrace$ readelf -S 
/build/debian-installer/debian-installer-head/build/tmp/netboot/tree/lib/libm.so.6 
There are 12 section headers, starting at offset 0x2f4:

Section Headers:
  [Nr] Name  TypeAddr OffSize   ES Flg Lk Inf Al
  [ 0]   NULL 00 00 00  0   0  0
  [ 1] .hash HASH0094 94 44 04   A  2   0  4
  [ 2] .dynsym   DYNSYM  00d8 d8 c0 10   A  3   b  4
  [ 3] .dynstr   STRTAB  0198 000198 1f 00   A  0   0  1
  [ 4] .gnu.version  VERSYM  01b8 0001b8 18 02   A  2   0  2
  [ 5] .gnu.version_dVERDEF  01d0 0001d0 38 00   A  3   2  4
  [ 6] .data PROGBITS00010208 000298 00 00   W  0   0  1
  [ 7] .dynamic  DYNAMIC 00010208 000208 88 08  WA  3   0  4
  [ 8] .got  PROGBITS00010290 000290 08 04  WA  0   0  4
  [ 9] .sbss PROGBITS00010298 000298 00 00   W  0   0  1
  [10] .bss  NOBITS  00010298 000298 00 00  WA  0   0  1
  [11] .shstrtab STRTAB   000298 5c 00  0   0  1

and there is no DT_JMPREL entry in the dynamic section:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/build/ptrace$ objdump -p 
/build/debian-installer/debian-installer-head/build/tmp/netboot/tree/lib/libm.so.6 

/build/debian-installer/debian-installer-head/build/tmp/netboot/tree/lib/libm.so.6:
 file format elf32-hppa-

Bug#221969: marked as done (libc6.1 2.3.2.ds1-10 & 2.3.2-9 causes Segmentation fault in Java JDK1.3.1 programs on Alpha)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#221969: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Nov 2003 09:54:36 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 21 03:53:14 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (saphir.proteinstrukturfabrik.de) [141.14.150.91] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AN7yT-0007NY-00; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 03:53:14 -0600
Received: from leo.proteinstrukturfabrik.de ([141.14.150.81])
by saphir.proteinstrukturfabrik.de with esmtp (Exim 4.22)
id 1AN7yh-0008Hv-Sk
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 10:53:27 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Ulrich Harttig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libc6.1 2.3.2.ds1-10 & 2.3.2-9 causes Segmentation fault in Java JDK1.3.1 
programs on Alpha
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 10:53:26 +0100
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.4]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.1 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_30,HAS_PACKAGE,SIGNATURE_LONG_SPARSE
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: libc6.1
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
Version: 2.3.2-9

After an update of the libc6.1 package (from version 2.3.1 ?? or 2.3.2-7 ??, 
i'm not sure about it), running  Java programs under the JDK1.3.1 (Tomcat, 
SQuirrel) will end up with an Segmentation fault. These programs worked under 
previous libc6.1 versions.
Downgrading the system to libc6.1 to version 2.2.5-11.5 resolves the problem.
Upgrading back to 2.3.2.ds1-10 lets the problem reappear.

gdb output shows the following (for Tomcat)
(gdb) run
Starting program: /usr/java/jdk1.3.1/bin/alpha/native_threads/java 
-Djava.endorsed.dirs=/var/tomcat41/common/endorsed -classpath 
/usr/java/jdk1.3.1/lib/tools.jar:/var/tomcat41/bin/bootstrap.jar 
-Dcatalina.base=/var/tomcat41 -Dcatalina.home=/var/tomcat41 
-Djava.io.tmpdir=/var/tomcat41/temp org.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap 
start
[New Thread 16384 (LWP 10704)]
[New Thread 32769 (LWP 10705)]
[New Thread 16386 (LWP 10706)]
[New Thread 32771 (LWP 10707)]
[New Thread 49156 (LWP 10708)]

Program received signal SIGEMT, Emulation trap.
[Switching to Thread 49156 (LWP 10708)]
0x203588c in __pthread_sigsuspend () from /lib/libpthread.so.0

after a few steps, the segmentation fault appears
(gdb) step
Single stepping until exit from function __pthread_sigsuspend,
which has no line number information.

