Processed: Re: Bug#339981: linux-kernel-headers: includes non-existant file cpu-feature-overrides.h on mips(el)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 339981 evms Bug#339981: linux-kernel-headers: includes non-existant file cpu-feature-overrides.h on mips(el) Bug reassigned from package `linux-kernel-headers' to `evms'. > severity 339981 serious Bug#339981: linux-kernel-headers: includes non-existant file cpu-feature-overrides.h on mips(el) Severity set to `serious'. > retitle 339981 FTBFS on mips(el) Bug#339981: linux-kernel-headers: includes non-existant file cpu-feature-overrides.h on mips(el) Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#339981: linux-kernel-headers: includes non-existant file cpu-feature-overrides.h on mips(el)
reassign 339981 evms severity 339981 serious retitle 339981 FTBFS on mips(el) thanks On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 06:32:46PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > Do not use from userspace; it is not portably usable > from userspace. The MIPS headers are a perfect example of why not; in > several cases the MIPS bitops call local_irq_save. OK, thank you. In that case, I'll just remove it; it _looks_ like it can be removed (I can't find any _bit functions being called) in there, so I'll just try that. /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#339981: linux-kernel-headers: includes non-existant file cpu-feature-overrides.h on mips(el)
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 03:42:29PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 02:06:15AM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > > evms miscompiles on mips(el) due to some missing file or wrong #include: > > Is there anything happening on this? I can't get evms into testing (neither > via testing-proposed-updates or via unstable) because of this bug, and thus I > can't fix a critical bug in stable (causing severe data loss in some cases) > either. It's been almost a month; what's the hold-up? The holdup is a shortage of glibc maintainers, obviously. This is a bug in your package: In file included from /usr/include/asm/bitops.h:16, from md_super.c:33: Do not use from userspace; it is not portably usable from userspace. The MIPS headers are a perfect example of why not; in several cases the MIPS bitops call local_irq_save. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
glibc_2.3.5-9_sparc.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: glibc-doc_2.3.5-9_all.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.5-9_all.deb glibc_2.3.5-9.diff.gz to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.5-9.diff.gz glibc_2.3.5-9.dsc to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.5-9.dsc libc6-dbg_2.3.5-9_sparc.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.3.5-9_sparc.deb libc6-dev-sparc64_2.3.5-9_sparc.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev-sparc64_2.3.5-9_sparc.deb libc6-dev_2.3.5-9_sparc.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev_2.3.5-9_sparc.deb libc6-pic_2.3.5-9_sparc.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-pic_2.3.5-9_sparc.deb libc6-prof_2.3.5-9_sparc.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-prof_2.3.5-9_sparc.deb libc6-sparc64_2.3.5-9_sparc.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-sparc64_2.3.5-9_sparc.deb libc6-sparcv9_2.3.5-9_sparc.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-sparcv9_2.3.5-9_sparc.deb libc6-sparcv9b_2.3.5-9_sparc.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-sparcv9b_2.3.5-9_sparc.deb libc6-udeb_2.3.5-9_sparc.udeb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-udeb_2.3.5-9_sparc.udeb libc6_2.3.5-9_sparc.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6_2.3.5-9_sparc.deb libnss-dns-udeb_2.3.5-9_sparc.udeb to pool/main/g/glibc/libnss-dns-udeb_2.3.5-9_sparc.udeb libnss-files-udeb_2.3.5-9_sparc.udeb to pool/main/g/glibc/libnss-files-udeb_2.3.5-9_sparc.udeb locales_2.3.5-9_all.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/locales_2.3.5-9_all.deb nscd_2.3.5-9_sparc.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/nscd_2.3.5-9_sparc.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 339389 339415 340835 341514 342755 343571 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
glibc override disparity
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): libc6-sparc64_2.3.5-9_sparc.deb: package says priority is required, override says standard. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload. If you feel the override is incorrect then please reply to this mail and explain why. [NB: this is an automatically generated mail; if you replied to one like it before and have not received a response yet, please ignore this mail. Your reply needs to be processed by a human and will be in due course, but until then the installer will send these automated mails; sorry.] -- Debian distribution maintenance software (This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#340835: marked as done (sparc: /lib64/libc.so.6: unexpected reloc type 0x4f)
Your message dated Sat, 17 Dec 2005 13:47:59 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#341514: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Nov 2005 09:32:05 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 26 01:32:05 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de ([130.149.17.13] ident=root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EfwPc-0002eO-Mj
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 01:32:05 -0800
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA17799
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 10:32:01 +0100 (MET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71460F2B2
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 10:32:01 +0100 (MET)
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP
id 19332-42 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sat, 26 Nov 2005 10:31:57 +0100 (MET) 13901
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 10:31:57 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id jAQ9Vvag007801;
Sat, 26 Nov 2005 10:31:57 +0100 (MET)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 10:31:57 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: sparc: /lib64/libc.so.6: unexpected reloc type 0x4f
X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 17) "Jumbo Shrimp" XEmacs Lucid
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: glibc
Version: 2.3.5-8
Severity: serious
makes gcc* FTBFS on sparc, 2.3.5-6 looks ok.
