Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Let's hope you can reach Neskie Manuel who is, IIRC, the author of many locales for Aboriginal languages of North America. It's quite some time since I heard from him, though (about 2 years). Quoting Helge Kreutzmann (deb...@helgefjell.de): Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: shs_CA This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ -- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
I add to the CC list another mail address I know about Boerre Gaup. Also CC'ing Petter Reinholdtsen, ou Debian Wizard for everything related to Norway, in case he would have alternate ways to reach Boerre. Quoting Helge Kreutzmann (deb...@helgefjell.de): Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: se_NO This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ -- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: tg_TJ This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: tk_TM This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
2012/6/27 Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de: Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: ro_RO This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? Yes, of course. GPL/LGPL v2+ is OK. Same for any other copyleft license. If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFP6r2DRsxcY/MYpWoRAuznAJ9j9Jcx4LFov/BCoqfenmJkPeu7iwCffT39 WAfakavcn7LbwSSmW+SHLiU= =AkQ3 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Regards, EddyP = Imagination is more important than knowledge A.Einstein -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAK0XTWc2Rwc1z6YzA=whgo-docukk2kumcowqf5axhntv0t...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: tl_PH This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: tr_CY This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: tr_TR This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: tt_RU This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: tt_RU@iqtelif This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
On 06/29/2012 12:30 PM, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: tr_TR This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? Sure, I put my name to be contacted in case of any problem. I did not have any intention to put any license restrictions in the first place . I believe that statement was inherited from a template of libc at that moment. I am willing to set it to LGPL v2 or any license to be consistent with the rest of the locale licenses. You can delete my name as well since I do not maintain it for a long time. Let me know if I can provide any assistance you might need. Best regards. -- Onur Tolga Sehitoglu http://www.ceng.metu.edu.tr/~onur/ If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fed7ded.8000...@ceng.metu.edu.tr
Processed: Re: Bug#679198: bash: [on native FreeBSD] unable to set FD_CLOEXEC flag
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 679198 by 635192 Bug #679198 [bash] bash: Fails to upgrade in kFreeBSD jails 679198 was not blocked by any bugs. 679198 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 679198: 635192 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 679198: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679198 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.134097374421916.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Bearjadat, geassemánu 29. b. 2012 07.03.15 Christian PERRIER čálii: I add to the CC list another mail address I know about Boerre Gaup. Also CC'ing Petter Reinholdtsen, ou Debian Wizard for everything related to Norway, in case he would have alternate ways to reach Boerre. Quoting Helge Kreutzmann (deb...@helgefjell.de): Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: se_NO This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Thus it does not allow modification; it is unclear, however, if this statement was meant as a license. As discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555168 this locale could strictly speaking not be part of Debian which would be a great loss. (Currently it is allowed pending investigation). To properly resolve this, I would like to ask you the following question: Would you be willing to relicense this locale to a proper license, e.g. (L)GPL v2 or higher or another free software license of your choice? (L)GPL v2 sounds quite all right by me. If you have any questions regarding this issue, do not hesitate to contact me (via the reply-to address set). Thanks for helping to resolve this! Helge -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/3347282.NMrGyHx1md@jiralf-macbookpro
Bug#555168: Unclear license situation for (e)glibc locales provided by you
Quoting Helge Kreutzmann (deb...@helgefjell.de): Hello, you are listed as contact person/author of the following locale: tr_CY This locale comes with a statement % Distribution and use is free, also % for commercial purposes. Recai Oktas is also a Debian developer. CC'ing his Debian address. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#635192: Processed: Bug#679198: bash: [on native FreeBSD] unable to set FD_CLOEXEC flag
2012/6/29 Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org: #679198 is this bug. Did you mean #635192? Yes, sorry. In /usr/include/i386-kfreebsd-gnu/bits/fcntl.h : #if _POSIX_C_SOURCE = 200809L #define O_TTY_INIT 0x0008 /* Restore default termios attributes */ /* Defining O_CLOEXEC would break kfreebsd 8.1, see #635192 */ /* #define O_CLOEXEC 0x0010 */ #endif So it is undefined on purpose? Correct. Although leaving it undefined might be worse than defining it. E.g. consider programs doing: /* use O_CLOEXEC if possible */ #ifndef O_CLOEXEC #define O_CLOEXEC 0 #endif fd = open (..., O_CLOEXEC); // don't bother closing fd But the decision is up to glibc maintainers. -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caofdtxosf-dnj+xy4ncbdh+parrpwkednniw6sluu9fl+jx...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#679172: libc-2.11.3.so: ls[8213]: segfault in libc-2.11.3.so
tag 679172 + moreinfo thanks On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:31:46PM +0200, a...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: Package: libc6-i686 Version: 2.11.3-3 Severity: normal File: libc-2.11.3.so Just found this in /var/log/kern.log and /var/log/messages: ls[8213]: segfault at 1ebbc787 ip b769aa53 sp bffcbc14 error 4 in libc-2.11.3.so[b7626000+14] ls seemed to work normally, though. Most of this kind of reports are actually not libc fault, but program passing wrong arguments to some libc functions (like NULL to strlen()). Please provide a way to reproduce the issue. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120629232129.ga...@hall.aurel32.net
Bug#671715: libc6: Fail to upgrade from 2.13-27 to newer version !
