Bug#658171: libc6: dns resolving failing after point release update

2012-02-01 Thread Aurelien Jarno
tag 658171 + confirmed
thanks

Le 31/01/2012 21:17, Bernhard R. Link a écrit :
 * Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org [120131 20:57]:
 It guess it gets confused if the dns server (in this case a local pdnsd
 as the ISP supplied server does not answer to  at all thus causing
 long timeouts all the time) replies to  queries with not implemented.
 
 Here is some tcpdump log of wget www.gmx.net:
 
 This is with the old version libc6:
 
 21:05:57.420550 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 42980, offset 0, flags [DF], proto 
 UDP (17), length 56)
 127.0.0.1.47733  127.0.0.1.53: [bad udp cksum 3540!] 46166+ A? 
 www.gmx.de. (28)
 21:05:57.423897 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 42981, offset 0, flags [DF], proto 
 UDP (17), length 56)
 127.0.0.1.47733  127.0.0.1.53: [bad udp cksum c6d5!] 7850+ ? 
 www.gmx.de. (28)
 21:05:57.423973 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto UDP 
 (17), length 56)
 127.0.0.1.53  127.0.0.1.47733: [bad udp cksum 4255!] 7850 NotImp q: 
 ? www.gmx.de. 0/0/0 (28)
 21:05:57.424093 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto UDP 
 (17), length 72)
 127.0.0.1.53  127.0.0.1.47733: [bad udp cksum e4e6!] 46166 q: A? 
 www.gmx.de. 1/0/0 www.gmx.de. [11m8s] A 213.165.64.74 (44)
 21:05:57.546142 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 43012, offset 0, flags [DF], proto 
 UDP (17), length 57)
 127.0.0.1.54485  127.0.0.1.53: [bad udp cksum 61e6!] 61514+ A? 
 www.gmx.net. (29)
 21:05:57.546159 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 43013, offset 0, flags [DF], proto 
 UDP (17), length 57)
 127.0.0.1.54485  127.0.0.1.53: [bad udp cksum b187!] 13307+ ? 
 www.gmx.net. (29)
 21:05:57.546259 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto UDP 
 (17), length 57)
 127.0.0.1.53  127.0.0.1.54485: [bad udp cksum 2d07!] 13307 NotImp q: 
 ? www.gmx.net. 0/0/0 (29)
 21:05:57.546371 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto UDP 
 (17), length 73)
 127.0.0.1.53  127.0.0.1.54485: [bad udp cksum d780!] 61514 q: A? 
 www.gmx.net. 1/0/0 www.gmx.net. [12m21s] A 213.165.64.71 (45)
 
 Note that it gets a NotImp for the  and an address for the A and
 then proceeds (as it gets a HTTP redirect then asking for the redirected
 address).
 
 This is with the newer bad version:
 
 21:06:07.348727 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 45462, offset 0, flags [DF], proto 
 UDP (17), length 56)
 127.0.0.1.34608  127.0.0.1.53: [bad udp cksum 377f!] 43161+ A? 
 www.gmx.de. (28)
 21:06:07.351912 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 45463, offset 0, flags [DF], proto 
 UDP (17), length 56)
 127.0.0.1.34608  127.0.0.1.53: [bad udp cksum 8a57!] 53291+ ? 
 www.gmx.de. (28)
 21:06:07.351986 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto UDP 
 (17), length 56)
 127.0.0.1.53  127.0.0.1.34608: [bad udp cksum 5d7!] 53291 NotImp q: 
 ? www.gmx.de. 0/0/0 (28)
 21:06:07.352099 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto UDP 
 (17), length 72)
 127.0.0.1.53  127.0.0.1.34608: [bad udp cksum f125!] 43161 q: A? 
 www.gmx.de. 1/0/0 www.gmx.de. [10m58s] A 213.165.64.74 (44)
 21:06:07.352164 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 45463, offset 0, flags [DF], proto 
 UDP (17), length 79)
 127.0.0.1.50438  127.0.0.1.53: [bad udp cksum a99e!] 20724+ A? 
 www.gmx.de.Speedport_W_502V_Typ_A. (51)
 21:06:07.352220 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 45464, offset 0, flags [DF], proto 
 UDP (17), length 79)
 127.0.0.1.50438  127.0.0.1.53: [bad udp cksum da40!] 37827+ ? 
 www.gmx.de.Speedport_W_502V_Typ_A. (51)
 21:06:07.352294 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto UDP 
 (17), length 79)
 127.0.0.1.53  127.0.0.1.50438: [bad udp cksum 261e!] 20724 NXDomain q: 
 A? www.gmx.de.Speedport_W_502V_Typ_A. 0/0/0 (51)
 21:06:07.352341 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto UDP 
 (17), length 79)
 127.0.0.1.53  127.0.0.1.50438: [bad udp cksum 55c0!] 37827 NotImp q: 
 ? www.gmx.de.Speedport_W_502V_Typ_A. 0/0/0 (51)
 
 Here it gives up after it gets the address and instead continues using
 the domain search path from resolv.conf. (Finally giving up and wget
 getting an error).
 