Program received signal SIGPWR, Power fail/restart.
0x23bc550 in sigsuspend () from /lib/libc.so.6.1
(gdb) step
Single stepping until exit from function sigsuspend,
which has no line number information.

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x23b9ffc in textdomain () from /lib/libc.so.6.1
--- end gdb

This problem happens on a 
Alpha system (XP1000) with Debian GNU/Linux 3.01r stable\testing, kernel 
2.2.20  and libc6.1 version 2.3.2.ds1-10,
as well as on a similar
Alpha system with Debian GNU/Linux 3.01 testing kernel 2.4.22 and libc6.1 
version 2.3.2-9

It appears to be somwhat similar to bug #220584 since it appearss to involve
libpthread

Cheers
Ulrich 
-- 
/
Dr. Ulrich Harttig, Protein Struktur Fabrik

RZPD Deutsches Ressourcenzentrum für Genomforschung GmbH
Heubnerweg 6 D, D-14059 Berlin, Germany
Tel(+49 30) 32639-2814, Fax(+49 30) 32639-2833
Email  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWWwww.proteinstrukturfabrik.de
/


---
Received: (at 221969-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 20:38:24 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 13:38:24 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkxk-0003Ez-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:38:24 -0700
Received: from dsilvers by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkuo-0003S7-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#221969: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Daniel Silverstone <[EMAIL PROT

Bug#219459: marked as done (NPTL breaks abort())

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#219459: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Nov 2003 17:39:27 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 06 11:39:26 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from public1-sout4-4-cust241.cosh.broadband.ntl.com (cyclone) 
[81.103.170.241] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AHo6Q-0006ch-00; Thu, 06 Nov 2003 11:39:26 -0600
Received: from asuffield by cyclone with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1AHo6N-0002os-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 06 Nov 2003 17:39:23 +
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 17:39:23 +
From: Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: NPTL breaks abort()
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_03
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_03 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)


--VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: libc6
Severity: important

This may turn out to be a gdb bug, but let's start here...


[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat foo.c
int main(void)
{
  abort();
}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gcc -o foo foo.c
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ./foo
Aborted (core dumped)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gdb foo core
GNU gdb 6.0-debian
Copyright 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain condition=
s.
Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
There is absolutely no warranty for GDB.  Type "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "i386-linux"...
Core was generated by `./foo'.
Program terminated with signal 6, Aborted.

warning: current_sos: Can't read pathname for load map: Input/output error

Reading symbols from /lib/tls/libc.so.6...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/tls/libc.so.6
Reading symbols from /lib/ld-linux.so.2...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/ld-linux.so.2
#0  0x4004cd89 in raise () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
(gdb) bt
#0  0x4004cd89 in raise () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
#1  0x40158f70 in ?? () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
#2  0xb7c0 in ?? ()
#3  0x4004e5e1 in abort () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
(gdb) q
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=3D2.4.1 ./foo
Aborted (core dumped)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gdb foo core
GNU gdb 6.0-debian
Copyright 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain condition=
s.
Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
There is absolutely no warranty for GDB.  Type "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "i386-linux"...
Core was generated by `./foo'.
Program terminated with signal 6, Aborted.

warning: current_sos: Can't read pathname for load map: Input/output error

Reading symbols from /lib/libc.so.6...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/libc.so.6
Reading symbols from /lib/ld-linux.so.2...done.
Loaded symbols for /lib/ld-linux.so.2
#0  0x4004c551 in kill () from /lib/libc.so.6
(gdb) bt
#0  0x4004c551 in kill () from /lib/libc.so.6
#1  0x4004c2f5 in raise () from /lib/libc.so.6
#2  0x4004d7e8 in abort () from /lib/libc.so.6
#3  0x08048359 in main ()
(gdb) q


Note how when using the NPTL version of the library, the stack trace
does not contain the caller of abort() or anything that preceeded it;
this makes abort() mostly useless, and the generated core dump
entirely useless.