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 07:07:05PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 11:14:56AM +0200, Mourad Jaber wrote: Package: libc6 Version: 2.13-27 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? My system (debian/testing) is using 2.13-27 version of libc6 and I'm trying to upgrade to the current testing version... * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? I'm trying to do an aptitude install libc6 * What was the outcome of this action? It didn't finish well, I obtain the following messages : A copy of the C library was found in an unexpected directory: '/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc-2.13.so' It is not safe to upgrade the C library in this situation; please remove that copy of the C library or get it out of '/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu' and try again. * What outcome did you expect instead? An upgrade without problem ! I have tryied : - to move that file - nothing work after that so I cannot redo the upgrade ! - to use a rescue CD (PartedMagic), chroot the environement and try to force the upgrade, but I get the same result ! Is there any solution to make the upgrade happen without reinstalling the whole system ? This looks like your dpkg database is corrupted, or at least not in sync with the files installed in your system. Can you please provide us the contents of all the files named /var/lib/dpkg/info/libc6*.list ? Ping ? -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120629232747.gb...@hall.aurel32.net
r5295 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . patches po
Author: aurel32 Date: 2012-06-29 23:22:51 + (Fri, 29 Jun 2012) New Revision: 5295 Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/series glibc-package/trunk/debian/po/sk.po Log: * Update Slovak debconf translation, by Ivan Mas?\195?\161r. Closes: #677919. Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog === --- glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog2012-06-24 12:41:45 UTC (rev 5294) +++ glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog2012-06-29 23:22:51 UTC (rev 5295) @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ #674412. * patches/localedata/submitted-es_MX-decimal_point.diff: fix thousand separator, use a space instead of a comma. + * Update Slovak debconf translation, by Ivan Masár. Closes: #677919. [ Samuel Thibault ] * patches/hurd-i386/libpthread_librt-link.diff: Remove patch, having Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/series === --- glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/series 2012-06-24 12:41:45 UTC (rev 5294) +++ glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/series 2012-06-29 23:22:51 UTC (rev 5295) @@ -118,6 +118,11 @@ hppa/cvs-test-tls-support.diff hppa/cvs-cloexec-nonblock.diff hppa/cvs-prlimit64.diff +hppa/local-EAGAIN.diff +hppa/ports-2011-08-31.diff +hppa/ports-2011-09-17.diff +hppa/ports-2011-10-30.diff +hppa/ports-2012-03-31.diff hurd-i386/local-dl-dynamic-weak.diff hurd-i386/local-enable-ldconfig.diff Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/po/sk.po === --- glibc-package/trunk/debian/po/sk.po 2012-06-24 12:41:45 UTC (rev 5294) +++ glibc-package/trunk/debian/po/sk.po 2012-06-29 23:22:51 UTC (rev 5295) @@ -1,12 +1,16 @@ -# Ivan Masár heli...@centrum.sk, 2007, 2008. +# Slovak translation of eglibc debconf templates. +# Copyright (C) YEAR THE PACKAGE'S COPYRIGHT HOLDER +# This file is distributed under the same license as the eglibc package. +# Ivan Masár heli...@centrum.sk, 2007, 2008, 2012. +# msgid msgstr -Project-Id-Version: glibc 2.6.1-1\n +Project-Id-Version: eglibc\n Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: egl...@packages.debian.org\n POT-Creation-Date: 2011-10-30 11:52-0700\n -PO-Revision-Date: 2008-02-26 23:21+0100\n +PO-Revision-Date: 2012-06-17 20:43+0100\n Last-Translator: Ivan Masár heli...@centrum.sk\n -Language-Team: Slovak sk-i...@lists.linux.sk\n +Language-Team: Slovak debian-l10n-slo...