 I've also done this test on a system with the old working libc6 and only
 giving one wget the newer libc6 version using LD_LIBRAR_PATH and it
 shows the same problem (so it cannot be anything else depending on libc6
 but must be the resolver itself).
 

Thanks a lot for the detailed analysis, it helped me to understand the
problem. I have written a patch for bind9 that returns NOTIMP for 
queries, and with it I have been able to reproduce the issue. That
clearly help for debugging and tests.

For the record, it usually fails only for the first query, as in that
case the result of the  query arrives before the result from the A
one. For the others, given the entry is in cache, they are returned most
of the time in the order of the queries, that is A and than .

It means that a workaround until the bug is fixed is to add the
following line to /etc/resolv.conf:

  options single-request

I am 

Processed: Re: Bug#658171: libc6: dns resolving failing after point release update

2012-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tag 658171 + confirmed
Bug #658171 [libc6] libc6: dns resolving failing after point release update
Bug #657812 [libc6] [2.11.2 - 2.11.3 regression] first dns resolution request 
fails, if  query yields not implemented
Bug #658052 [libc6] [2.11.2 - 2.11.3 regression] first dns resolution request 
fails, if  query yields not implemented
Added tag(s) confirmed.
Added tag(s) confirmed.
Added tag(s) confirmed.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
658171: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=658171
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.132809954728546.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#658278: ld.so segfaults on wrong input

2012-02-01 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Package: libc6
Version: 2.13-21
Severity: normal
File: /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2

Running ld.so with the wrong kind of file segfaults:

mrvn@frosties:~% /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 /usr/lib/klibc/bin/ls 
zsh: segmentation fault  /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 /usr/lib/klibc/bin/ls

MfG
Goswin

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.1.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages libc6 depends on:
ii  libc-bin  2.13-21  
ii  libgcc1   1:4.6.2-5

libc6 recommends no packages.

Versions of packages libc6 suggests:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]  1.5.41 
ii  glibc-doc  none 
ii  locales2.13-21

-- debconf information excluded



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20120201184729.7158.97119.reportbug@frosties.localnet



Bug#658278: marked as done (ld.so segfaults on wrong input)

2012-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 1 Feb 2012 23:00:41 +0100
with message-id 20120201220041.gd2...@hall.aurel32.net
and subject line Re: Bug#658278: ld.so segfaults on wrong input
has caused the Debian Bug report #658278,
regarding ld.so segfaults on wrong input
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
658278: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=658278
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: libc6
Version: 2.13-21
Severity: normal
File: /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2

Running ld.so with the wrong kind of file segfaults:

mrvn@frosties:~% /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 /usr/lib/klibc/bin/ls 
zsh: segmentation fault  /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 /usr/lib/klibc/bin/ls

MfG
Goswin

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.1.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages libc6 depends on:
ii  libc-bin  2.13-21  
ii  libgcc1   1:4.6.2-5

libc6 recommends no packages.

Versions of packages libc6 suggests:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]  1.5.41 
ii  glibc-doc  none 
ii  locales2.13-21

-- debconf information excluded


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 07:47:29PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
 Package: libc6
 Version: 2.13-21
 Severity: normal
 File: /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
 
 Running ld.so with the wrong kind of file segfaults:
 
 mrvn@frosties:~% /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 /usr/lib/klibc/bin/ls 
 zsh: segmentation fault  /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 /usr/lib/klibc/bin/ls
 

It's not the wrong file type:

$file /usr/lib/klibc/bin/ls
/usr/lib/klibc/bin/ls: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1
(SYSV), statically linked (uses shared libs), stripped

It's an ELF file, but given it has a different ABI just doesn't work
with /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2. It's hardly the fault of the libc.

-- 
Aurelien Jarno  GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net

---End Message---


Processed: tagging 653441

2012-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tags 653441 + pending
Bug #653441 [libc6.1-dev] error: 'epoll_create1' was not declared in this scope
Added tag(s) pending.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
653441: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=653441
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.132813385616910.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#653441: marked as done (error: 'epoll_create1' was not declared in this scope)

2012-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 1 Feb 2012 23:05:28 +0100
with message-id 20120201220528.ga24...@ohm.aurel32.net
and subject line Re: epoll_create1() available in C, not C++ (on alpha)?
has caused the Debian Bug report #653441,
regarding error: 'epoll_create1' was not declared in this scope
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
653441: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=653441
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: libboost1.48-dev
Version: 1.48.0-2
Severity: normal


hi,

flann fails to build with:

[ 55%] Building CXX object 
src/cpp/CMakeFiles/flann_mpi_client.dir/flann/mpi/flann_mpi_client.cpp.o
cd 
/build/buildd-flann_1.7.0-4-alpha-gzklli/flann-1.7.0/obj-alpha-linux-gnu/src/cpp
  /usr/bin/c++   -D_FLANN_VERSION=1.7.0 -DHAVE_MPI -g -O2 -Wformat 
-Wformat-security -Werror=format-security  -O2 -g -I/usr/lib/openmpi/include 
-I/usr/lib/openmpi/include/openmpi 
-I/build/buildd-flann_1.7.0-4-alpha-gzklli/flann-1.7.0/src/cpp-Wall -o 
CMakeFiles/flann_mpi_client.dir/flann/mpi/flann_mpi_client.cpp.o -c 
/build/buildd-flann_1.7.0-4-alpha-gzklli/flann-1.7.0/src/cpp/flann/mpi/flann_mpi_client.cpp
In file included from /usr/include/boost/asio/detail/epoll_reactor.hpp:242:0,
 from /usr/include/boost/asio/detail/reactor.hpp:21,
 from 
/usr/include/boost/asio/detail/impl/task_io_service.ipp:24,
 from /usr/include/boost/asio/detail/task_io_service.hpp:199,
 from /usr/include/boost/asio/impl/io_service.hpp:71,
 from /usr/include/boost/asio/io_service.hpp:767,
 from /usr/include/boost/asio/basic_io_object.hpp:19,
 from /usr/include/boost/asio/basic_socket.hpp:19,
 from /usr/include/boost/asio/basic_datagram_socket.hpp:20,
 from /usr/include/boost/asio.hpp:20,
 from 
/build/buildd-flann_1.7.0-4-alpha-gzklli/flann-1.7.0/src/cpp/flann/mpi/client.h:34,
 from 
/build/buildd-flann_1.7.0-4-alpha-gzklli/flann-1.7.0/src/cpp/flann/mpi/flann_mpi_client.cpp:8:
/usr/include/boost/asio/detail/impl/epoll_reactor.ipp: In static member 
function 'static int boost::asio::detail::epoll_reactor::do_epoll_create()':
/usr/include/boost/asio/detail/impl/epoll_reactor.ipp:468:39: error: 
'epoll_create1' was not declared in this scope
make[3]: *** 
[src/cpp/CMakeFiles/flann_mpi_client.dir/flann/mpi/flann_mpi_client.cpp.o] 
Error 1


It would be nice if header file 
/usr/include/boost/asio/detail/impl/epoll_reactor.ipp was fixed

Thanks

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.1
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable'), (200, 'testing'), (100, 
'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Version: 2.13-25

On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 10:52:57PM -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
 Hi,
 
 By private mail, I got the suggestion that maybe Alpha's epoll.h lacks
 extern C; I diff'd the two files and that's not the case.  However,
 I did find the following:
 
 On Alpha:
 
 /* Same as epoll_create but with an additional FLAGS parameter.  */
 extern int epoll_create2 (int __size, int __flags) __THROW;
 
 On AMD:
 
 /* Same as epoll_create but with an FLAGS parameter.  The unused SIZE
parameter has been dropped.  */
 extern int epoll_create1 (int __flags) __THROW;
 
 And, in fact, epoll_create2() does not exist.  I changed the
 test code to ... int fd = epoll_create2(0,0); and the Alpha
 machine fails to compile:
 
 gcc try-epoll.c 
 /tmp/cckkq2Mc.o: In function `main':
 (.text+0x2c): undefined reference to `epoll_create2'
 
 
  I've boiled it down to the following test code:
  
#include sys/epoll.h
  
int main(int ac, char* av[])
{
int fd = epoll_create1(0);
return 0;
}
  
  This can be successfully compiled using gcc on both alpha (tested in sid 
  chroot of albeniz.debian.org) and on my amd64 machine.
 
 It turns out that the only reason it works on Alpha is due
 to C's rules for implict function definition:
 
   gcc -Wall try-epoll.c 
   try-epoll.c: In function ~main~:
   try-epoll.c:5: warning: implicit declaration of function ~epoll_create1~
 
 
 This looks like a bug in glibc, specifically that the following patch
 was never applied:
 http://www.cygwin.com/ml/libc-ports/2011-09/msg00017.html
 
 

This has been fixed in eglibc 2.13-25.