long longval () { return (long) (sizeof (int)); }
unsigned long ulongval () { return (long) (sizeof (int)); }
#include
#include
int
main ()
{
FILE *f = fopen ("conftest.val", "w");
if (! f)
exit (1);
if (((long) (sizeof (int))) < 0)
{
long i = longval ();
if (i != ((long) (sizeof (int
exit (1);
fprintf (f, "%ld\n", i);
}
else
{
unsigned long i = ulongval ();
if (i != ((long) (sizeof (int
exit (1);
fprintf (f, "%lu\n", i);
}
exit (ferror (f) || fclose (f) != 0);
;
return 0;
}
$ gcc -m64 foo.c
$ ./a.out
./a.out: error while loading shared libraries: /lib64/libc.so.6: unexpected
reloc type 0x4f
---
Received: (at 341514-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Dec 2005 21:51:10 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 17 13:51:10 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1EnjuJ-SF-KX; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 13:47:59 -0800
From: Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#341514: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-9
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 13:47:59 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3
Source: glibc
Source-Version: 2.3.5-9
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
glibc-doc_2.3.5-9_all.deb
to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.5-9_all.deb
glibc_2.3.5-9.diff.gz
to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.5-9.diff.gz
glibc_2.3.5-9.dsc
to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.5-9.dsc
libc6-dbg_2.3.5-9_sparc.deb
to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.3.5-9_sparc.deb
libc6-dev-sparc64_2.3.5-9_sparc.deb
to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev-sparc64_2.3.5-9_sparc.deb
libc6-dev_2.3.5-9_sparc.deb
to pool/main/g/glibc/
Bug#343571: marked as done (libc6: FTBFS [powerpc] weak alias issues)
Your message dated Sat, 17 Dec 2005 13:47:59 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#343571: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Dec 2005 08:54:57 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 16 00:54:56 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EnBMe-0003w7-M2 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 00:54:56 -0800 Received: by ozlabs.org (Postfix, from userid 1010) id AEC0E688AF; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 19:54:55 +1100 (EST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Anton Blanchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: libc6: FTBFS [powerpc] weak alias issues X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 19:43:41 +1100 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.5-8 Severity: serious Tags: patch Justification: no longer builds from source I was unable to build the latest version of glibc on an up to date powerpc unstable system. The following patch fixes it for me. The fixes come straight out of mainline glibc. --- sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc32/fpu/s_lround.S~ 2004-06-30 17:29:12.0 -0500 +++ sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc32/fpu/s_lround.S2005-11-18 16:48:11.0 -0600 @@ -88,7 +79,6 @@ b .L9 END (__lround) -strong_alias (__lround, __lround) weak_alias (__lround, lround) strong_alias (__lround, __lroundf) --- sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/powerpc/powerpc32/socket.S~ 2005-12-16 01:04:21.0 -0600 +++ sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/powerpc/powerpc32/socket.S 2005-12-16 01:06:26.0 -0600 @@ -42,7 +42,11 @@ #define stackblock 20 #ifndef __socket -#define __socket P(__,socket) +# ifndef NO_WEAK_ALIAS +# define __socket P(__,socket) +# else +# define __socket socket +# endif #endif .text @@ -116,4 +120,6 @@ PSEUDO_END (__socket) +#ifndef NO_WEAK_ALIAS weak_alias (__socket, socket) +#endif --- sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/powerpc/powerpc64/socket.S~ 2005-12-16 01:08:45.0 -0600 +++ sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/powerpc/powerpc64/socket.S 2005-12-16 01:09:32.0 -0600 @@ -41,12 +41,12 @@ #define stackblock 80 /* offset to socket parm area. */ -#ifndef socket -/* If this is just socket.S leave it alone! */ -#else #ifndef __socket -#define __socket P(__,socket) -#endif +# ifndef NO_WEAK_ALIAS +# define __socket P(__,socket) +# else +# define __socket socket +# endif #endif .text @@ -120,4 +120,6 @@ cfi_endproc PSEUDO_END (__socket) +#ifndef NO_WEAK_ALIAS weak_alias (__socket, socket) +#endif -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-rc2-g5d240918 Locale: LANG=en_AU, LC_CTYPE=en_AU (charmap=ISO-8859-1) -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 343571-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Dec 2005 21:51:08 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 17 13:51:08 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EnjuJ-SJ-M2; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 13:47:59 -0800 From: Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#343571: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-9 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 13:47:59 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: glibc Source-Version: 2.3.5-9 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: glibc-doc_2.3.5-9_all.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.5-9_all.deb glibc_2.3.5-9.diff.gz to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.5-9
Bug#342755: marked as done (glibc: ftbfs [sparc] Error: symbol `__bind' is already defined)
Your message dated Sat, 17 Dec 2005 13:47:59 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#342755: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Dec 2005 05:25:10 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 09 21:25:10 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from blars.org ([64.81.35.59] helo=renig.nat.blars.org) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EkxEM-0007z3-9w for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 21:25:10 -0800 Received: from quaff (quaff.nat.blars.org [172.16.2.7]) by renig.nat.blars.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id jBA5P7Wp002541 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 9 Dec 2005 21:25:08 -0800 Received: from quaff.nat.blars.org (quaff [127.0.0.1]) by quaff (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id jBA5MqtI018063; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 21:22:52 -0800 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by quaff.nat.blars.org (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id jBA5MqjR018061; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 21:22:52 -0800 Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 21:22:51 -0800 From: Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: glibc: ftbfs [sparc] Error: symbol `__bind' is already defined Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Reportbug-Version: 3.18 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: glibc Version: 2.3.5-8.1 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source glibc failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder. gcc-4.0 ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/bind.S -c -I../include -I. -I/tmp/build= d/glibc-2.3.5/build-tree/sparc-libc/socket -I.. -I../libio -I/tmp/buildd/g= libc-2.3.5/build-tree/sparc-libc -I../sysdeps/sparc/sparc32/elf -I../libidn= /sysdeps/unix -I../linuxthreads/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sparc/sparc32 -I../= linuxthreads/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sparc -I../linuxthreads/sysdeps/unix/s= ysv/linux -I../linuxthreads/sysdeps/pthread -I../sysdeps/pthread -I../linux= threads/sysdeps/unix/sysv -I../linuxthreads/sysdeps/unix -I../linuxthreads/= sysdeps/sparc/sparc32 -I../linuxthreads/sysdeps/sparc -I../sysdeps/unix/sys= v/linux/sparc/sparc32 -I../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sparc -I../sysdeps/unix/= sysv/linux -I../sysdeps/gnu -I../sysdeps/unix/common -I../sysdeps/unix/mman= -I../sysdeps/unix/inet -I../sysdeps/unix/sysv -I../sysdeps/unix/sparc -I..= /sysdeps/unix -I../sysdeps/posix -I../sysdeps/sparc/sparc32/sparcv8 -I../sy= sdeps/sparc/sparc32/fpu -I../sysdeps/sparc/sparc32 -I../sysdeps/wordsize-32= -I../sysdeps/ieee754/flt-32 -I../sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64 -I../sysdeps/sparc= /sparc32/soft-fp -I../sysdeps/sparc/fpu -I../sysdeps/sparc -I../sysdeps/iee= e754 -I../sysdeps/generic/elf -I../sysdeps/generic -nostdinc -isystem /usr/= lib/gcc/sparc-linux-gnu/4.0.3/include -isystem /tmp/buildd/glibc-2.3.5/debi= an/include -D_LIBC_REENTRANT -include ../include/libc-symbols.h -DASS= EMBLER -D__ASSEMBLY__ -g -Wa,--noexecstack -o /tmp/buildd/glibc-2.3.5/buil= d-tree/sparc-libc/socket/bind.o -MD -MP -MF /tmp/buildd/glibc-2.3.5/build-t= ree/sparc-libc/socket/bind.o.dt -MT /tmp/buildd/glibc-2.3.5/build-tree/spar= c-libc/socket/bind.o =2E./sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/bind.S: Assembler messages: =2E./sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/bind.S:5: Error: symbol `__bind' is already de= fined make[3]: *** [/tmp/buildd/glibc-2.3.5/build-tree/sparc-libc/socket/bind.o] = Error 1 make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/glibc-2.3.5/build-tree/glibc-2.3.5/= socket' make[2]: *** [socket/subdir_lib] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/glibc-2.3.5/build-tree/glibc-2.3.5' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/glibc-2.3.5/build-tree/sparc-libc' make: *** [/tmp/buildd/glibc-2.3.5/stamp-dir/build_libc] Error 2 --- Received: (at 342755-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Dec 2005 21:51:09 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 17 13:51:09 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from kat
Bug#341514: marked as done (libc6-sparc64: All 64-bit binaries fail to execute.)