@lists.debian.org\n Language: sk\n MIME-Version: 1.0\n Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\n @@ -27,24 +31,14 @@ #. Type: multiselect #. Description #: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:1002 -msgid -Locales are a framework to switch between multiple languages and allow users -to use their language, country, characters, collation order, etc. -msgstr -Locales sú infraštruktúra na prepínanie medzi viacerými jazykmi a umožňujú -používateľom používať ich jazyk, krajinu, poradie znakov atď. +msgid Locales are a framework to switch between multiple languages and allow users to use their language, country, characters, collation order, etc. +msgstr Locales sú infraštruktúra na prepínanie medzi viacerými jazykmi a umožňujú používateľom používať ich jazyk, krajinu, poradie znakov atď. #. Type: multiselect #. Description #: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:1002 -msgid -Please choose which locales to generate. UTF-8 locales should be chosen by -default, particularly for new installations. Other character sets may be -useful for backwards compatibility with older systems and software. -msgstr -Prosím zvoľte, ktoré locales sa majú vytvoriť. Štandardne by mali byť -zvolené UTF-8 locales, zvlášť na nových inštaláciách. Iné znakové sady môžu -byť užitočné pre spätnú kompatibilitu so staršími systémami a softvérom. +msgid Please choose which locales to generate. UTF-8 locales should be chosen by default, particularly for new installations. Other character sets may be useful for backwards compatibility with older systems and software. +msgstr Prosím zvoľte, ktoré locales sa majú vytvoriť. Štandardne by mali byť zvolené UTF-8 locales, zvlášť na nových inštaláciách. Iné znakové sady môžu byť užitočné pre spätnú kompatibilitu so staršími systémami a softvérom. #. Type: select #. Choices @@ -61,26 +55,14 @@ #. Type: select #. Description #: ../debhelper.in/locales.templates:2002 -msgid -Many packages in Debian use locales to display text in the correct language -for the user. You can choose a default locale for the system from the -generated locales. -msgstr -Mnohé balíky v Debiane používajú locales pre zobrazovanie textu v správnom -jazyku používateľa. Z vytvorených locales môžete zvoliť štandardné locale -systému. +msgid Many packages in Debian use locales to display text in the correct language for the user. You can choose a default locale for the system from the generated locales. +msgstr Mnohé balíky v Debiane používajú locales pre
r5296 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . control.in
Author: aurel32 Date: 2012-06-29 23:29:16 + (Fri, 29 Jun 2012) New Revision: 5296 Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog glibc-package/trunk/debian/control glibc-package/trunk/debian/control.in/main Log: * control.in/main: switch multiarch-support to priority: required. Closes: #677624. Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog === --- glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog2012-06-29 23:22:51 UTC (rev 5295) +++ glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog2012-06-29 23:29:16 UTC (rev 5296) @@ -7,6 +7,8 @@ * patches/localedata/submitted-es_MX-decimal_point.diff: fix thousand separator, use a space instead of a comma. * Update Slovak debconf translation, by Ivan Masár. Closes: #677919. + * control.in/main: switch multiarch-support to priority: required. Closes: +#677624. [ Samuel Thibault ] * patches/hurd-i386/libpthread_librt-link.diff: Remove patch, having Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/control === --- glibc-package/trunk/debian/control 2012-06-29 23:22:51 UTC (rev 5295) +++ glibc-package/trunk/debian/control 2012-06-29 23:29:16 UTC (rev 5296) @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ libc6 (= 2.13-5) [armhf i386], libc0.3 (= 2.13-5) [hurd-i386], libc0.1 (= 2.13-5) [kfreebsd-i386], -Priority: standard +Priority: required Description: Transitional package to ensure multiarch compatibility This is a transitional package used to ensure multiarch support is present in ld.so before unpacking libraries to the multiarch directories. It can Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/control.in/main === --- glibc-package/trunk/debian/control.in/main 2012-06-29 23:22:51 UTC (rev 5295) +++ glibc-package/trunk/debian/control.in/main 2012-06-29 23:29:16 UTC (rev 5296) @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ libc6 (= 2.13-5) [armhf i386], libc0.3 (= 2.13-5) [hurd-i386], libc0.1 (= 2.13-5) [kfreebsd-i386], -Priority: standard +Priority: required Description: Transitional package to ensure multiarch compatibility This is a transitional package used to ensure multiarch support is present in ld.so before unpacking libraries to the multiarch directories. It can -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1skkcn-0006zt...@vasks.debian.org