--=20
  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' :  http://www.debian.org/ |
 `. `'  |
   `- -><-  |

--VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/qodLlpK98RSteX8RAkjsAJ9YWl0IIBfNQSv+EJRfLkdUt8OdxwCfb+3g
olsh3XulzCIxTTcvubfeJTk=
=aGd1
-END PGP SIG

Bug#218424: marked as done (locales: Should list nb_NO in SUPPORTED file)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#218424: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Oct 2003 08:49:28 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 31 02:49:10 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pat.uio.no [129.240.130.16] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AFUxy-0004Jb-00; Fri, 31 Oct 2003 02:49:10 -0600
Received: from mail-mx6.uio.no ([129.240.10.47])
by pat.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.20)
id 1AFUxy-0005QI-0N
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 31 Oct 2003 09:49:10 +0100
Received: from saruman.uio.no ([129.240.201.202])
by mail-mx6.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
id 1AFUxw-0008N6-1M; Fri, 31 Oct 2003 09:49:08 +0100
Received: from pre by saruman.uio.no with local (Exim 2.12 #7)
id 1AFUxv-0005e4-00; Fri, 31 Oct 2003 09:49:07 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: locales: Should list nb_NO in SUPPORTED file
From: Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 09:49:07 +0100
X-MailScanner-Information: This message has been scanned for viruses/spam. Contact 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] if you have questions about this scanning.
X-UiO-MailScanner: No virus found
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.9 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,PATCH_UNIFIED_DIFF
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_28
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_28 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)


Package:  locales
Version:  2.3.2-9
Severity: minor
Tags: patch

I forgot a minor thing in my patch to add nb_NO as a real locale.  It
should also be listed in the SUPPORTED file, to make it possible to
select it at install time.

Here is a patch to fix it.

--- SUPPORTED.orig  2003-10-31 08:47:26.0 +
+++ SUPPORTED   2003-10-31 08:47:37.0 +
@@ -126,6 +126,7 @@
 mr_IN.UTF-8 UTF-8
 ms_MY ISO-8859-1
 mt_MT ISO-8859-3
+nb_NO ISO-8859-1
 nl_BE ISO-8859-1
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15
 nl_NL ISO-8859-1

---
Received: (at 218424-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 20:40:04 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 13:40:04 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkzM-0003WQ-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:40:04 -0700
Received: from dsilvers by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkuo-0003Rz-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#218424: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Daniel Silverstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 28

Source: glibc
Source-Version: 2.3.2.ds1-12

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
libc6_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libnss-dns-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libnss-dns-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
locales_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
  to pool/m

Bug#215466: marked as done (fi_FI locale doesn't contain first_weekday)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#215466: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Oct 2003 23:02:14 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 12 18:02:12 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from jt3-172.tky.hut.fi (rafaello) [130.233.19.42] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A8pE4-0006r2-00; Sun, 12 Oct 2003 18:02:12 -0500
Received: from donatello ([2002:82e9:132a:0:201:3ff:fedb:e67d] ident=mail)
by rafaello with esmtp (Exim 4.24)
id 1A8pE2-0002ur-JP; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 02:02:10 +0300
Received: from tvainika by donatello with local (Exim 4.24)
id 1A8pE5-0001Bi-P4; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 02:02:13 +0300
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===0579895313=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Tommi Vainikainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: fi_FI locale doesn't contain first_weekday
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.34
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 02:02:13 +0300
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Tommi Vainikainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.9 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE,PATCH_UNIFIED_DIFF
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_09
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_09 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.

--===0579895313==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: locales
Version: 2.3.2-8
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream patch

Currently fi_FI (and sv_FI) does not contain first_weekday nor
first_workday information.  Here is a patch to add that.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux donatello 2.4.22 #1 to syyskuun 11. 03:06:10 EEST 2003 i686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Versions of packages locales depends on:
ii  debconf   1.3.15 Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6 [glibc-2.3.2-8] 2.3.2-8GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

-- debconf information:
* locales/locales_to_be_generated: en_GB.UTF-8 UTF-8, en_US.UTF-8 UTF-8, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15, fi_FI.UTF-8 UTF-8, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15, sv_FI.UTF-8 
UTF-8, sv_SE.UTF-8 UTF-8
* locales/default_environment_locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--===0579895313==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="fi_FI.patch"

--- /usr/share/i18n/locales/fi_FI~  2003-09-21 15:51:13.0 +0300
+++ /usr/share/i18n/locales/fi_FI   2003-10-13 01:54:52.0 +0300
@@ -2191,6 +2191,8 @@
 date_fmt   "/
 /
 "
+first_weekday 2
+first_workday 2
 END LC_TIME
 