Your message dated Sat, 17 Dec 2005 13:47:59 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#341514: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Dec 2005 04:14:45 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 30 20:14:44 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from dsl027-180-168.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.27.180.168] helo=sunset.davemloft.net ident=Debian-exim) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EhfqG-0004VL-Sl for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 20:14:44 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] ident=davem) by sunset.davemloft.net with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EhfqG-0003I5-5F for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 20:14:44 -0800 Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 20:14:43 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: libc6-sparc64: All 64-bit binaries fail to execute. X-Debbugs-CC: David S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: "David S. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> FX-Debbugs-CC: +backup X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2.53 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: libc6-sparc64 Version: 2.3.5-8 Severity: normal There are some critical things missing in the sparc64 TLS support code in the current debian glibc tree, for example none of the TLS relcation support is in sysdeps/sparc/sparc64/dl-machine.h, and therefore so no binary linked against 64-bit libc can execute. Not even "/lib64/libc.so.6 --version" will work, it will fail because the dynamic linker doesn't understand the TLS relocations present in the /libc64/libc.so.64 binary. If this sparc TLS support has been backported, this back has missed significant chunks of the necessary changes and now all 64-bit binaries fail to execute on the system. I would suggest trying to execute a "Hello World" program, post-build, to avoid major errors like this. There is no way that any of the testsuite executed properly. Perhaps it was "built" successfully, but none of the programs linking against libc could have executed properly due to this bug. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: sparc (sparc64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-rc3-gd2ef5ebb Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages libc6-sparc64 depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-8GNU C Library: Shared libraries an libc6-sparc64 recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 341514-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Dec 2005 21:51:10 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 17 13:51:10 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EnjuJ-SF-KX; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 13:47:59 -0800 From: Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#341514: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-9 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 13:47:59 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Source: glibc Source-Version: 2.3.5-9 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: glibc-doc_2.3.5-9_all.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.5-9_all.deb glibc_2.3.5-9.diff.gz to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.5-9.diff.gz glibc_2.3.5-9.dsc to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.5-9.dsc libc6-dbg_2.3.5-9_sparc.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.3.5-9_sparc.deb libc6-dev-sparc64_2.3.5-9_sparc.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev-sparc64_2.3.5-9_sparc.deb libc6-dev_2.3.5-9_sparc.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev_2.3.5-9_sparc.deb libc6-pic_
Bug#341514: marked as done (libc6-sparc64: All 64-bit binaries fail to execute.)
Your message dated Sat, 17 Dec 2005 13:47:59 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340835: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Dec 2005 04:14:45 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 30 20:14:44 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from dsl027-180-168.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.27.180.168] helo=sunset.davemloft.net ident=Debian-exim) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EhfqG-0004VL-Sl for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 20:14:44 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] ident=davem) by sunset.davemloft.net with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EhfqG-0003I5-5F for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 20:14:44 -0800 Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 20:14:43 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: libc6-sparc64: All 64-bit binaries fail to execute. X-Debbugs-CC: David S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: "David S. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> FX-Debbugs-CC: +backup X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2.53 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: libc6-sparc64 Version: 2.3.5-8 Severity: normal There are some critical things missing in the sparc64 TLS support code in the current debian glibc tree, for example none of the TLS relcation support is in sysdeps/sparc/sparc64/dl-machine.h, and therefore so no binary linked against 64-bit libc can execute. Not even "/lib64/libc.so.6 --version" will work, it will fail because the dynamic linker doesn't understand the TLS relocations present in the /libc64/libc.so.64 binary. If this sparc TLS support has been backported, this back has missed significant chunks of the necessary changes and now all 64-bit binaries fail to execute on the system. I would suggest trying to execute a "Hello World" program, post-build, to avoid major errors like this. There is no way that any of the testsuite executed properly. Perhaps it was "built" successfully, but none of the programs linking against libc could have executed properly due to this bug. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: sparc (sparc64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-rc3-gd2ef5ebb Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages libc6-sparc64 depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-8GNU C Library: Shared libraries an libc6-sparc64 recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 340835-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Dec 2005 21:51:15 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 17 13:51:15 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EnjuJ-SD-Jo; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 13:47:59 -0800 From: Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#340835: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-9 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 13:47:59 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 6 Source: glibc Source-Version: 2.3.5-9 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: glibc-doc_2.3.5-9_all.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.5-9_all.deb glibc_2.3.5-9.diff.gz to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.5-9.diff.gz glibc_2.3.5-9.dsc to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.5-9.dsc libc6-dbg_2.3.5-9_sparc.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.3.5-9_sparc.deb libc6-dev-sparc64_2.3.5-9_sparc.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev-sparc64_2.3.5-9_sparc.deb libc6-dev_2.3.5-9_sparc.deb to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev_2.3.5-9_sparc.deb libc6-pic_
Bug#340835: marked as done (sparc: /lib64/libc.so.6: unexpected reloc type 0x4f)
Your message dated Sat, 17 Dec 2005 13:47:59 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#340835: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Nov 2005 09:32:05 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 26 01:32:05 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de ([130.149.17.13] ident=root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EfwPc-0002eO-Mj
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 01:32:05 -0800
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA17799
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 10:32:01 +0100 (MET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71460F2B2
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 10:32:01 +0100 (MET)
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP
id 19332-42 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sat, 26 Nov 2005 10:31:57 +0100 (MET) 13901
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 10:31:57 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id jAQ9Vvag007801;
Sat, 26 Nov 2005 10:31:57 +0100 (MET)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 10:31:57 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: sparc: /lib64/libc.so.6: unexpected reloc type 0x4f
X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 17) "Jumbo Shrimp" XEmacs Lucid
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: glibc
Version: 2.3.5-8
Severity: serious
makes gcc* FTBFS on sparc, 2.3.5-6 looks ok.