r5297 - glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches
Author: aurel32 Date: 2012-06-30 00:06:58 + (Sat, 30 Jun 2012) New Revision: 5297 Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/series Log: Fix commit r5295 Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/series === --- glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/series 2012-06-29 23:29:16 UTC (rev 5296) +++ glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/series 2012-06-30 00:06:58 UTC (rev 5297) @@ -118,11 +118,6 @@ hppa/cvs-test-tls-support.diff hppa/cvs-cloexec-nonblock.diff hppa/cvs-prlimit64.diff -hppa/local-EAGAIN.diff -hppa/ports-2011-08-31.diff -hppa/ports-2011-09-17.diff -hppa/ports-2011-10-30.diff -hppa/ports-2012-03-31.diff hurd-i386/local-dl-dynamic-weak.diff hurd-i386/local-enable-ldconfig.diff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1skldh-l9...@vasks.debian.org
r5298 - glibc-package/trunk/debian
Author: aurel32 Date: 2012-06-30 02:45:42 + (Sat, 30 Jun 2012) New Revision: 5298 Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog Log: Upload to unstable Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog === --- glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog2012-06-30 00:06:58 UTC (rev 5297) +++ glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog2012-06-30 02:45:42 UTC (rev 5298) @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -eglibc (2.13-34) UNRELEASED; urgency=low +eglibc (2.13-34) unstable; urgency=low [ Aurelien Jarno ] * patches/any/cvs-pthread-builtin-expect.diff: new patch from upstream to @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ * patches/hurd-i386/unsubmitted-mremap.diff: New hurd-only patch to comment MREMAP flags, unimplemented on the Hurd. - -- Aurelien Jarno aure...@debian.org Sun, 03 Jun 2012 22:51:53 +0200 + -- Aurelien Jarno aure...@debian.org Sat, 30 Jun 2012 01:44:32 +0200 eglibc (2.13-33) unstable; urgency=medium -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1skngs-0006ws...@vasks.debian.org
Bug#677624: marked as done (multiarch-support should be priority: required)
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jun 2012 03:04:55 + with message-id e1sknzt-00022i...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#677624: fixed in eglibc 2.13-34 has caused the Debian Bug report #677624, regarding multiarch-support should be priority: required to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 677624: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677624 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: multiarch-support Version: 2.13-33 Forwarding per Russ's observation that multiple required library packages are depending on multiarch-support, which causes Lintian to complain. Given that it is a transitional package, this shouldn't be a big deal, since it's less than 200k installed (and all of that package documentation overhead) Thanks, - Ted ---BeginMessage--- Theodore Ts'o ty...@mit.edu writes: If a required package (such as e2fslibs, which is required by e2fsprogs) provides multiarch support, then Lintian requires that the package have a dependency on the package multiarch-support[1]. However, this causes debcheck to complain because you now have a required package depending on a package, multiarch-support, which is only at standard priority[2] [1] http://lintian.debian.org/tags/missing-pre-dependency-on-multiarch-support.html [2] http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=unstablepackage=e2fsprogs What is the right thing to do to resolve this mutually irreconcilable set of complaints from either Lintian or debcheck? multiarch-support should be priority: required. It's already a dependency of several other priority: required packages, such as libselinux1 and zlib1g. That implies that in the interim you should ignore debcheck. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87aa05kxv0@windlord.stanford.edu ---End Message--- ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: eglibc Source-Version: 2.13-34 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of eglibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: eglibc-source_2.13-34_all.deb to main/e/eglibc/eglibc-source_2.13-34_all.deb eglibc_2.13-34.diff.gz to main/e/eglibc/eglibc_2.13-34.diff.gz eglibc_2.13-34.dsc to main/e/eglibc/eglibc_2.13-34.dsc glibc-doc_2.13-34_all.deb to main/e/eglibc/glibc-doc_2.13-34_all.deb libc-bin_2.13-34_amd64.deb to main/e/eglibc/libc-bin_2.13-34_amd64.deb libc-dev-bin_2.13-34_amd64.deb to main/e/eglibc/libc-dev-bin_2.13-34_amd64.deb libc6-dbg_2.13-34_amd64.deb to main/e/eglibc/libc6-dbg_2.13-34_amd64.deb libc6-dev-i386_2.13-34_amd64.deb to main/e/eglibc/libc6-dev-i386_2.13-34_amd64.deb libc6-dev_2.13-34_amd64.deb to main/e/eglibc/libc6-dev_2.13-34_amd64.deb libc6-i386_2.13-34_amd64.deb to main/e/eglibc/libc6-i386_2.13-34_amd64.deb libc6-pic_2.13-34_amd64.deb to main/e/eglibc/libc6-pic_2.13-34_amd64.deb libc6-prof_2.13-34_amd64.deb to main/e/eglibc/libc6-prof_2.13-34_amd64.deb libc6-udeb_2.13-34_amd64.udeb to main/e/eglibc/libc6-udeb_2.13-34_amd64.udeb libc6_2.13-34_amd64.deb to main/e/eglibc/libc6_2.13-34_amd64.deb libnss-dns-udeb_2.13-34_amd64.udeb to main/e/eglibc/libnss-dns-udeb_2.13-34_amd64.udeb libnss-files-udeb_2.13-34_amd64.udeb to main/e/eglibc/libnss-files-udeb_2.13-34_amd64.udeb locales-all_2.13-34_amd64.deb to main/e/eglibc/locales-all_2.13-34_amd64.deb locales_2.13-34_all.deb to main/e/eglibc/locales_2.13-34_all.deb multiarch-support_2.13-34_amd64.deb to main/e/eglibc/multiarch-support_2.13-34_amd64.deb nscd_2.13-34_amd64.deb to main/e/eglibc/nscd_2.13-34_amd64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 677...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Aurelien Jarno aure...@debian.org (supplier of updated eglibc package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 01:44:32 +0200 Source: eglibc Binary: libc-bin libc-dev-bin glibc-doc eglibc-source locales locales-all nscd
Bug#674412: marked as done (tcc: undefined symbol '__builtin_expect' on pthread_cleanup_push() call)
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jun 2012 03:04:55 +
with message-id e1sknzt-00022c...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#674412: fixed in eglibc 2.13-34
has caused the Debian Bug report #674412,
regarding tcc: undefined symbol '__builtin_expect' on pthread_cleanup_push()
call
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
674412: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674412
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: tcc
Version: 0.9.26~git20120104.83d57c0-5
Severity: normal
Hi,
When using pthread_cleanup_push() from a threaded function, tcc won't
compile. Please see the attached example file thread.c. Here is how it
compiles with gcc and tcc:
$ gcc -Wall -Wextra thread.c -pthread
thread.c: In function ‘clean_something’:
thread.c:3:28: warning: unused parameter ‘NULL_value’ [-Wunused-parameter]
$ tcc -Wall -Wextra thread.c -pthread
thread.c:10: warning: implicit declaration of function '__builtin_expect'
tcc: error: undefined symbol '__builtin_expect'
Cheers,
Matteo
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (900, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages tcc depends on:
ii dpkg 1.16.3
ii install-info 4.13a.dfsg.1-10
ii libc6 2.13-32
Versions of packages tcc recommends:
ii libc6-dev [libc-dev] 2.13-32
tcc suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
#include pthread.h
void clean_something(void* NULL_value)
{
// some code
}
void* thread_func(void* NULL_value)
{
pthread_cleanup_push(clean_something, NULL) ;
// some code
pthread_cleanup_pop(1) ;
pthread_exit(NULL_value) ;
}
int main(void)
{
pthread_t mythread ;
pthread_create(mythread, NULL, thread_func, NULL) ;
return 0 ;
}
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: eglibc
Source-Version: 2.13-34
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
eglibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
eglibc-source_2.13-34_all.deb