-- 
Aurelien Jarno

r5146 - glibc-package/trunk/debian

2012-02-01 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Author: aurel32
Date: 2012-02-01 22:04:02 + (Wed, 01 Feb 2012)
New Revision: 5146

Modified:
   glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
Add bug number


Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
===
--- glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog2012-01-30 22:01:17 UTC (rev 
5145)
+++ glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog2012-02-01 22:04:02 UTC (rev 
5146)
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
   * Update Spanish debconf translation, by Omar Campagne.  Closes: #655850.
   * Danish debconf translation update from Joe Hansen.  Closes: #656681.
   * patches/alpha/submitted-epoll_create1.diff: new patch from Mike 
-Frysinger to fix epoll_create1() on alpha.
+Frysinger to fix epoll_create1() on alpha.  Closes: #653441.
   * debian/control.in/main: bump build-depends on libc-linux-dev to
 (= 3.2.1-1) to get accept4 defined on ia64. 
 debian/libc6.1.symbols.ia64: force accept4 version to 2.13-25~.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1rsihc-0004st...@vasks.debian.org



Processed: tagging 658171

2012-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tags 658171 + pending
Bug #658171 [libc6] libc6: dns resolving failing after point release update
Bug #657812 [libc6] [2.11.2 - 2.11.3 regression] first dns resolution request 
fails, if  query yields not implemented
Bug #658052 [libc6] [2.11.2 - 2.11.3 regression] first dns resolution request 
fails, if  query yields not implemented
Added tag(s) pending.
Added tag(s) pending.
Added tag(s) pending.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
658171: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=658171
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.132814166012083.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



r5147 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . patches patches/any

2012-02-01 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Author: aurel32
Date: 2012-02-02 00:14:08 + (Thu, 02 Feb 2012)
New Revision: 5147

Added:
   
glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/any/submitted-resolv-first-query-failure.diff
Modified:
   glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
   glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/series
Log:
  * patches/any/submitted-resolv-first-query-failure.diff: new patch to fix
resolving issues with broken servers returning NOTIMP or FORMERR to 
queries.  Closes: #658171.



Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
===
--- glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog2012-02-01 22:04:02 UTC (rev 
5146)
+++ glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog2012-02-02 00:14:08 UTC (rev 
5147)
@@ -2,6 +2,9 @@
 
   [ Aurelien Jarno ]
   * sysdeps/kfreebsd.mk: also symlink x86 directory.
+  * patches/any/submitted-resolv-first-query-failure.diff: new patch to fix
+resolving issues with broken servers returning NOTIMP or FORMERR to 
+queries.  Closes: #658171.
 
  -- Aurelien Jarno aure...@debian.org  Mon, 30 Jan 2012 23:01:02 +0100
 

Added: 
glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/any/submitted-resolv-first-query-failure.diff
===
--- 
glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/any/submitted-resolv-first-query-failure.diff
(rev 0)
+++ 
glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/any/submitted-resolv-first-query-failure.diff
2012-02-02 00:14:08 UTC (rev 5147)
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+2012-02-02  Aurelien Jarno  aure...@debian.org
+
+   * resolv/res_query.c(__libc_res_nsearch): succeed if the first
+   query fails, but the second query succeeds.
+
+diff --git a/resolv/res_query.c b/resolv/res_query.c
+index 947c651..c88268f 100644
+--- a/resolv/res_query.c
 b/resolv/res_query.c
+@@ -378,7 +378,7 @@ __libc_res_nsearch(res_state statp,
+   ret = __libc_res_nquerydomain(statp, name, NULL, class, type,
+ answer, anslen, answerp,
+ answerp2, nanswerp2, resplen2);
+-  if (ret  0 || trailing_dot)
++  if (ret  0 || (ret == 0  *resplen2  0) || trailing_dot)
+   return (ret);
+   saved_herrno = h_errno;
+   tried_as_is++;
+@@ -418,7 +418,7 @@ __libc_res_nsearch(res_state statp,
+ answer, anslen, answerp,
+ answerp2, nanswerp2,
+ resplen2);
+-  if (ret  0)
++  if ((ret  0) || (ret == 0  *resplen2  0))
+   return (ret);
+ 
+   if (answerp  *answerp != answer) {
+@@ -487,7 +487,7 @@ __libc_res_nsearch(res_state statp,
+   ret = __libc_res_nquerydomain(statp, name, NULL, class, type,
+ answer, anslen, answerp,
+ answerp2, nanswerp2, resplen2);
+-  if (ret  0)
++  if ((ret  0) || (ret == 0  *resplen2  0))
+   return (ret);
+   }
+ 

Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/series
===
--- glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/series   2012-02-01 22:04:02 UTC (rev 
5146)
+++ glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/series   2012-02-02 00:14:08 UTC (rev 
5147)
@@ -320,3 +320,4 @@
 any/cvs-vfscanf.diff
 any/cvs-fmtmsg-lock.diff
 any/cvs-reloc-sort.diff
+any/submitted-resolv-first-query-failure.diff


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1rskjw-0007vc...@vasks.debian.org