long longval () { return (long) (sizeof (int)); }
unsigned long ulongval () { return (long) (sizeof (int)); }
#include
#include
int
main ()
{
FILE *f = fopen ("conftest.val", "w");
if (! f)
exit (1);
if (((long) (sizeof (int))) < 0)
{
long i = longval ();
if (i != ((long) (sizeof (int
exit (1);
fprintf (f, "%ld\n", i);
}
else
{
unsigned long i = ulongval ();
if (i != ((long) (sizeof (int
exit (1);
fprintf (f, "%lu\n", i);
}
exit (ferror (f) || fclose (f) != 0);
;
return 0;
}
$ gcc -m64 foo.c
$ ./a.out
./a.out: error while loading shared libraries: /lib64/libc.so.6: unexpected
reloc type 0x4f
---
Received: (at 340835-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Dec 2005 21:51:15 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 17 13:51:15 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1EnjuJ-SD-Jo; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 13:47:59 -0800
From: Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#340835: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-9
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 13:47:59 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 6
Source: glibc
Source-Version: 2.3.5-9
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
glibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
glibc-doc_2.3.5-9_all.deb
to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc-doc_2.3.5-9_all.deb
glibc_2.3.5-9.diff.gz
to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.5-9.diff.gz
glibc_2.3.5-9.dsc
to pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.5-9.dsc
libc6-dbg_2.3.5-9_sparc.deb
to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dbg_2.3.5-9_sparc.deb
libc6-dev-sparc64_2.3.5-9_sparc.deb
to pool/main/g/glibc/libc6-dev-sparc64_2.3.5-9_sparc.deb
libc6-dev_2.3.5-9_sparc.deb
to pool/main/g/glibc/
Bug#339415: marked as done (FTBFS: Redefinitions of __divdi3, __moddi3, __udivdi32, and __umoddi3)
Your message dated Sat, 17 Dec 2005 13:47:59 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#339415: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Nov 2005 04:55:59 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 15 20:55:59 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zoot.lafn.org ([206.117.18.6])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EcFKx-0007IS-Hi
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 20:55:59 -0800
Received: from localhost.localdomain
(pool-71-104-166-233.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.104.166.233])
(authenticated bits=0)
by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jAG4twvL083741
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 20:55:58 -0800 (PST)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from kraai by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.54)
id 1Ec5by-qP-Rg
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 10:32:55 -0800
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 10:32:54 -0800
From: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FTBFS: Redefinitions of __divdi3, __moddi3, __udivdi32, and __umoddi3
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.86.2/1176/Tue Nov 15 12:47:39 2005 on zoot.lafn.org
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: glibc
Version: 2.3.5-8
Severity: serious
pbuilder fails to build glibc in an unstable chroot on i386:
> gcc-4.0 ../sysdeps/wordsize-32/divdi3.c -c -std=3Dgnu99 -O2 -Wall -Winlin=
e -Wstrict-prototypes -Wwrite-strings -fstrict-aliasing -g -pipe -mpreferre=
d-stack-boundary=3D4 -fPIC-I../include -I. -I/tmp/buildd/glibc-2.3.5/b=
uild-tree/i386-libc/csu -I.. -I../libio -I/tmp/buildd/glibc-2.3.5/build-tr=
ee/i386-libc -I../sysdeps/i386/elf -I../libidn/sysdeps/unix -I../linuxthrea=
ds/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386 -I../linuxthreads/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux -=
I../linuxthreads/sysdeps/pthread -I../sysdeps/pthread -I../linuxthreads/sys=
deps/unix/sysv -I../linuxthreads/sysdeps/unix -I../linuxthreads/sysdeps/i38=
6 -I../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386 -I../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux -I../sysde=
ps/gnu -I../sysdeps/unix/common -I../sysdeps/unix/mman -I../sysdeps/unix/in=
et -I../sysdeps/unix/sysv/i386 -I../sysdeps/unix/sysv -I../sysdeps/unix/i38=
6 -I../sysdeps/unix -I../sysdeps/posix -I../sysdeps/i386/i486 -I../sysdeps/=
i386/fpu -I../sysdeps/i386 -I../sysdeps/wordsize-32 -I../sysdeps/ieee754/ld=
bl-96 -I../sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64 -I../sysdeps/ieee754/flt-32 -I../sysdeps/=
ieee754 -I../sysdeps/generic/elf -I../sysdeps/generic -nostdinc -isystem /u=
sr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.0.3/include -isystem /tmp/buildd/glibc-2.3.5/de=
bian/include -D_LIBC_REENTRANT -include ../include/libc-symbols.h -DPIC -D=
SHARED -DHAVE_INITFINI -o /tmp/buildd/glibc-2.3.5/build-tree/i386-libc/=
csu/divdi3.os -MD -MP -MF /tmp/buildd/glibc-2.3.5/build-tree/i386-libc/csu/=
divdi3.os.dt -MT /tmp/buildd/glibc-2.3.5/build-tree/i386-libc/csu/divdi3.os
> ../sysdeps/wordsize-32/divdi3.c: In function '__moddi3':
> ../sysdeps/wordsize-32/divdi3.c:312: warning: pointer targets in passing =
argument 3 of '__udivmoddi4' differ in signedness
> {standard input}: Assembler messages:
> {standard input}:416: Error: symbol `__divdi3' is already defined
> {standard input}:504: Error: symbol `__moddi3' is already defined
> {standard input}:608: Error: symbol `__udivdi3' is already defined
> {standard input}:642: Error: symbol `__umoddi3' is already defined
--=20
Matt
--IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDeinWfNdgYxVXvBARAvngAKCi+I/82dAEr38jkCSEVaBYasDR6wCgmpZa
h0CGIdBPpQhmx0ssYRgKrCA=
=CfwJ
-END PGP SIGNA
Bug#339389: marked as done (glibc: FTBFS on amd64: sem_trywait.S:59: Error: symbol `sem_trywait' is already defined)
Your message dated Sat, 17 Dec 2005 13:47:59 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#339389: fixed in glibc 2.3.5-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Nov 2005 23:00:50 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 15 15:00:50 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from asia.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.137.74]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ec9nF-0005LT-S7 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 15:00:50 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 074F93808F for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 00:00:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775F4A.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.74]) by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9EC53805A for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 00:00:48 +0100 (CET) Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id 8400426136; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 00:00:48 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 00:00:48 +0100 From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: glibc: FTBFS on amd64: sem_trywait.S:59: Error: symbol `sem_trywait' is already defined Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_SORBS,RCVD_IN_SORBS_MISC autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: glibc Version: 2.3.5-8 Severity: important Tags: patch Hi, glibc is failing to build on amd64 with the following error: gcc ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/sem_trywait.S -c -I../include -= I. -I/build/buildd/glibc-2.3.5/build-tree/amd64-libc/nptl -I.. -I../libio = -I/build/buildd/glibc-2.3.5/build-tree/amd64-libc -I../sysdeps/x86_64/elf -= I../libidn/sysdeps/unix -I../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64 -I../nptl/= sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux -I../nptl/sysdeps/pthread -I../sysdeps/pthread -I..= /nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv -I../nptl/sysdeps/unix -I../nptl/sysdeps/x86_64 -I.= ./sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64 -I../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/wordsize-64 -= I../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux -I../sysdeps/gnu -I../sysdeps/unix/common -I../= sysdeps/unix/mman -I../sysdeps/unix/inet -I../sysdeps/unix/sysv -I../sysdep= s/unix/x86_64 -I../sysdeps/unix -I../sysdeps/posix -I../sysdeps/x86_64/fpu = -I../sysdeps/x86_64 -I../sysdeps/wordsize-64 -I../sysdeps/ieee754/ldbl-96 -= I../sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64 -I../sysdeps/ieee754/flt-32 -I../sysdeps/ieee754= -I../sysdeps/generic/elf -I../sysdeps/generic -nostdinc -isystem /usr/lib/= gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.0.3/include -isystem /build/buildd/glibc-2.3.5/debia= n/include -D_LIBC_REENTRANT -D_LIBC_REENTRANT -include ../include/libc-symb= ols.h -DNOT_IN_libc=3D1 -DIS_IN_libpthread=3D1-DASSEMBLER -g -Wa,--no= execstack -o /build/buildd/glibc-2.3.5/build-tree/amd64-libc/nptl/sem_tryw= ait.o -MD -MP -MF /build/buildd/glibc-2.3.5/build-tree/amd64-libc/nptl/sem_= trywait.o.dt -MT /build/buildd/glibc-2.3.5/build-tree/amd64-libc/nptl/sem_t= rywait.o =2E./nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/sem_trywait.S: Assembler messages: =2E./nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/sem_trywait.S:59: Error: symbol `s= em_trywait' is already defined make[3]: *** [/build/buildd/glibc-2.3.5/build-tree/amd64-libc/nptl/sem_tryw= ait.o] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/glibc-2.3.5/build-tree/glibc-2.3.= 5/np tl' I believe the attached patch should fix it. It now does the same as on i386, and have the real symbol named __new_sem_trywait, and add the weak alias as sem_trywait. With the attached patch it builds, and seems to work fine. Kurt --vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="sem_trywait.diff" --- nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/sem_trywait.S.old 2005-11-15 23:09:31.0 +0100 +++ nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/sem_trywait.S 2005-11-15 23:10:09.0 +0100 @@ -29,10 +29,10 @@ .text - .globl sem_trywait - .type sem_tr
Processing of glibc_2.3.5-9_sparc.changes
glibc_2.3.5-9_sparc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: glibc_2.3.5-9.dsc glibc_2.3.5-9.diff.gz glibc-doc_2.3.5-9_all.deb locales_2.3.5-9_all.deb libc6_2.3.5-9_sparc.deb libc6-dev_2.3.5-9_sparc.deb libc6-prof_2.3.5-9_sparc.deb libc6-pic_2.3.5-9_sparc.deb libc6-sparc64_2.3.5-9_sparc.deb libc6-sparcv9_2.3.5-9_sparc.deb libc6-sparcv9b_2.3.5-9_sparc.deb libc6-dev-sparc64_2.3.5-9_sparc.deb nscd_2.3.5-9_sparc.deb libc6-dbg_2.3.5-9_sparc.deb libc6-udeb_2.3.5-9_sparc.udeb libnss-dns-udeb_2.3.5-9_sparc.udeb libnss-files-udeb_2.3.5-9_sparc.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#313219: Let op: Het bericht aan [EMAIL PROTECTED] is tegengehouden door de mailfilter van thuis.nl.