to main/e/eglibc/eglibc-source_2.13-34_all.deb
eglibc_2.13-34.diff.gz
to main/e/eglibc/eglibc_2.13-34.diff.gz
eglibc_2.13-34.dsc
to main/e/eglibc/eglibc_2.13-34.dsc
glibc-doc_2.13-34_all.deb
to main/e/eglibc/glibc-doc_2.13-34_all.deb
libc-bin_2.13-34_amd64.deb
to main/e/eglibc/libc-bin_2.13-34_amd64.deb
libc-dev-bin_2.13-34_amd64.deb
to main/e/eglibc/libc-dev-bin_2.13-34_amd64.deb
libc6-dbg_2.13-34_amd64.deb
to main/e/eglibc/libc6-dbg_2.13-34_amd64.deb
libc6-dev-i386_2.13-34_amd64.deb
to main/e/eglibc/libc6-dev-i386_2.13-34_amd64.deb
libc6-dev_2.13-34_amd64.deb
to main/e/eglibc/libc6-dev_2.13-34_amd64.deb
libc6-i386_2.13-34_amd64.deb
to main/e/eglibc/libc6-i386_2.13-34_amd64.deb
libc6-pic_2.13-34_amd64.deb
to main/e/eglibc/libc6-pic_2.13-34_amd64.deb
libc6-prof_2.13-34_amd64.deb
to main/e/eglibc/libc6-prof_2.13-34_amd64.deb
libc6-udeb_2.13-34_amd64.udeb
to main/e/eglibc/libc6-udeb_2.13-34_amd64.udeb
libc6_2.13-34_amd64.deb
to main/e/eglibc/libc6_2.13-34_amd64.deb
libnss-dns-udeb_2.13-34_amd64.udeb
to main/e/eglibc/libnss-dns-udeb_2.13-34_amd64.udeb
libnss-files-udeb_2.13-34_amd64.udeb
to main/e/eglibc/libnss-files-udeb_2.13-34_amd64.udeb
locales-all_2.13-34_amd64.deb
to main/e/eglibc/locales-all_2.13-34_amd64.deb
locales_2.13-34_all.deb
to main/e/eglibc/locales_2.13-34_all.deb
multiarch-support_2.13-34_amd64.deb
to main/e/eglibc/multiarch-support_2.13-34_amd64.deb
nscd_2.13-34_amd64.deb
to main/e/eglibc/nscd_2.13-34_amd64.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 674...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Aurelien Jarno aure...@debian.org (supplier of updated eglibc package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 01:44:32 +0200
Source: eglibc
Binary: libc-bin libc-dev-bin glibc-doc eglibc-source locales locales-all nscd
multiarch-support libc6 libc6-dev libc6-dbg libc6-prof libc6-pic libc6-udeb
libc6.1 libc6.1-dev libc6.1-dbg libc6.1-prof libc6.1-pic libc6.1-udeb libc0.3
libc0.3-dev
Bug#677919: marked as done (eglibc: [INTL:sk] Slovak po-debconf translation)
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jun 2012 03:04:55 + with message-id e1sknzt-00022l...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#677919: fixed in eglibc 2.13-34 has caused the Debian Bug report #677919, regarding eglibc: [INTL:sk] Slovak po-debconf translation to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 677919: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677919 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: eglibc Severity: wishlist Tags: l10n patch Version: 2.13-33 .po attached ~~helix84 sk.po Description: Binary data ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: eglibc Source-Version: 2.13-34 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of eglibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: eglibc-source_2.13-34_all.deb to main/e/eglibc/eglibc-source_2.13-34_all.deb eglibc_2.13-34.diff.gz to main/e/eglibc/eglibc_2.13-34.diff.gz eglibc_2.13-34.dsc to main/e/eglibc/eglibc_2.13-34.dsc glibc-doc_2.13-34_all.deb to main/e/eglibc/glibc-doc_2.13-34_all.deb libc-bin_2.13-34_amd64.deb to main/e/eglibc/libc-bin_2.13-34_amd64.deb libc-dev-bin_2.13-34_amd64.deb to main/e/eglibc/libc-dev-bin_2.13-34_amd64.deb libc6-dbg_2.13-34_amd64.deb to main/e/eglibc/libc6-dbg_2.13-34_amd64.deb libc6-dev-i386_2.13-34_amd64.deb to main/e/eglibc/libc6-dev-i386_2.13-34_amd64.deb libc6-dev_2.13-34_amd64.deb to main/e/eglibc/libc6-dev_2.13-34_amd64.deb libc6-i386_2.13-34_amd64.deb to main/e/eglibc/libc6-i386_2.13-34_amd64.deb libc6-pic_2.13-34_amd64.deb to main/e/eglibc/libc6-pic_2.13-34_amd64.deb libc6-prof_2.13-34_amd64.deb to main/e/eglibc/libc6-prof_2.13-34_amd64.deb libc6-udeb_2.13-34_amd64.udeb to main/e/eglibc/libc6-udeb_2.13-34_amd64.udeb libc6_2.13-34_amd64.deb to main/e/eglibc/libc6_2.13-34_amd64.deb libnss-dns-udeb_2.13-34_amd64.udeb to main/e/eglibc/libnss-dns-udeb_2.13-34_amd64.udeb libnss-files-udeb_2.13-34_amd64.udeb to main/e/eglibc/libnss-files-udeb_2.13-34_amd64.udeb locales-all_2.13-34_amd64.deb to main/e/eglibc/locales-all_2.13-34_amd64.deb locales_2.13-34_all.deb to main/e/eglibc/locales_2.13-34_all.deb multiarch-support_2.13-34_amd64.deb to main/e/eglibc/multiarch-support_2.13-34_amd64.deb nscd_2.13-34_amd64.deb to main/e/eglibc/nscd_2.13-34_amd64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 677...