Processed: Not a libc bug

2011-03-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> unmerge 238786
Bug#238786: gmtime returns NULL for time_ts larger than 40 bits on Alpha
Bug#200641: glibc gmtime() broken for 64bit time_t (in arch=alpha)
Disconnected #238786 from all other report(s).

> reassign 238786 cyrus-imapd-2.4
Bug #238786 [libc6.1] gmtime returns NULL for time_ts larger than 40 bits on 
Alpha
Bug reassigned from package 'libc6.1' to 'cyrus-imapd-2.4'.
> retitle 238786 cyrus21-imapd: APPEND fails with Invalid date-time, on 64-bit 
> architectures.
Bug #238786 [cyrus-imapd-2.4] gmtime returns NULL for time_ts larger than 40 
bits on Alpha
Changed Bug title to 'cyrus21-imapd: APPEND fails with Invalid date-time, on 
64-bit architectures.' from 'gmtime returns NULL for time_ts larger than 40 
bits on Alpha'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
238786: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=238786
200641: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=200641
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.130154635815798.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#238786: Not a libc bug

2011-03-30 Thread Witold Baryluk
unmerge 238786
reassign 238786 cyrus-imapd-2.4
retitle 238786 cyrus21-imapd: APPEND fails with Invalid date-time, on 64-bit 
architectures.
thanks

Previous 'gmtime returns NULL for time_ts larger than 40 bits on Alpha' title
was wrong. First it returns NULL only for larger than about 2**58. Second
it is not bug, returning NULL is not a bug, it is just error condition
conforming to POSIX standards. See my posts to bug #200641.

Thus reasigning back to cyrus-imapd

Thanks

-- 
Witold Baryluk



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110331043401.ga20...@smp.if.uj.edu.pl



Bug#200641: zdump -v on alpha (and other 64-bit archs), and gmtime

2011-03-30 Thread Witold Baryluk
Hello all.

This message is about bug #412569, but informations
are also relevant to issue #200641.

I looked deeper into zdump and gmtime issues.

And I think there is no error in libc's gmtime or zdump.

$ zdump -v /usr/share/zoneinfo/UTC
/etc/localtime  -9223372036854775808 = NULL
/etc/localtime  -9223372036854689408 = NULL
/etc/localtime  9223372036854689407 = NULL
/etc/localtime  9223372036854775807 = NULL
$

In my opinion it is actually correct output.
Documentation of zdump needs to be updated
to fully reflect this strange (but correct) behaviour.

Why?

-9223372036854775808 is smallest possible time_t
value on alpha (-2**63), as time_t on alpha is
signed long int (64 bits). Next one is one day later.
Similary 9223372036854775807 is biggest possible time_t.

This corectly follows documentation of zdump -v option.

Why such strange output?

Because -9223372036854775808, is more than 2*31 years before 1970.
And a tm_year field of struct tm, have type int, which on alpha have 32-bits.
So oldest year is -2**31 = -2147483648, and in conlusion
oldest possible date/time is  01 Jan 00:00:00 -2147483648 UTC, with
value of ``seconds after epoch'' equal -67768040609740800
(somwhere beetwen -2**56 and -2**55). This minus one, already
cannot be represented in broken-down time format in struct tm.

Similary for maxium date.

Cearfully inspecting source code, and adding some debuging
to zdump, shows also that gmtime properly sets errno to EOVERFLOW,
indicateing it cannot convert data to broken-down format.
I suppose gmtime_r will behave in exactly same way.

This issues will not happen on architectures with sizeof(int) = 8,
as tm_year will be big enugh to fit year -300498215812.
(slightly more 2**38 years before 1970).

So, also #200641 is not a bug. gmtime is behaving properly,
because int is 32-bits, even on 64-bit architectures
in our cases (not tested on amd64 just now,
but AFAIR, int is still 32-bit also there).

I checked POSIX standards and it looks that,
current behaviour do not violatate this standards.
I also think this is same behaviour as under Solaris.

Other solution is to have hardcoded string "01 Jan 00:00:00 -2147483648",
or display -67768040609740800 as smallest one
(it isn't actually smallest, but smalles which can be printed using gmtime).