Een e-mail van u is tegengehouden door de mailfilter van thuis.nl. Het bericht was gezonden aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Het onderwerp was: Re: Thank you for delivery. De zender was: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Het bericht was ontvangen op 17-12-2005 om 19:06:52. Het verzend adres was: 82.98.249.10. De error was: Message deleted: Unauthorized file type De redenen waarom e-mailberichten door de filter tegengehouden worden zijn; Het e-mailbericht is gestuurd met een bijlage van een niet gewenst formaat. Het e-mailbericht is afkomstig van een spamadres. Het e-mailbericht is gestuurd met een bijlage waarin zich een virus bevindt. Bijlages die meegstuurd worden in een e-mailbericht mogen van de volgende formaten zijn; Foto's jpg, bmp, gif Muziek mp3, wav Alle andere bestandsformaten worden standaard door de mailfilter tegengehouden. Komt uw mailbericht niet door de filter heen en voldoet de mail volgens u aan bovenstaande voorwaarden, neem dan contact op met het service center van thuis.nl [EMAIL PROTECTED] Het kan handig zijn een kopie van dit bericht mee te zenden. * Letop * Heeft u geen e-mail gestuurd naar ons, dan is de kans groot dat een virus uit uw naam heeft gemailed. Ook dan kunt u dit bericht negeren. Het is altijd verstandig om een up2date virusscanner op uw systeem actief te hebben en regelmatig uw complete systeem te scannen op virussen. Voor actuele informatie over virussen kunt u terecht op de sites van de grote virusbestrijders of op http://www.waarschuwingsdienst.nl * Met vriendelijke groet, Service Center thuis.nl --- Message analysis performed by TurboGeeks Block & Tackle --- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
r1066 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . control.in
Author: schizo Date: 2005-12-17 15:44:47 + (Sat, 17 Dec 2005) New Revision: 1066 Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog glibc-package/trunk/debian/control glibc-package/trunk/debian/control.in/main Log: * Bump Standards-Version to 3.6.2 and add myself to Uploaders. Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog === --- glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog2005-12-17 15:35:23 UTC (rev 1065) +++ glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog2005-12-17 15:44:47 UTC (rev 1066) @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ * Add patch from Anton Blanchard to fix build failures with "__moddi3" and friends being already defined on i386 and powerpc (Closes: #339415). + * Bump Standards-Version to 3.6.2 and add myself to Uploaders. -- Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sat, 17 Dec 2005 10:33:38 -0500 Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/control === --- glibc-package/trunk/debian/control 2005-12-17 15:35:23 UTC (rev 1065) +++ glibc-package/trunk/debian/control 2005-12-17 15:44:47 UTC (rev 1066) @@ -4,8 +4,8 @@ Build-Depends: gettext (>= 0.10.37-1), make (>= 3.80-1), dpkg-dev (>= 1.13.5), debianutils (>= 1.13.1), tar (>= 1.13.11), bzip2, texinfo (>= 4.0), linux-kernel-headers (>= 2.6.13+0rc3-2) [!hurd-i386], mig (>= 1.3-2) [hurd-i386], hurd-dev (>= 20020608-1) [hurd-i386], gnumach-dev [hurd-i386], texi2html, file, gcc-4.0 [!powerpc !m68k !hppa !hurd-i386], gcc-3.4 (>= 3.4.4-6) [powerpc], gcc-3.4 [m68k hppa], gcc-3.3 [hurd-i386], autoconf, binutils (>= 2.14.90.0.7-5), sed (>= 4.0.5-4), gawk, debhelper (>= 4.1.76), libc6-dev-amd64 [i386], libc6-dev-ppc64 [powerpc] Build-Depends-Indep: perl, po-debconf Maintainer: GNU Libc Maintainers -Uploaders: Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Philip Blundell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -Standards-Version: 3.6.1.0 +Uploaders: Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Philip Blundell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> +Standards-Version: 3.6.2 Package: glibc-doc Architecture: all Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/control.in/main === --- glibc-package/trunk/debian/control.in/main 2005-12-17 15:35:23 UTC (rev 1065) +++ glibc-package/trunk/debian/control.in/main 2005-12-17 15:44:47 UTC (rev 1066) @@ -4,8 +4,8 @@ Build-Depends: gettext (>= 0.10.37-1), make (>= 3.80-1), dpkg-dev (>= 1.13.5), debianutils (>= 1.13.1), tar (>= 1.13.11), bzip2, texinfo (>= 4.0), linux-kernel-headers (>= 2.6.13+0rc3-2) [!hurd-i386], mig (>= 1.3-2) [hurd-i386], hurd-dev (>= 20020608-1) [hurd-i386], gnumach-dev [hurd-i386], texi2html, file, gcc-4.0 [!powerpc !m68k !hppa !hurd-i386], gcc-3.4 (>= 3.4.4-6) [powerpc], gcc-3.4 [m68k hppa], gcc-3.3 [hurd-i386], autoconf, binutils (>= 2.14.90.0.7-5), sed (>= 4.0.5-4), gawk, debhelper (>= 4.1.76), libc6-dev-amd64 [i386], libc6-dev-ppc64 [powerpc] Build-Depends-Indep: perl, po-debconf Maintainer: GNU Libc Maintainers -Uploaders: Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Philip Blundell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -Standards-Version: 3.6.1.0 +Uploaders: Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Philip Blundell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> +Standards-Version: 3.6.2 Package: @[EMAIL PROTECTED] Architecture: all -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
r1065 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . patches
Author: schizo
Date: 2005-12-17 15:35:23 + (Sat, 17 Dec 2005)
New Revision: 1065
Added:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/divdi3-moddi3.dpatch
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/00list
Log:
* Add patch from Anton Blanchard to fix build failures with
"__moddi3" and friends being already defined on i386
and powerpc (Closes: #339415).
Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
===
--- glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog2005-12-17 15:29:13 UTC (rev
1064)
+++ glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog2005-12-17 15:35:23 UTC (rev
1065)
@@ -1,5 +1,9 @@
glibc (2.3.5-9) unstable; urgency=low
+ [ Daniel Jacobowitz ]
+ * Downgrade priority of amd64 libraries on i386.
+ * Move packages from base to libs.
+
[ Clint Adams ]
* Remove sparc64 TLS patch, and disable TLS for sparc64 build
(Closes: #340835, #341514).
@@ -11,13 +15,12 @@
defined on powerpc (Closes: #343571).
* Replace amd64 sem_trywait patch from Kurt Roeckx's NMU with
fix from upstream glibc CVS (Closes: #339389).
+ * Add patch from Anton Blanchard to fix build failures with
+"__moddi3" and friends being already defined on i386
+and powerpc (Closes: #339415).
- [ Daniel Jacobowitz ]
- * Downgrade priority of amd64 libraries on i386.
- * Move packages from base to libs.
+ -- Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sat, 17 Dec 2005 10:33:38 -0500
- -- Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun, 13 Nov 2005 00:10:20 -0500
-
glibc (2.3.5-8.1) unstable; urgency=low
* Non-maintainer upload.
Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/00list
===
--- glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/00list 2005-12-17 15:29:13 UTC (rev
1064)
+++ glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/00list 2005-12-17 15:35:23 UTC (rev
1065)
@@ -93,3 +93,4 @@
sparc-socket-weakalias
powerpc-socket-weakalias
amd64-semtrywait-weakalias
+divdi3-moddi3
Added: glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/divdi3-moddi3.dpatch
===
--- glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/divdi3-moddi3.dpatch 2005-12-17
15:29:13 UTC (rev 1064)
+++ glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/divdi3-moddi3.dpatch 2005-12-17
15:35:23 UTC (rev 1065)
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+#! /bin/sh -e
+
+# All lines beginning with `# DP:' are a description of the patch.
+# DP: Description: Fix __u?divdi3/__u?moddi3 failure on i386 and powerpc
+# DP: Related bugs:
+# DP: Dpatch author: Clint Adams
+# DP: Patch author: Upstream CVS
+# DP: Upstream status: Committed
+# DP: Status Details:
+# DP: Date: 2005-12-16
+
+PATCHLEVEL=0
+
+if [ $# -ne 2 ]; then
+echo >&2 "`basename $0`: script expects -patch|-unpatch as argument"
+exit 1
+fi
+case "$1" in
+-patch) patch -d "$2" -f --no-backup-if-mismatch -p$PATCHLEVEL < $0;;
+-unpatch) patch -d "$2" -f --no-backup-if-mismatch -R -p$PATCHLEVEL < $0;;
+*)
+echo >&2 "`basename $0`: script expects -patch|-unpatch as argument"
+exit 1
+esac
+exit 0
+
+# append the patch here and adjust the -p? flag in the patch calls.
+
+--- sysdeps/wordsize-32/Makefile~ 2002-09-19 01:47:56.0 -0500
sysdeps/wordsize-32/Makefile 2005-11-16 13:19:03.0 -0600
+@@ -2,5 +2,6 @@
+ ifeq (yes,$(build-shared))
+ sysdep_routines += divdi3
+ shared-only-routines += divdi3
++CPPFLAGS-divdi3.c = -Din_divdi3_c
+ endif
+ endif
+--- sysdeps/wordsize-32/symbol-hacks.h~2004-03-08 14:59:34.0
-0600
sysdeps/wordsize-32/symbol-hacks.h 2005-11-16 13:18:25.0 -0600
+@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
+therefore we get PLTs. Unnecessarily so. Changing gcc is a big
+task which might not be worth it so we play tricks with the
+assembler. */
+-#if !defined __ASSEMBLER__ && !defined NOT_IN_libc && defined SHARED
++#if !defined __ASSEMBLER__ && !defined in_divdi3_c && !defined NOT_IN_libc &&
defined SHARED
+ asm ("__divdi3 = __divdi3_internal");
+ asm ("__udivdi3 = __udivdi3_internal");
+ asm ("__moddi3 = __moddi3_internal");
Property changes on: glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/divdi3-moddi3.dpatch
___
Name: svn:executable
+ *
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
r1064 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . patches
Author: schizo Date: 2005-12-17 15:29:13 + (Sat, 17 Dec 2005) New Revision: 1064 Added: glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/amd64-semtrywait-weakalias.dpatch Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/00list Log: * Replace amd64 sem_trywait patch from Kurt Roeckx's NMU with fix from upstream glibc CVS (Closes: #339389). Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog === --- glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog2005-12-17 15:14:53 UTC (rev 1063) +++ glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog2005-12-17 15:29:13 UTC (rev 1064) @@ -5,10 +5,12 @@ (Closes: #340835, #341514). * Add patch to fix build failure with __bind and other socket-related symbols being already defined on -sparc. (Closes: #342755). +sparc (Closes: #342755). * Add patch from Anton Blanchard to fix build failure with __bind and other socket-related symbols being already -defined on powerpc. (Closes: #343571). +defined on powerpc (Closes: #343571). + * Replace amd64 sem_trywait patch from Kurt Roeckx's NMU with +fix from upstream glibc CVS (Closes: #339389). [ Daniel Jacobowitz ] * Downgrade priority of amd64 libraries on i386. @@ -16,6 +18,15 @@ -- Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun, 13 Nov 2005 00:10:20 -0500 +glibc (2.3.5-8.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Rename sem_trywait to __new_sem_trywait in amd64 nptl code +so the alias works properly, and it can be build. +(Closes: #339389) + + -- Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun, 27 Nov 2005 11:22:03 +0100 + glibc (2.3.5-8) unstable; urgency=low * Add missing build dependency on libc6-dev-ppc64 on powerpc. Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/00list === --- glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/00list 2005-12-17 15:14:53 UTC (rev 1063) +++ glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/00list 2005-12-17 15:29:13 UTC (rev 1064) @@ -92,3 +92,4 @@ eh-frame-terminator sparc-socket-weakalias powerpc-socket-weakalias +amd64-semtrywait-weakalias Added: glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/amd64-semtrywait-weakalias.dpatch === --- glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/amd64-semtrywait-weakalias.dpatch 2005-12-17 15:14:53 UTC (rev 1063) +++ glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/amd64-semtrywait-weakalias.dpatch 2005-12-17 15:29:13 UTC (rev 1064) @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ +#! /bin/sh -e + +# All lines beginning with `# DP:' are a description of the patch. +# DP: Description: Fix sem_trywait on amd64 +# DP: Related bugs: +# DP: Dpatch author: Clint Adams +# DP: Patch author: Upstream CVS +# DP: Upstream status: Committed +# DP: Status Details: +# DP: Date: 2005-12-16 + +PATCHLEVEL=0 + +if [ $# -ne 2 ]; then +echo >&2 "`basename $0`: script expects -patch|-unpatch as argument" +exit 1 +fi +case "$1" in +-patch) patch -d "$2" -f --no-backup-if-mismatch -p$PATCHLEVEL < $0;; +-unpatch) patch -d "$2" -f --no-backup-if-mismatch -R -p$PATCHLEVEL < $0;; +*) +echo >&2 "`basename $0`: script expects -patch|-unpatch as argument" +exit 1 +esac +exit 0 + +# append the patch here and adjust the -p? flag in the patch calls. + +--- nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/sem_trywait.S~ 2003-05-10 16:37:38.0 -0400 nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/sem_trywait.S 2005-10-24 16:50:36.0 -0400 +@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ +-/* Copyright (C) 2002, 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc. ++/* Copyright (C) 2002, 2003, 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc. +This file is part of the GNU C Library. +Contributed by Ulrich Drepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2002. + +@@ -56,4 +56,3 @@ + orl $-1, %eax + retq + .size sem_trywait,.