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Aurelien Jarno aure...@debian.org (supplier of updated eglibc package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 01:44:32 +0200 Source: eglibc Binary: libc-bin libc-dev-bin glibc-doc eglibc-source locales locales-all nscd multiarch-support libc6 libc6-dev libc6-dbg libc6-prof libc6-pic libc6-udeb libc6.1 libc6.1-dev libc6.1-dbg libc6.1-prof libc6.1-pic libc6.1-udeb libc0.3 libc0.3-dev libc0.3-dbg libc0.3-prof libc0.3-pic libc0.3-udeb libc0.1 libc0.1-dev libc0.1-dbg libc0.1-prof libc0.1-pic libc0.1-udeb libc6-i386 libc6-dev-i386 libc6-sparc64 libc6-dev-sparc64 libc6-s390 libc6-dev-s390 libc6-s390x libc6-dev-s390x libc6-amd64 libc6-dev-amd64 libc6-powerpc libc6-dev-powerpc libc6-ppc64 libc6-dev-ppc64 libc6-mipsn32 libc6-dev-mipsn32 libc6-mips64 libc6-dev-mips64 libc0.1-i386 libc0.1-dev-i386 libc6-i686 libc6-xen libc0.1-i686 libc0.3-i686 libc0.3-xen libc6.1-alphaev67 libc6-loongson2f libnss-dns-udeb libnss-files-udeb Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 2.13-34 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Aurelien Jarno aure...@debian.org Changed-By: Aurelien Jarno aure...@debian.org Description: eglibc-source - Embedded GNU C Library: sources glibc-doc - Embedded GNU C Library: Documentation libc-bin - Embedded GNU C Library: Binaries libc-dev-bin - Embedded GNU C Library: Development binaries libc0.1- Embedded GNU C Library: Shared libraries libc0.1-dbg - Embedded GNU C Library: detached debugging symbols libc0.1-dev - Embedded GNU C Library: Development Libraries and Header Files libc0.1-dev-i386 - Embedded GNU C Library: 32bit development libraries for AMD64 libc0.1-i386 - Embedded GNU C Library: 32bit shared libraries for AMD64 libc0.1-i686 - Embedded GNU C Library: Shared
Bug#678358: marked as done (hurd should not define AF_LINK .....)
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jun 2012 03:04:55 + with message-id e1sknzt-00022o...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#678358: fixed in eglibc 2.13-34 has caused the Debian Bug report #678358, regarding hurd should not define AF_LINK . to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 678358: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=678358 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: hurd Version: 20120605-2 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, *** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** ... or if it does should implement the relevant functionality including making a definition of the sockaddr_dl structure available. * What led up to the situation? In trying to NMU pmacct for #675836, I found that Hurd defines AF_LINK but does define the sockaddr_dl structure. One would hope it would be defined in the net/if_dl.h file as it is on kfreebsd. * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? I am looking at replacing #ifdef AF_LINK with #if defined(AF_LINK) !defined(__GNU__) * What was the outcome of this action? Some people seem to think it would be better if builds failed on Hurd. Other known cases of this occurring are: #256669 - efs2progs #636510 - erlang #676756 - netifaces If the known cases of this can be documented then hopefully the hacks can be removed once the underlying issue is fixed. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unreleased APT policy: (500, 'unreleased'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: hurd-i386 (i686-AT386) Kernel: GNU-Mach 1.3.99/Hurd-0.3 Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages hurd depends on: ii libc0.32.13-33+b1 ii libncursesw5 5.9-4 ii libparted0debian1 2.3-9.1 ii libtinfo5 5.9-4 ii libuuid1 2.20.1-1 ii netdde 0.0.20120520-1+b1 ii sysv-rc2.88dsf-18 Versions of packages hurd recommends: ii bf-utf-source 0.05-0.1 Versions of packages hurd suggests: pn hurd-doc none -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: eglibc Source-Version: 2.13-34 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of eglibc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: eglibc-source_2.13-34_all.deb to