 LC_MESSAGES

--===0579895313==--

---
Received: (at 215466-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 20:40:02 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 13:40:02 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkzK-0003Vn-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:40:02 -0700
Received: from dsilvers by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkuo-0003Rr-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#215466: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Daniel Silverstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 8

Source: glibc
Source-Version: 2.3.2.ds1-12

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz

Bug#207199: marked as done (locales: locale-gen should complain about malformed /etc/locale.gen files)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#207199: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Aug 2003 17:13:04 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 25 12:12:34 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zealot.progeny.com (tentacle.deadbeast.net) [216.37.46.162] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19rKtO-0003W9-00; Mon, 25 Aug 2003 12:12:34 -0500
Received: by tentacle.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 07BE74F26F; Mon, 25 Aug 2003 12:12:39 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: locales: locale-gen should complain about malformed /etc/locale.gen files
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.20
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 12:12:39 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: locales
Version: 2.3.2-3
Severity: normal

# cat /etc/locale.gen
en_US.ISO-8859-1
en_US.UTF-8
# locale-gen
Generating locales...
Generation complete.

Hmph.

# locale-gen
+ LOCALEGEN=/etc/locale.gen
+ LOCALES=/usr/share/i18n/locales
+ '[' -f /etc/locale.gen -a -s /etc/locale.gen ']'
+ rm -rf '/usr/lib/locale/*'
+ umask 022
+ echo 'Generating locales...'
Generating locales...
+ read locale charset
+ '[' -n en_US.ISO-8859-1 -a -n '' ']'
+ continue
+ read locale charset
+ '[' -n en_US.UTF-8 -a -n '' ']'
+ continue
+ read locale charset
+ '[' -n '' -a -n '' ']'
+ continue
+ read locale charset
+ echo 'Generation complete.'
Generation complete.

This tool expects two "words" in each line of locale.gen.

It should complain if the input is malformed.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: powerpc
Kernel: Linux tentacle 2.4.19-pre7-ben0 #1 Tue Jun 18 10:25:42 EST 2002 ppc
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages locales depends on:
ii  debconf   1.3.9  Debian configuration management sy
hi  libc6 [glibc-2.3.2-3] 2.3.2-3GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

-- debconf information:
* locales/default_environment_locale: C
* locales/locales_to_be_generated: en_US.ISO-8859-1, en_US.UTF-8


---
Received: (at 207199-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 20:40:00 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 13:40:00 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkzI-0003TN-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:40:00 -0700
Received: from dsilvers by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkuo-0003Rl-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#207199: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Daniel Silverstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 5

Source: glibc
Source-Version: 2.3.2.ds1-12

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/

Bug#221740: marked as done (/usr/sbin/locale-gen: Post install script fails)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#198099: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Nov 2003 21:12:56 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 19 15:12:53 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zeus.netset.com [64.40.192.10] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AMZd3-86-00; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 15:12:49 -0600
Received: from hades (hades.noc.netset.com [64.40.192.155])
by zeus.netset.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hAJLCWmP006324;
Wed, 19 Nov 2003 16:12:47 -0500
Received: by hades (Postfix, from userid 0)
id 26490284C3; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 16:22:16 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Debian Bugs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: /usr/sbin/locale-gen: Post install script fails
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 16:22:16 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_15
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_15 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: locales
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
Severity: important
File: /usr/sbin/locale-gen

During a recent apt-get dist-upgrade, I noted a post-install error when
upgrading the locales package. The following results were obtained:

Setting up locales (2.3.2.ds1-10) ...
Generating locales...
  en_US.ISO-8859-1.../usr/sbin/locale-gen: line 32:  3771 Killed  
localedef -i $input -c -f $charset -A /etc/locale.alias $locale
dpkg: error processing locales (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 137
Errors were encountered while processing:
 locales
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

It does not appear (from my cursory investigation) that the post install
script itself is the problem, rather, it seems to be an issue with the 
/usr/sbin/locale-gen script, as the same error results from running that 
manually.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux hades 2.4.22 #1 Wed Nov 5 16:14:27 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages locales depends on:
ii  debconf 1.3.20   Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6 [glibc-2.3.2.ds1-10]  2.3.2.ds1-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