-sem_trywait +- versioned_symbol(libpthread, __new_sem_trywait, sem_trywait, GLIBC_2_1) Property changes on: glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/amd64-semtrywait-weakalias.dpatch ___ Name: svn:executable + * -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
r1063 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . patches
Author: schizo Date: 2005-12-17 15:14:53 + (Sat, 17 Dec 2005) New Revision: 1063 Added: glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/powerpc-socket-weakalias.dpatch Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/00list Log: * Add patch from Anton Blanchard to fix build failure with __bind and other socket-related symbols being already defined on powerpc. (Closes: #343571). Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog === --- glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog2005-12-17 14:43:10 UTC (rev 1062) +++ glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog2005-12-17 15:14:53 UTC (rev 1063) @@ -6,6 +6,9 @@ * Add patch to fix build failure with __bind and other socket-related symbols being already defined on sparc. (Closes: #342755). + * Add patch from Anton Blanchard to fix build failure with +__bind and other socket-related symbols being already +defined on powerpc. (Closes: #343571). [ Daniel Jacobowitz ] * Downgrade priority of amd64 libraries on i386. Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/00list === --- glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/00list 2005-12-17 14:43:10 UTC (rev 1062) +++ glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/00list 2005-12-17 15:14:53 UTC (rev 1063) @@ -91,3 +91,4 @@ hppa-fenv-align eh-frame-terminator sparc-socket-weakalias +powerpc-socket-weakalias Added: glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/powerpc-socket-weakalias.dpatch === --- glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/powerpc-socket-weakalias.dpatch 2005-12-17 14:43:10 UTC (rev 1062) +++ glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/powerpc-socket-weakalias.dpatch 2005-12-17 15:14:53 UTC (rev 1063) @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@ +#! /bin/sh -e + +# All lines beginning with `# DP:' are a description of the patch. +# DP: Description: Fix __bind redefinition and lround problems +# DP: Related bugs: +# DP: Dpatch author: Clint Adams +# DP: Patch author: Anton Blanchard +# DP: Upstream status: Not Submitted +# DP: Status Details: +# DP: Date: 2005-12-16 + +PATCHLEVEL=0 + +if [ $# -ne 2 ]; then +echo >&2 "`basename $0`: script expects -patch|-unpatch as argument" +exit 1 +fi +case "$1" in +-patch) patch -d "$2" -f --no-backup-if-mismatch -p$PATCHLEVEL < $0;; +-unpatch) patch -d "$2" -f --no-backup-if-mismatch -R -p$PATCHLEVEL < $0;; +*) +echo >&2 "`basename $0`: script expects -patch|-unpatch as argument" +exit 1 +esac +exit 0 + +# append the patch here and adjust the -p? flag in the patch calls. + +--- sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc32/fpu/s_lround.S~ 2004-06-30 17:29:12.0 -0500 sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc32/fpu/s_lround.S 2005-11-18 16:48:11.0 -0600 +@@ -88,7 +79,6 @@ + b .L9 + END (__lround) + +-strong_alias (__lround, __lround) + weak_alias (__lround, lround) + + strong_alias (__lround, __lroundf) +--- sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/powerpc/powerpc32/socket.S~2005-12-16 01:04:21.0 -0600 sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/powerpc/powerpc32/socket.S 2005-12-16 01:06:26.0 -0600 +@@ -42,7 +42,11 @@ + #define stackblock 20 + + #ifndef __socket +-#define __socket P(__,socket) ++# ifndef NO_WEAK_ALIAS ++# define __socket P(__,socket) ++# else ++# define __socket socket ++# endif + #endif + + .text +@@ -116,4 +120,6 @@ + + PSEUDO_END (__socket) + ++#ifndef NO_WEAK_ALIAS + weak_alias (__socket, socket) ++#endif +--- sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/powerpc/powerpc64/socket.S~2005-12-16 01:08:45.0 -0600 sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/powerpc/powerpc64/socket.S 2005-12-16 01:09:32.0 -0600 +@@ -41,12 +41,12 @@ + + #define stackblock 80 /* offset to socket parm area. */ + +-#ifndef socket +-/* If this is just socket.S leave it alone! */ +-#else + #ifndef __socket +-#define __socket P(__,socket) +-#endif ++# ifndef NO_WEAK_ALIAS ++# define __socket P(__,socket) ++# else ++# define __socket socket ++# endif + #endif + + .text +@@ -120,4 +120,6 @@ + cfi_endproc + PSEUDO_END (__socket) + ++#ifndef NO_WEAK_ALIAS + weak_alias (__socket, socket) ++#endif Property changes on: glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/powerpc-socket-weakalias.dpatch ___ Name: svn:executable + * -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: sparc fixes committed to svn
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 340835 + pending Bug#340835: sparc: /lib64/libc.so.6: unexpected reloc type 0x4f Tags were: patch Bug#341514: libc6-sparc64: All 64-bit binaries fail to execute. Tags added: pending > tag 342755 + pending Bug#342755: glibc: ftbfs [sparc] Error: symbol `__bind' is already defined Tags were: patch Tags added: pending > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
r1062 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . patches