main/e/eglibc/eglibc-source_2.13-34_all.deb eglibc_2.13-34.diff.gz to main/e/eglibc/eglibc_2.13-34.diff.gz eglibc_2.13-34.dsc to main/e/eglibc/eglibc_2.13-34.dsc glibc-doc_2.13-34_all.deb to main/e/eglibc/glibc-doc_2.13-34_all.deb libc-bin_2.13-34_amd64.deb to main/e/eglibc/libc-bin_2.13-34_amd64.deb libc-dev-bin_2.13-34_amd64.deb to main/e/eglibc/libc-dev-bin_2.13-34_amd64.deb libc6-dbg_2.13-34_amd64.deb to main/e/eglibc/libc6-dbg_2.13-34_amd64.deb libc6-dev-i386_2.13-34_amd64.deb to main/e/eglibc/libc6-dev-i386_2.13-34_amd64.deb libc6-dev_2.13-34_amd64.deb to main/e/eglibc/libc6-dev_2.13-34_amd64.deb libc6-i386_2.13-34_amd64.deb to main/e/eglibc/libc6-i386_2.13-34_amd64.deb libc6-pic_2.13-34_amd64.deb to main/e/eglibc/libc6-pic_2.13-34_amd64.deb libc6-prof_2.13-34_amd64.deb to main/e/eglibc/libc6-prof_2.13-34_amd64.deb libc6-udeb_2.13-34_amd64.udeb to main/e/eglibc/libc6-udeb_2.13-34_amd64.udeb libc6_2.13-34_amd64.deb to main/e/eglibc/libc6_2.13-34_amd64.deb libnss-dns-udeb_2.13-34_amd64.udeb to main/e/eglibc/libnss-dns-udeb_2.13-34_amd64.udeb libnss-files-udeb_2.13-34_amd64.udeb to main/e/eglibc/libnss-files-udeb_2.13-34_amd64.udeb locales-all_2.13-34_amd64.deb to main/e/eglibc/locales-all_2.13-34_amd64.deb locales_2.13-34_all.deb to main/e/eglibc/locales_2.13-34_all.deb multiarch-support_2.13-34_amd64.deb to main/e/eglibc/multiarch-support_2.13-34_amd64.deb nscd_2.13-34_amd64.deb to main/e/eglibc/nscd_2.13-34_amd64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 678...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Aurelien Jarno aure...@debian.org (supplier of updated eglibc package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 01:44:32 +0200
Bug#679172: marked as done (libc-2.11.3.so: ls[8213]: segfault in libc-2.11.3.so)
Your message dated Fri, 29 Jun 2012 23:09:51 -0500 with message-id 20120630040906.GA3486@burratino and subject line [a...@users.sourceforge.net: Re: ls[8213]: segfault in libc-2.11.3.so] has caused the Debian Bug report #679172, regarding libc-2.11.3.so: ls[8213]: segfault in libc-2.11.3.so to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 679172: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679172 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: libc6-i686 Version: 2.11.3-3 Severity: normal File: libc-2.11.3.so Just found this in /var/log/kern.log and /var/log/messages: ls[8213]: segfault at 1ebbc787 ip b769aa53 sp bffcbc14 error 4 in libc-2.11.3.so[b7626000+14] ls seemed to work normally, though. -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0.5 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages libc6-i686 depends on: ii libc6 2.11.3-3 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib libc6-i686 recommends no packages. libc6-i686 suggests no packages. -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Forwarding with permission. ---BeginMessage--- Hi, Jonathan, I see what you mean. Looking at /var/log/kern.log again, I have just noticed something a bit strange: Jun 26 17:32:24 tulip kernel: [38097.453497] sshd[5014]: segfault at cebc3057 ip b7354a53 sp bfa6f364 error 5 in libc-2.11.3.so[b72e+14] Jun 26 17:32:26 tulip kernel: [38098.938167] sshd[5025]: segfault at ce7e33cf ip b734ea53 sp bfaccb34 error 5 in libc-2.11.3.so[b72da000+14] Jun 26 17:32:53 tulip kernel: [38126.483606] grep[5069]: segfault at 201f513b ip b76e0a53 sp bfaa7b34 error 4 in libc-2.11.3.so[b766c000+14] Jun 26 17:33:14 tulip kernel: [38147.117780] grep[5108]: segfault at 2041258b ip b76a1a53 sp bfdce394 error 4 in libc-2.11.3.so[b762d000+14] Jun 26 17:33:16 tulip kernel: [38148.904277] ls[5111]: segfault at 1fe9b770 ip b766da53 sp bf8413a4 error 4 in libc-2.11.3.so[b75f9000+14] Jun 26 22:03:10 tulip kernel: [54343.297123] ls[8213]: segfault at 1ebbc787 ip b769aa53 sp bffcbc14 error 4 in libc-2.11.3.so[b7626000+14] It never happened before, and the messages preceding (Jun 26 17:23:01 tulip kernel: [37534.196807]) and following (Jun 27 17:24:23 tulip kernel: [124015.641028]) the ones quoted here concern totally different things. And, of course, I cannot reproduce the problem. Sorry. I hope it is not a serious hardware problem. Very curious and a bit worried myself, Axel ---End Message--- ---End Message---