So in both cases zdump documentation will need to be updated.

I personally think we should just document current behaviour.

PS. Original bug reports of #412569, do not apply anymore.
--version option is working. It still loops, but on any 64-bit
computer I tested, it exit after about 3 to 9 seconds.
And it do not crash anymore in any case.

Regards,
Witek

-- 
Witold Baryluk
JID: witold.baryluk // jabster.pl


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#620203: [alpha] libc-bin / libc6.1: LEVEL*CACHE* inproperly mixed

2011-03-30 Thread Witold Baryluk
Package: libc6.1
Version: 2.11.2-13
Severity: normal

I tested both 2.7-18lenny7 and 2.11.2-13 on other machine,
result is the same:

$ getconf -a | grep LEVEL
LEVEL1_ICACHE_SIZE 64
LEVEL1_ICACHE_ASSOC65536
LEVEL1_ICACHE_LINESIZE 2
LEVEL1_DCACHE_SIZE 64
LEVEL1_DCACHE_ASSOC65536
LEVEL1_DCACHE_LINESIZE 2
LEVEL2_CACHE_SIZE  64
LEVEL2_CACHE_ASSOC 4194304
LEVEL2_CACHE_LINESIZE  1
LEVEL3_CACHE_SIZE  
LEVEL3_CACHE_ASSOC 
LEVEL3_CACHE_LINESIZE  
LEVEL4_CACHE_SIZE  
LEVEL4_CACHE_ASSOC 
LEVEL4_CACHE_LINESIZE  
$

$ cat /proc/cpuinfo 
cpu : Alpha
cpu model   : EV6
cpu variation   : 7
cpu revision: 0
cpu serial number   : 
system type : Tsunami
system variation: Monet
system revision : 0
system serial number: AY0
cycle frequency [Hz]: 5 
timer frequency [Hz]: 1024.00
page size [bytes]   : 8192
phys. address bits  : 44
max. addr. space #  : 255
BogoMIPS: 994.44
kernel unaligned acc: 24 (pc=fc00010e0748,va=fc00192ca1ea)
user unaligned acc  : 0 (pc=0,va=0)
platform string : COMPAQ Professional Workstation XP1000
cpus detected   : 1
L1 Icache   : 64K, 2-way, 64b line
L1 Dcache   : 64K, 2-way, 64b line
L2 cache: 4096K, 1-way, 64b line
L3 cache: n/a
$

As you can see

  LEVEL2_CACHE_SIZE  64
  LEVEL2_CACHE_ASSOC 4194304
  LEVEL2_CACHE_LINESIZE  1

should be actually

  LEVEL2_CACHE_SIZE  4194304
  LEVEL2_CACHE_ASSOC 1
  LEVEL2_CACHE_LINESIZE  64

for example

Both machines are identical. one have lenny installed, one is
partially using unstable (for example libc* packages).

Both machines runs 2.6.26:

Linux a02 2.6.26-2-alpha-generic #1 Thu Jan 27 05:54:49 UTC 2011 alpha GNU/Linux


Regards,
Witek


-- debconf information:
  glibc/upgrade: true
  glibc/restart-failed:
  glibc/restart-services:



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20110331004217.9681.94849.report...@a09.smp.if.uj.edu.pl



Bug#620134: locales/locales_to_be_generated is not read when reconfiguring locales

2011-03-30 Thread Sylvain Ferriol
Package: locales
Version: 2.11.2-10
Severity: normal

hi
when i want to reconfigure locales by setting locales_to_be_generated 
with debconf-set-selections, the new value is never read because 
locales.config rewrites locales_to_be_generated to languages 
selected in /etc/locale.gen.
so using debconf is unuseful.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0
  APT prefers squeeze-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'squeeze-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages locales depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.36.1   Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6 [glibc-2.11-1]  2.11.2-10  Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib

locales recommends no packages.

locales suggests no packages.

-- debconf information excluded



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20110330131519.28779.94891.report...@gatelse008.gate.cnrs.fr