Author: schizo Date: 2005-12-17 14:43:10 + (Sat, 17 Dec 2005) New Revision: 1062 Added: glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/sparc-socket-weakalias.dpatch Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/00list Log: * Add patch to fix build failure with __bind and other socket-related symbols being already defined on sparc. (Closes: #342755). Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog === --- glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog2005-12-17 14:38:23 UTC (rev 1061) +++ glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog2005-12-17 14:43:10 UTC (rev 1062) @@ -3,6 +3,9 @@ [ Clint Adams ] * Remove sparc64 TLS patch, and disable TLS for sparc64 build (Closes: #340835, #341514). + * Add patch to fix build failure with __bind and other +socket-related symbols being already defined on +sparc. (Closes: #342755). [ Daniel Jacobowitz ] * Downgrade priority of amd64 libraries on i386. Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/00list === --- glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/00list 2005-12-17 14:38:23 UTC (rev 1061) +++ glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/00list 2005-12-17 14:43:10 UTC (rev 1062) @@ -90,3 +90,4 @@ hppa-iitlbp hppa-fenv-align eh-frame-terminator +sparc-socket-weakalias Added: glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/sparc-socket-weakalias.dpatch === --- glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/sparc-socket-weakalias.dpatch 2005-12-17 14:38:23 UTC (rev 1061) +++ glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/sparc-socket-weakalias.dpatch 2005-12-17 14:43:10 UTC (rev 1062) @@ -0,0 +1,72 @@ +#! /bin/sh -e + +# All lines beginning with `# DP:' are a description of the patch. +# DP: Description: Fix __bind redefinition problem +# DP: Related bugs: +# DP: Dpatch author: Clint Adams +# DP: Patch author: Clint Adams +# DP: Upstream status: Not Submitted +# DP: Status Details: +# DP: Date: 2005-12-10 + +PATCHLEVEL=0 + +if [ $# -ne 2 ]; then +echo >&2 "`basename $0`: script expects -patch|-unpatch as argument" +exit 1 +fi +case "$1" in +-patch) patch -d "$2" -f --no-backup-if-mismatch -p$PATCHLEVEL < $0;; +-unpatch) patch -d "$2" -f --no-backup-if-mismatch -R -p$PATCHLEVEL < $0;; +*) +echo >&2 "`basename $0`: script expects -patch|-unpatch as argument" +exit 1 +esac +exit 0 + +# append the patch here and adjust the -p? flag in the patch calls. + +--- sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sparc/sparc32/socket.S.old 2003-08-31 13:23:11.0 -0400 sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sparc/sparc32/socket.S 2005-12-10 12:46:23.313930095 -0500 +@@ -40,7 +40,11 @@ +The .S files for the other calls just #define socket and #include this. */ + + #ifndef __socket +-#define __socket P(__,socket) ++# ifndef NO_WEAK_ALIAS ++# define __socket P(__,socket) ++# else ++# define __socket socket ++# endif + #endif + + .globl __socket +@@ -105,4 +109,6 @@ + + END (__socket) + ++#ifndef NO_WEAK_ALIAS + weak_alias (__socket, socket) ++#endif +--- sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sparc/sparc64/socket.S.old 2003-08-31 13:23:11.0 -0400 sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sparc/sparc64/socket.S 2005-12-10 12:46:23.313930095 -0500 +@@ -40,7 +40,11 @@ +The .S files for the other calls just #define socket and #include this. */ + + #ifndef __socket +-#define __socket P(__,socket) ++# ifndef NO_WEAK_ALIAS ++# define __socket P(__,socket) ++# else ++# define __socket socket ++# endif + #endif + + .globl __socket +@@ -105,4 +109,6 @@ + + END (__socket) + ++#ifndef NO_WEAK_ALIAS + weak_alias (__socket, socket) ++#endif Property changes on: glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/sparc-socket-weakalias.dpatch ___ Name: svn:executable + * -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
r1061 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . patches sysdeps
Author: schizo
Date: 2005-12-17 14:38:23 + (Sat, 17 Dec 2005)
New Revision: 1061
Removed:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/sparc64-tls.dpatch
Modified:
glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/00list
glibc-package/trunk/debian/sysdeps/sparc.mk
Log:
* Remove sparc64 TLS patch, and disable TLS for sparc64 build
(Closes: #340835, #341514).
Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
===
--- glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog2005-11-13 05:11:21 UTC (rev
1060)
+++ glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog2005-12-17 14:38:23 UTC (rev
1061)
@@ -1,5 +1,10 @@
glibc (2.3.5-9) unstable; urgency=low
+ [ Clint Adams ]
+ * Remove sparc64 TLS patch, and disable TLS for sparc64 build
+(Closes: #340835, #341514).
+
+ [ Daniel Jacobowitz ]
* Downgrade priority of amd64 libraries on i386.
* Move packages from base to libs.
Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/00list
===
--- glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/00list 2005-11-13 05:11:21 UTC (rev
1060)
+++ glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/00list 2005-12-17 14:38:23 UTC (rev
1061)
@@ -89,5 +89,4 @@
mips-bits-syscall
hppa-iitlbp
hppa-fenv-align
-sparc64-tls
eh-frame-terminator
Deleted: glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/sparc64-tls.dpatch
===
--- glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/sparc64-tls.dpatch 2005-11-13
05:11:21 UTC (rev 1060)
+++ glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/sparc64-tls.dpatch 2005-12-17
14:38:23 UTC (rev 1061)
@@ -1,94 +0,0 @@
-#! /bin/sh -e
-
-# DP: TLS code for sparc64, taken from CVS
-
-if [ $# -ne 2 ]; then
-echo >&2 "`basename $0`: script expects -patch|-unpatch as argument"
-exit 1
-fi
-case "$1" in
--patch) patch -d "$2" -f --no-backup-if-mismatch -p1 < $0;;
--unpatch) patch -d "$2" -f --no-backup-if-mismatch -R -p1 < $0;;
-*)
- echo >&2 "`basename $0`: script expects -patch|-unpatch as argument"
- exit 1
-esac
-exit 0
-
glibc-2.3.5.orig/elf/tls-macros.h 2005-11-12 03:47:57.0 +0100
-+++ glibc-2.3.5/elf/tls-macros.h 2005-11-12 03:56:01.0 +0100
-@@ -440,6 +440,74 @@
- "o5", "o7", "cc");\
- __o0; })
-
-+#elif defined __sparc__ && defined __arch64__
-+
-+# define TLS_LE(x) \
-+ ({ int *__l;
\
-+ asm ("sethi %%tle_hix22(" #x "), %0" : "=r" (__l));\
-+ asm ("xor %1, %%tle_lox10(" #x "), %0" : "=r" (__l) : "r" (__l));
\
-+ asm ("add %%g7, %1, %0" : "=r" (__l) : "r" (__l));
\
-+ __l; })
-+
-+# ifdef __PIC__
-+# define TLS_LOAD_PIC \
-+ ({ long pc, got; \
-+ asm ("sethi %%hi(_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_-4), %1\n\t"
\
-+"rd %%pc, %0\n\t" \
-+"add %1, %%lo(_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_+4), %1\n\t" \
-+"add %1, %0, %1\n\t"\
-+: "=r" (pc), "=r" (got)); \
-+ got; })
-+# else
-+# define TLS_LOAD_PIC \
-+ ({ long got;
\
-+ asm (".hidden _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_\n\t"
\
-+ "sethi %%hi(_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_), %0\n\t"\
-+ "or %0, %%lo(_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_), %0" \
-+ : "=r" (got)); \
-+ got; })
-+# endif
-+
-+# define TLS_IE(x) \
-+ ({ int *__l;
\
-+ asm ("sethi %%tie_hi22(" #x "), %0" : "=r" (__l));
\
-+ asm ("add %1, %%tie_lo10(" #x "), %0" : "=r" (__l) : "r" (__l)); \
-+ asm ("ldx [%1 + %2], %0, %%tie_ldx(" #x ")"\
-+: "=r" (__l) : "r" (TLS_LOAD_PIC), "r" (__l)); \
-+ asm ("add %%g7, %1, %0, %%tie_add(" #x ")" : "=r" (__l) : "r" (__l));
\
-+ __l; })
-+
-+# define TLS_LD(x) \
-+ ({ int *__l; register void *__o0 asm ("%o0");
\
-+ long __o;
\
-+ asm ("sethi %%tldm_hi22(" #x "), %0" : "=r" (__l));\
-+ asm ("add %1, %%tldm_lo10(" #x "), %0" : "=r" (__l) : "r" (__l));
\
-+ asm ("add %1, %2, %0, %%tldm_add(" #x ")"
\
-+: "=r" (__o0) : "r" (TLS_LOAD_PIC), "r" (__l)); \
-+ asm ("call __tl
