Re: Processed: Cloning this bug

2006-09-21 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
reopen 388489
thanks

Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Debian Bug Tracking System a écrit :
>>> retitle -1 libc6-i386: Missing /etc.ld.so.conf.d/i486-linux-gnu.conf
>
> There is no need for such a file. ld.so natively looks on all
> directories of bi (or tri)-arches directories. If you need to be
> convinced just run: strings /sbin/ldconfig | grep "^/lib"
>
> Clising the bug

Binutils doesn't. And in some cases binutils looks at ld.so.conf and
thus ld.so.conf.d/*.

Or what is the point of the ld.so.conf.d files at all?

MfG
Goswin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: Processed: Cloning this bug

2006-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reopen 388489
Bug#388489: libc6-i386: Missing /etc.ld.so.conf.d/i486-linux-gnu.conf
Bug reopened, originator not changed.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Processed: Cloning this bug

2006-09-21 Thread Aurelien Jarno

Goswin von Brederlow wrote:

reopen 388489
thanks

Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:


Debian Bug Tracking System a écrit :

retitle -1 libc6-i386: Missing /etc.ld.so.conf.d/i486-linux-gnu.conf

There is no need for such a file. ld.so natively looks on all
directories of bi (or tri)-arches directories. If you need to be
convinced just run: strings /sbin/ldconfig | grep "^/lib"

Clising the bug


Binutils doesn't. And in some cases binutils looks at ld.so.conf and
It does. Well it was not the case on amd64, but it has been fixed two 
months ago in version 2.17-2 (see bug#369052).


I am closing the bug, please only reopen the bug if you have a testcase 
to show what you claim.



thus ld.so.conf.d/*.

Or what is the point of the ld.so.conf.d files at all?


The purpose of the ld.so.conf.d files is to provide an easy way to add 
search directories for some packages (eg atlas), which is a lot easier 
than modifying the ld.so.conf directly.


It is also a way for future multiarch support to add a search path, 
hence the /etc.ld.so.conf.d/(host-triplet).conf in libc6. But it has 
nothing to do with bi-arch or tri-arch which are directly handled in the 
toolchain.


--
  .''`.  Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
 : :' :  Debian developer   | Electrical Engineer
 `. `'   [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   `-people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#388489: marked as done (libc6-i386: Missing /etc.ld.so.conf.d/i486-linux-gnu.conf)

2006-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 21 Sep 2006 12:37:28 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Processed: Cloning this bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Subject: ia32-libs: ldconfig files installed in wrong directory?
Package: ia32-libs
Version: 1.15
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

*** Please type your report below this line ***

The ldconfig configuration files are installed in /lib/ldconfig.
Shouldn't they be installed in /etc/ld.so.conf.d?  They're not being
picked up by ldconfig.

Thanks!

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-2-amd64-k8-smp
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages ia32-libs depends on:
ii  dpkg 1.13.21 package maintenance system
for Deb
ii  lib32asound2 1.0.11-7ALSA library (32 bit)
ii  lib32gcc11:4.1.1-13  GCC support library (32 bit
Versio
ii  lib32ncurses55.5-3   Shared libraries for
terminal hand
ii  lib32stdc++6 4.1.1-13The GNU Standard C++
Library v3 (3
ii  lib32z1  1:1.2.3-13  compression library - 32
bit runti
ii  libc6-i386   2.3.6.ds1-4 GNU C Library: 32bit shared
librar
ii  lsb-release  3.1-15  Linux Standard Base version
report

ia32-libs recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---

Goswin von Brederlow wrote:

reopen 388489
thanks

Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:


Debian Bug Tracking System a écrit :

retitle -1 libc6-i386: Missing /etc.ld.so.conf.d/i486-linux-gnu.conf

There is no need for such a file. ld.so natively looks on all
directories of bi (or tri)-arches directories. If you need to be
convinced just run: strings /sbin/ldconfig | grep "^/lib"

Clising the bug


Binutils doesn't. And in some cases binutils looks at ld.so.conf and
It does. Well it was not the case on amd64, but it has been fixed two 
months ago in version 2.17-2 (see bug#369052).


I am closing the bug, please only reopen the bug if you have a testcase 
to show what you claim.



thus ld.so.conf.d/*.

Or what is the point of the ld.so.conf.d files at all?


The purpose of the ld.so.conf.d files is to provide an easy way to add 
search directories for some packages (eg atlas), which is a lot easier 
than modifying the ld.so.conf directly.


It is also a way for future multiarch support to add a search path, 
hence the /etc.ld.so.conf.d/(host-triplet).conf in libc6. But it has 
nothing to do with bi-arch or tri-arch which are directly handled in the 
toolchain.


--
  .''`.  Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
 : :' :  Debian developer   | Electrical Engineer
 `. `'   [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   `-people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net
--- End Message ---