-- debconf information:
* locales/default_environment_locale: None
* locales/locales_to_be_generated: en_US ISO-8859-1, en_US.ISO-8859-15 ISO-8859-15, 
en_US.UTF-8 UTF-8


---
Received: (at 198099-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 20:38:29 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 13:38:29 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkxp-0003GE-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:38:29 -0700
Received: from dsilvers by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkuo-0003Rj-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#198099: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Daniel Silverstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4

Source: glibc
Source-Version: 2.3.2.ds1-12

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12

Bug#215821: marked as done (PAX segfault - locales + grsecurity)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#198099: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Oct 2003 23:28:10 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 14 18:27:45 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from debian.black.pl [217.113.232.82] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A9YZs-0001sS-00; Tue, 14 Oct 2003 18:27:45 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by debian.black.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id B07A619C32
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 01:27:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from debian.black.pl ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (debian [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 25718-03 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Wed, 15 Oct 2003 01:27:43 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from admin (unknown [192.168.121.2])
(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by debian.black.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id E066819C2D
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 01:27:42 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Rados=B3aw_Antoniuk?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PAX segfault - locales + grsecurity
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 01:28:04 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-2"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p5 (Debian) at debian.black.pl
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_70,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_13
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_13 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: locales
Version: 2.3.2-7
Severity: important

debian:~# locale-gen
Generating locales...
  pl_PL.ISO-8859-2.../usr/sbin/locale-gen: line 29:  7086 Killed
localedef -i $input -c -f $charset -A /etc/locale.alias $locale

Oct 15 01:22:11 debian kernel: PAX: From 192.168.1.2: terminating task:
/usr/bin/localedef(localedef):7086, uid/euid: 0/0, PC: 59106f20, SP:
59106e0c
Oct 15 01:22:11 debian kernel: PAX: bytes at PC: b9 c0 74 10 59 e9 96 e7 =
f6
ae 00 00 0c ae 08 08 06 00 00 00

iF  locales2.3.2-7GNU C Library: National Language (local=
e)
da
ii  libc6  2.3.2-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries and
Timezone
ii  libc6-dev  2.3.2-7GNU C Library: Development Libraries an=
d
Hea

--=20
Pozdrawiam,
Rados=B3aw 'Warden' Antoniuk
GG: 260746  |  http://debian.black.pl | 6BONE: MNT-WARDEN


---
Received: (at 198099-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 20:38:29 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 13:38:29 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkxp-0003GE-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:38:29 -0700
Received: from dsilvers by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkuo-0003Rj-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#198099: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Daniel Silverstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4

Source: glibc
Source-Version: 2.3.2.ds1-12

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gli

Bug#215624: marked as done (locales: no_NO.UTF-8 generation killed by grsec)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#198099: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Oct 2003 19:25:02 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 13 14:24:38 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from emma.bahner.com [81.0.149.82] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A98J3-0005Y9-00; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 14:24:38 -0500
Received: by emma.bahner.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id AC36D17042; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 21:24:16 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Lars Bahner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: locales: no_NO.UTF-8 generation killed by grsec
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.29
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 21:24:16 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_13
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_13 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: locales
Version: 2.3.2-7
Severity: wishlist

Hello,

locale-gen croaks trying to generate my locale. Now from syslog
I read:

Oct 13 20:56:41 emma kernel: PAX: terminating task:
/usr/bin/localedef(localedef):5208, uid/euid: 0/0, EIP: BFF4C330, ESP:
BFF4C21C
Oct 13 20:56:41 emma kernel: PAX: bytes at EIP: b9 d0 c8 f4 bf e9 86 93
12 48 00 00 0c ae 08 08 06 00 00 00 

So, I take this is because locale-gen is trying to execute a memory
page, and therefore the process is killed by grsec.

Is it necessary for locale-gen to access memory this way?

Kind regards,
Lars Bahner.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux emma 2.4.18-grsec-1.9.4 #4 Sat Jun 1 01:40:55 CEST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages locales depends on:
ii  debconf   1.3.14 Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6 [glibc-2.3.2-7] 2.3.2-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

-- debconf information:
* locales/default_environment_locale: C
* locales/locales_to_be_generated: 


---
Received: (at 198099-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 20:38:29 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 13:38:29 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkxp-0003GE-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:38:29 -0700
Received: from dsilvers by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkuo-0003Rj-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#198099: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Daniel Silverstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4

Source: glibc
Source-Version: 2.3.2.ds1-12

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
libc6_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libnss-dns-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libnss-dns-udeb

Bug#245387: Usage of long long on amd64.

[Kurt Roeckx]

Package: linux-kernel-headers
Version: 2.5.999-test7-bk-15

Here is a small patch that fixes warning/errors about usage of
long long for amd64.


Kurt

--- include/asm-x86_64/types.h.orig 2004-04-22 23:16:11.294209120 +0200
+++ include/asm-x86_64/types.h  2004-04-22 23:16:02.109605392 +0200
@@ -19,8 +19,10 @@
 typedef __signed__ int __s32;
 typedef unsigned int __u32;
 
+#if defined(__GNUC__) && !defined(__STRICT_ANSI__)
 typedef __signed__ long long __s64;
-typedef unsigned long long  __u64;
+typedef unsigned long long __u64;
+#endif
 
 #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
 
--- include/asm-x86_64/byteorder.h.orig 2004-04-22 23:15:06.162110704 +0200
+++ include/asm-x86_64/byteorder.h  2004-04-22 23:17:36.556247320 +0200
@@ -5,11 +5,13 @@
 
 #ifdef __GNUC__
 
+#if !defined (__STRICT_ANSI__)
 static __inline__ __u64 ___arch__swab64(__u64 x)
 {
__asm__("bswapq %0" : "=r" (x) : "0" (x));
return x;
 }
+#endif
 
 static __inline__ __u32 ___arch__swab32(__u32 x)
 {

Bug#183139: marked as done (libc-udeb: Should be renamed to libc6-udeb)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#183139: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Mar 2003 18:33:03 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 02 12:33:03 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mx.mmweg.rwth-aachen.de [134.130.118.4] 
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18pYGk-8D-00; Sun, 02 Mar 2003 12:33:02 -0600
Received: (qmail 31388 invoked by alias); 2 Mar 2003 18:32:51 -
Received: (qmail 31375 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2003 18:32:50 -
Received: from coyote.mmweg (HELO coyote) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  by hub.mmweg with SMTP; 2 Mar 2003 18:32:50 -
Received: by coyote (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun,  2 Mar 2003 19:33:01 +0100
Date: 2 Mar 2003 19:33:01 +0100
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Sebastian Ley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: libc-udeb: Should be renamed to libc6-udeb
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libc-udeb
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-03-02
Severity: normal

On the next soname change all udebs relying on libc-udeb are about to
break. Until they are rebuilded, net installs will not be possible.


---
Received: (at 183139-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 20:38:31 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 13:38:31 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkxq-0003Gr-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:38:31 -0700
Received: from dsilvers by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkuo-0003Rd-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#183139: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Daniel Silverstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Source: glibc
Source-Version: 2.3.2.ds1-12

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
libc6_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libnss-dns-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libnss-dns-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
locales_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/locales_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
nscd_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/nscd_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated glibc package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [

Bug#196382: marked as done (libc6 - don't respect DEBIAN_FRONTEND = noninteractive for setup timezone)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#196382: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Jun 2003 15:00:03 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 06 10:00:02 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from p50831ab5.dip.t-dialin.net (extern.mail.waldi.eu.org) [80.131.26.181] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19OIhF-0004DK-00; Fri, 06 Jun 2003 10:00:02 -0500
Received: by wavehammer.waldi.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 45AEA743A5; Fri,  6 Jun 2003 17:00:00 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 17:00:00 +0200
From: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libc6 - don't respect DEBIAN_FRONTEND = noninteractive for setup timezone
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-18.6 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,USER_AGENT_MUTT
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)


--UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.1-17
Severity: normal

libc6 postinst don't respect DEBIAN_FRONTEND =3D noninteractive for
initiale timezone setup. it may just set it to UTC.

bastian

--=20
If I can have honesty, it's easier to overlook mistakes.
-- Kirk, "Space Seed", stardate 3141.9

--UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAj7grHAACgkQLkAIIn9ODhGSzwCdEcsme9alKleyyF+lSBbl7Xat
g+4An2v2YYx2qpalScY1lVbAx4PYdfH8
=TOj/
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2--

---
Received: (at 196382-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 20:39:59 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 13:39:59 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkzH-0003SA-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:39:59 -0700
Received: from dsilvers by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkuo-0003Rh-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#196382: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Daniel Silverstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3

Source: glibc
Source-Version: 2.3.2.ds1-12

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
libc6_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libnss-dns-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libnss-dns-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
locales_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/locales_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
nscd_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/

Bug#183143: marked as done (libc-udeb: Should provide libc6)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#183143: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Mar 2003 19:06:22 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 02 13:06:17 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mx.mmweg.rwth-aachen.de [134.130.118.4] 
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18pYmr-0001iW-00; Sun, 02 Mar 2003 13:06:13 -0600
Received: (qmail 32512 invoked by alias); 2 Mar 2003 19:06:01 -
Received: (qmail 32500 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2003 19:06:01 -
Received: from coyote.mmweg (HELO coyote) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  by hub.mmweg with SMTP; 2 Mar 2003 19:06:01 -
Received: by coyote (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun,  2 Mar 2003 20:06:12 +0100
Date: 2 Mar 2003 20:06:12 +0100
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Sebastian Ley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: libc-udeb: Should provide libc6
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libc-udeb
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-03-02
Severity: normal

Together with the packagename change this will allow other udebs to just
use dh_shlibdeps to determine their dependencies, because the shlibs
file for glibc of course ponts to libc6.


---
Received: (at 183143-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 20:38:30 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 13:38:30 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkxq-0003Gf-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:38:30 -0700
Received: from dsilvers by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkuo-0003Rf-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#183143: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Daniel Silverstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: glibc
Source-Version: 2.3.2.ds1-12

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
libc6_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libnss-dns-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libnss-dns-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
locales_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/locales_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
nscd_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/nscd_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated glibc package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the a

Bug#198099: marked as done (Please make localedef support PAX)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#198099: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Jun 2003 17:47:17 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 19 12:47:16 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from srv.bobcom.de (hosting.bobcom.de) [217.69.161.101] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19T3VE-0007aE-00; Thu, 19 Jun 2003 12:47:16 -0500
Received: from pd9e3674d.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.227.103.77] helo=cyberoptic.de)
by hosting.bobcom.de with asmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 19T3WM-0002X5-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 19 Jun 2003 19:48:26 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 19:47:08 +0200
From: CyberOptic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030529
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: locales: locales-gen broken
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanner: exiscan *19T3WM-0002X5-00*IiyU70XbGXQ*
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-12.3 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_UA
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_18
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_18 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: locales
Version: 2.3.1-16
Severity: important
Tags: sid

-- Problem Description
locales-gen aborts after first locale. Which locale it is doesn't matter.

-- Live Example

host:/# locale-gen
Generating locales...
   de_DE.ISO-8859-1.../usr/sbin/locale-gen: line 24: 31124 Killed 
localedef -i $input -c -f $charset $locale -A /etc/locale.alias
host:/#


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux bobcom1 2.4.21-grsec #1 Sat Jun 14 01:13:11 CEST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages locales depends on:
ii  debconf   1.2.35 Debian configuration 
management sy
ii  libc6 [glibc-2.3.1-16]2.3.1-16   GNU C Library: Shared 
libraries an

-- debconf information:
* locales/default_environment_locale: C
* locales/locales_to_be_generated: de_DE ISO-8859-1, de_DE.UTF-8 UTF-8, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] UTF-8, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISO-8859-15


---
Received: (at 198099-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 20:38:29 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 22 13:38:29 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkxp-0003GE-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:38:29 -0700
Received: from dsilvers by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGkuo-0003Rj-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
From: GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#198099: fixed in glibc 2.3.2.ds1-12
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Daniel Silverstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:35:22 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4

Source: glibc
Source-Version: 2.3.2.ds1-12

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.2.ds1-12_all.deb
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.diff.gz
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
  to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-12.dsc
libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-i686_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-pic_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-prof_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.deb
libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-udeb_2.3.2.ds1-12